Teenaged YouTube 'Counter-Strike' Star Dies, Kills Two In Fiery Wrong-Way Highway Crash (sandiegouniontribune.com) 345
The San Diego Union-Tribune reports:
The 18-year-old who sped the wrong way down state Route 805 Thursday, crashing into a SUV and killing himself, a 12-year-old girl and her mother, was a YouTube star who had made a small fortune in video gaming gambling, according to authorities and hundreds of gaming fans on Twitter. The California Highway Patrol identified him Friday as Trevor Heitmann of San Diego. But the nearly 900,000 subscribers to his YouTube video channel and his Twitter followers knew him as "McSkillet"...
Kevin Hitt, editor in chief of VPesport.com online gaming news outlet, said Valve, under constraints from the state of Washington gambling commission, confiscated about $200,000 worth of McSkillet's skins and shut down his ability to acquire more.
VPEsports reports: Heitmann was one of the biggest names in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CSGO) skin trading when in late 2017, Valve, developers of CSGO, banned all of Heitmann's Steam platform accounts, shutting down his entire skin trading and collecting empire... The ban by Valve precluded Heitmann from being able to unbox, gamble, or trade skins which directly affected his ability to monetize his YouTube videos which saw viewer counts anywhere between 250,000 to 4.3 million. He hasn't posted a video since....
Before the fatal crash, Heitmann purposely drove his vehicle into the Ashley Falls Elementary School front gate that had a sign on the front that had the word "STEAM" printed on it in reference to a magnet program which supports science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics. After breaking a window, he then drove onto the soccer field, spinning his car in circles a couple of times before leaving.
A CHP office says Heitmann's speed was estimated at over 100 miles per hour before his final fiery crash -- and that Heitmann's $250,000 McLaren sports car "disintegrated", while the SUV was so badly burned investigators couldn't determine whether its two passengers -- Aileen Pizarro and her 12-year-old daughter Aryana Pizarro -- had been wearing seat belts.
Aileen's 22-year-old son has started a GoFundMe page "to help aid my family with funeral costs and any additional expenses related to Aileen and Aryana's deaths."
Kevin Hitt, editor in chief of VPesport.com online gaming news outlet, said Valve, under constraints from the state of Washington gambling commission, confiscated about $200,000 worth of McSkillet's skins and shut down his ability to acquire more.
VPEsports reports: Heitmann was one of the biggest names in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive (CSGO) skin trading when in late 2017, Valve, developers of CSGO, banned all of Heitmann's Steam platform accounts, shutting down his entire skin trading and collecting empire... The ban by Valve precluded Heitmann from being able to unbox, gamble, or trade skins which directly affected his ability to monetize his YouTube videos which saw viewer counts anywhere between 250,000 to 4.3 million. He hasn't posted a video since....
Before the fatal crash, Heitmann purposely drove his vehicle into the Ashley Falls Elementary School front gate that had a sign on the front that had the word "STEAM" printed on it in reference to a magnet program which supports science, technology, engineering, arts and mathematics. After breaking a window, he then drove onto the soccer field, spinning his car in circles a couple of times before leaving.
A CHP office says Heitmann's speed was estimated at over 100 miles per hour before his final fiery crash -- and that Heitmann's $250,000 McLaren sports car "disintegrated", while the SUV was so badly burned investigators couldn't determine whether its two passengers -- Aileen Pizarro and her 12-year-old daughter Aryana Pizarro -- had been wearing seat belts.
Aileen's 22-year-old son has started a GoFundMe page "to help aid my family with funeral costs and any additional expenses related to Aileen and Aryana's deaths."
Suicide (Score:5, Insightful)
Committing suicide is one thing, but in do it in such a manner that you take other innocent lives with you, is fucking horribly twisted. Almost makes me wish that a Hell really does exist.
Re:Suicide (Score:5, Insightful)
It sounds like typical psychological projection [rationalwiki.org]. He felt he was wrongly punished. So he lashed out, using the justification that if an "innocent" such as himself could be made to suffer, then it was OK for him to make another innocent suffer.
