Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Courts

'GTA V' Character Doesn't Resemble Lindsay Lohan, Court Rules (rollingstone.com) 67

Actress Lindsay Lohan has failed in her latest attempt to sue the maker of the video game Grand Theft Auto V. From a report: While the court said in an opinion a computer generated image may be considered a "portrait" under current state civil rights law, "the artistic renderings are indistinct, satirical representations of the style, look, and persona of a modern, beach-going young woman that are not reasonably identifiable as the plaintiff." Lohan sued GTA V publisher Take-Two Interactive in 2014 over a NPC in the game called Lacey Jonas. Players encounter her while she's hiding in an alley from the paparazzi. She describes herself as an "actress slash singer" and the "voice of a generation."

Artwork during the game's loading screens depict similar blonde women. One is wearing a red bikini and flashing a peace sign as she takes a selfie. Another wears a fedora and large sunglasses while being frisked by a female police officer. Lohan claimed developer Rockstar Games modelled the character and screens after her, using her "image, likeness, clothing, outfits, clothing line products, and ensemble in the form of hats, hairstyle, and sunglasses" without her permission.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

'GTA V' Character Doesn't Resemble Lindsay Lohan, Court Rules

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward

    That's not a fedora though, it's a trilby.

    • by Anonymous Coward

      Back to the basement, dweeb

  • by RazorSharp ( 1418697 ) on Friday March 30, 2018 @12:16PM (#56354113)

    I don't know why it matters whether the NPC resembles her or not. They could have made it look even more like her and it wouldn't be a case. The protections for parody are very broad, especially when directed at public figures.

    • by alvinrod ( 889928 ) on Friday March 30, 2018 @12:34PM (#56354253)
      It's been a while since I played the game, but the character seemed to be a generalization of several different actresses who were relatively successful or well known before getting heavily into drugs or alcohol and tanking their careers. It seems like every five years or so there's a new starlet that goes down the exact same path.
      • by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

        IIRC she wasn't even in the game itself, just on the loading screens.

      • by rtb61 ( 674572 )

        Cough, cough, many different actresses seem to be generalisations of many different successful actresses who were in turn generalisation of other successful actresses and on it goes. Keep in mind pretty, is not special other than being really average looking, proven by science, you average out images of people and they take on what is accepted as an attractive appearance. So they will tend to all look alike and as the are managed by the same people behave publicly alike and as the same narcissistic ego and

    • "They could have made it look even more like her and it wouldn't be a case. "

      She seems to think everybody in a prostitute costume is copying her.

    • In this case it might have been about parody. In the future, it could mean that studios can use actors without hiring or paying them.
      • That's an interesting point, but I don't think this is the right case to set a precedent for that. I haven't played this particular GTA game, but what I remember from the ones I did play, is that pretty much everything was a parody of something. Like, "Vice City" was a parody for Miami, the radio shows were parodies, etc.

        The idea of using CGI to animate a famous actor without paying themwell, I'm sure it's just a matter of time before we go down that rabbit hole. But it's an audacious move, so I doubt a maj

  • I haven't actually played the game, however, I would think that such a character would be covered as a 'political satire' even if they exactly took her image.

  • by zarmanto ( 884704 ) on Friday March 30, 2018 @12:27PM (#56354199) Journal

    You know, she might theoretically have been right about her being the inspiration for that one character... but it seems obvious that the reason she lost is because she got greedy, and pushed the comparison much, much too far. It was the absolute pinnacle of vanity for her to try to claim that basically all of the blond females likewise had to've been "stolen" from her.

    Know your limits, people. Push things too far, and you're gonna fall right off the cliff... and ain't nobody gonna try to catch you, either.

    • by Higaran ( 835598 )
      So a stereotypical video game character is similar to a stereotypical actress, wow that's such a shocker.
  • Not even close. However, looking at Ellen Page and Ellie from The Last of Us...
  • Irrelevant people doing irrelevant stuff. Don't give them attention. It's what they want.
  • wow (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward

    Lindsay Lohan doesn't even look like Lindsay Lohan anymore

  • Joe Walsh, [youtube.com] for writing a song about her without permission, before she was even born.
  • What's hilarious about the lawsuit was that the only real notable similarity was that both the character and Lindsay Lohan are complete and total fuckups. By filing the lawsuit she's essentially saying that any reference to, "an actress who can't stop doing stupid shit" could only be a reference to her.

    I feel kind of bad for Lindsay Lohan, but the suit was an act of desperation. Anyone with any dignity would never have tried to make the connection...and no one else would have made it either.

  • I'm still so confused about what happened with GTA V.
    It was as though I finished the game on my Xbox 360, and then there was a new version of the game released on the Xbox One a year later that had way more content and first-person mode.
    Did I buy a beta version of the game without ever receiving the full game?

The 11 is for people with the pride of a 10 and the pocketbook of an 8. -- R.B. Greenberg [referring to PDPs?]

Working...