Snowden Warns Governments Are Using Coronavirus To Build 'The Architecture of Oppression' (vice.com) 107
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Vice: Snowden is the first guest in the new 'Shelter in Place' series debuting on VICE TV on Thursday at 10 p.m. EST, which looks at the global response to COVID-19 and its lasting impact around the world. VICE co-founder Shane Smith will discuss these themes, as well as how to survive quarantine, with a host of thinkers from science, entertainment, economics, and journalism. In the premiere episode, Smith talks to Snowden, who blew the lid off of the National Security Agency's surveillance of the American people in 2012. In the interview conducted from Smith's home in Santa Monica over video chat, the two tackle topics including the lack of preparedness in the face of a global pandemic, how long this will be a threat to humanity, and whether the power we're handing to global leaders will come back and bite us in the ass.
[...]
It seems that [coronavirus] may be the greatest question of the modern era around civil liberties, around the right to privacy. Yet no one's asking this question. As authoritarianism spreads, as emergency laws proliferate, as we sacrifice our rights, we also sacrifice our capability to arrest the slide into a less liberal and less free world. Do you truly believe that when the first wave, this second wave, the 16th wave of the coronavirus is a long-forgotten memory, that these capabilities will not be kept? That these datasets will not be kept? No matter how it is being used, what' is being built is the architecture of oppression. Snowden said intelligence agencies knew a pandemic like this was coming "because they used to read the reports had been planning for pandemics."
Asked about if we can trust the numbers coming from China, Snowden says "I don't think we can," adding that autocratic regimes like China aren't doing things better than democratic ones. "I mean, there are arguments being made that China can do things that the United States can't. That doesn't mean that what these autocratic countries are doing is actually more effective."
You can watch Shane Smith's full interview with Snowden here.
[...]
It seems that [coronavirus] may be the greatest question of the modern era around civil liberties, around the right to privacy. Yet no one's asking this question. As authoritarianism spreads, as emergency laws proliferate, as we sacrifice our rights, we also sacrifice our capability to arrest the slide into a less liberal and less free world. Do you truly believe that when the first wave, this second wave, the 16th wave of the coronavirus is a long-forgotten memory, that these capabilities will not be kept? That these datasets will not be kept? No matter how it is being used, what' is being built is the architecture of oppression. Snowden said intelligence agencies knew a pandemic like this was coming "because they used to read the reports had been planning for pandemics."
Asked about if we can trust the numbers coming from China, Snowden says "I don't think we can," adding that autocratic regimes like China aren't doing things better than democratic ones. "I mean, there are arguments being made that China can do things that the United States can't. That doesn't mean that what these autocratic countries are doing is actually more effective."
You can watch Shane Smith's full interview with Snowden here.
Patriot Act Permanently Took Some (Score:5, Insightful)
I wonder how much we lose with COVID-19, all for the sake of "we'll be safe from future pandemics."
Re:Patriot Act Permanently Took Some (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
As an example Google and Apple teaming up for a Corona API to make detecting of nearby contacts easier will be part of this new infrastructure. Of course its use is only for "(future) pandemics" but the API will never disappear.
The API won't be very useful for other tracking purposes. You should read about it: https://blog.google/documents/... [blog.google]
Re: (Score:2)
As an example Google and Apple teaming up for a Corona API to make detecting of nearby contacts easier will be part of this new infrastructure. Of course its use is only for "(future) pandemics" but the API will never disappear.
The API won't be very useful for other tracking purposes. You should read about it: https://blog.google/documents/... [blog.google]
More technical specifications linked from here: https://blog.google/inside-goo... [blog.google]
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah we aint fucking stupid, just wait until the next fucking update, more and more invasive each cycle. Could they have even sold windows anal probe 10, ten years ago or would a more aware public rebelled. Yeah, we know the sick anal retentive control freaks. Drop Google now, or have them control your live for ever.
