Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Republicans Twitter United States

Trump Endorses Permanent Daylight Savings Time (thehill.com) 376

President Trump on Monday threw his support behind efforts to keep the United States permanently on daylight saving time, which took effect Sunday morning. "Making Daylight Saving Time permanent is O.K. with me!" Trump tweeted. The Hill reports: California and several other states are considering measures that would end the biannual clock changes between standard and daylight saving time. Three GOP lawmakers from Florida introduced legislation in Congress this month that would end the November clock change from daylight saving time back to standard time. The measures, introduced by Sens. Marco Rubio and Rick Scott and Rep. Vern Buchanan, would keep the country in daylight saving time, the clock change made in early March that is observed by most states for eight months of the year. Rubio introduced a similar measure in 2018. That bill did not advance in the Senate.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Trump Endorses Permanent Daylight Savings Time

Comments Filter:
  • by Snotnose ( 212196 ) on Monday March 11, 2019 @08:02PM (#58257758)
    I don't care if it's DST or standard, just quit changing the damn thing twice a year. Myself, I prefer it getting darker later, whichever one that is. But I don't care enough to change my damned sleep cycle twice a year.
    • by supremebob ( 574732 ) <themejunky AT geocities DOT com> on Monday March 11, 2019 @08:16PM (#58257842) Journal

      I never really understood why we "fell back" to standard time during winter, the one time of the year where the extra hour of daylight in the evening was the most useful.

      Daylight until 8:30 PM during Summer never seemed all that helpful, but daylight when you're trying to drive home from work around 5:30? Now THAT is useful!

      Yeah, sure... It would be better yet if management left everyone leave at 4 PM during Winter to improve their commutes, but we all know that's not going to happen in most organizations.

      • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

        DST was originally to benefit farmers whose workday was dictated by daylight hours. Since that's not an issue anymore we don't need DST.
      • Because daylight earlier in the morning helps people wake up. I know it helps me.

        Permanent day light savings time would be fine with me though. But congress is the only one that can change it. Individual states can't.

        • by dryeo ( 100693 )

          Why can't the individual States decide? Here, in Canada, it is a Provincial decision. Shit there's currently a private members bill in my Provinces legislature to create a new time zone splitting the Province, and it could pass and officially we'll follow the Western States decision to stay in sync according to the government.
          Probably have to give the feds notice though as they're in charge of stuff like ships and railroads.

          • Why can't the individual States decide?

            Because that's the way the laws were written a few decades back when they implemented the current system. Not saying it is good or bad, just that that's what happened. Canada evidently wrote their laws differently which is neither better nor worse - just a different solution to the same problem. For whatever reason the federal law in the US allows states to opt out of DST permanently but does not permit opting in permanently. Not sure why but that's what happened. Since this is a federal law it require

      • as has been pointed out originally it was for farmers. After that the reason we kept it around was shopping. People shop more when there's more daylight, so the retail chains fought to keep DST to maximize daily shopping time. Retail has waned quite a bit so there's less pressure to keep it.

        You'd be amazed how many things in your life you take for granted are that way because a company wanted it that way.
        • You'd be amazed how many things in your life you take for granted are that way because...

          Because somebody told you that the things were that way, and instead of taking that as encouragement to look the subject up since it interested you, instead you just believed whatever the person told you. And so you've got this giant load of bullshit inside your head that you carry around and sometimes share.

          It involved shopping in a way, but not directly; it was the BBQ Lobby that encouraged the last extension.

          The biggest shopping day of the year is in November. The biggest shopping season is late fall/ear

      • by mark-t ( 151149 ) <markt AT nerdflat DOT com> on Monday March 11, 2019 @10:31PM (#58258406) Journal

        Daylight until 8:30 PM during Summer never seemed all that helpful, but daylight when you're trying to drive home from work around 5:30? Now THAT is useful!