I've had to caution a couple of my friends who "struck it rich" from a single income source like he did. Don't blow your money on toys and transient things like fast cars and hot women. Save it, invest it, use it to diversify your income stream. That way if that original income source disappears, you're not left high and dry like he was. Worst case you just have to reintegrate into society like a regular person, except you have a huge nest egg saved up to help you.
Re: (Score:2)
Or he was just depressed having lost his successful creation and by impulse started to risk his own life and this happened and it may not have been planned or rationalized at all.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm shocked! Shocked I tell you!
Re: (Score:2)
Yet it happens - pilots crashing planes deliberately is another one that routinely shocks people. The recent Horizon Air "hijack" was notable in that it was only the guy on board - usually there are other innocent passengers just expecting to begin a nice vacation or looking forward to coming home to family and not be a pa
Re: (Score:2)
If you believe that a mother wouldn't be upset about her daughter being murdered by a narcissistic asshole because it sparked "valuable discussions and debate", then you're either a sociopath or an utter moron.
Re: (Score:2)
Knowledge comes in two forms - intellectual and experiential.
Your fallacy is that you are looking for intellectual knowledge or intellectual proof - which you will NEVER find. E.g. 1+1=2.
You will have you experiential proof when you die and realize your consciousness is 100% independent of your dead physical body; that is, your physical body will be nothing more then an empty shell but your thoughts will continue. E.g. I know what red is and how it differs from green because I can SEE both of them. How woul
I guess I'll never have a McLaren (Score:5, Insightful)
For the life of me, I cannot wrap my head around the vanity needed to be buying skins for a shooter game.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Money and glory are feishized. Sometimes, fetishes are lethal.
What was it? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
That liberty is good and restrictions are bad.
As long as you don't rob people of their skins with the gambling sites just let people gamble with their (actual terms may not say it's "their" skins) skins if they want to.
Re: (Score:2)
Seems like he had mental health issues, probably relating to the ban and loss of income. Given his wealth it seems unlikely that he couldn't afford metal healthcare.
So why didn't he seek out help? We can only speculate but it's often the stigma attached to mental health issues, especially for men.
We could also ask if maybe YouTube and Twitch could offer more support. At the very least require 18 year olds making that kind of money on their services to have a proper manager and maybe offer them a mentor.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure. Because Google assigning managers that take a 10% cut couldn't possibly be a conflict of interest.
Re: (Score:2)
They wouldn't assign one, merely require such users to get one.
Re: (Score:2)
What's really sad is that we used to be able to at least talk about this stuff on Slashdot. Now it gets modded down.
Re: (Score:2)
I guess he taught us a lesson. What was it?
Get your depression (whether freestanding or part of bipolar) treated.
Everyone has setbacks, often severe ones. But healthy people do not respond to them by harming themselves and others.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, it's easy to think that evil is a mere matter of mental health--and I agree that plenty of bad things are the result of people either not seeking or not having the means to acquire proper treatment. But the fact is that healthy people are still able to make decisions, and many of our decisions selfishly build up ourselves at the expense of others. Being healthy does not cause us to choose morally good or helpful activities all of the time.
No one of us can say for sure whether this particular case was
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, it's easy to think that evil is a mere matter of mental health--and I agree that plenty of bad things are the result of people either not seeking or not having the means to acquire proper treatment. But the fact is that healthy people are still able to make decisions, and many of our decisions selfishly build up ourselves at the expense of others. Being healthy does not cause us to choose morally good or helpful activities all of the time.
No one of us can say for sure whether this particular case was a matter of mental illness or not, but we shouldn't assume from the start that simply because he did something harmful that he was not free in doing so. If we are not free to do evil, then how can we pretend to be free to do anything good? If we don't hold ourselves responsible for our bad decisions, how can we claim any merit for our good ones? Or to put it in another manner: how can we be sure that our good actions are not also the byproduct of mental health issues?
