
Quebec To Impose French-Language Quotas On Streaming Giants 91
Quebec Culture Minister Mathieu Lacombe has introduced Bill 109, which would require streaming platforms like Netflix and Spotify to feature and prioritize French-language content. CBC.ca reports: Bill 109 has been in the works for over a year. It marks the first time that Quebec would set a "visibility quota" for French-language content on major streaming platforms such as Netflix, Disney and Spotify. [...] The legislation, titled An Act to affirm the cultural sovereignty of Quebec and to enact the Act respecting the discoverability of French-language cultural content in the digital environment, would apply to every digital platform that offers a service for watching videos or listening to music and audiobooks online. Those include Canadian platforms such as Illico, Crave and Tou.tv. It would amend the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms to enshrine "the right to discoverability of and access to original French-language cultural content."
If the bill is adopted, streaming platforms and television manufacturers would be forced to present interfaces for screening online videos in French by default. Those interfaces would need to provide access to platforms that offer original French-language cultural content based on the government's pending criteria. Financial penalties would be imposed on companies that don't follow the rules. If the business models of some companies prevent them from keeping to the letter of the proposed law, companies would be allowed to enter into an agreement with the Quebec government to set out "substitute measures" to fulfil Bill 109 obligations differently. "We don't want to exempt them. We're telling them, 'let's negotiate substitute measures,'" Lacombe told reporters.
If the bill is adopted, streaming platforms and television manufacturers would be forced to present interfaces for screening online videos in French by default. Those interfaces would need to provide access to platforms that offer original French-language cultural content based on the government's pending criteria. Financial penalties would be imposed on companies that don't follow the rules. If the business models of some companies prevent them from keeping to the letter of the proposed law, companies would be allowed to enter into an agreement with the Quebec government to set out "substitute measures" to fulfil Bill 109 obligations differently. "We don't want to exempt them. We're telling them, 'let's negotiate substitute measures,'" Lacombe told reporters.
Here's my contribution to French language quota (Score:2, Interesting)
The Guard dies, it doesn't surrender!
or, as it was originally uttered at Watrerloo:
Merde!
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I thought that was Joual [youtube.com]..
Francais (Score:2)
Sacre Bleu!
Tribalism (Score:5, Informative)
Tribalism will end humanity. Too many human brains are programmed to be tribalistic instead of humanist. It's not going to turn out well.
Re: Tribalism (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Canada as a whole, like a America, is a settler society where this is possible. Quebec is a vestige of the Old World, fighting tooth and nail against not the New Man but against then same old Man who decided to pull his head out of his ass.
Canada's society is only partially removed from the British colonialism we descended from. Central Canada (formally ON and QC, but informally Toronto and Montreal) rules over Eastern and Western Canada like colonies. With all the votes clustered there what the 401 says goes. For many federal governments the rest of the country does not really matter, and are often an inconvenience. This was entirely by design a couple hundred years ago, but it has not aged as well as many would like to think.
Re: (Score:2)
Which is a strange way of saying "F--- you Frenchies, adopt *MY* culture!"
Re: (Score:3)
The grandparent post didn't demand Canadians speak English or French, only that this cultural divide is not healthy. Canadians are naturally shifting to predominately speak English and this is upsetting to some people in the Quebec government. If there is a middle ground on this then perhaps everyone can meet there.
These kind of laws are exactly the "middle ground" you are talking about. One side wants Quebec to be an independant country. One otherside wants to assimilate Quebec into an English-speaking Canada (and one third side wants Canada to be the 51st state but that's offtopic).
The middle ground is Quebec remains in Canada, but is allowed to protect its language and culture (which wouldn't need that much protection to begin with if it were a country). Part of the protection of the French language is Canada-wide.
Re: (Score:2)
If it weren't for the efforts from the Quebec government to preserve the French language in Canada then I would expect the people in and around Quebec to have their own kind of "cityspeak" that took in elements of English, French, and perhaps other languages.
Which would be a bad news for Quebec because it wouldn't be possible anymore to communicate with people from France and other French-speaking countries.
Why would this necessarily be true? English is spoken in the UK, US, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Each country has different localizations in terms of distinct vocabulary, accents, and even grammar. Yet, people from these countries can easily communicate with each other, even with no training.
Re: Tribalism (Score:2)
Not without laughing though. Quebecois rarely fails to make me smile, as a French native. There are various anglicisms in the language spoken in France and Quebec, but they are often not for the same words, and that does create some surmountable difficulties.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure but English is not "cityspeak". The OP said that without language laws, Quebec would no longer speak French, and wouldn't speak English either. That resulting new language is what I would call bad news. I'm glad schools standardize French to some point to prevent that from happening.
