2001 Big Brother Awards Announced 89
DaHat writes "ABC News.com is reporting that the latest round of Big Brother Awards are out. This years list includes the FBI's carnivore system being named "Most Invasive Proposal." The NSA won a "Lifetime Menace" award for, allegedly, "50 years of spying" on Americans and others and even the Florida company ChoicePoint was named "greatest corporate invader," for their actions during the Florida recount. Get the whole scoop and whole article here." We should have a different award, the Stalin award or something for entities advancing the destruction of the first ammendment. We can nominate the evil organizations oppressing freedom of speech like the RIAA, the MPAA, and Slashdot.
You want a sad day? (Score:1)
Oh man (Score:1)
Slashdot is fucked up again.
You guys really should consider not using MySQL.
while on the topic of the Florida recount (Score:1)
Awards? (Score:1)
Maybe you should... then you'd finally have something to update the "awards" section with! =^)
Re:NSA != spying on americans (Score:1)
You're not an American, so I'll cut you some slack!
:}
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
I'd also like to add, that despite the impression that people might have gotten from Saving Private Ryan, there were quite a lot of nationalities involved on the D-Day landing, including British, Australians, the free French, and many others.
************************************************ ** *
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
POLAND MY DEAR FRIEND!!!!!!
ADMIRED??? GO READ THE MINUTES OF THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE THIRD REICH AND THEIR FUCKING TALKS WITH YOUR PRIME MINISTER OF THEN... AND HOW THAT MOTHERFUCKER TALKED SO SWETTLY WITH THE SWINE THAT PISSED OFF YOUR COUNTRY
I'm not defending Stalin of what he did or didn't do. But let's put things on place, ok? Poland also was quite ready to get a good piece of Czechoslovakia where lived a polish majority. And they had big and sweet talks with Hitler about that. It's in the minutes of the Ministries of the III Reich and I read several copies of that shit. Middle to end of 1938 to ease to search...
Re:Slashdot too (Score:1)
Everything is still there, moderation is simply a automated, massive, editoral system. All the speach is still there.
Yeah, but what's the prize for the award? (Score:1)
How 'bout we give 'em a Slashdot Cruiser?
(On a side note, including the NSA with such a vague reason was lame.)
Cheers,
Re:You want a sad day? (Score:1)
What are you worried about? Got a hood and cloak stashed away somewhere?
~dlb
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
--
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Stalin was a butcher. But he was a Soviet butcher who lead Soviet Union and not America. And there were no First or Last Amendments of the likes. Pick up you OWN people for that and point out and leave Stalin alone. If anyone has anything to say about Stalin then it is Germans, Poles, Czecks, Slovaks, Yougoslavians, Chinese, Koreans, Georgians, Azeris, Tatarians, Russians and a several other tens of nations that lived in the grip of the Butcher of Nations. But you should THANK GOD that there was Stalin as he saved the world and YOU from being swallowed by the Nazi machinery. And NEVER DARE to forget about that!
Hitler couldn't even get across the English Channel. I think the Atlantic Ocean is a bit wider...
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Suggested Reading (Score:1)
Even if I did believe in God, I wouldn't thank Stalin for his contribution to WWII.
It has been said that only two men from the Bolshevik party could have suceeded in stopping the German war machine on the Soviet front, one being Stalin the other being Trotsky. Many of the ideas for the modernization of the Soviet Union that Stalin used were actually Trotsky's ideas. Trotsky saw that there was an abundance of minerals at the Ural mountains and that they needed to move factories there to prevent the destruction Soviet industry in case of attack from Europe. Trotsky was the one who came up with the 5 year plans. Trotsky was also a great general, if you have studied the revolution you would know that he lead the Red Army. But it was shown that Trotsky had more compassion for the Soviet people than Stalin. Stalin stole the leadership of the Soviet Union and murdered tens of millions of people, whether it be from lack of safety in his 5 year plans, or the GULag, or what he did in WWII.
Stalin threw divisions of soldiers who did not have guns at the Germans. If a general retreated for any reason what-so-ever and survived, he was executed. The only reason why Stalin did as well as he did during WWII was not because he was a military genius but because he cared so little about the Soviet people that he was willing to sacrifice every last one of them in order to defeat Germany.
