Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Privacy

Amazon Wants To Scan Your Body To Make Perfectly Fitting Shirts (fastcompany.com) 112

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Fast Company: For just $25, Amazon wants to make you a custom T-shirt. And a virtual body double. This week, the company unveiled a brand called "Made for You" that creates made-to-measure clothes. The initial product, a T-shirt, can be personalized to your taste and measurements, and more products are coming. This is Amazon's latest bid to make itself a fashion destination, and if the company chooses to double down on this made-to-measure technology, it could have significant impacts throughout the industry.

It took me five minutes to design a pink, long-sleeved cotton T-shirt. The process began with creating a virtual body double, which involves inputting details -- such as my height, weight, and skin tone -- then taking two photos on my phone using the 3D body scanner in the app. (Amazon has been incorporating body scanners into a number of its products lately, from its fitness band to its smart mirror.) The final 3D representation that appeared on the app looked uncannily like me. In the final step, I chose the color, sleeve length, and neckline of the tee. Then boom! I added it to my cart, and the custom shirt is set to arrive on Christmas Eve.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Amazon Wants To Scan Your Body To Make Perfectly Fitting Shirts

Comments Filter:
  • lets use jeff bezos first
    • The robot, or the alien from planet Bezos inside it?

    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      I'm sure they probably did, this is the sort of development that would catch his interest. This has been in development for quite some time internally, they gave a lot of us (Amazon blue badges) a ten dollar gift certificate for being measured a couple of times several different ways. One of the advantages of working there is you get to see odd things like this or the Go stores coming down the pike, as well as mainstream stuff like Alexa in Spanish. There's no way in hell that I'm selling my Amazon stock

  • by geekmux ( 1040042 ) on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @09:27PM (#60839720)

    The human race continues to struggle with an ever-growing obesity epidemic, and Amazon's answer to that, is form fitting clothing?

    I can see this idea going over like a double-deep-fried balloon filled with nacho cheese.

    • It's not for your benefit. Now you won't be able to return anything because it's "custom fitted", even if it was pulled off a pile of stuff all the exact same size.

      It also doesn't take into account that sometimes you want something a little loose fitting, and sometimes you want something form-fitting.

      • by DaHat ( 247651 )

        How many things do you return to Amazon which you think actually get resold? And how many of those items end up being recycled or dumped as it's cheaper/easier for them to write it off?

        • A lot of returns get sold off by the pallet.

        • How many things do you return to Amazon which you think actually get resold? And how many of those items end up being recycled or dumped as it's cheaper/easier for them to write it off?

          Recycled?

          Try destroyed or sent to landfills

          Amazon Slammed for Destroying As-New and Returned Goods [slashdot.org]

          Many Amazon Returns Are Just Destroyed or Sent to Landfills [slashdot.org]

        • Worked in an Amazon warehouse once. Returns are resold unless grossly damaged or broken.

          • by cusco ( 717999 )

            Our niece bought a pallet of returns one time. Most of it she couldn't use so donated to Goodwill, but she still came out ahead on the rest.

        • How many things do you return to Amazon which you think actually get resold?

          I take it you haven't seen any of those "I bought an Amazon returns box" videos from influencers trying to make a buck on YT yet.

          Amazon wraps up literal tons of return in "mystery" bulk pallets and sells it off to 3rd party liquidators.

          When you ask "How many things" the most accurate Amazon answer, is probably "Yes."

        • by NFN_NLN ( 633283 )

          > How many things do you return to Amazon which you think actually get resold? And how many of those items end up being recycled or dumped as it's cheaper/easier for them to write it off?

          I remember stories of people buying sealed consoles from Best Buy and finding bricks or other junk to weigh the box down.

          All it takes it one crack head to buy a coffee maker, take a dump in it, seal the box up and return it. The re-certifying process and potential lawsuits when they fail aren't worth it.

      • I actually just tried this out as I am curious to see how well their app is able to measure my fat body. Before purchasing I did make sure returns are allowed. Their website says "You can return this item for any reason: no shipping charges. The item must be returned in new and unused condition." In the future they might change that policy though.

        • by MrL0G1C ( 867445 )

          Their website says "You can return this item for any reason: no shipping charges. The item must be returned in new and unused condition."