Re: (Score:2)
What are you on about? Karens are the racists tribalist. Tribalism says that when people outside your tribe are starving you shouldn't care. As for bitching, it's you tribalists that bitch about immigrants and people outside your tribe.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't want to out anyone, and my username is at least fairly consistent across sites (though there are all sorts of people using this moniker and are not me), but I fairly recently had an online conversation with a gentleman. I was quite surprised, taken aback even...
They said that they did not like Ubuntu (it was a Linux-related site) because of Ubuntu's "humanist" traits.
As far as I can tell, they're a bit religious but not like into 'racial superiority' types of things. They seem to be fine with me, an
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Tribalism (Score:2)
Everyone is tribalistic. It's just that some people's tribes include more of the world than orders.
Re: (Score:2)
Once civilisation started, we started helping each other survive on an industrial scale. People who would normally fail to reproduce now manage to. So survival of the fittest lost its cutting edge. So we've hardly evolved since pre-civilisation. Hence our biological instincts are oriented towards living in small isolated tribes. And as a culture we're collapsing back to that pre-civilisation psychology. In previous generations, hardship motivated us to work together, and religion played a role to. We've got
Re: (Score:2)
I'm undecided on this. On the one hand there doesn't seem to be much benefit to children to teach them Welsh, as we do in the UK. It's only used by a relatively small population, so has little value as a qualification, and is part of a family of little used languages so don't help much with travel.
On the other hand, being bilingual does have advantages in terms of understanding your primary language better, and making it easier to leader a 3rd language. I'm not sure Welsh is the ideal 2nd language for this,
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps they should arrest the person who handed out the CDLs to unqualified individuals.
Re: (Score:2)
Was there a law passed? States issue licenses, how does this work?
Re: (Score:2)
Offtopic, but true..
First hit on a Google search:
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, because everybody knows English-language movies and songs do not have enough visibility on streaming platforms.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a regional law to deal with a regional language. The comparison for US would be the authorities of Hawaii/Guam/Native American reserve asking Netflix to display contents in the native language.
There is no comparison with Trump/English. Trump isn't a regional leader; English is already the language displayed by default by Netflix and there is no threat of change. A law mandating it to stay like that would be totally useless.
I don't have examples where English would be co-official in a place and Netfl
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
He would be called a racist.
He's not? Half is mandate is about shipping brown people somewhere else, and now he's recently added shipping in "persecuted" white people from South Africa.
Re:Imagine if this was Trump (Score:5, Insightful)
At the same time Trump expedited the refugees from South Africa, he reversed the status of refugees from Afghanistan.
These were people who had directly helped the United States. They had demonstrated this work ethic you claim to be worried about over and over again, in incredibly difficult circumstances. Many acted as translators, and already speak English.
Trump wants to send these people back to a country where they will be tortured and killed.
The racism is obvious. The only reason you don't see it is because you choose to ignore tit.
Re: (Score:2)
and we were talking about English. He would be called a racist.
Not if this is doing what I think it's doing. He'd be hailed as a hero.
The problem is that Netflix has a tendency to surface giant piles of content that are A. not in a language that you speak, and B. often aren't even *overdubbed* into a language that you speak. Unless you just enjoy staring at the screen and reading subtitles all the time, this is not a good user experience. But Netflix doesn't seem to care.
This proposed law will make them care.
This is a good thing. It would be better if they wrote th
Re: (Score:1)
I use subtitles all the time because the sound mixing on modern entertainment is so awful that I can't understand what is being said more often than not.
sigh (Score:5, Interesting)
I would like to let the rest of the world know that most of Canada thinks this is as ridiculous as you do.
Re: sigh (Score:3)
5 parties races (Score:2)
Re:sigh (Score:5, Insightful)
Do we? I think Quebec has every right to protect its linguistic heritage, as do many linguistic and cultural minorities around the world.
Oh, and I'm a Canadian and not from Quebec.
Re: (Score:2)
It's ironic how a European language that is one of the most prolific in the world is a heritage but the native languages of the area are left to die while the native speakers are being forced to assimilate.
This is just more racism with a pretext to legalize. There are even laws in Quebec and Canada defining this racial discrimination and making it illegal but have a clause that it's not discrimination if the government says so.
Just hypocritical.