Well, I'm not his doctor, so of course I can't be sure. I'm just spouting off on /.
Had he responded to his setbacks by becoming, say, a bank robber, I'd more more inclined towards your take on it though.
Re: (Score:2)
It wouldn't necessarily be depression. Teenage brains are not fully developed. Take one drowning in testosterone, add too much money, and presto: instant dangerous person.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
this should be held up as an example of success where a large company finally mostly protects their/your data and honestly reports details quickly.
That there are better ways to train for Grand Theft Auto.
Headline (Score:5, Insightful)
"Kills"? Try the word "murders". Killing people in a car crash can be accidental. This guy murdered two innocent people.
Re: (Score:2)
I, personally, agree but in American law there has to be an intent to kill. Merely killing with a full knowledge that that's the outcome but with no actual intent tends to be considered manslaughter or accidental.
Re: (Score:2)
The legal idea that committing a felony that risks others and thus constitutes murder is called "felony murder". As best I can tell, every state acknowledges felony murder as equivalent to the most deliberate and most punishable forms of deliberate murder.
Re: (Score:2)
The legal idea that committing a felony that risks others and thus constitutes murder is called "felony murder". As best I can tell, every state acknowledges felony murder as equivalent to the most deliberate and most punishable forms of deliberate murder.
Correct. However neither going over 100 nor reckless driving are felonies in California, so "felony murder" doesn't count here. In California, vehicular manslaughter is its own thing, and it in and of itself can be either charged as a felony or a misdemeanor, depending on if the defendant was negligent or "grossly negligent". Vehicular manslaughter can separately be upgraded to murder (usually in the second degree) if there was what CA calls "implied malice". This is a bit vague, but:
“Implied malice c
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
If he somehow managed to live and had to face tri
Money, Mental healthcare, community policing (Score:2)
Money is a status symbol. It's a surrogate for having any kind of sense. If he wasn't capable of earning millions - if total earnings are capped per unit time, along with total wealth, as per Plato's suggestion, he wouldn't have become addicted.
Nobody becomes suicidal overnight. If instead of holding to some outmoded macho image that was out of style in the 60s and an insurance system that makes mental healthcare highly profitable by doing little and charging a lot, there was a system in place that correcte
Re:Money, Mental healthcare, community policing (Score:4, Insightful)
There is no system that "corrects issues early, quickly, cheaply and effectively". Even if mental health services were socialized (which they should be, really, because untreated mental illness affects us all), it would still be neither quick nor necessarily effective.
Any reason/motive? (Score:2)
This looks like an extended suicide "I I'll go out with a flash and a bang" type thing.
Any reasons for that? Was his star dwindling? Did he have other troubles?
The lesson here is... (Score:2)
Mental health is no joke, stop pretending it is.
Let Me Help You With That, Editors.... (Score:2, Insightful)
Middle-aged Video Poker Star Dies, Kills 58 In Bullet-ridden Gun-misfiring Hotel Incident
WTF, Slashdot? Murder-suicide is now just some sort of gaming side-effect that needs to be listed on the label?
18 Is Too Young (Score:2)
They should restrict the sale and licensing of full sized automobiles* to those 21 and over. Bring in Kei cars for the teenagers.
*And no full auto either.
And his assets? (Score:5, Insightful)
Every penny of what he had should be given/sold to the family so they don't need a gofundme to pay for the funeral/reparations.
STEAM? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I think it's more the fact that the bodies we so badly burned, the investigators were not able to complete straightforwards and standard tasks, like determining if the seat belts were worn by the occupants.
Re:Seat belts? (Score:5, Insightful)
The seatbelt thing is meant to describe the level of carnage that this hormone-filled douche bag inflicted on innocent bystanders due to his inability to control his emotions. He torched a little girl and his mother so bad the police could barely figure out who he murdered. It has nothing to do with safety. Obviously everyone will be dead in a 100mph head-on collision. I hope he burns in hell.