          New and unused technically means you can't try it on, there's nothing stopping them from putting the clothing in 'tamper-proof' packaging and refusing a refund if you tampered. No change in T's&C's required.

          • Then return the item regardless of trying it on. Just imagine for a second the shit people try to return and it's no surprise they make such a statement. Putting something on to try on is very different from mowing the lawn with.
          • by cusco ( 717999 )

            I take it you've never returned anything to Amazon, you're not walking up to the counter and handing it to someone like at Walmart. It's a mostly-automated web transaction or a phone call, you print a label or have one sent to you, and the return is credited to your account as soon as the label is scanned at the warehouse (if you actually even need to ship it back). A friend accidentally returned the wrong thing one time, sending something totally different that cost a quarter of the original purchase pri

      • by jbengt ( 874751 )

        It also doesn't take into account that sometimes you want something a little loose fitting, and sometimes you want something form-fitting.

        I don't know if this particular app takes that into account or not, but using actual measurements to fit clothing doesn't preclude making loose fitting clothing from those measurements.

      • Amazon will probably also sell the data they collect to, e.g., life insurance companies.
      • Amazon policy is returns are accepted. Where have you been for the last couple of decades to not know this?

        There are standards in clothing fitment known as "slim/athletic fit", "standard/classic fit", and "relaxed/loose fit". They also are not new inventions. Selecting between them is a simple function.

        You seem to be being deliberately obtuse, aka trolling.

      • Or if you do want to return anything, it'll need a $50 "re-scanning" to register a "new body image" with the - is it Seattle? - Police Department's Remote ID and Gait Analysis system. Every time.

        I still don't think I've ever brought a piece of clothing other than a tee-shirt online, and it's not as if "fit" is anything like as important in a tee-shirt as the slogan on the front. Occasionally on the back too.

    • The human race continues to struggle with an ever-growing obesity epidemic, ...

      Actually, it doesn't. Apparently that was already declining - at least among US school-age children - by the time the Obama administration made a big deal of student lunch composition.

      • by DaHat ( 247651 )

        Yeah, leading to many an inedible meal and kids going hungry.

        https://news.yahoo.com/teens-b... [yahoo.com]
        https://www.buzzfeednews.com/a... [buzzfeednews.com]
        https://www.huffpost.com/entry... [huffpost.com]
        https://abcnews.go.com/US/stud... [go.com]

        • No, that was caused by schools hiring cooks who don't know how to cook real food.

          • by cusco ( 717999 )

            Many of the parents of our generation failed their children. Most of my niece's and nephew's friends couldn't cook anything more complex than ramen when they left the house, and most of the rest hit their limit at boxed mac and cheese.

            • True, but that is no excuse for schools to fail students by hiring cooks who can't cook.

              They tell us all about how important an education is, how we will need it to find a job, then they hire lames who can't do their jobs.

      • by quenda ( 644621 )

        What is the thing with American school lunches??
        They all seem to be unhealthy or unpalatable.

        Here in Australia, schools have a canteen for time-poor parents (aka lazy), but most kids just bring their own lunches to school.
        A sandwich and a piece of fruit for my kids. Sometimes a treat. Boring and cheap. They wolf it down and run off to play.

        The evening meal is the main meal of the day, and we can make sure they eat some vegetables then.
        The American school lunch system seems to be based on the idea that pa

        • Money, really. Lunch to a school is an overhead. They will serve the cheapest meal that government requirements let them get away with, and since America tends to favor light regulations where possible, that tends to involve 'mystery meat' and boiled staples. It's even a recurring source of political dispute, as various politicians either push for healthier school meals, or push back against government regulation and spending.

        • by jbengt ( 874751 )

          . . . maybe those awful school lunches are an improvement for many!

          For a lot of poor kids, the "awful" school lunches (and often school breakfasts) are the only real meals the kids eat.
          For example [businessinsider.com]:

          Children who suffer from summer hunger can face more health challenges than their more affluent peers. For instance, many children from low-income families turn to inexpensive, calorie-dense foods during the summer, but those meals lack nutritional value. According to No Kid Hungry, many children who go without school meals during the summer gain weight two to three times faster than their peers during those months. This can lead to higher healthcare expenses for children experiencing obesity.

          • by quenda ( 644621 )

            You cannot blame poverty for such neglect. By historical and global standards, these families are wealthy and food is cheap.
            You only need look as far as Mexico, to see people feeding their kids on a fraction of the budget.