I'm human and find that the more I experience the more I reali
Re: (Score:2)
but the native languages of the area are left to die
Not sure what your point is. The government of Quebec serves the people of Quebec, not the natives which came before it. The official language is French. It's not hypocritical to ask companies to use the official language.
Culture and heritage is not something that is forced on the people. It's created by the people.
Yes a collective group of people, and those collectives can make decisions on how to preserve that culture, such as electing a government that mandates that language is protected.
Re: (Score:2)
The official language became French by virtue of restricting laws that protect individual rights provincially and federally.
Yes a collective group of people, and those collectives can make decisions on how to preserve that culture, such as electing a government that mandates that language is protected.
A government can't mandate culture. It's created by the people. Each new generation creates it's culture. That's why western culture is so dominant. It allows new additions and changes with the times as the new generations express themselves. We don't go to clubs to square dance. The music of my youth is not the music of today. This has been going on in Quebec since the mid 70's and ye
Re: (Score:2)
Atleast if the translations/subtitles/alternate audio are accurate, it would be ok. But thus far, when it comes to streaming services- they struggle to even get an English show to have correct ENGLISH subtitles... and from what i have personally observed from their English to alternate language stream, it isn't better. really trippy when you watch a show and the English version is one thing, the subtitles say something completely different and then the dubbed audio of the dialogue gets warped into a compl
Yes We Do (Score:2)
If you want to preserve your culture you have to make it something people want to take part in - and there is a lot in Quebec culture that attracts peopl
How about a simple setting instead? (Score:5, Insightful)
Preferred language. Simple dropdown. Job done. Let the user decide.
Re: (Score:1)
You're not wrong, but you misunderstand the reality on the ground in Canada. We do NOT have a first amendment (or a second amendment for that matter) and the government in Quebec is quite willing to censor, abuse free speech, and impose draconian restrictions to prevent access to ANYTHING in English in their Perfect French Utopia. That government is just Anglo-haters who just want to exterminate any remaining English in their "nation". (Is this fascism? You decide!)
So how to fix this? Easy! Netflix, Disney,
Re: (Score:2)
Do the people who actually live there support the "we must preserve French at all costs" mentality that the governments (at multiple levels) seem to have?
Re: (Score:1)
Canada and Quebec are not the United States, but do have free speech. And no, English is not "censored" in Quebec.
So how to fix this? Easy! Netflix, Disney, Hulu, Amazon Prime, and everyone else just have to block all streaming access to Quebec. (They can still bill Quebec credit cards, however!) Anyone in Quebec who wants to defy their micro-controlling government should just use a VPN. Then, everyone is happy.
So, if the streaming sites simply block all access from Quebec IP addresses, that would meet the proposed legal requirements and costs the streaming services very little.
That's your wet dream but is not going to happen. Why? Because
1. it would cost streaming services much more than complying to this law.
2. If there is any real blocker in the law (I haven't seen any so far but the law just got announced), the law will likely endup being amended.
It's not as if the content in the streaming services had to change. They only need to enhance "visilibity" of French con
Re: (Score:1)
"And no, English is not "censored" in Quebec."
Put an English-only sign on your building and see what happens.
Hint: It starts with large fines.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Preferred language. Simple dropdown. Job done. Let the user decide.
That doesn't solve the licensing issue. The point is that they are demanding that Netflix have content to suit that preferred option. It doesn't help to say I want to hear French (why anyone would want to do that is beyond me, weird language) if the result is that only one or two movies show up.
The user can't decide what Netflix makes available. Geoblocking is the root cause of this, and it is an example of our species at its worst and most self centered.
Canadian ruling party wants more of this (Score:1)
Service not available (Score:4, Interesting)
"Erreur : Le service n'est pas disponible dans votre region (Quebec)."
Quebec is not a large market. It may not be worth the effort to service this requirement.
On the other hand... France has French language requirements. It may be trivial to surface French language materiel from France for Quebec users -at least for providers that already operate in France.
Re: (Score:2)
"Erreur : Le service n'est pas disponible dans votre region (Quebec)."
Quebec is not a large market. It may not be worth the effort to service this requirement.
On the contrary. They don't have to change any content. They only have to make a custom page for Quebec (their algorithms are already location-based anyways as they do not put forward the same content in all countries). I am betting that Netflix and Spotify will remain in Quebec.
On the other hand... France has French language requirements. It may be trivial to surface French language materiel from France for Quebec users -at least for providers that already operate in France.