You temperature up or not, they have the control to decide whether it is or not, confine you to your home and cut you off from the internet, refuse and prison. That is not the life of a free pe
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah we aint fucking stupid, just wait until the next fucking update
At least for Android, the core implementation will all be in AOSP. You'll be able to see exactly what it does.
Re: (Score:2)
You should check out the equally effective peer-to-peer oppression among the made men on The Sopranos. They're horrible shits to each other, and still find time for so much more to trickle down.
And yet: dangerous and aggressive gun-toting young adult males (sheeple type A) continue to volunteer to become bottom-feeder wannabe "soldiers" in this sordid organization:
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Patriot Act Permanently Took Some (Score:1)
The tracking technology has been in use for many years, but hidden in the shadows. Now it is coming out into the light. How society will respond remains to be seen.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Patriot Act Permanently Took Some (Score:5, Interesting)
Bush only built one part of it, like everything else... the citizens just have been busy looking the other way for so long that each time something happens the "pussy ass american wimps" keep expecting government to make sure nothing bad can ever happen again.
9/11 proved that Americans can be controlled through fear and terror. People are going to die, that is just life and there is nothing you can do to stop it. Because there is one simple rule... if a pandemic or terrorist plot is not going to kill you... your government will kill you under the guise of protecting you instead. There is evil in the world... and they are going to be killing people whether is is under the guise of fighting a foreign enemy or a domestic one.
Governments of man have killed more people than all the pandemics, epidemics, and disasters of nature combined.
Re: (Score:3)
Everyone likes the free money, as long as they get some of it. So welfare is bad, because it's other poor people who don't deserve it, but the tax rebates are great because it goes to everyone as long as they're poor like me. It's all about branding.
Re: (Score:2)
We're supposed to live in a capitalist society, why is the people have little or no access to capital?
Your ignorance of capitalism is complete.
Re: Patriot Act Permanently Took Some (Score:1)
Like many people, he seems to conflate capitalism and free enterprise.
Re: (Score:2)
9/11 proved that Americans can be controlled through fear and terror.
The human race knew that long before 9/11. In brief, you'll find throughout history that an authoritarian's playbook follows this pattern:
1. Create (or exploit) fear, anger, or confusion in the populace.
2. Point the finger at an external cause.
3. Present yourself as the only solution to the problem.
The parallel to current events is left as an exercise to the reader.
Re: Patriot Act Permanently Took Some (Score:1)
When future historians look back on the era that began with the Bushbama presidency, they will refer to the period as "the Terror".
Re: (Score:3)
Bush built the basis of all socialist oppression
Well, Bush was surely a big government Republican, but he didn't write the PATRIOT act. John Kerry did. Kerry bragged about it on his election web site, proud of the accomplishment.
So, the wonderful 2004 election was between two big-government establishment politicians who went to the same university at the same time, belonged to the same secrect society, got the same grades, and were basically interchangable.
When the general election is between two establishment candidates, the voters have already lost.
Re: (Score:3)
There is a silver lining at least.
We'll now be allowed to wear masks in public (outside of Halloween).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I plan on going to the drug store and getting some black construction board paper, rolling it up into a cone and putting it over my face.
Buy yourself a long cane too.
It would suck if you had to call 911 for help because you can't see and can't find your way home anymore.
Re: (Score:1)
The mask thing is probabaly wrecking total havok on the AI face recognition programs.
Re: (Score:1)
but but but for your "safety" (Score:1)
Re: Patriot Act Permanently Took Some (Score:1)
Only living as slaves will save us from the Mexican Beer virus!! Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!
Only useful during active pandemic ; Not outside (Score:2)
I wonder how much we lose with COVID-19, all for the sake of "we'll be safe from future pandemics."
That would be a bad argument, because tracking doesn't prevent *future* pandemics at all.
- It's only useful while there is a pandemic in progress and you want to slow down the spread by tracing contact and quarantining only the exposed people instead of reaching the point where you lock down the whole country.