The Allies would have eventually defeated the Nazis. The Russians sped the processes up dramatically, but by the end of the war all of factories in Europe could not compete with the production of the United States. That is a KNOW FACT! There were factories in Detroit that were producing a B-29 EVERY DAY! No factory in the Luftwafa had that capability.
I refuse to thank a person who is responsible for the deaths of more than 40 million people, and that number continues to grow as more records are uncovered. Stalin should never be praised, anything he did that might be considered "good" came from him standing on the dead bodies of giants. It sickens me to think that someone would praise Stalin, who I consider the most evil man of the 20th century.
And yes, I have studied the differences between Stalinism and Leninism. I have studied Russian and Soviet history, and I have quite a few good friends who are Russian who I talk to about their culture's history.
SIGINT???? (Score:1)
>however, it specializes in SIGINT while the CIA
>does...
You mean every time I type Ctrl-C to terminate a program, the NSA is watching?
From now on I'll stick to "kill -9 %1"
Re:McNealy was right - Get over it. (Score:1)
Re:McNealy was right - Get over it. (Score:1)
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Alright, first off - Stalin abridged the personal rights of the Russians just as most dictators do. He's not especially known for it, it just comes with the job - so he may not be the best example, but he's certianly *a* valid example. Second, why don't you stop thinking that all Americans are ignorant? And stop taking the words of one American to represent them all?
Stalin was a butcher. But he was a Soviet butcher who lead Soviet Union and not America. And there were no First or Last Amendments of the likes. Pick up you OWN people for that and point out and leave Stalin alone. If anyone has anything to say about Stalin then it is Germans, Poles, Czecks, Slovaks, Yougoslavians, Chinese, Koreans, Georgians, Azeris, Tatarians, Russians and a several other tens of nations that lived in the grip of the Butcher of Nations. But you should THANK GOD that there was Stalin as he saved the world and YOU from being swallowed by the Nazi machinery. And NEVER DARE to forget about that!
Ahh. So being a citizen of America disqualifies me as a citizen of the world? There are not many of "our OWN" people that compare to Stalin - the system doesn't allow for it, and we haven't had as much time. Also - I could think god for "Stalin saving the world." OR I could thank god for Turing and the COLOSSUS, or I could thank god that the Nazis didn't make more U-boats, or I could thank god they used the enigma insecurely, or I could thank god for any of the thousands of factors that contributed to the winning of the war - Saying that one factor out of thousands saved the world is showing a very narrow view of the situation.
Pick up you McCarthy's, Hoover's, Nixon's for that First Amendment of yours... And never forget History. And if you have any troubles about this then go and pick some old films of the 50's and look at your First Amendment and how it worked. Btw, on Slashdot someone, not long ago, published a link to such type of archive. I took some of those films and OH MY. How you loved Uncle Joe in the 40's... And how you HATED him and Russia in the 50's. You hated SO MUCH that you could not say a correct thing about Russia's History or say Lenin's true name...
Whatever. I'm tired of typing, and I can't be held accountable for what people did in my country before I was born.
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Indeed. And Stalin (who we were talking about) killed 60 million, thru summary executions, planned famine and gulag, and is thought to have been "our savior from Hitler", almost a "nice guy". (Shudder).
/Dervak
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Imaginating having to do that in Japan made a lot of people thankful that Uranium and Plutonium tended to do their thing with a lot of gusto.
There was no need for Hiroshima. There was no need for invading Japan at all. Japans war machine was totally broken; they had almost no warships or aircraft left and their factories were being pulverized by the minute. The US could have simply stopped there and made peace - after all, Japan had already lost all conquered land. They were no threat anymore. But of course the US wanted vengeance.
I dont see fire-bombing or nuking civilian cities with almost no military significance as any less warcrime or any less horrific than gassing people in camps. But, as we all know, history is written by the victors.
/Dervak
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
"huhuhuhh, go away. we're like closed or something"
Hmm... (Score:1)
It ought to be (Score:1)
--
Re:Stalin awards (Score:1)
--
Move '.sig'
Re:Slashdot too (Score:1)
Until it's archived. Then all 0 and -1 posts go to
Example: http://slashdot.org/articles/00/11/09/1715248.sht
kickin' science like no one else can,
my dick is twice as long as my attention span.
Re:Stalin awards (Score:1)
The Volksempfänger [geocities.com]. Yeah, I can see that award taking off :) You could call them the "Volkies", I guess!
