Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Piracy Entertainment

Pirated 'DVD Screeners' Will be History After Next Year's Oscars (torrentfreak.com) 44

An anonymous reader shares a report: The Academy has announced that DVD and Blu-Ray screeners will be banned after the next Oscars ceremony. This marks the end of a long-standing tradition. Not just in the movie business, but also on pirate sites where the DVDscr tag is closely watched. Although Oscar DVD Screeners may soon be history, this doesn't mean that screener leaks will be thing of the past.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Pirated 'DVD Screeners' Will be History After Next Year's Oscars

Comments Filter:
  • by BitterOak ( 537666 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @03:14PM (#60029654)
    I"m for one am going to miss seeing phrases like "For Your Consideration" popping up every few minutes as I watch movies.
    • Meanwhile, on hand-cam bootlegs...

      1X BET!
      1X BET!
      1X BET!
      • by bloodhawk ( 813939 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @04:54PM (#60029966)
        seriously does anyone actually watch the handy cam bootlegs? the quality is so awful it ruins any possible enjoyment. tried a couple of times for various movies, now I just wait for a proper rip.
        • Not anymore. But back in the day the difference between a handicam bootleg and a proper DVD release was many months. That's what made DVD screeners so popular, they came out long before the DVD release.

          These days? It's only a matter of a few weeks after the cinema run before you end up with a WebDL rip at top quality.

        • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

          Cam bootlegs are becoming less common. It seems that theatres have got better at stopping them. The current early release favourite is the Korean sub.

          For some reason movies get released in Korea with hard coded subtitles (i.e. they are burned into the image, not supplied as text that the device overlays) quite early and in good quality. A lot of people can put up with the Korean writing at the bottom of the screen.

          Sounds like it will all be coming to an end anyway thanks to C19 forcing early streaming relea

    • That will probably still be in the rip of the stream that replaces the discs.

  • by gavron ( 1300111 ) on Wednesday May 06, 2020 @03:32PM (#60029730)

    The Academy Awards shows are self-congratulating piles of steaming dog poo as "entertainers" and "hosts" glad-hand each other.
    Generally if a movie wins an "Academy" (not a real academy) award it means politics prevailed... not that it's a super awesome movie.

    The only good part of it is the screeners, which let the rest of us watch the movie without all the crap.

    As usual, Hollywood, tone-deaf to Coronavirus, closed theaters, people who are tired of their self-congratulatory handjobs, etc. wants to eliminate those.

    "The Net interprets censorship as damage and routes around it" -- John Gilmore

    E

    • The Academy Awards shows are self-congratulating piles of steaming dog poo as "entertainers" and "hosts" glad-hand each other.

      I'm not disagreeing with you, but that's just you opining the matter and then thrusting such onto everyone else that didn't ask for it. And for the most part I wouldn't even care to say something till I hit this.

      As usual, Hollywood, tone-deaf to Coronavirus, closed theaters, people who are tired of their self-congratulatory handjobs, etc. wants to eliminate those.

      Theater operators aren't the same person as those who are in Hollywood. I have no idea what point you're trying to make at this point in your comment. Yes, Hollywood is tone-deaf to a lot of things. Shocker. But they're not the ones that ultimately closed the theaters, there was plenty of now p

    • I always like to point to which movie won best original score against The Good The Bad and the Ugly as an example of how naff the Oscars really are. If I played the sound track to the winner that year most people would have not a clue, it was piffle frankly. Play the Extisy of Gold or the title song and well my point proven.

      • by zilch0 ( 6836464 )

        I always like to point to which movie won best original score against The Good The Bad and the Ugly as an example of how naff the Oscars really are. If I played the sound track to the winner that year most people would have not a clue, it was piffle frankly. Play the Extisy of Gold or the title song and well my point proven.

        I love that film and score... But I would blame an unfortunate release schedule before politics. With an Italian release date of 12/23/1966 it was competing against The Sound of Music and Dr Zhivago (winner). The Oscars have always been very USA centric and I don't think it was even on anyone's Oscar RADAR in 1966/1967 and it was never nominated. If the rules allowed it to be considered based on the US release date of January 1968 it would have been competing against that years winner Thoroughly Modern Mill

      • by tlhIngan ( 30335 )

        I always like to point to which movie won best original score against The Good The Bad and the Ugly as an example of how naff the Oscars really are. If I played the sound track to the winner that year most people would have not a clue, it was piffle frankly. Play the Extisy of Gold or the title song and well my point proven.

        Most of the oscars, especially the technical ones, are like that.

        Best Picture, Best Actor, Best Actress and the like are the only ones that really matter, the technicals are just to awar

      • The Good the Bad and the Ugly was never going to get nominated, let alone win awards. It had EVERYTHING stacked against it at the time, It was a foreign film that was first released in a foreign language in a foreign country and then later in the US, it was one of the most critic hated genres of the time (spaghetti western) and was released to subpar reviews and then it was released at worst possible timing.
      • by Rhipf ( 525263 )

        Playing a soundtrack without the movie isn't really a good way to judge a good soundtrack. A good movie soundtrack should complement the movie. This may mean that it is good on its own or it could mean that it needs the context of the movie to make it a great soundtrack. There is a ton of music that sounds great in the context of a movie that I wouldn't ever bother to listen to on its own.
        Do the Oscars always select what I think of as the best soundtrack (or movie, or actor, or screenplay, etc.) every year?

  • very good your argument in your post friend continues so you will go far thanks [shortskimo1.xsrv.jp]
  • The safest conclusion, for now, is that piracy will likely remain a problem no matter what the distribution platform is.

    I don't see any "problem" here.

    • Hollywood even found a "solution" to that problem -- make the movie suck [youtube.com] SO bad [youtube.com] that people don't even want to pirate them! /s

    • The problem is counting copies stolen by people who couldn't afford your product in the first place as lost sales.

      A lot of people are as moral as they can afford to be. Disney in particular really caters to the top 20% of the market and doesn't give a damn about the bottom 80% of the market.

  • Is that like what the cool kids called WebDL rips back in the 90s?

  • Curb Your Enthusiasm...

  • Jusr like streaming made recompression nearly obsolete, as now you can simply not delete the file that is downloaded (aka "streamed"), keep it, and share it as "webrip".
    (Be sure to filter out all metadata.)

    Also stop saying "pirated". They are not seafaring, nor stealing. Copying is not like stealing but like telling a secret. And thinking you can tell the whole world your secret for money, and somhow still keep the secret, because billing by the actual work hour/job won't allow you to steal money from artis

  • Netflix has been operating as a commercial entity since May 23, 2002 - almost 18 years exactly.

    It isn't as though "streaming" is some "new-fangled thing" or "bleeding edge technology."

    It isn't as though the studios haven't all rushed to get into the streaming business themselves...

    So how come, in 2020, studio are still sending out review copies on Bluray or DVD at all? Didn't they get the memo?

    If this is a genuine story - and neither clickbait or fabrication - then the shareholders of the main

No spitting on the Bus! Thank you, The Mgt.

Working...