And unlike the security theater show at airports, I think the average citizen *is* clearly able to understand that and would vote/petition (well at least in countries that have true democracies) for so
Re: (Score:2)
Building? (Score:5, Insightful)
They already had it all built. They are using the virus to give the oppression architecture a shakedown before full deployment.
I have to say, I always felt a lot of sympathy for the police before. But seeing images of paddle boarders being arrested, pulling people off busses because they are not wearing masks... most of my goodwill towards state security has evaporated.
Someone on Twitter said there are no libertarians in a pandemic, but I've become way more libertarian and intolerant of authority than I even was before.
Re: (Score:2)
Someone on Twitter said there are no libertarians in a pandemic, but I've become way more libertarian and intolerant of authority than I even was before.
They don't have the same Facebook friends I do obviously
Re:Building? (Score:5, Insightful)
Came here to say just that. The governors are having a ball, ordering people around. The cops, breaking people's faces for holding weddings or being (alone) in a park without a license, are overjoyed. And of course, from the public, thunderous applause.
Re: Building? (Score:1)
If America survives this panic without losing our republic to dictatorship, we must implement drastic political reform. Never again must a handful of governors and officials be allowed to imprison the entire country. While it's _possible_ such extreme measures might be needed some day in the future, they should only be undertaken after a vote by the Congress and the state legislatures.
Re: (Score:2)
Stay home, asshole, this isn't about you.
Re: (Score:1)
This is the same behaviour as refusing all vaccinations. Somehow, I doubt you're so protective of anti-vaxers' rights to endanger their children and the rest of society. There are 2 differences: 1) The police do Something when they identify an arsehole denying medical advice for This disease; 2) Responsibility to the community and setting an example (of how to protect You), be dammed.
If you were, I would understand but that's not happening. You're saying those people behaving badly, have more rights
Re: Building? (Score:1)
Cowardly Nazis sure do love apologizing for shameless oppression.
Re: Building? (Score:1)
Although it's a shame it had to happen this way, I'm glad you've seen the truth about the law enforcer thugs who have long oppressed the American people. Hopefully you also can see that our kangaroo courts, the gulag, and the badlaws they brutally enforce are all one and the same.
We must all join together in solidarity - across party lines, class lines, cultures, and ideologies - to end this prison state before we loose our republic to dictatorship. And to ensure that NEVER AGAIN can such a tyrannical state
Meh, Terrorism was working just fine (Score:5, Insightful)
The best way to oppress people is to keep them occupied with survival. You need a certain level of material wealth before freedom becomes an issue. Until then you're struggling so hard to stay afloat that it doesn't even come up in your thoughts.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I bought my first home (in the PNW!) and finally started playing with the stock market last month! I really WAS doing better than I had ever done before. Talk about timing!
Re: Meh, Terrorism was working just fine (Score:1)
"real median income was at the highest point it had ever been."
Hoho - haha - hehe - hahahahahahahaha! Good one, good one! Should I pull your other finger?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Meh, Terrorism was working just fine (Score:1)
You don't _really_ believe the obviously-false official inflation figures, do you?
Re: (Score:2)
The Dems will respond to climate change (Score:3)
There won't be any regulations. There'll be jobs. Lots and lots of good paying, middle class jobs making solar panels, wind farms and improving the energy efficiency of our homes, schools, places of work and fleet of vehicles.
Re: (Score:1)
the same way we responded to the Great Depression: Large scale government jobs program.
There won't be any regulations. There'll be jobs. Lots and lots of good paying, middle class jobs making solar panels, wind farms and improving the energy efficiency of our homes, schools, places of work and fleet of vehicles.
Your understanding of the Great Depression is mostly based on popular mythology.
During the boom years of the 1920's, the USA had the lowest unemployment rate in the developed world.
After a few years of Hoover and eight years of FDR, the USA didn't even make the top ten list.