            The US industrial agriculture and food distribution system has made food cheaper than ever:
            A whole chicken, luxury to my grandparents, is now $5. Seasonal fresh fruit $1-2/lb.
            Frozen mixed vegetables $1/lb. This is crazy cheap, but people choose convenience and junk food.
            Instant

      • The human race continues to struggle with an ever-growing obesity epidemic, ...

        Actually, it doesn't. Apparently that was already declining - at least among US school-age children - by the time the Obama administration made a big deal of student lunch composition.

        Claiming an epidemic is "declining" is like claiming the same thing with smoking. Smoking is still one of the planets largest killers. Even today. So is obesity.

        And looking at children is hardly the accurate metric with obesity, since the massive majority of humans become overweight or obese as an adult. Up until my early 20's, I would have laid ten grand on the table betting I would never get over a certain weight in my life. Adult reality set in a couple dozen pounds later.

    • And still the majourity is slim and/or athletic.

      And: do fat people not have a right to fitting cloth?

    • by Kisai ( 213879 )

      Automatically tailored clothing is actually a good idea that people have been wanting since the 90's, and the only thing that has really prevented it from happening is privacy requirements and people's utter incompetency at judging their own weight/measurements.

      • Automatically tailored clothing is actually a good idea that people have been wanting since the 90's, and the only thing that has really prevented it from happening is privacy requirements and people's utter incompetency at judging their own weight/measurements.

        What you call "utter incompetency" I accurately label that as arrogant people unwilling to recognize their own faults. This isn't a matter of judging as much as it is a matter of admitting the obvious truth. A computer isn't going to be any more successful convincing the socialite narcissist she's actually a size 14 and not the size 6 she's been violating for the better part of a decade.

        As far as privacy requirements, we live in a world that rewards narcissism. Privacy, is no longer a concern. Anyone who

        • A computer isn't going to be any more successful convincing the socialite narcissist she's actually a size 14 and not the size 6 she's been violating for the better part of a decade.

          A custom, made to fit, item is not a size. There is no need to include a label that says "YOU ARE FAT". It just fits -thus removing the shame of purchasing appropriately sized garments.

    • by Wolfrider ( 856 )

      --Yah, this is news for guys but not so much for the ladies

  • by BAReFO0t ( 6240524 ) on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @09:31PM (#60839726)

    There are people.

    And there are creatures that give their data to their enemies to be used against them in every possible way.

    Two different species. The former woild never reproduce with or give even an inch to the latter.

    • You would, if you knew what she looks like in that shirt. Don't tell me you have this conversation early, it's likely 10th date material at the earliest.

    • There is a third species, the kind that instantly declares everyone an enemy. These are typically classified Homonutbaggius. Classical traits are an affinity for aluminium foil to cover the hair on their heads, and a propensity to tell people all the things they do not do rather than the traditional social norms of the Homosapien of telling people the things they do do.

  • Thing is, I don't want perfectly fitted clothing. I like stuff that fits loosely, to give me room to move and let my skin breathe.
    If I wanted a perfect fit, I'd just wear yoga pants and tight tees. And it would be uncomfortable, and you wouldn't want to see it.

    • No, it is offering "custom" fit, not skin tight unless that's what you're after. It's a crap product, but more because it's really far less customized than the article is misleading one to believe.

    • I'm pretty sure they have checkboxes:
      [ ] lose fit
      [ ] extra long
      [ ] longer sleeves
      [ ] without collar

      etc.

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        TFA actually shows the app has

        loose fit - classic fit - slim fit

        as options.

      • I'm pretty sure they have checkboxes: [ ] lose fit

        If I want "loose fit" I will go to the store and find something there. Something I can take away with me after trying it on, if needs be.

        And it seems to me rather futile to be ordering "perfect fit" clothes just before christmas kicks in. After the festivities I suspect that many "perfect fit" will seem a little too snug.
        Or maybe that's the plan?

        • "After the festivities I suspect that many "perfect fit" will seem a little too snug.

          Or maybe that's the plan?"

          Yep, good old Planned Obsolecence.