Re: (Score:2)
That is an interesting theory. With modern air bags, and the difficulty of good forensic analysis after a vehicle fire, I suspect that the body _locations_ were not very different, and that the positions were very difficult to analyze on the scene.
Re:Seat belts? (Score:4, Insightful)
>"This event also makes driving laws in some other countries (Australia is the first that comes to mind) look better than our own. They restrict the use of high-powered vehicles until the driver has a certain amount of driving experience -- five years, if I remember right."
Different (objective), not better (generally subjective).
In any case- ANY modern car can go 100 MPH, the estimated speed of this accident. In many places in the USA, the highest speed limit is 80 (and 85 in a few tiny spots), with people reasonably going 5 over. You don't need a "performance" [high-powered] vehicle to do that.
Now, most would admit that "performance" vehicles may further coax certain [already reckless-leaning] people to do reckless things.
Re: (Score:3)
Some people don't know how to control high powered vehicles. Of course, it only takes a short bit of training to get used to them, which I'm sure this dork had. It basically sounds like he was drunk, rich, or drunk and rich, either way not suitable for being on the road.
Re: (Score:3)
I take it that Australia also makes it illegal to travel the wrong way down a highway if you're an inexperienced driver?
Face it, going 100 the wrong way down a highway sounds more like a suicide attempt than a failure in driving laws....
Re: (Score:2)
They restrict the use of high-powered vehicles
Why would it matter if it's high powered or not? I used to drive a 90s something Honda Civic which could go over 100 mph. I know of no one who calls a stock Civic a high powered vehicle.
Re: (Score:2)
It appears the only requirements for McLaren are that if you want their flagship car [wikipedia.org], you have to be a "loyal customer" [headinformation.com] (such as the type that buys $250,000 "production cars").
Re: (Score:3)
Or, he wouldn't have found it so easy to build up that much speed
My beat-to-hell, 5500 pound pickup truck that's coming up on 200,000 miles will still hit 100 mph faster than a lot of cars will. That speed is a pretty low bar for modern cars, and my truck is about the least flashy thing anyone could hope to drive.
Re: (Score:3)
Do you people just intuitively try to restrict freedom?
Because it's so much easier than usefully addressing the cause of the problem?
Re: (Score:3)
I remember when I was new to driving. I ended up using a 1967 Mustang for a day, with a 302, that belonged to a friend. Well that was OK until it started raining and I managed to spin out while trying to make a left turn. Luckily I didn't hit anything, but I found myself facing directly into traffic, which had already stopped to watch my foolishness.
Having some more experience would have helped.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Seat belts? (Score:5, Informative)
Firefighter here - in my response area we have a single lane undivided roadway with a 50mph speed limit and we routinely see survivors of head on 100-120mph collisions. Airbags play a big factor as do crumple zones, as do seatbelts. Iâ(TM)ll add that in my career, 16+ years and counting, everyone Iâ(TM)ve cut out of cars who was wearing a seat belt survived. As an aside, we sometimes have to pick up motorcyclists with a shovel, and hose away the pieces too small to pick up.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
So full of crap.
The P=mv equation plays here. Mass and relative velocity of BOTH vehicles must be considered.
If they are moving in opposite directions, then there is more energy in the collision.
Then you can't treat a CAR as a SOLID WALL. They are designed to deform during the crash. This is the difference between an elastic and in-elastic collision. During the collision, some energy will be lost in deforming of the vehicles.
A head on by two cars travelling at 50MPH is definitely worse than a single car hit
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Not this crap again. Didn't they bust this myth on Mythbusters too? It doesn't matter what you hit, a wall or another object travelling at an arbitrary speed in arbitrary direction. All that matters is delta V. If you were travelling at 50 mph and then as the result of collision ended up travelling 0 mph -- it absolutely doesn't matter what was the object that you hit, a wall, or another car with similar mass head on -- the kinetic energy that you need to dissipate is exactly the same. Yeah, there are nuanc
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
All that matters is delta V.