The majority of other developed nations had recovered from their economic depressions by that point.
The USA (which did more than any other nation to create the world wide depression, thanks to the Smoot-Hawley Tariff, which wouldn't be f
Re: (Score:3)
That must be why we never recovered from it until WW2...
Dot-communism, eh?
Re: (Score:2)
That must be why we never recovered from it until WW2...
The biggest govt jobs program of all...
Maybe we will get a new Megadeth album out of it.. (Score:4, Funny)
Maybe we will get a new Megadeth album out of it...
Re: (Score:3)
Ironically, they have a new one ready, they just need to get in and record it: https://loudwire.com/megadeth-... [loudwire.com]
Noooo kidding. (Score:2)
*cough* [slashdot.org]
Things that we can't do (Score:5, Insightful)
Asked about if we can trust the numbers coming from China, Snowden says "I don't think we can,"
A response I read on the trustworthiness of the Chinese number:
- if the Chinese number lies, we are doomed because even such restrictive measures can't stop the virus;
- if the Chinese number is true, we are doomed because we can't implement such restrictive measures.
adding that autocratic regimes like China aren't doing things better than democratic ones. "I mean, there are arguments being made that China can do things that the United States can't. That doesn't mean that what these autocratic countries are doing is actually more effective."
For all my respects to Mr. Snowden, the real reasons that China can do things (these restrictive) are not their autocracy or authoritarianism or any other political reason, but because of the following systems that have been in China for long times:
1. pervasive amount of private security personnel: if you go to China, you can every housing site, village, school, factory, office building, mall, subway station, and what not is guarded by uniformed people. No they aren't Chinese police but private security guards. Look, that's what authoritarian state has. No. Private security has been prevalent in China since the 1990s because property crimes were real problem there until a few years ago. It also has to do with relative cheap labor cost, so even poorer communities can pool together enough salary to hire private security. it's a market-oriented solution to a social problem. Now, in the days of an epidemic, those private security can provide effective access controls [thenextweb.com].
2. the massive package and take-out delivery services: since the boom of mobile era, China has developed massive online shopping and restaurant take-out industry. The accompanying shipping services immediately fill in the role of last mile delivery of essential groceries [time.com] to the quarantined public. (The packages are typically delivered to the front entrance and the private guards will call the buyer to come down to pick it up, without physically interacting with the delivery guy.)
3. mobile payment apps and pervasive QR code: these facilitate contact-free transactions end-to-end during the epidemic.
4. freaking of the public: after SARS and bird flu, Chinese and other Asians have deep fear of viral epidemic, unlike that in US and Europe; and they understand well from their recent experiences that social distancing and wearing face masks are the effective and likely the only way to survive for individual.
It's clear that Mr Snowden, like most Americans, have never actually lived in China and only got biased information from their western media outlets. China is mostly about practicality rather than politic.
Re: (Score:3)
A response I read on the trustworthiness of the Chinese number:
- if the Chinese number lies, we are doomed because even such restrictive measures can't stop the virus;
- if the Chinese number is true, we are doomed because we can't implement such restrictive measures.
It's time to forget about China. Really. There's plenty of other countries now that are past the peak, like for example here in Norway they now estimate the R = 0.7, in other worlds we can beat it down. But we've also had the most invasive measures since WW2, more or less stripping the country down to bare survival mode. The question now is what's the end game, if we snuff it out at massive expensive with 5-10% population immunity then what? If we restore normal social contact it'll just blossom up again at
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Things that we can't do (Score:1)
The obvious solution is a permanent military-medical state of emergency. Only then will we be able to crush the human spirit under the iron boot... er, sorry, I mean save ourselves from the Mexican Beer virus!
Re: (Score:2)
1. pervasive amount of private security personnel: if you go to China, you can every housing site, village, school, factory, office building, mall, subway station, and what not is guarded by uniformed people. No they aren't Chinese police but private security guards. Look, that's what authoritarian state has. No.