          To me, a form fitting shirt that's not sportswear just seems like all kinds of ick. :|

      • "I'm pretty sure they have checkboxes:
        [X] lose fit
        [X] extra long
        [X] longer sleeves
        [ ] without collar
        [X] High, stiff, snug collar with large lapels"

        That would be for me. :O)

  • by ClueHammer ( 6261830 ) on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @10:07PM (#60839800)
    At least for most of us, it to hide our ugly bodies! The last thing we want is a snugly fitting T-shirt that shows just how flabby we are!
    • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

      I'm sure that it will provide options to mask body shape as well as showcase it, with suggestions for colour and patterns that assist.

  • Once they get their hands on your DNA, this will make it even easier to replace you with a clone.
  • by Hans Lehmann ( 571625 ) on Wednesday December 16, 2020 @10:35PM (#60839838)
    your body dimensions, to be added to the pile of data that they already have about you, all for them to be able to monetize it in whatever way they want.
    • I was also thinking that, vampires trying to capture all your biometrics.

    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      Their plan to "monetize" it is to sell you more and better-fitting clothes. I'm really not seeing your objection. Care to clarify?

      • Their plan to "monetize" it is to sell you more and better-fitting clothes. I'm really not seeing your objection. Care to clarify?

        I"m sure your insurance companies would LOVE to get your body info....and raise your rates based on your obesity levels, etc.

        • by cusco ( 717999 ) <brian@bixby.gmail@com> on Thursday December 17, 2020 @10:43AM (#60841264)

          Amazon never sells customer info, ever. Personally identifying information has the highest classification at Amazon, higher even then personnel information (we have to take a refresher periodically about data classification and pass the test.) I could get Jeff Bezo's personnel data easier than I could get your shirt measurement.

          • Amazon never sells customer info, ever. Personally identifying information has the highest classification at Amazon, higher even then personnel information

            For now.

            And one day, that will change, whether by hack or by policy change or by some other method.

            Perhaps you have faith in Amazon, but the total absence of leverage means that the only recourse available is to withhold the information in the first place.

    • by CODiNE ( 27417 )

      Introducing... Amazon Date. With accurate and verified body measurements. See how they look naked, before your first date. (C)

  • I don't need shirts that bad.
    And they already have too much data on me.

  • I would love to have my measurements exactly scanned, I could then use them to make a tailoring body double, a basic block, etc and seriously improve the quality and fitting of what I can make.
  • by fredrated ( 639554 ) on Thursday December 17, 2020 @12:52AM (#60840116) Journal

    You can scan this.

  • I see a lot of people against this - are you all seriously finding shirts that fit you well all the time?

    I have a thinner frame and longer arms, I often have issues with finding shirts that actually fit well. Shirts can often hang off me, or have parts like the sleeves or shoulders that fit oddly on me.

    There are other higher end clothing companies that have you take measurements in several places - those are better for sure, but even there you can get odd actual fitting around shoulders or other areas.

    It s

  • by ayesnymous ( 3665205 ) on Thursday December 17, 2020 @01:58AM (#60840210)
    How does skin tone impact clothing shape?
  • by Impy the Impiuos Imp ( 442658 ) on Thursday December 17, 2020 @02:02AM (#60840216) Journal

    "Damn, we've been having a lot of orders for shirts shaped like beach balls lately."

    "Yep. Slashdot just had an article about us."

  • Big (Score:4, Funny)

    by UnixUnix ( 1149659 ) on Thursday December 17, 2020 @02:09AM (#60840234) Homepage
    Does this extend to condoms?
  • Is it actually any better than a standard size? What about if you don't have a perfect six-pack and don't want it to fit incredibly snugly?

    Does it work for other types of shirt, jackets etc? You don't want a jacket to fit tight to your body, but it still benefits from being tailor fit, if the measurements are done right. For those less than perfectly svelte, a well-cut jacket can help to hide the flab. Can the AI do as well as a tailor?

  • Sounds like a season of Westworld
  • My first guess would be:

    - Take a selfie.
    - Send pic to India and China.
    - Let children select a shirt size for you: XS, S, M, L, XL, XXL, XXXL
    - Pass it through the standard ordering process.
    - Call it "custom-tailored" and profit.

    If this isn't how it works, then some competitor will do this. AliExpress.com or Alibaba.com I would think.

    • At some point they are going to have to do the opposite of condoms, and start shifting sizes down. Make the average size 'XL' so the overweight people can avoid the shame of having to buy XXXL.

