Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts Google

Google Asks Judge To Dismiss Most of Texas Antitrust Lawsuit (reuters.com) 7

Alphabet's Google asked a federal judge on Friday to dismiss the majority of an antitrust lawsuit filed by Texas and other states that accused the search giant of abusing its dominance of the online advertising market. Reuters reports: Google said in its court filing that the states failed to show that it illegally worked with Facebook, now Meta, to counter "header bidding," a technology that publishers developed to make more money from advertising placed on their websites. Facebook is not a defendant in the lawsuit. The states had also alleged that Google used at least three programs to manipulate ad auctions to coerce advertisers and publishers into using Google's tools. Google responded that the states had a "collection of grievances" but no proof of wrongdoing. On some allegations, Google argued the states waited too long to file its lawsuit.

"They criticize Google for not designing its products to better suit its rivals' needs and for making improvements to those products that leave its competitors too far behind. They see the 'solution' to Google's success as holding Google back," the company said in its filing. Google asked for four of the six counts to be dismissed with prejudice, which means that it could not be brought back to the same court.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said they would press on with the fight. "The company whose motto was once 'Don't Be Evil' now asks the world to examine their egregious monopoly abuses and see no evil, hear no evil, and speak no evil," he said in a statement. The Texas lawsuit had two other claims based on state law and made against Google which were stayed in September. The search giant did not ask for them to be dismissed on Friday but may in the future.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google Asks Judge To Dismiss Most of Texas Antitrust Lawsuit

Comments Filter:
  • Followed closely by "deny everything", of course. Can't say I blame the Goog, pretty sure I'd do the same in their position.

    (then again, I'll never be a supergiant megacorp on the cusp of world domination. I've had to reconcile myself to that. *Sigh*)

    • by splutty ( 43475 )

      It's funny how they're asking to have it vacated, but they never say "We don't do that"...

  • You would think they would learn from Microsoft. Nip it in the bud, it's much less painful then dealing with it later.

    • by schwit1 ( 797399 )

      The government lawyers in the FTC when Google, Amazon and FB got big were hoping to get a future gig with these same companies for gobs more in salary and stock options..

    • Tell us you aren't paying attention without telling us you aren't paying attention. Microsoft and Google are both part of PRISM. The government doesn't want to break them up, it would reduce the benefits of the panopticon they've built. If they do get broken up it won't be in any way which helps consumers.

      • Not to mention it's incredibly convenient to have three companies controlling everything half the human race sees, hears, and says. Just look at the last election: Tulsi Gabbard was the most searched candidate online, had singlehandedly ended Kamala's entire candidacy in one debate, and then from one moment to the next she simply ceased to exist. Search results were removed, messages not transmitted, and hashtags/trending topics delisted.

Anyone can make an omelet with eggs. The trick is to make one with none.

Working...