That your business is required to pay them for protection does not automatically imply that you are their boss, or change the fact that those uniformed personnel answer to the government, not private business.
Strange that an autocratic government would be so successful at so many other types of control that other countries can't implement, and yet they're powerless to prevent property crime or hire police, leaving the glorious People to police themselves. It seems somewhat less likely than other, more obvio
Re: (Score:3)
Oh really? (Score:2, Insightful)
I had the same thought myself. Only more specifc:
his may sound conspiratorial, but please humor me long enough to read this post.
Trump's endgame all along has been declaring nationwide martial law, because when this happens he will in effect become a dictator.
Prior to this pandemic, the plan was to foment civil war for this purpose; thus the sabre rattling such as, "our side has things that go boom."
With a pandemic in full swing, civil war will not be necessary. Instead, all he has to do is wait for condit
Re:Oh really? (Score:4, Insightful)
Seriously? We are no where near to a position where a President can use Martial law to stay in power. It was just as assinine when the conservatives were bitching about this stupidity when Obama was in power. Do you seriously think there are no loads of edge lords out there just waiting for a president to try something like this for real? If Trump actually tries to do anything like this you will find that his own base will be split asunder and he will have only succeeded in causing civil war. While I would not put the idea past a self entitled prick like Trump, if such a thing were possible, I don't think he is that fucking dumb. Congress loves its power too much, they would definitely remove any President if they tried this.
There are still more than enough guns in the hands of people to make any sitting president seriously think about trying something like this. Not only would they be likely assassinated if congress failed to remove them but they would also lose 1/2 of their own military and states in the attempt. That is a lot of shit to consider before trying to take power like this considering the structure of the US government.
Re: (Score:2)
What if 1/2 the people think it's ok? I thought when "King" Obama was criticized for all his "illegal" actions, that it was stupid and incorrect. It's not likely that a constitutional scholar will do anything illegal because he knows how to "bend" the rules.
With our current prez being a narcissist if not being a megalomaniac, we have someone who's only concept of the constitution is what some influencers on certain TV shows tell him. And, of course, every time someone uses "tricks", as Obama did, it is used
Re: (Score:3)
Trump's endgame all along has been declaring nationwide martial law, because when this happens he will in effect become a dictator.
Why do we get this nonsense prediction with every president? Don't you remember predicting that it would happen with Bush?
Re: (Score:2)
Obama too! People were seriously predicting that Obama, the most milquetoast president in my lifetime, would not hand over power.
Re: (Score:2)
Clinton didn't go out easy; his staffers stole the W keys from all the White House keyboards before they left.
Re: (Score:2)
Those W keys were clearly documented as feeling depressed, and chose to take their own lives by jumping off their keyboards.
Re: Oh really? (Score:2)
Stopped reading after the third sentence. Stop the pretext of not wanting to sound like a conspiracy theorist when you reach conclusions based purely on speculation.
Sensationalism (Score:1)
This is sensationalist nonsense. Even freedom-loving western governments have always had special powers for situations like this. Are there privacy issues that should be kept in mind? sure. Is that a reason to curtail emergency powers during a pandemic? no.
We also already know that informing the public about why stay-at-home orders are necessary is MUCH more effective than trying to "force" them to do it. It is really startling how many people in the US don't understanding that citizens in a free socie
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Like South Korea, Taiwan, Japan did as a gov to look after their own citizens.
Western nations are using the private sector to push new brand of apps down on smartphones to track people under the cover of "health".
Thats ad brands and US brands that are happy to work with and fully invest in Communist nations.
Want a gov health worker tracking back over a sick citizens past?
Big tech working with other big tech sharing citizens movement
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Sensationalism (Score:1)
Only a worldwide prison state will save us all from the Mexican Beer virus! IT'S PERFECTLY NORMAL!! Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee3eeeeeee!
