Chinese Province Targets Journalists, Foreign Students With Planned New Surveillance System (reuters.com) 46
Security officials in one of China's largest provinces have commissioned a surveillance system they say they want to use to track journalists and international students among other "suspicious people," Reuters reported Monday, citing internal documents. From the report: A July 29 tender document published on the Henan provincial government's procurement website -- reported in the media for the first time -- details plans for a system that can compile individual files on such persons of interest coming to Henan using 3,000 facial recognition cameras that connect to various national and regional databases. A 5 million yuan ($782,000) contract was awarded on Sept. 17 to Chinese tech company Neusoft (600718.SS), which was required to finish building the system within two months of signing the contract, separate documents published on the Henan government procurement website showed. Reuters was unable to establish if the system is currently operating.
China is trying to build what some security experts describe as one of the world's most sophisticated surveillance technology networks, with millions of cameras in public places and increasing use of techniques such as smartphone monitoring and facial recognition. U.S.-based surveillance research firm IPVM, which has closely tracked the network's expansion and first identified the Henan document, said the tender was unique in specifying journalists as surveillance targets and providing a blueprint for public security authorities to quickly locate them and obstruct their work.
China is trying to build what some security experts describe as one of the world's most sophisticated surveillance technology networks, with millions of cameras in public places and increasing use of techniques such as smartphone monitoring and facial recognition. U.S.-based surveillance research firm IPVM, which has closely tracked the network's expansion and first identified the Henan document, said the tender was unique in specifying journalists as surveillance targets and providing a blueprint for public security authorities to quickly locate them and obstruct their work.
So explain to me (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: So explain to me (Score:1)
Re:So explain to me (Score:4, Insightful)
Because you're interested in the culture. Because you're adventurous. Because China is an important country and having direct experience of it may give you useful insights for later in your career.
The problem is the CCP doesn't want *you* there. Not any more. The pendulum has swung back to more of a "Great Leap Forward" mentality. They want to be self-sufficient; that's been the object all along, and the end game is here. Now that China is an economic superpower, the party feels like that's within their grasp, so it doesn't feel it needs to tolerate foreigners and brook foreign influence.
The mark of an advanced country is trade. A modern power is more dependent upon its *rivals* than a 19th century power was dependent upon its *allies*. This may account for the fact that we live in the what is arguably the most peaceful era in human history. It makes no sense to subjugate people when you can get what you want by trading. You certainly don't want to destroy anyone's economy because they're your *customers*.
Colonial empires are obsolete. Their absurdity was laid bare by the near self-destruction of Japan during WW2, in an attempt to *steal* resources like rubber and oil that people would gladly have *sold* to them. But the CCP is stuck in a 19th Century mentality where to be a great power is to be internally self-sufficient.
Re: (Score:2)
The US oil embargo was triggered by Japanese expansionism, which was triggered by the belief they needed an empire to secure the raw materials. If they had simply *bought* the stuff they needed, there would never have been an embargo; nobody would have had any qualms selling oil or rubber to them.
Re: (Score:1)
Japanese expansionism into their China holdings, which they held for several decades at that point and were expanding. It was a colonial age. Another thing that deeply ideological anti-history people tend to really like to forget is that colonial expansionism wasn't a "European" but global thing. And also the primary mode of existence for Chinese imperialism over last five millenia, long before Europeans even discovered the concept of a "state", when the top tier civilization in Mediterranean was African.
An
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not disputing anything you're saying, I'm saying it's irrelevant. If Japan simply bought what it needed, nobody would have denied it anything, especially with war on in Europe.
It was a classic self-fulfilling prophecy. Internal disagreements about *where* to establish their colonial dominion aside, the whole impetus of having an empire in the first place was fear of being cut off from resources. But the obvious intent to secure those resources by force made it prudent for other countries to cut Japan
Japanese in central asia? (Score:2)
I don't think so. The Japanese beat the Russians in about 1905. But during WWII I think they were keen not to upset the Russians.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know where you got central asia from. I didn't mention it at all.
Re: (Score:2)
Given what Japan did in Manchuria (and other countries), they deserved every damn bit of what they got.
Re: (Score:1)
Considering firebombing of Japan and the big problem with US and nuclear bombardment, that of "err, there are no targets left to drop this about 10% of our daily payload going into Japan that is condensed into two bombs, because there isn't really anything intact enough to make a difference", anyone arguing about "deserving" things in history is just so utterly autistic to what human history is (in the technical sense, focused on minutiae and utterly unable to piece anything from those minutiae that even re
Re: (Score:3)
The primary launch point for Japanese expansionism into the French Indochina, Dutch East Indies and Pacific in general, the path that lead to attack on Pearl Harbor was directly triggered by 1940 US oil and metals export ban
I wonder what Japan could have possbily done before 1940 to deserve that...? /s
Re: (Score:1)
I dunno, what does US deserve for firebombing of Japan? What do Native Indians deserve for slaughtering the men and enslaving the women of the tribes they conquered? What do Maias deserve for normalising ritualistic human sacrifice? West African tribes for slavery going into mid 1900s and Arabs and Maghrebis for it going on today? Turks and Crimean Tatars for running the longest, most destructive industrial slaver complex in known human history?
