Can OpenAI Trademark 'GPT'? (techcrunch.com) 34
"ThreatGPT, MedicalGPT, DateGPT and DirtyGPT are a mere sampling of the many outfits to apply for trademarks with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in recent months," notes TechCrunch, exploring the issue of whether OpenAI can actually trademark the phrase 'GPT'...
Little wonder that after applying in late December for a trademark for "GPT," which stands for "Generative Pre-trained Transformer," OpenAI last month petitioned the USPTO to speed up the process, citing the "myriad infringements and counterfeit apps" beginning to spring into existence. Unfortunately for OpenAI, its petition was dismissed last week... Given the rest of the queue in which OpenAI finds itself, that means a decision could take up to five more months, says Jefferson Scher, a partner in the intellectual property group of Carr & Ferrell and chair of the firm's trademark practice group. Even then, the outcome isn't assured, Scher explains... [H]elpful, says Scher, is the fact that OpenAI has been using "GPT" for years, having released its original Generative Pre-trained Transformer model, or GPT-1, back in October 2018...
Even if a USPTO examiner has no problem with OpenAI's application, it will be moved afterward to a so-called opposition period, where other market participants can argue why the agency should deny the "GPT" trademark. Scher describes what would follow this way: In the case of OpenAI, an opposer would challenge Open AI's position that "GPT" is proprietary and that the public perceives it as such instead of perceiving the acronym to pertain to generative AI more broadly...
It all begs the question of why the company didn't move to protect "GPT" sooner. Here, Scher speculates that the company was "probably caught off guard" by its own success... Another wrinkle here is that OpenAI may soon be so famous that its renown becomes a dominant factor, says Scher. While one doesn't need to be famous to secure a trademark, once an outfit is widely enough recognized, it receives protection that extends far beyond its sphere. Rolex is too famous a trademark to be used on anything else, for instance.
Thanks to Slashdot reader rolodexter for sharing the article.
Even if a USPTO examiner has no problem with OpenAI's application, it will be moved afterward to a so-called opposition period, where other market participants can argue why the agency should deny the "GPT" trademark. Scher describes what would follow this way: In the case of OpenAI, an opposer would challenge Open AI's position that "GPT" is proprietary and that the public perceives it as such instead of perceiving the acronym to pertain to generative AI more broadly...
It all begs the question of why the company didn't move to protect "GPT" sooner. Here, Scher speculates that the company was "probably caught off guard" by its own success... Another wrinkle here is that OpenAI may soon be so famous that its renown becomes a dominant factor, says Scher. While one doesn't need to be famous to secure a trademark, once an outfit is widely enough recognized, it receives protection that extends far beyond its sphere. Rolex is too famous a trademark to be used on anything else, for instance.
Thanks to Slashdot reader rolodexter for sharing the article.
It begs nothing at all (Score:5, Interesting)
It all begs the question of why
No it doesn't [wikipedia.org]
.
Re: (Score:2)
Your own link disagrees with you:
The phrase "begs the question" is also commonly used to mean "prompts a question" or "raises a question".
If OpenAI loses control of the GPT trademark (Score:3)
At least some of their shit will remain open.
Re: If OpenAI loses control of the GPT trademark (Score:3)
I still don't understand what AI has to do with GPT. Which by the way was a much needed replacement for MBR, despite what the EFI haters say, particularly given we no longer need a 16-bit bootstrap intended for 8086 CPUs.
Re: (Score:2)
Are EFI haters still a thing? I thought they disappeared as electronic fuel injection systems became more reliable. No-one wants to waste time adjusting their carby.
Re: (Score:3)
What do you mean? All their shit is protected with copyright, the trademark only protects the name.
No, but that's okay (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
productivity will rise and more workers will be employed as a result. I doubt many of us will live to see the results
That's right: what the current generations will see is mass unemployment. The rise in productivity and employment is for the next generation.
Re: Did you mean TrumpGPT? (Score:2)
Trump is a bot, so no surprise.
Re: (Score:1)
LardGPT, or GPTint.
Re: (Score:2)
But it failed the Turing test.
Re: (Score:2)
*woosh*
names are important (Score:2)
I was talking with a chatbot, and it told me it was a Nexus 7. Then it said 'time to die, blade runner'. I'm not sure what it was talking about.
Re: (Score:2)
Think of a better name. (Score:2)
Coin a new word, or call it something that describes it better.
GPT could be butter, or a trampoline, for all anyone knows.
And not one of those dictionary words with a letter or two missing.
Buncha' lazy nerds.
Seriesrly? (Score:1)
Re: Seriesrly? (Score:3, Interesting)
I disagree. I never once heard GPT used to name any AI technology before "ChatGPT." I've heard AI used, like "OpenAI." But GPT? No, "CatGPT" is pretty clearly trying to tie itself to ChatGPT in particular. That does make it trade-markable. Point: can you in all sincerity, not trying to win an Internet debate, say that "ChatGPT" isn't the reason everyone wants to use "GPT" in their product names in particular? I mean isn't it peculiar a bunch of people who never met selected such particular names for their
Re: (Score:1)
just use xGTP (Score:1)
Generative Toilet Paper.
I use that to clean my Relox watch.
Generalized Probabilistic Theory... (Score:4, Informative)
Me: How many instances of the acronym GPT are there? Give examples
ChatGPT: There are several instances of the acronym GPT, but the most well-known and widely used one is "Generative Pre-trained Transformer," which refers to a type of neural network architecture used for natural language processing tasks. However, there are other instances of the acronym GPT that can have different meanings depending on the context. Here are some examples:
Me: Give more examples.
ChatGPT: Sure, here are some additional examples of the acronym GPT in various contexts:
Me: More!
ChatGPT: Sure, here are some more examples of the acronym GPT in various contexts:
TrollGPT (Score:2)
because greed? (Score:2)
"...the company was "probably caught off guard" by its own success... "
It could be that as it was genuinely a non profit, this was a non priority...until it somehow morphed into a for-profit company worth $tens of billions.
Whoopsies, how did that happen?
brings Negativland to mind (Score:2)
The Letter U and the Numeral 2 [wikipedia.org]