They already offer content in French, from France, Quebec and elsewhere. That's not going to change and that's not what the law is about. But yes, that's one of the reasons why streaming services are not going anywhere. It's easy to
Whack (Score:2)
I'm curious if the politicians that want to pass this have ever watched a french film themselves. Pretty positive every time I (english speaker) watch a foreign film with subtitles, I spend the next several months getting things suggested to me like "Korean Dark Romance Violent Revenge Films". ... never based on "french" or "german" or "russian" .... there is more to categorize than that...and I'm betting the politicians have watched nothing but amer
I've discovered some quite excellent items over the years
Re: (Score:2)
I'm curious if the politicians that want to pass this have ever watched a french film themselves.
Of course they have. Like everybody in Quebec. Especially if by French you mean French-language. Quebec movies (almost all of which are in French) were 10-12% (depending on source) of movie theater ticket sales in Quebec in 2023. Plus a couple percent for French.
I don't think I know anyone in Quebec who never saw a movie in French. Also while I am not counting those, most English movies are dubbed in French.
Pretty positive every time I (english speaker) watch a foreign film with subtitles, I spend the next several months getting things suggested to me like "Korean Dark Romance Violent Revenge Films".
I watch "foreign films" (I guess you mean non-English language) from time to time and don't get this
So when Trump annexes Canada... (Score:1)
Maybe leave Quebec alone. I'd say build a wall around them, but the quebecois would probably beat us to the punch.... /sarc
Re: (Score:2)
This is mostly about putting at least some original French-language content on the home screen. But yes, it's easy to do. Streaming services will comply and everybody will move on.
But haters are going to hate.
Reality check. (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
They are free to expand the service to all of Canada, or perhaps other French-speaking countries as well. These global companies are very good at profiling. They can offer ads or special content only to people of an age group, gender or city. It's very easy to do for a province.
Also streaming services already operate in countries smaller than Quebec. Sometimes with their own currency and content rules. The same content is not offered in Canadian and US Netflix, for example.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I imaging being a streaming company and saying "Fuck you 9M people living in Quebec" and discontinuing offering my products and services in that area.
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine being a global streaming company and being expected to tailor your content for one Province that has an entire population equivalent to that of one medium-sized American city.
France has a population of 68 million people, Quebec has a population of 9 million, and French language content is one of the most prolific in the western world. It's not like this content is somehow strange, unique or unavailable, and France already has similar requirements which were easily met.
I applaud even one single person criticising the geoblocking and general unavailability of content.
Re: (Score:2)
Cajun First! (Score:1)
Show'em what real French be.
Re: (Score:3)
You know that French was literally **banned** in Louisiana by a constitutional amendment until 1974, right? Children caught speaking French even faced corporal punishment in schools. So rag about "whiney Frenchies" all you want, but attempts to stamp out French language and culture in North America were very much real until very recently. The French explored most of North America and set up settlements across the continent by the early 1700s, and many places still carry anglicized French names. However, the
Culture (Score:3, Insightful)
You know your culture sucks when you have to prop it up with force of law.
Re: (Score:2)
To be clear you're saying that about a law specifically targeting a company from a *foreign* culture. It's not about culture sucking. It's about an American company pushing large American culture locally.
Sidenote: My favourite cable channel growing up was "World Movies". It just showed how much of a sheltered little shit we can turn into cranking out the same garbage over and over again if we all adopt whatever culture is *most popular* (not better, culture isn't about good or bad, it's about size).
I am gla
Is this based on user numbers or amount of media? (Score:3)
Curious how this works for judging a streaming provider for having to adhere to this legislation. Like, what about more niche streaming services that are serving specialized content. Can't demand Rakuten's Viki [viki.com] or TelevisaUnivision's Vix [vix.com] to prioritize languages that don't follow their business.
Re: (Score:2)
The French language film industry is the second most prolific in the western world. France has had this law on the books a long time and Netflix had no problem meeting their requirements.
Funny you mention Rakuten Viki, because that's not a streaming service. It's a specific sub channel from the service. Rakuten TV itself is a streaming provider which among other countries is a streaming provider in France meeting the French language requirements. They have a lot of French content to make available.
Never hea
Now go away (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
"Can you even prove you are Canadian?"
Maybe he is a lumberjack.
There is no Canada, (Score:2)
Bravo! (Score:1)
It's forced, but if that's what people want.... (Score:2)
In Quebec 95%+ speak French because if you don't you are excluded from society, business, everything
Because everything is conducted only in French
In Wales you are taught Welsh at School, everything defaults to Welsh, some Schools teach only in Welsh etc. but you can easily get by without speaking Welsh .... and only 17.5 % of the population speak Welsh at all