        Not nearly as useful as having exposure to at least *some* sunlight in the morning before a person start's their work day. While it's true that many people begin their commute while it is still dark in the winter, a *vast* majority of them still get to experience at least some sunlight before heading indoors at the end of their commute. Exposure to even just 15 minutes of sunlight in the morning boosts seratonin levels, which in turn boosts melatonin production in the evening and is vital for having healthy and restful sleep... delaying exposure to sunlight until later in the day does not boost seratonin levels as high as it will in the morning and further delays melatonin production, leading to health problems related to the lack of restful sleep. You're talking about a "nice to have", but comparing it to something that we are biologically adapted to, which is to function primarily during the day.... well, as I've said before on this subject, evolution is not a democracy.

        And while you wouldn't get the sudden chaos that changing the clocks twice per year brings, instead slowly ramping up and then slowly ramping down throughout the winter, but keeping the clocks pushed ahead through the winter months would be certainly disasterous for a period of about 3 to 4 weeks in the middle of winter for people who live north of about 45 degrees, which while not a majority of Americans, is still not a small a number.

      • My interpretation was that it was always about giving your employer the best hours of your day.
      • Comment removed based on user account deletion
      • by e3m4n ( 947977 )

        They spring forward to ‘save’ daylight because otherwise sunrise would be 4:30AM. I dont get why everyone is such a pussy about the whole thing. Try going on a WestPac deployment. We changed times more than 24times in 6mos. Go across the internatiomal date line and see how far off that throws you. Being the navy, they never gave you that extra hour during sleep. It was always lose an hour at night and gain an hour during ships working hours (0600 - 1600). With our current timechanges, If I

    • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 11, 2019 @08:52PM (#58258000)

      Look I get it - Winter is dark up north. And the sun comes up really early in the summer (I have daylight from 5ish AM to almost 10pm where I live). Fireworks don't start until 9:30.

      But I too hate the 1 hour forward/back. It's miserable. Why not get the benefits of both and pick the middle.

    • I grew up in Indiana (when they didn't observe) and it was glorious. The only thing we ever noticed was that all our summer TV shows were 'central time'.

      This whole twice a year thing is jarring. We ate dinner at 9 tonight because we're used to looking outside to judge when to start stuff.

      Plus all the studies of morbidity in hospitals and traffic accidents.

      Daylight-saving time is literally killing us [businessinsider.com]

      But each year on the Monday after the springtime switch, hospitals report a 24% spike in heart-attack visits around the US.

      Then again, I'm sort of a diehard UTC person. College caught me that who cares what time you wake up on the c

      • by magarity ( 164372 ) on Monday March 11, 2019 @09:35PM (#58258204)

        Then again, I'm sort of a diehard UTC person. College caught me that who cares what time you wake up on the clock. Especially with the global economy I know business meetings across 4 timezones and all their nuances would go a lot smoother if we just set UTC meeting times.

        China has all one time zone - it's rather strange to fly west 4 hours and not change your watch. And the sun comes up at 3 am. Although their mentality about it is that Beijing is the center of their universe so everyone is on that city's time.

      • While I agree changing the clock is stupid and lame, the "killing people" part is a bit iffy.

        The statistic presented sets off my BS detector, because who cares about a 1 day spike? What people actually care about is if more heart attacks happened than would have happened otherwise. So when they give you the statistic about same-day admissions and things, it seems to imply that they didn't have the better stat; an actual increase in total heart attacks.

        So lets say that some people with heart disease are real

    • Darker later = get up earlier. It that what you want?

  • by Y2K is bogus ( 7647 ) on Monday March 11, 2019 @08:04PM (#58257770)

    Trump says something that isn't completely idiotic!

    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward

      And he even got the Daylight vs Standard Time distinction correct, and expressed a policy choice succinctly.

      Which means somebody else wrote the tweet.

    • Re: (Score:2, Funny)

      by Tablizer ( 95088 )

      About time he says something right. [paraphrased]

      You know what they say about a broken daylight savings clock being right twice a year.

    • by rnturn ( 11092 ) on Monday March 11, 2019 @08:20PM (#58257862)

      Yeah but there's always the chance that he said that because he thinks it's actually saving daylight.

