Qualcomm Processors Properly Licensed From Arm, US Jury Finds (yahoo.com) 14
Jurors delivered a mixed verdict on Friday, ruling that Qualcomm had properly licensed its central processor chips from Arm. This decision effectively concludes Arm's lawsuit against Qualcomm, which had the potential to disrupt the global smartphone and PC chip markets.
The dispute stemmed from Qualcomm's $1.4 billion acquisition of chip startup Nuvia in 2021. Arm claimed Qualcomm breached contract terms by using Nuvia's designs without permission, while Qualcomm maintained its existing agreement covers the acquired technology. Arm demanded Qualcomm destroy the Nuvia designs created before the acquisition. Reuters reports: An eight-person jury in U.S. federal court deadlocked on the question of whether Nuvia, a startup that Qualcomm purchased for $1.4 billion in 2021, breached the terms of its license with Arm. But the jury found that Qualcomm did not breach Nuvia's license with Arm.
The jury also found that Qualcomm's chips created using Nuvia technology, which have been central to Qualcomm's push into the personal computer market, are properly licensed under its own agreement with Arm, clearing the way for Qualcomm to continue selling them.
The dispute stemmed from Qualcomm's $1.4 billion acquisition of chip startup Nuvia in 2021. Arm claimed Qualcomm breached contract terms by using Nuvia's designs without permission, while Qualcomm maintained its existing agreement covers the acquired technology. Arm demanded Qualcomm destroy the Nuvia designs created before the acquisition. Reuters reports: An eight-person jury in U.S. federal court deadlocked on the question of whether Nuvia, a startup that Qualcomm purchased for $1.4 billion in 2021, breached the terms of its license with Arm. But the jury found that Qualcomm did not breach Nuvia's license with Arm.
The jury also found that Qualcomm's chips created using Nuvia technology, which have been central to Qualcomm's push into the personal computer market, are properly licensed under its own agreement with Arm, clearing the way for Qualcomm to continue selling them.
One moron down (Score:3)
The writing's on the wall (Score:4, Informative)
Qualcomm's license can only be renewed through 2033 without ARM's agreement, which means that if ARM wants to, they can legally cut off Qualcomm's license at that point. If I were Qualcomm, I'd be working mighty hard to migrate to another instruction set by then, or at least a fallback plan in case license renegotiations fall through.
I guess RISCV is the only actual viable alternative, so Qualcomm would need to dump a significant amount of resources into pushing the state of Android's RISCV support forward over the next nine years.
Re: (Score:3)
Qualcomm would need to dump a significant amount of resources into pushing the state of Android's RISCV
Qualcomm has a market cap of $170B, so it has plenty of resources.
Apple's M1 had an NRE cost of about $3B. Qualcomm can afford a similar investment.
Even better, Qualcomm could team up and form a consortium. There are plenty of other companies that'd love to get out of ARM's thumbscrews.
Re: (Score:2)
Qualcomm's license can only be renewed through 2033 without ARM's agreement, which means that if ARM wants to, they can legally cut off Qualcomm's license at that point. If I were Qualcomm, I'd be working mighty hard to migrate to another instruction set by then, or at least a fallback plan in case license renegotiations fall through.
I guess RISCV is the only actual viable alternative, so Qualcomm would need to dump a significant amount of resources into pushing the state of Android's RISCV support forward over the next nine years.
OpenPower and OpenSpark are also available, and free of charge instruction sets. ;-)
But yeah, Qualcomm will have to "pull an Apple" and start moving to RISC-V in earnest.
Re: The writing's on the wall (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
We live in a world where tech companies are not above the law.
It is actually not in the interest of the US government for Qualcomm to keep using ARM. (ARM being an English company owned by a Japanese company, and Qualcomm being a Chinese competitor to American chip manufacturers - which need subsidies to be able to keep up.)
However, it is also not in the interest of judges to render contracts meaningless.
USB-C may be a horribly standard by any standard, but at least it is a common standard (like E27 light
Re: (Score:2)
Reminder Qualcomm was aggressively pushing for RISC-V extension since 2022 that would allow for a trivial frontend swap [riscv.org] on Nuvia. If this went through last year, we'd be quite possibly seeing "RISC-V Elite", not Oryon right now.
For better or worse SiFive isn't going along with it. First its a bad look to let QC dominate the consortium on the market, plus they're probably right on that ARM (uarch-wise) compatibility approach would just add bloat just to save Qualcomm a boatload of money so that they don't ha
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting.
Nvidia also has a contingency with Project Denver if they ever need to switch ISA.
Post case analysis - R&D version (Score:1)
Patent troll won (Score:1)
Suing your customers is stupid (Score:2)
ARM suing its single biggest customer was completely idiotic. Not only suing Qualcomm, but delivering a notice that ARM would be canceling Qualcomm's license entirely during Qualcomm's investor day event in New York. Spiteful bastards.
Now the jury smacked ARM back down and Qualcomm - along with every other major ARM licensee - will accelerate the move to RISC-V as a result. Except Apple, because they have a sweetheart deal of a license through 2040.
ARM will reap what they sowed here. Morons.
Re: (Score:3)
absolutely right... weird thing, neither companies stock prices reflect any of this :/
Curious how much of their (ARM) decision making was driven by Apple. It feels like ARM was played against Qualcomm to undermine both of them, while Apple ramps up it's own efforts on home grown chips/tech... leaving ARM and Qualcomm in the dust bin in a decade. Time will tell how many of ARMs executives will end up working at Apple eventually.