Energy-wise yeah, but the damage is drastically different depending on the distance that energy has been dissipated over:
* if you hit a solid wall, the distance is 0 (plus your car's internal crumple zones)
* if you hit a similar car coming head-on with the same speed, the distance is 0 (plus your own car's (only) internal crumple zones)
* if you hit a parked car with handbrake off, you may move it several meters before coming to a halt
Same difference as falling onto hard floor vs falling onto a pillow, from
Re: Seat belts? (Score:4, Insightful)
A head on by two cars travelling at 50MPH is definitely worse than a single car hitting a solid immovable wall at 50MPH.
No. [youtube.com] Your car will deform on your side, their car will deform on their side and the net effect is the same as hitting an immovable wall. Now between two equal cars the damage scales with the relative speed difference, regardless of distribution. Like 50+50 and 100+0 ends up the same, it's still two crumple zones meeting at 100 mph. If you have unequal weights the heavier vehicle will maintain some momentum and thus have less deceleration, which is quite obvious if you consider car vs motorcycle. Though what happens to the passengers depends on the car, there's some very complex systems to soften the impact of the deceleration. If you connected a solid steel rod from the front of the car to the car seat people would die real quick.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Two cars colliding frontal with 50 mph each, is equivalent to one car hitting a standing car (wall) with 100mph.
It seems intuitive, but it's not true, because kinetic energy is not proportional to the speed, but to the speed squared. For simplification let's assume the vast majority of the cars' kinetic energy before the collision ends up in the deformation of the crumple zones, and compare the energies in the two cases. In both cases, the kinetic energy after the collision is 0, so by computing the kinetic energy before the collision we can find out how much the crumple zones have absorbed.
In the car-car scenario, t
Re: (Score:3)
Your conclusion is correct but you're off with the kinetic energy formula. The formula presumes an inertial frame of reference; simply put, the "oncoming" object - whether a car or a wall - will have the same relative speed so the KE transfer will be the same (mass differences and inelasticity aside) in both scenarios.
However, as you point out, the "car vs car" scenario involves twice as much crumple zone - which means for any given relative speed, twice as much energy can be absorbed rather than going into
Re: (Score:2)
What is clear in the linked article, is that a collision between two cars is not similar to a collision between a car and an immovable solid object such as a wall or bridge abutment.
Re: (Score:2)
That's not an explanation. If you replace a car with an immovable object, the impact would be the same as one car vs. immovable object. If you replace one car with a teddy bear, the impact would be the same as a car vs. a teddy bear.
Only in a direct head on collision, with two similarly weighted vehicles, where they both essentially come to an immediate halt, is that true.
Most likely the victim tried to swerve out of the way, adding rotational forces and an indirect collision, making it worse.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Seat belts? (Score:5, Insightful)
I've heard this stupid mantra for 40+ years. The chances of you being in an accident where, seatbelt = burned alive and no seat belt = instant death, is very close to zero.
The other common argument is no seatbelt = instant death is better than seatbelt = vegetable. Which is fine except the set of car accidents where no seat belt = vegetable and seatbelt = perfectly fine is much much larger.
In short if you want to avoid horrible death or long term disability then wear a fucking seatbelt, or don't reproduce because you're mucking up the gene pool
Re: (Score:2)
F1 drivers can handle such collisions, but they use safety harnesses rather than seatbelts. Harnesses, incidentally, that seem less failure prone than seatbelts in the event of an accident.
Of course, the total destruction in this case makes that a moot point.
SUVs are not terribly safe vehicles anyway, but it's hard to see what could have been done here. Airbags on the front of the vehicle? Ejector seats? I'm not sure either would have worked.
Re: (Score:2)
F1 drivers also have safety cages. That's all great for protecting one person, but most of us have cars that can carry more than just a driver.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
F1 drivers also have safety cages. That's all great for protecting one person, but most of us have cars that can carry more than just a driver.
Other types of drivers have safety cages too, even when they race in vehicles that can hold more than one person. A WRC car can roll, tumble, and cartwheel multiple times before hitting a tree and the driver and co-driver can both get out and walk away in many cases. It's well past time to ask why race cars have to be safe in high-speed collisions, but street cars don't.