--
US gov't still rules (Score:1)
Re:You want a sad day? (Score:1)
Very interesting. Can you supply us with proof of your point? If not, then you are just talking out your ass.
And by the way, the NSA requires approval from the attorney general to collect information on US soil, whether it involves US citizens or not.
Yes, the FBI and the NSA would never do anything illeagle. They have always kept within the law. Is this your point? Try doing a web search for the word "COINTELPRO". Then come back and tell us you have nothing to fear from this goverment.
Re:Stalin awards (Score:1)
What a evil world we live in (Score:1)
The RIAA is another super evil for attacking "free speech" I love free speech to death, and would definately be annoyed if I could not complain about stuff out loud, however that does not mean I have the right to piracy. Any bimbo can log on and copy any album they want. That can't be just "Free speech". I have always felt the RIAA is going about this wrong for they will never be able to stop the pirates, for piracy has been around forever, and that they should work out a system where the musician is paid once, handsomly, to create the hit and then it is made publicaly available and it is up to the individuals to spend the transfering costs, however I do not feel they are evil for trying to protect their profits. This is similiar to the MS monopoly. We all hate them b/c they are the big monopoly. Howeve,r how did they get there? If there were other products that were as convinient for business and people to use as MS, then the businesses would, b/c they care about themselves more then a/b MS, and would gladly switch if it meant money saved. This is not flamebait, and I'm going to hope that I either get moderated down enough that nobody reads this, or that those who do do'nt send me e-mails calling me some sort of neo-facist or something. But I had to add my two cents beause I feel the nerd community tends to attack things without really having a good reason.
Re:No Shit! (Score:1)
Re:McNealy was right - Get over it. (Score:1)
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Here, a bit from one of my essays;
The battle of Stalingrad was a bloody siege which lasted from August '42 to January '43. In this battle alone the Germans lost
400,000 troops
1.5 million Germans surrendered
3500 tanks,
12,000 guns and mortars,
75,000 vehicles
3,000 aircraft
This left the entire German army greatly over extended, while the Russian strategy of a `reflexive line` (bend under pressure, then attack the `fire bucket` located inside of the bend) effectively dealt with the German offensive movements.
The russians did not win the war - though they did divide the german front (into 3 parts, because the italians were constantly fucking up and Hitler sent troops to "reinforce them"
China was being raped by the japanese, and the japanese hoped to meet the germans a few months after d-day.
They (russians) lost troops to the Germans at a rate of 2:1 (either killed or surrendered)
Also - we had the fucking bomb (admittedly, a bit too late, but firebombing berlin (or dresden -
BTW - more japanese were killed in the firebombing of tokyo than the A-Bomb attack on the other cities. firebombing from the outside in was a really wonderful practice (i.e. so that people couldn't run out of the city, as that part was already in flames)
I digress - firebombs had the same effect )
The germans did not have an impregnable air defense - carpet bombing with nukes woulda been cool. 'nuff said.
It woulda been really interesting if normandy had not happened. But thats another discussion.
But, after all, I'm Polish, so I can't forget the fact that the fucking russians went to bed with hitler when he invaded poland.
Or the fucking French and British - who pledged to defend us. Took 40 years for the poles to be free from some despot.
Whatver, flame on. Fact is, there were agreements which were not honoured.
Oh.. Russians were under orders to kill those on their side who surrendered before firing at enemy troops.
i.e. firing at germans. White flag goes up. Russians fire on white flag. Flag goes down, resume firing at germans.
Fuckit, it seems that few on
Oh.. couldn't resist - Lenin? you mean Vlad?
I have a shotgun, a shovel and 30 acres behind the barn.
And who the fuck modded this up? (Score:1)
I have a shotgun, a shovel and 30 acres behind the barn.
don't get your comment... (Score:1)
I have a shotgun, a shovel and 30 acres behind the barn.
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Yay First Amendment (Score:1)
I'm glad we have freedom of speech so we can speel wurds n e way we want.
(Yeah, yeah, I'm a bad man.)
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
> peace - after all, Japan had already lost all
> conquered land. They were no threat anymore.
> But of course the US wanted vengeance.
No, the US wanted to avoid a repeat of 1918.
If there was one thing WWI taught the Allies,
it was that you had to *finish* the job, or
it would be to do all over again the next
generation.