    • Trump says something that isn't completely idiotic!
      Could have been just dumb luck, it's a simple binary choice.
      • >"it's a simple binary choice."

        Not really. It is a simple trinary choice-

        1) Do nothing and continue this insane time changing twice a year that the vast majority of people dislike or even hate.
        2) Stay on standard time year-round.
        3) And the BEST choice of all- stay on summer time (daylight saving time) year-round.

        But somehow even this will be made partisan, like everything else now, and then go nowhere. So we will be stuck with the worst choice (#1). Count on it.

        • by dryeo ( 100693 )

          Numbers 2 and 3 really depend on where in your timezone you are. There's an hour or so difference between the east and west.

        • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

          You really think there are only three choices? Tisk.

        • The flaw in your third proposal is, staying on summer time year-round does not make it summer year-round.

    • by spitzak ( 4019 ) on Monday March 11, 2019 @08:34PM (#58257916) Homepage

      Even a stopped clock is right twice a day!

      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        Not when the clocks go forward and we lose an hour. That day it's never 01:30!

        • by spitzak ( 4019 )

          On the day clocks go back a stopped clock can be right 3 times, however. So it makes up for it.

    • is right twice a day.
    • A broken clock is right twice each day
  • by Tablizer ( 95088 ) on Monday March 11, 2019 @08:11PM (#58257816) Journal

    I bet he asked it be named, "Trump Standard Time". And maybe "Time Force" the second option.

  • Trumpy and I agree about something. Repent, for the end is near.
  • by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Monday March 11, 2019 @08:30PM (#58257888)

    If you know this president then it's that he flip-flops when the pressure is on. As soon as a Republican objects he will change his position. Count on it.

    • FOX mistakenly probably gave him the idea with the yearly bitching that losing an hour causes; they'll set him straight on if he gets serious... unless they poll it gains him a few points... They've still got to win over the smarter portion of the below average IQ voters.

      Stupid or Evil. Ignorance of him is no longer an excuse.

  • Standard all year (Score:4, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 11, 2019 @08:37PM (#58257934)

    Thoose advocating year round DST don't remember the disaster in the mid-70s. The country switched to year round DST for two years. It was quickly killed for many reasons. Scvhool children going to class in the dark was one, another was that people in cold country discovered that an extra hour of sun in the evening was of no benefit, but darkness until 8:320 or 9 was a pain.
    I hope rational heads will prevail on this, at a minimum keep the current system, or better yet, kill DST altogether.

    • This argument baffles me. Here's a concept. Get up earlier or go to bed later. The amount of time in the day is unchanged.

      What? It's dark for kids? You know schools can choose what hours they open and close?

      What? Construction workers have to work in the dark? They too can change what hours they work. Just like they do when it rains.

      • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

        You know schools can choose what hours they open and close?

        But many parents can't choose what time they have to be at work, and often they are affected by what time little Johnny goes to or returns from school. There's no simple solution that's not going to cause grief for some large portion of the population.

        I personally like DST, but then having worked rotating shifts for several years, a one hour change seems hardly noticeable to me.

    • by hey! ( 33014 )

      In 1969, 48% of K-8 students walked or biked to school. By 2016 that percentage dropped to less than 10%. In my part of the country, the norm of shoveling sidewalks is no longer enforced meaning that walking often requires detours into the street.

      Since this makes winter walking to school impractical, it's a moot issue. Personally, I think kids should walk to school, and the sidewalks should be cleared at least four feet wide. Schools could simply move their start later in the day.

      • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

        In 1969, we didn't have helicopter parents. I walked seven blocks unescorted to and from elementary school in Detroit up until that year. Now, I see parents sitting out at the bus stop in front of my suburban home every day just to pick up their middle school kids on bright sunny mornings and afternoons. This is in a very crime free area of upper middle class homes. Sweet Jesus what is wrong with parents these days? None of these kids has more than a 1/4 mile walk to home. SMH

  • Why? Because it has for worked well for millenia.

    • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

      The first clock was invented in 1656, so 363 years at most, but then you came here for the pedantic replies.

    • by _merlin ( 160982 )

      Clocks and "standard time" have existed for a few hundred years. For millennia, people defined the start of the day as astronomical sunrise. DST is supposed to be a kind of compromise for the way astronomical sunrise time varies throughout the year.

  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • Re: (Score:2, Informative)

      by mark-t ( 151149 )

      It doesn't save any daylight though... it steels some from the morning to add some in the evening.

      And considering the proven health benefits that exist for having exposure to the sun in the morning, it's better from a health-perspective if the sun rises earlier rather than later anyways, so the entire concept of DST Is just plain fucking stupid, completely ignoring human biology and fundamental truths about how humans have adapted and evolved.

      • Well, technically, it *is* "saving" daylight from the perspective of most people. Very few people are awake & take advantage of daylight at 5:30am. Nearly everyone is awake & appreciates extra daylight after work, including most of the people who ARE awake at 5:30am.

    • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

      I'd be willing to bet you say "hot water heater", "ATM machine", and "PIN number". Language evolves, and so should we.

    • Um, yeah, you are -- how else are you planning to pay it back once November rolls around?

  • Please pass this and eliminate the clock switching madness.

  • by tsa ( 15680 )

    The idiot said something.

    Why is this even news? Amd why is it on /.?

    • by dcw3 ( 649211 )

      Because based upon comments here, it's the first time a majority of /.ers have agreed with him.

  • A million Unix sysadmins' heads would explode.

    • by djinn6 ( 1868030 )

      Sorry, TAI is where we need to go. Screw leap seconds.

    • The only people who would like this idea are Unix sysadmins. For the rest of us, it matters that lunch is around noon, that office hours are roughly from 8-5, that people are usually in bed at midnight. We don't care what time it is in Greenwich, UK.

      • We don't care what time it is in Greenwich, UK.

        Those who work with people in other countries would care a lot, and those who do any long-distance travel. Which not a small bunch. For those, a global standard time would be extremely convenient.

        Of course, this would mean a lot of adjustment for your local time. But DST already makes solar noon at 1 PM, which is not its natural time. Your local working hours would still be around solar noon, just not using numbers like 8 AM to 5 PM. Especially when "AM" and "PM" refer to before and after noon -- you rea

  • Ottawa is in about the middle of the Eastern Time zone. 9 to 5 is the standard work day. Sun rise in Ottawa in late december is after 7:30am. If we went to DST it would mean sun rise at 8:30am. So leaving for work in darkness. If we move west in the time zone things get worse. Detroit sun rise would be 9am so the entire morning commute would be in the dark. Poor Thunderbay would see the sun rise at 10am.
  • Liberals will now find reasons to hate on this, too. Basically Trump can control them through reverse psychology. Support Jews, and liberals become literally Hitler. Checkmate.

  • What is wrong with permanent standard time? Trump upholds idiocracy.

    • What is wrong with permanent standard time? Trump upholds idiocracy.

      People want an extra hour of sunshine in the evening when they are free to be outside, not in the morning when they work in offices, attend school, or still sleep.

  • so why do we want to change that?
    The definition per-se of noon is "sun in zenith".

    If people feel it's dark too early, well then change working times par law, instead of changing time per law.
    It's so silly
    Some law says we should start work at 8, but it's dark. Oh, let's do another law to change the time, so it's sunny at 8.

    This is sooo Trump

  • Beyond stupid... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Pyramid ( 57001 ) on Tuesday March 12, 2019 @09:38AM (#58260702)

    You can't make a rope longer by cutting a foot off one end and attaching it to the other. "Permanent DST" is identical to getting up 1 hour earlier. Just leave how we indicate time alone so the sun is (roughly) at its greatest height on the ecliptic at noon in any given time zone instead of playing a stupid shell game that doesn't do anything but mess up astronomical time.

Don't tell me how hard you work. Tell me how much you get done. -- James J. Ling

Working...