New Tax in Canada on Blank Recordable Media 22
Adrift writes ""Following the recently concluded public review of the current
private copying levies, the Copyright Board announced today that it is setting new levies on blank audio recording media. Effective January 1, 2001, private copying levies will increase to 29 on audio cassette tapes of 40 minutes or longer (remaining zero for tapes of shorter length), 21 on CD-Rs and CD-RWs and 77 on CD-R Audio, CD-RW Audio and MiniDiscs. Manufacturers and importers of blank audio recording media are required to pay these levies to the Canadian Private Copying Collective (CPCC) when these media are sold in Canada." The Copyright Board's announcement is here."
Yawn. (Score:1)
International Orders? (Score:2)
Re:Well, if the people have to pay the tax... (Score:3)
Re:International Orders? (Score:1)
But not on hard disks? (Score:2)
Re:Yawn. (Score:2)
Well, if the people have to pay the tax... (Score:3)
Oh wait. That's the way they want it.
_______
Scott Jones
Newscast Director / ABC19 WKPT
Re:Well, if the people have to pay the tax... (Score:1)
it's cheap (Score:1)
--
Re:Taxable Media (Score:1)
Re:Yawn. (Score:2)
Nope. (Score:3)
This levy only applies to blank recording media resold in Canada, and is remitted by resellers. This means that (a) the first reseller is usually a wholesaler/distributor (except when a retailer imports the media directly), (b) the levy is never collected by a customs agency, (c) you never have to remit the levy for media imported that will not be resold (while blank).
The limitation to blank recording media is interesting: If I import CD-RWs, and then resell them already recorded with something, it would seem that I don't have to pay the levy. =)
(See Neil Herber's FAQ on the levy [neil.eton.ca] for plenty more useful information.)
Re:Well, if the people have to pay the tax... (Score:1)
Small price that I'm quite willing to pay... (Score:2)
An aside - if I understand correctly, because of this, Napster is arguably legal here, at least to download from.
A FAQ on the levy is available at http://neil.eton.ca/copylevy.shtml [neil.eton.ca] which includes this very interesting bit:
Re:big brother (Score:1)
CD-R vs. CD-R audio?! (Score:1)
-Erf C.
Re:CD-R vs. CD-R audio?! (Score:1)
I beleive this information is pre-burned somewhere near the hub of the CDR-Audio disc (but am probably wrong).
CD-Recorders relying on a computer for control are primarialy to be used for data, and therefore no "artist compensation" is necessary. That's why computer CD-Recorders will burn on any CDR. No, I don't get why they will still burn Audio CDs without checks, but I sure ain't gonna complain.
Here in Canada the price difference between CDR-Audio and plain CDR is extreme (or was). Since DR-Audio isn't popular the biggest packs I usually find are 3 packs. These go for about $8 CAN ($2.6 per disc!) . 100 spindles of "normal" CDs can be gotten for $40-50 ($0.4 - $0.5 per disc).
Heh... I'm off to www.futureshop.ca to see if I can get any CDRs before this levy makes its way into their prices.
Re:it's cheap (Score:1)
Re:CD-R vs. CD-R audio?! (Score:2)
The difference: Price and tax. Sometimes CD-R Audio when used in those cd copiers (the music only ones) will set a flag that will prevent a copy from being made of a copy. Only in the audio-copiers though.
For computer users they are they same but cost more :-)
--
From: Aaron "PooF" Matthews
Re:Yawn. (Score:2)
The money goes into the general fund, like any other tax. It is not earmarked for medical research or any other activity that might benefit smokers.
Re:Yawn. (Score:1)
Not an attack or anything, but do you have any information or links to back this up? I'm quite skeptical -- to me it always just looked like a simple sin tax.
Look on the brightside (Score:1)