Chris Mattern
Re:Sad Day Indeed... (Score:1)
Re:McNealy was right - Get over it. (Score:1)
Yeah, Europe has even more pathetic laws requiring people to have internal equivalent of passport.
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Nobody outside of Germany even suspected how disastrous it will end.
BTW.
I suspect that couple hundred years from now Hitler will be viewed in much better light than it is now.
After all, Caesar was just as cruel and caused (comparatively to his means) just as much suffering and death and yet he is not regarded as a grand murderer.
Stalin on the other hand was more like Nero; his extreme cruelty was mainly directed at his own people.
Anyway, I would much prefer living under Hitler rule.
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Whow, amazing!
If you are as much interested in history as you claim it would not be that difficult to find out that Poland used to be one of the most powerfull countries in Europe in xv-xvii century and having "its own damn" country is not that much considering where they come from.
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
You know, it does not take a genius to keep sending guys waiting for other side to run out of bullets
"Or maybe not them, but the public" (Score:1)
Oracle (Score:1)
Good news! (Score:1)
I wonder what Microsoft got... (Score:1)
You think USA citizens are in trouble? (Score:1)
Hmmm, but what if you wanted to be a politician? (Score:1)
Well, I'm not stupid, (valedictorian in high school, like many other /.'ers, I'm sure) and no one has offered me a Megabuck or two, but I'm considering putting my life in the public eye. My current plan is to get a degree in Law, Political Science and CS (as a backup in case of disillusionment) and maybe head into politics, while documenting and posting a *ton* of information about my personal finances, life, etc. on the web.
I figure, if you want to have the privilege of holding power in the world, you should be held accountable for your personal life. For instance, one criticism of liberals is that they spend other people'a money,(the taxpayers) and get the credit for it, all the while contributing next to nothing to charity. I plan on tithing 10% at least, and putting up my personal financial records of it so that I hold myself above that reproach. This is giving the public more information about me than most would feel comfortable with, but I feel that this and other rules dictate the way I should live my life.
We don't have a shortage of intelligent people in politics, we have a shortage of honest, intelligent people. The guy mentioned yesterday on /. is an exception to that rule, as are many others (Colin Powell, for one), but the goodguys are mostly outnumbered by the venal and the incompetent. I plan to do my bit to change that.
Politics is more attractive to me than pure science at this point, since science seems to me to have the same drawbacks as professional sports: You have only 15, maybe 20 years at your peak when you can be counted among the best in the world.(check the age that most Nobel-winning scientists were at when they did their best work) Politicians, however, don't peak until middle-aged or older, though the climb up takes a bit longer than in science. And furthermore, I feel that America has a large enough supply of geniuses in science work today, given that we get the cream of the crop from other countries too. We don't have enough able, honest politicians who give a damn, though. So I'll have less competition to work against in making my mark. :)
OTOH, some may classify politicians as 'not human' on principle...:P That ignores, however, those few good men that *are* in office today, though, and things like that can be discouraging to them. :( So don't mentally damn *every* politican out there. Public service is poorly rewarding enough as is...
-----
IANASRP- I am not a self-referential phrase
-----
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
Is it typo, or are ueo trying to say something?
Sad Day Indeed... (Score:1)
I think government needs to get with the times and adobt policies that fit accordingly. The RIAA has assumed an almost Gestapo-like role lately, and the last time there was a Gestapo we went to war... makes me wander what could be looming around the corner for us now.
Syn
Re:Sad Day Indeed... (Score:1)
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:1)
No one is saying that the Russians didn't put up a heroic fight during ww2. What impressed me the most about the Russians was how they moved all the factories east of the caucasus (sp?) mountains and out of the range of the german bombers. The point I was making was that Stalin/Russia were not the saviors of the west. Sure they contributed blood and resources, but so did everyone else. And I don't think either side could have won without the other
By the way, in american high schools and in english language documentaries, we're taught that the americans got to berlin first and didn't take the city so that the russians could. I'm not sure which of our history educations is distorted more.
Re:McNealy was right - Get over it. (Score:1)
has lots of germs, is loud and offensive, and only speaks one language
I thought that was how all the french were.
McNealy was right - Get over it. (Score:1)
Since your government tracks you all by a unique number (Social Security ID) which is illegal in most European states, your privacy is effectively dead. You have one choice, so eloquently phrased by Scott McNealy: GET OVER IT.
Really, I mean who really cares about all that information anyway.