      • You probably mean "obese". There aren't this many overweight people actually. One is "overweight" at a body mass index (BMI) of 25, and "obese" at 35. Some definitions involving the BMI put "overweight" just between 25 and 30 even.

        If this is confusing then know there is no definition for the word "fat", and one can just call them all fat (... don't try this at home).

  • "And a virtual body double. "

    They already did that once years ago, but we had to enter the measures ourselves.

  • by FudRucker ( 866063 ) on Thursday December 17, 2020 @07:17AM (#60840692)
    i prefer loose fitting clothes, much more comfortable, plus natural fibers are best 100% cotton, and wool for winter warmth
    • i prefer loose fitting clothes, much more comfortable, plus natural fibers are best 100% cotton, and wool for winter warmth

      Yes, exactly. And after a pandemic like this, I'm pretty sure we're going to see a rather massive shift towards "athleisurewear"...also known as the work pajamas many have gotten very used to wearing for the last year.

      Watch Under Armour become a suit maker, and CEOs strut around in $200 custom-tailored yoga pants.

  • I'm completely sure that Amazon won't use body scanning for any other purpose whatsoever because it's not like they monetize the shit out of every last scrap of data they gather now is it?
    • Insurance companies might pay a bit to target advertisments on it. No point showing advertisments to the overly obese, who would only cost the company money if they did sign up.

    • by cusco ( 717999 )

      I've seen this objection several times in the thread, and I'm actually curious what nefarious use you think your measurements could be put to.

      • I've seen this objection several times in the thread, and I'm actually curious what nefarious use you think your measurements could be put to.

        Corporate rates on health insurance are already subject to adjustments after employee health screenings. My previous employer paid for detailed physicals, including bloodwork, and fitness trackers for tens of thousands of employees in order to get a discount on the rate they paid for health insurance.

        Better believe if health insurance ever gets decoupled from employment, a massive measurement and health database will be very valuable.

        Of course, if healthcare ever gets decoupled from health insurance, that

        • by cusco ( 717999 )

          Just as an FYI (I mentioned this somewhere earlier in the thread too) Amazon does not sell its customer data, ever. We periodically have to take a refresher course on data security, and customer identifiable data has the highest classification of anything in Amazon. Jeff Bezos' HR info has a lower classification than your shirt measurements would (really).

      • by DrXym ( 126579 )
        Think of the data you're inadvertently handing over through Amazon's services - your body shape, face (through Ring etc), voice (through Alexa), age, sex, sexuality, address, affluence, interests (based on the shit you buy / watch on Amazon), your location, the medications you take (since Amazon has a pharmacy). Invariably there is more inferences they can make just than this based on what you buy, how you search or review stuff, who you buy for and so on.

        Even if Amazon claims they don't sell information

        • by cusco ( 717999 )

          Other than your last sentence, which I disagree with because it's held as a basic tenet of the company that customer data is sacrosanct, my response tends to be "so what?" The credit card companies have considerably more aggregate data about us, which they **do** sell, and I recognize that in the modern world there isn't any reasonable way to avoid this. If Amazon wants to sell me the latest widget, good luck. I don't respond to advertising much. On the other hand if they let me know that (for example)

          • by DrXym ( 126579 )
            No, the data is not "sacrosanct", it's valuable. That's why they won't release it willy nilly, they'll monetize like every other social media service does, either by selling it to 3rd parties via web services or by expanding into so many services they can utilize it themselves. Either way it is an obvious violation of privacy. And by making "so what?" comparisons to credit card companies or other data aggregators you implicitly lose the argument.
            • by cusco ( 717999 )

              either by selling it to 3rd parties

              No, Amazon does not sell customer data, ever. That's what I meant by "sacrosanct", personally identifiable customer data has the highest classification in Amazon, and we all periodically have to take a refresher course on data classification to remind us of that fact.

              **OF COURSE** they use the data themselves. My niece would put her hands on her hips, cock her head and say, "Duh!" I'm not really sure what retail operation wouldn't. If the barista at the coffee shop remembers your regular drink and look

  • Just sizing us up for the matrix style pods we will be shoved into soon.

A committee takes root and grows, it flowers, wilts and dies, scattering the seed from which other committees will bloom. -- Parkinson

Working...