Tell me since you seem to know exactly what specific peoples de
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Imagine being so devoured by your ideology, that you will literally twist history into the opposite of what it was.
Imagine being so devoured by your ideology, that you will literally twist a statement into something it was not, in order to lecture someone about a point you yourself seem to be deeply confused about.
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, well, they are a bit closer to China than Europe and the USA, it's just a hop over the mountains...
Re: (Score:2)
Do you think they ride there on a donkey or something? What's the difference by airplane?
Re: (Score:1)
Week long trip on a donkey is 5 or 10 minutes by plane...
the NCAA should pull out or let players drop games (Score:2)
the NCAA should pull out or let players drop games with no loss of scholarship
Meanwhile top 10 cities with cameras per sq mile. (Score:1)
https://www.indiatimes.com/tre... [indiatimes.com]
1. Delhi, India
1826.58 cameras per square mile
2. London, United Kingdom
1,138.48 cameras per square mile
3. Chennai, India
609.92 cameras per square mile
4. Shenzhen, China
520.08 cameras per square mile
5. Wuxi, China
472.66 cameras per square mile
6. Qingdao, China
415.80 cameras per square mile
7. Shanghai, China
408.49 cameras per square mile
8. Singapore, Singapore
387.56 cameras per square mile
9. Changsha, China
353.85 cameras per square mile
10. Wuhan, China
339.01 cameras per square
Re:Meanwhile top 10 cities with cameras per sq mil (Score:4, Interesting)
It's probably worth noting that many of the Chinese cities on this list are vast prefectural cities. Qingdao, for example, covers an area of 4273 square miles. That's 8x the size of Los Angeles.
This isn't just providing security for city centers. China has a population of 1.4 billion with 200 million public cameras; that's one camera for every seven people and they're all operated by state security. They have ambitions of moving them into workplaces and rural areas, and they want them to become 2-way, so authorities can speak to anyone, anywhere. The idea is that they will be able to tell people what to do, or to stay put while a policeman comes to get them. They don't have the manpower or technology to make this work, yet, but they're working on it.
Re: (Score:2)
Cameras are good if there was a way to securely restrict their use to only serious violent crimes upon obtaining a publicly disclosed warrant. Any petty or non-violent crimes revealed on camera should be granted full immunity by law. Maybe have the data encrypted, deleted within 30 days, with the decryption key split among a term-limited rotating group of citizens with serious consequences for any attempt at circumvention.
Re: (Score:2)
This historical cities are much smaller, but the actual government of the surrounding areas have been consolidated.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
City sizes can be found in Wikipedia, as can the population of China and an estimate of surveillance cameras [wikipedia.org].
China's attempt to make these two way has been widely reported [latimes.com]. They don't make any secret of this, because they see nothing wrong with it. I don't have the link handy, but I've seen Chinese state propaganda which depicts staged encounters in which the camera operator does things like scold people for not separating their trash or staying to late at work. That's obviously fantasy because of the sh
Re: (Score:2)
You could at least provide a link [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:2)
Project Veritas is just a tool of Dear Leader. Their idea of a society is one run by them for them.
Chung Kuo (Score:2)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
fiction?
maybe
Winnie the Pooh is making a strategic mistake (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Winnie the Pooh is making a strategic mistake (Score:4, Interesting)
Mao had to die (Score:2)
Before the Chinese changed. And he instigated the Great Famine, millions starved to death (we cannot really imagine what that would be like).
Sure, China has changed, had western influence. But the Confucian beliefs of hard work, family, and respect for authority run deep.
I think Xi is emperor for life and China will obediently follow him to wherever he leads them. Just pray it is not to a very bad place.
Re: (Score:2)
I truly hope the Chinese people overthrow the CCP horror they live under. Imagine a world with a free China.
The West can hardly compete with China now. Even though China has one hand tied behind its back due to being a 1 party state.
People don't want a free China to compete against fairly. They want a Chinese civil war that will remove China from the competition for a very long time. Maybe even permanently.
Re: (Score:1)
Why would the Chinese people question Xi or get tired? The middle class is getting comfortable, they can have every gizmo they want, they can dream of becoming super-rich. China's industry dictates what we can buy and at what price; China research is going to lead the space race; China has dramatic influence on UN agencies. It's the best time China has had in a millenia, and it's the CCP that brought them there. They don't care about elections, they have money and power (or Bread and Games). Of course China
One of two outcomes... (Score:5, Insightful)
China is determined to reach the latter it seems.
Why are /. folks still supporting Apple and Googl? (Score:2)
Apple and Google are 2 of the biggest lobbyists against slave labor legislation.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/1... [nytimes.com]