Wow (Score:1)
Re:Wow (Score:1)
This is funny (Score:1)
Slashdot too (Score:2)
Re:McNealy was right - Get over it. (Score:2)
Or are all my european friends lying to me?
CIA and NSA on world, FBI on Americans. (Score:2)
Btw, I don't mean to be redundant here -- all the other refutations were by ACs, and not explicit in their subject lines.
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:2)
No Berlin was sorrounded even before western allies made it to the Elba river, which is quite far from Berlin... In fact Berlin was well located inside the territory ocuppied by the soviets. However due to agreements, Stalin gave a good piece of Berlin to the western allies. Later when relations with US got to frost level, Moscow decided to rise that same Berlin Wall that sorrounded completely West Berlin from the rest of Germany. Until the 80's most if not all contact with the West was made through air.
On what concerns the take of Berlin then one should note that it was one of the biggest battles of WWII. Russians had to overcome an heavily defended fortification line and to fight for every corner. Only the Reichstag (the center of the Nazi Government) took days to be conquered. Historians note that reports about the fight of Reichstag were made on the basis of what floor was conquered.
Re:And who the fuck modded this up? (Score:2)
Lived 40 years under Soviet occupation. Who told you to run to Hitler to ask for a piece of Czechoslovakia. It's on there and it is not pretty. So don't try to be more saint that Molotov Ribbentrop or anyone else. Everyone was trading Europe with Hitler. E-V-E-R-Y-O-N-E. And Poland was one of them. And that helped Hitler to get Czechoslovakia to its knees. And get you later you fools...
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:2)
So, for political maturity, first pick up your own. We don't say Reaganomics when someone picks up shitty liberalism and pisses off the whole country...
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:2)
In 1938 the only problem with Poland was some minor "worries" about Dantzig (now Gdansk). And how these guys talking about butchering the Czechoslovakia. Poland was even ready to send troops to help Germany deal with the Sudetes.
So I can't stand that people speak only about poor Poland... There is only one poor country here and that's Czechoslovakia. They were the first. And everyone was agreeing or helping the butchering. Poland was acting on it... So?..
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:2)
You speak about Normandy. Germans were 24 kilometers from the center of Moscow. And it was holiday in Russia. And you know what these Russian bastards did??? They openly marched! Stalin alone in the tribune and echelons of soldiers and tanks marching in October's Revolution Day. And by that time any German General could see the Red Square's buildings through a damn binocule! You weren't even in the war when that thing happened. And in a few days they beated the Germans so badly that they had to go back a few hundreds of kilometers.
And your politicians did want Berlin before Russians... But if someone says "nado" to "nado" and only God stops the roar.
Re:Stalin awards (Score:2)
Or how 'bout the "Black Marker" awards.
other ideas:
muzzle awards
turncoat awards
the draconies
we say so awards
Re:Hmm... ABC would know (Score:2)
ANy way, another company that people should be on the watch for is planetu. Of course that is if you use a coupon and a frequent buyers card. They are linking off line shopping habits with online coupons. And collecting lots of information on who you are (name address etc), as well as what you shop for, (mainly groceries now, but who knows later), and how often. Scary to me. And they build an online / offline database about you. Good idea behind what they are trying to acomplish, but to big brotherish for me.
This is only the beginning. Choicepoint is only the first step in 'identity' theft and making the little guy (like me) getting f***** over by the system in some way. Suddenly the police show up at your door for something that you did not do, but you cannot prove it cause your identity has been stolen. Oh this happened to a friend of mine. Well sort of...
I don't want a lot, I just want it all!
Flame away, I have a hose!
European Brothers (Score:2)
brrr....
Pictures [tofz.org]from the event are available on my site [tofz.org], though... =)
Re:What a evil world we live in (Score:2)
NO HUMAN would go and put their entire life into public eyes unless they were
a) stupid
b) getting the chance to win a million dollars.
I have no complaints with them listening into my phone calls or reading my e-mail
Maybe it sounds cliche if I say this, but honestly, go to a book store or chapters or whatever, and pick up 1984 by George Orwell. READ it. Think about it. See where things CAN go when personal liberties and rights are squashed to nothingness. Then ask yourself, "Do I really want to live in a world like that?"
Re:McNealy was right - Get over it. (Score:2)
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:2)
Victor Suvorov [sunysb.edu]
Re:NSA != spying on americans (Score:2)
Um (Score:2)
Do the story posters do this for their own benefit? To show that they made a joke?