Businesses are under the thumb of government too (Score:4, Insightful)
Aside from personal freedoms, the state and local governments are exercising enormous control over businesses. A lot of businesses are being given a death sentence, even those that could operate with masks, social distancing, and ever other current government recommendation.
After things are supposed to "open up", we're going to see a lot of business that never open again.
Re: Businesses are under the thumb of government t (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
TL;DR countries all over the world are turning into police states because of COVID-19, and the Internet enables its own citizens to replace Big Brother at no cost. All at the cost of a single-digit loss of lives averaged over the planet. Well played, NWO.
As they always say: (Score:3)
Never let a good crisis go to waste.
Snowden is far from wrong (Score:3)
Said this elsewhere, repeating it here: You will know we're all completely junglefucked when they make it a LAW that you have to own and carry a smartphone with you at all times. Beware of this. Small chance it can be stopped if they try it.
In the meantime: consider getting rid of your smartphone. Get a cheap plastic dumbphone, or at least a smartphone with a removable battery. Then you can have some modicum of privacy while travelling.
Re: (Score:2)
No phone will let you have privacy. They can all be tracked via TDOA. And most old school phones can be longer be used since they don't support modern frequencies.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Snowden is far from wrong (Score:1)
Re: Snowden is far from wrong (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Blah blah blah FUD
Just stop. You're not impressing anyone.
Odds. (Score:2)
...with a host of thinkers from science, entertainment, economics, and journalism.
Well one out of four isn't bad...
Re: (Score:2)
The Yellow Star. Jews throughout Nazi-occupied Europe were forced to wear a badge in the form of a Yellow Star as a means of identification. ... Jewish shops were also marked with a Yellow Star. The star was intended to humiliate Jews and to mark them out for segregation and discrimination.
Re: (Score:1)
Havev't you heard? Dr Fauci has suggested that everyone who has not yet contracted the disease and developed immunit , be given a yellow star they have to wear. So that those people can be forced to stay at home.
Don't be so silly. It won't be a yellow star. That is so 1930s. Probably use the # sign. So maybe a color shifting circle with a #OK in it. Color shifting so you can't just make one at home.
Man, I started this as a joke... They say humour is based on some truth. Ha ha?
Hungary is the prime example... (Score:3)
From: https://www.theguardian.com/co... [theguardian.com]
The Hungarian parliament, which has a two-thirds majority in favour of the prime minister, Viktor Orbán, passed a bill on Monday 30 March that extended his already strong powers. The bill, not supported by most opposition MPs, gives parliamentary authorisation to prolong the state of emergency the government declared on 11 March in light of the coronavirus pandemic. As a result, the few remaining checks and balances in Hungary will cease to exist, with the government ruling by decree with hardly any legal supervision. No elections and no rallies can be held. Hungary has become a textbook case of how coronavirus can be abused for authoritarian ends.
Re: (Score:1)
That normal emergency powers in Hungary.
Find the sick, people who had contact with the sick.
Ensure citizens in Hungary get masks, medical support and PPE as needed without the EU and other nations saying no.
Normal emergency medical laws every normal advanced nation has to look after their own citizens.
Re "no rallies " why would Hungary do what France, Italy and Spain allowed and let
Sheltering in Putin's Russia (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have to specify that water is wet? I don't think anyone needs to be told that Russia, China or North Korea will jump to the occasion of implementing or ratcheting up the "architecture of oppression".
Thanks Edward! (Score:1)
Snowden? (Score:1)
As if he's some kind of expert on this? Sorry, nothing to see here.
Could be worse. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm also getting
This video file cannot be played.
(Error Code: 102630)
I'm in Canada.
Re: (Score:1)
Right, and I am in Europe.
I did wonder whether it's a geographic block. But I didn't see anyone else complaining, and I thought Slashdot had a more international readership than apparently it does...
If it's geographic blocking indeed, it would have been nicer of VICE TV to just say so instead of hiding behind this cryptic error message.
Re: (Score:2)