Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime Bitcoin Security

'How Cryptocurrency Gave Birth to the Ransomware Epidemic' (vice.com) 47

"Cryptocurrency has changed the game of cybercrime," argues Vice's Christian Devolu, in a new episode of their video series CRYPTOLAND. "Hackers and cybergangs have been locking down the data of large corporations, police departments, and even hospitals, and demanding ransom — and guess what they're asking for? Cryptocurrency!"

In short, argues an article accompanying the episode, cryptocurrency "gave birth to the ransomware epidemic."

Slashdot reader em1ly shares one highlight from the video: The team visits a school district in Missouri ["just one of around 1,000 U.S. schools hacked last year with ransomware"] that was the victim of a ransomware attack. ["Luckily, the school's backups were not impacted...."]
Another interesting observation from the article: When ransom payments do happen, companies like Chainalysis can track the Bitcoin through the blockchain, identifying the hackers' wallets and collaborating with law enforcement in an attempt to recover the funds or identify the hackers themselves.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

'How Cryptocurrency Gave Birth to the Ransomware Epidemic'

Comments Filter:
  • by Powercntrl ( 458442 ) on Saturday April 16, 2022 @09:56AM (#62451964) Homepage

    ..are what keeps the major cryptocurrencies from crashing to zero. Even when the speculation market gets completely spooked and panic selling ensues, there's still demand created by criminals who have no other means of moving their ill-gotten gains. Crime is essentially the backbone of the cryptocurrency economy - it isn't the entire organism, but it keeps it from collapsing.

    • by Registered Coward v2 ( 447531 ) on Saturday April 16, 2022 @10:01AM (#62451978)

      ..are what keeps the major cryptocurrencies from crashing to zero. Even when the speculation market gets completely spooked and panic selling ensues, there's still demand created by criminals who have no other means of moving their ill-gotten gains. Crime is essentially the backbone of the cryptocurrency economy - it isn't the entire organism, but it keeps it from collapsing.

      Exactly. At some point, regulation will result in making it difficult to convert the gains into real cash, lessening the demand for it and what sustains the price. No doubt the means to convert it will still exist, but the traceability will make it a lot harder to cover tracks once governments step in and make it costly for companies to accept crypto without vetting it first.

      • Re: (Score:3, Interesting)

        by nuckfuts ( 690967 )

        Exactly. At some point, regulation will result in making it difficult to convert the gains into real cash...

        I think you are being a bit naive if you believe that the people who author our laws are interested in stamping out money laundering. Many of them rely on it themselves to avoid paying taxes, or are beholden to others that do. Witness things like the The Panama Papers [wikipedia.org] and similar revelations in the past few years.

        Even before cryptocurrency this was apparent. Why is it that monies transferred to offshore accounts have been treated as untraceable? It's not for lack of capability, since computer transactions a

        • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

          "I think you are being a bit naive if you believe there's a vast conspiracy"

          FTFY

        • Even before cryptocurrency this was apparent. Why is it that monies transferred to offshore accounts have been treated as untraceable? It's not for lack of capability, since computer transactions are easily logged. It's for lack of will to do so.

          Bank secrecy laws play a part as well; and of course bankers willing to look the other way. The very nature of blockchain technology makes it much more traceable, since it's designed to provide a secure record of transactions, IMHO. Of course, someone could create a private currency based on teh same technology, but that would limit its usefulness to a small group and make cashing out hard.

    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Yes, pretty much. In essence any currency is worthless and will pretty fast crash to zero. The influx of "greater fools" can ultimately not stop or prevent that. What gives it value is that it is being used as a currency. This points to significant criminal activity because that is the only actual use all the cryptocurrencies have.

    • So they can still use it to... barter for... crimes? I'm not sure that's well thought out.
  • by ffkom ( 3519199 ) on Saturday April 16, 2022 @10:20AM (#62452014)
    Ransomware would not be a viable and successful business model had so many companies and organizations not decided to pay ransom. As long as companies gamble on saving money by not keeping offline backups and not investing in technical security (rather than snake oil security products and cover-your-ass policies), but then pay ransom when they loose the gamble, the ransomware business with continue to thrive - regardless of what "currency" (or goods) the ransom is paid in.
    • by gweihir ( 88907 )

      Indeed. I think that we need to make paying ransom for these cases illegal, with the ones doing it going to prison when found out. Just call it "financing a criminal enterprise".

      • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

        Indeed. I think that we need to make paying ransom for these cases illegal, with the ones doing it going to prison when found out. Just call it "financing a criminal enterprise".

        Really? What about cases where it's a life and death matter? What about public utilities?

        It's one thing when it's just the loss of some data. But in many cases, it's not so simple.

        • by gweihir ( 88907 )

          Really? What about cases where it's a life and death matter? What about public utilities?

          It's one thing when it's just the loss of some data. But in many cases, it's not so simple.

          In that case, definitely send the ones responsible for the missing risk management and recovery strategy to prison. Still deny them the option of paying. In case you have been living under a rock: Paying the ransom often does not get you in business again or does so far too slowly.

    • Yes and rape wouldn't be viable if so many women decided not to prosecute. By all means, let's blame them.
    • The company I worked for got hit by ransomware a couple of years ago.
      We were lucky that one of the guys working on the weekend noticed something weird was going on our network storage, and we also had some of the data duplicated at another site, so we ended up not paying, but it still set us back like three months.
      I can definitely see how someone given the options of either paying the ransom and maybe getting their data back or having their company of 200 people go bankrupt would choose the former.

  • Prior to the release and spread of TOR by our IC and the creation of the TOR Hidden Services system, the feds and our international partners had largely won the war on CP online. It was a crime that existed on the periphery and was easy to track down. That's not even counting the other contraband markets that flourish on TOR thanks to TOR Hidden Services.

    This is why I have always believed that Bitcoin was created by the US IC as an apology to law enforcement for unleashing the absolute legal nightmare that

    • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • There's a difference here, though - TOR and VPN's were created as a response to the excesses of the RIAA/MPAA

        Read the actual history, summarized here [wikipedia.org].

        TL;DR, the military created TOR to protect US intelligence communications in hostile foreign countries. In other words, it was absolutely not created with altruistic reasons in mind, and has been a cancer on the West where it essentially has crippled law enforcement's ability to reliably stop CP distribution.

        Has it ever occurred to any of its advocates that th

  • by Orlando ( 12257 ) on Saturday April 16, 2022 @11:30AM (#62452196) Homepage

    Wait, you mean there is a down side to crypto-currency?

  • So far, cryptocurrencies have proved to be good for speculating, for money laundering, and for extortion. After more than 13 years. And almost no one uses them as a replacement for ordinary currencies - which is, apparently, what they were developed for.
  • "Correlation does not mean causation"

    Crypto may well not have caused ransomware, maybe it's just an attractive medium for ransoms.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Reading comprehension fail. The headline said it was the cause of the epidemic, not ransomware itself. Ransomware was a great criminal idea, until payment because an obvious problem. Enter crypto, and for a time, ransomware is booming, until it becomes obviously problematic.

  • In other news, the Internet gave birth to computer viruses, spam, scamming from across the globe, and cryptocurrency itself, along with social media, which has given birth to spreading extremism and eroding democracy.
    The development of pharmaceuticals gave birth to the opioid epidemic, television gave birth to the obesity epidemic, and the automobile gave birth to a million road deaths per year.

    • I was recently ransomwared by a Nigerian prince who rick-rolled me and told me all my base are belong to him.
  • by nyet ( 19118 )

    ok boomer

  • This time you can pay to get your resources back. Next time you might not. So secure your network and start doing backups.
  • Cryptocurrency may also lead to increased general inflation because cryptocurrency competes with traditional currency for the purchase of goods. Since the rules of regulation are different, cryptocurrency may be advantaged with less oversight. National cryptocurrencies may provide the convenience of using cryptocurrencies without providing the means of an alternative under-regulated economic system operating within national borders. I would not be surprised if many nations develop their official versions of

"An idealist is one who, on noticing that a rose smells better than a cabbage, concludes that it will also make better soup." - H.L. Mencken

Working...