Link to the actual award site. (Score:2)
As well as the news article this link [privacyinternational.org] probably should have been included in the story as well.
Where is Microsoft? (Score:2)
i see.. (Score:2)
Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:3)
Stalin was a butcher. But he was a Soviet butcher who lead Soviet Union and not America. And there were no First or Last Amendments of the likes. Pick up you OWN people for that and point out and leave Stalin alone. If anyone has anything to say about Stalin then it is Germans, Poles, Czecks, Slovaks, Yougoslavians, Chinese, Koreans, Georgians, Azeris, Tatarians, Russians and a several other tens of nations that lived in the grip of the Butcher of Nations. But you should THANK GOD that there was Stalin as he saved the world and YOU from being swallowed by the Nazi machinery. And NEVER DARE to forget about that!
Pick up you McCarthy's, Hoover's, Nixon's for that First Amendment of yours... And never forget History. And if you have any troubles about this then go and pick some old films of the 50's and look at your First Amendment and how it worked. Btw, on Slashdot someone, not long ago, published a link to such type of archive. I took some of those films and OH MY. How you loved Uncle Joe in the 40's... And how you HATED him and Russia in the 50's. You hated SO MUCH that you could not say a correct thing about Russia's History or say Lenin's true name...
Re:NSA != spying on americans (Score:3)
I'm in the USA. If you're not and you're reading this, then the NSA is reading my words, even though I'm a private citizen.
Stalin awards (Score:3)
that would rock, we just need a
ball and chain (Score:3)
I think the winner would be windows XP hands down, but the restrictions on things like copy "protected" hard drives are pretty ball and chainy too.
IBM for selling computers? (Score:3)
Lifetime Menace, Runners Up
IBM for years of selling computers to developing countries that are used to suppress populations and for lobbying against privacy laws and standards wordlwide
IBM awarded, partly, for selling computers to developing countries that are used to suppress populations? Doesn't every company in the US try to sell computers to as many other countries as it can? Should Linus get mentioned for a reward because the Chinese government (who don't give a damn about privacy) get to use Linux (and for free)?
OH BROTHER (Score:3)
Re:McNealy was right - Get over it. (Score:3)
NSA != spying on americans (Score:4)
Come on people, I'm not even American and I know these things.
Flip side of Privacy International awards (Score:4)
Neither ABCNews nor the Slashdot write-up seem to link to the actual Privacy International site [privacyinternational.org] or their 2001 US Big Brother Awards page [privacyinternational.org].
Also, the ABCNews article and Slashdot write-up dwell entirely on the privacy violators, while the original site also mentions that
...and awards the Brandeis Award to...
These are the good guys (and girls). They deserve some recognition, too.
-M
You're smart; why haven't you learned Python yet? http://diveintopython.org [diveintopython.org]
Re:Leave Stalin alone ok? (Score:5)
In fact one should say that Europe was saved by the Soviets while US did the same for Asia and Oceania. If these two countries didn't do what they did then 80% of europeans would probably be slaves or near that. And millions would have ended in a factory or have its skin turned to shoes.
Normandy was a Hell. Sorry but even you americans of today may not totally understand this. In fact only veterans may say what is to stand in a shoreline with Hell falling on you. That should be honored.
But one should also note how many such Hells Russians have seen:
Smolensk
Leningrad
Moscow
Stalingrad
Sevastopol
Kursk and its famous Pokrovka Battle
Kiev
Minsk
And several others. Near Leningrad once Russians lost no less than 200000 soldiers in a German flank attack. Till now people dig their bones from that place...
And note. The first and the only complete Techno Battle that ever happened in History is Pokrovka. Not even Desert Storm goes near it. In Pokrovka both sides had infantry completely pissed off and went full contact with tanks and artillery. Just try to imagine thousands of tanks and other machinery go against each other in a small piece of land... And don't think about those "slow" tanks from films. There the T-34 jumped over the barricades and hills, a heavy German artillery pieces played face to face to several more maneuvarable Russians. And the same happened with Russian artillery cars and German tanks. Russians and Germans not only shot each other as crunched their tanks against each other.
Normandy. Ok I honour the vets who where there. But please people don't say it was the biggest and the best. Not even mighty Pokrovka has this title. That was Stalingrad.