Re: (Score:2)
The added weight of roll cages in passenger cars would fuck up the MPG ratings and manufacturers would have to engineer better.
Re: (Score:2)
Professional football players walk away from very high energy physical assaults every game with no injury at all, I think every person should be required to wear head to toe protective gear and exercise 20-30 hours a week in order to prevent needless injury. That is what you just described. One is a sport, the other is real life. What makes perfect sense to require in a totally voluntary sport with extremely high budgets per “player” would never work in real life.
After all this car also CAUGH
Re: (Score:2)
Professional football players walk away from very high energy physical assaults every game with no injury at all
In fact, many of them walk away with brain injuries.
I think every person should be required to wear head to toe protective gear and exercise 20-30 hours a week in order to prevent needless injury. That is what you just described.
Complete falsehood. Crash safety can be improved significantly without the driver even noticing that anything has changed, except cost. But since it costs everyone money when people die in a crash, it's reasonable to expect drivers to spend more money on safety.
After all this car also CAUGHT FIRE, maybe if we require halon systems with drop down oxygen support in all cars we could prevent this sort of tragedy.
We should absolutely require fire extinguishing systems such as are commonly installed in racing cars, with automatic trigger systems such as are commonly installed in transit and school buses. The
Re: (Score:2)
F1 cars are designed for that. It's not just the harness. They also cost lots and lots of money.
If you want that level of 'safety', shell out $1,000,000 for your grocery getter, and be prepared to rebuild it after every little fender bender.
Re: (Score:2)
I understand the point was to highlight the aftermath of the crash, but seat belts aren't going to save you if someone comes at you head-on at 100 MPH.
It would obviously depend on the masses of the vehicles involved. I was wondering for a moment whether an SUV might be heavy enough relative to a sports car to give you some chance of survival, but probably not at that speed difference.
Re: (Score:2)
I think it mentions it in an attempt to stop the barrage of questions as to whether they were wearing them or not.
Especially in CA I find it hard to believe any 12 year old wouldn't be wearing one. It's so ingrained into society at this point and at least the small glimpse into the lives of the victims shows them to be in a demographic that is probably 99% the car doesn't move without it being on.
Re: (Score:3)
I've been in car crashes that didn't kill anyone. That's as much experience as most of the people around here are going to have -- or are you saying that only traffic safety engineers and automotive engineers have any right to discuss the topic?
Re: (Score:2)
You set up an online casino in which people use real money to play but get paid out in digital artwork.
Re: (Score:2)
Because you can sell the artwork to get money, so the artwork may in some way be though of as a proxy for cash.
Re:Why is trading skins gambling? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Testosterone (Score:5, Insightful)
I have been wondering why driving licenses are given to persons with high testosterone level?
Why not ban driving if your testosterone level is above certain safe threshold?
This has nothing to do with unsafe driving, it was a guy committing suicide in a way that killed two other people in the process.
Re: (Score:2)
> This has nothing to do with unsafe driving,
Such a combined murder and suicide by driving would seem to be the epitome of unsafe driving.
> I have been wondering why driving licenses are given to persons with high testosterone level? There are many good studies that show male suicide tends to be more successful, but it's hardly unique to men, or even to men with high testosterone. _Depression_ has led many to self-destructive actions, and to self-destruction that imperils other people.
Re: Testosterone (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Tell that to Goebel's wife.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, he pretty much took time out of his busy schedule ripping people off to commit a heinous crime. Good riddance.
Re: (Score:3)
The "gig economy" involves monopolistic control for the gatekeepers, and zero rights for employees. We can probably expect more of this, barring some regulatory effort.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm reminded of the woman [cbsnews.com] who likewise killed herself and tried to kill others, when she was likewise effectively fired from her job making Youtube videos without appeal or recourse. She didn't even get an explanation, I don't know if that's the case for this guy.
