RIP vs. Human Rights Act 4
Oostendorpophile writes "Yikes: http://www.cnn.com/2000/TECH/computing/10/05/uk.snoop.v.eu.idg/index.html" The powers the UK government has awarded to itself with the new RIP bill appear to conflict with rights guaranteed under the Europe-wide Human Rights Act.
uk politicians != sense :) (Score:1)
I think there's more stuff about it for the uninformed at www.stand.org.uk and there's some interesting transcripts at the UK parliament web sites..
I have many (Score:1)
Firstly it's RIPA, not RIP, and you could have at least made a lame `Rest in Peace` joke.
I prefered the olden days when hordes of people with more swords than you ruled commoners like titans. It was so much more clean-cut and thrust.
I just love the wording: "gaining routine access to business communications".... oh, so long as they're business communications and not personal. "[caller consent required bar] activities such as downloading pornography)"... I love pornography and it's a protected right.
Honestly, this Kuro5hin article [kuro5hin.org] summed up the points better than I ever could.
Human Rights in US? (Score:3)
--
Re:I have many. (Score:2)
As I understand it, it was the RIP bill until it passed, at which point it became an Act of Parliment (the RIP Act)
Sorry, ran out of lame RIP jokes already discussing this abomination...
--