The "gig economy" involves monopolistic control for the gatekeepers, and zero rights for employees. We can probably expect more of this, barring some regulatory effort.
My first instinct on this story was to make some comment on how crazy was one way to make popular Youtube videos, and combining crazy with an income stream that might be taken away at any moment is a recipe for trouble.
However, I didn't make the comment since this was only a single incident... until you reminded me that this is the second such incident of a mentally unstable Youtuber going on a murder suicide when they lost their income stream.
I fear this isn't going to be the last incident, Youtube is goin
Excessive cars. (Score:2, Insightful)
If mass transit was commonplace, convenient and cheap and if there wasn't so much hostility to talking, then you could seriously restrict driving and pedestrianise large areas without inconveniencing anyone.
That might have meant the girl was on a bus, tram or train rather than vulnerable car.
That might also have meant the lunatic wasn't able to buy a car or didn't want one as it wasn't a status symbol.
Re: (Score:2)
Agreed. Car crime has clearly gotten out of control. We must ban cars! The Constitution only said cars were to be allowed "as part of a well-regulated militia fleet" NOT for regular civilians. SOMEONE WRITE AN OP-ED FOR THE HUFFINGTON POST, NOW!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Among people with no legs, ankle twisting would be replaced with wrist twisting. (Case in point: Swedish vrist means ankle.)
Weebles wobble but they don't fall down (Score:2)
If you cut off everyone's legs at birth [...] no one would ever twist their ankle.
Nobody would get tired legs while waiting in line either. So many positives I can't believe we're not doing it yet.
Turns out there's an animated series about a community of people with no legs. It's called Weebles [youtube.com].
Re: (Score:2)
People have been taught by supplement marketers to regard testosterone as some kind of magic potion that makes you more of a man. If that were true and you think that's good, then testosterone would make you better; if you think that's bad then testosterone would make you worse..
But even if testosterone worked the way the snake-oil hawkers want you to think it does, knowing an individual's testosterone levels wouldn't tell you anything about them because you don't know how sensitive that person's brain is
Re: (Score:2)
I thought sociopathy was linked to neurological defects/abnormalities. Now maybe in utero hormone levels might be responsible, at least in part, but the research I've seen is that most cases of antisocial disorder are really a matter of how the brain works.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, like I said it's early days yet, but I doubt, when we finally get to a good understanding, it'll be anything like "high testosterone + high cortisol = sociopathy". Even talking about cause and effect is someone misleading in a complex system.
Re:Testosterone (Score:4, Funny)
Yet alcohol abuse is lower in countries where the drinking age is between 0-5.
and the draft age needs to go the 25 as well. (Score:2)
and the draft age needs to go the 25 as well.
Re: Testosterone (Score:4, Insightful)
How's it sexist? Women also have testosterone, just as men also have oestrogen.
People with less melanin commit fewer crimes, therefore people with high melanin should be placed in jail by default. Totally not racist tho.
--This guy [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
I won't judge someone who takes their own life but to deliberately kill innocent people in the process is just pure malignant narcissism. Why reward this fool in death by giving him a slashdot article and profile? The only upside to this article is that more people might contribute money to the victims funeral expenses.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why is this on ./ ?
The "moody gamer" angle.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I assume you do realize that the trigger event from Valve was demonetizing skin gambling. They prohibited the gambling due to bad actors, and some guy that makes his living from gambling runs his car into some innocent people. Valve taking away someone's illegitimate revenue stream does not make them complicit in his desire to murder people on the highway. He is responsible for his own actions.
Re: (Score:2)
Give. Me. A. Break. At some point people have to be responsible for their own shit. Absolving people due to mental state is mostly ridiculous. Some people are 'just not right in the head' compared to a 'normal' person, doesn't make them blameless.
He could not handle life, this was solely his problem. He also ended it like a video game, now perhaps that is a comment on societies' faults.
Re: (Score:2)
Trolley problem (Score:2)
Banning computers would be a trolley problem, as it would cost more lives than it saves.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)