One of Australia's Richest Men Lost $1 Million To Email Scam (bloomberg.com) 84
Kaye Wiggins, reporting for Bloomberg: The multi-millionaire founder of Twynam Agricultural Group lost $1 million in an email fraud, a London court heard Thursday. The British man who facilitated the theft says he's a victim too. John Kahlbetzer, who is on the Forbes list of the 50 richest Australians, lost the money when fraudsters tricked the administrator of his personal finances into transferring it to them, his court papers say. Fraudsters emailed Christine Campbell, pretending to be the 87-year-old and asking her to pay $1 million to an account held by a British man, David Aldridge, which she did. Kahlbetzer is suing Aldridge to recover the funds, but Aldridge says he was being "unwittingly used" and was himself the victim of a fraud involving a woman he met online and believed he was in a loving relationship with. Email frauds where companies' staff are tricked into transferring money are a growing problem. U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation statistics show "business email compromise" cases, where criminals ask company officials to transfer funds, have cost more than $3 billion since 2015.
Happened to a group I know (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Where I work, we are required to take a the Kevin Mitnick online security training course every year.
It is really basic. How to look at an email and detect whether or not it is a scam. Don't click on shady links. Beware of PDF and Word, etc. For many of us, it feels like a waste of time as we are reminded of common-sense stuff that we automatically do anyway.
But.....the fact is....these scams work, and they hit businesses hard again and again. It totally makes sense for businesses to require their empl
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And those advices are mostly missing the point because scams will just get better. A well made scam would have no shady link, no PDF nor word.
You need proper procedure in all companies to make money transfers : either an oral confirmation, or an authenticated way to request transfers (or authenticated emails). People just don't know that there is no source authentication in emails.
Re: (Score:3)
Two things:
"Administrate" == BAD. "Administer" == GOOD.
Do money managers really move millions around based on an unauthenticated email?? The mind boggles at the abject stupidity implied....
Re: (Score:3)
Do money managers really move millions around based on an unauthenticated email?? The mind boggles at the abject stupidity implied....
Yes. This is far from the first time this kind of scam has been pulled off.
Re:Happened to a group I know (Score:4, Interesting)
Do money managers really move millions around based on an unauthenticated email?? The mind boggles at the abject stupidity implied....
I know someone who was handling the estate of a deceased parent. She was executor of the will. There were numerous financial accounts in various forms: checking, savings, stocks, bonds...when transferring the money to dole out the inheritance to her other siblings per the will, she had very little trouble with accounts with balances >$100,000, but the smaller accounts provided the most difficulty in terms of verifying authorization.
500 thousand dollars? Yea, no problem.
5 thousand dollars? We're going to need to see the notarized birth certificate, current I-9, special power of attorney signed by the owning party in the last 30 days, blood sample, and aqueous humor sample.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
You'd think after the first few hundred million, they'd reach a point where internally they'd be thinking "you know what? I'm rich enough now. I can let this go."
I'm not rich but I'd still get pissed off by losing 0.1% of my money to a trick, whether that 01.% was $1 or £10. Like I'd get pissed off at someone beating me at a game of Scrabble if they did it by cheating, and that is worth even less in money terms.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If the figures given above are correct he could have it happen once a month and it'd be less than the risk free rate of return by about an order of magnitude.
In plain English, he makes more than that in interest, unless he has it all stuffed under the mattress.
So no, he wouldn't end up in the poor house.
Re: (Score:2)
Mr. Kahlbetzer's net worth is estimated to be between 750 million USD [wikipedia.org] and 950 million [forbes.com] meaning this loss represents 0.105% to 0.133% of his total wealth.
If your net worth was $500K, would you shrug being scammed out of $500?
Re: (Score:2)
I certainly wouldn't lose any sleep over it.
Re: (Score:2)
Did I miss the part of the article where Mr. Kahlbetzer complained about losing sleep?
Re: (Score:2)
Bad in math? ...
You are off by some orders of magnitude, or don't know what the % means
Re: (Score:2)
So what happens when a genuine seller gets payment in advance, ships the goods, and then the buyer rolls back the transaction?
What if everybody starts rolling back transactions willy-nilly?
Re: (Score:2)
So what happens when a genuine seller gets payment in advance, ships the goods, and then the buyer rolls back the transaction?
What if everybody starts rolling back transactions willy-nilly?
Then the banks start charging 3% transaction fees so they can include "free fraud protection" like the credit card companies do. I am sure they would be happy to do so...
Re: (Score:2)
And businesses will tell them to fuck off.
Oops (Score:2)
Sounds like whoever he outsourced his financial management to is in trouble...
It's interesting that so many of these scams involve massive wire transfers of funds. Wire transfers aren't too common for individuals in the US, but from what I understand it's the equivalent of handing over a bag of cash to the recipient. If the funds are taken out of the account, there's no way to get it back. Why would anyone, businesses included, rely on such an irrevocable form of payment? I can understand shady internationa
Re: (Score:3)
The fraudster convinces David to accept a wire transfer on her behalf. When he receives the money, he withdraws it and hands over the cash to her. She then disappears. When the bank tries to reverse the wire transfer and finds the money is gone, the person liable for it is the second mark in the fraud, not the fraudster.
If you've ever gotten a scammy-looking email asking if you'd
Re: (Score:2)
Good (Score:2)
It won't hurt him much, and it's a small step in the opposite direction of the general trend of all money being concentrated in the hand of the few.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Something does not add up. (Score:5, Insightful)
It is high time the Government investigate if there is a pattern of getting instruction through email and transferring money without asking questions to allow the rich guy deniability. Scenario like this: Rich guy hires goons to do stuff, sends email to financial advisor cryptically pay x $ to account Y. Financial advisor deliberately avoids getting any written instruction, phone calls, oral verification. Even if the police catch the perps, sniff up the money trail of the goons, it would stop at this "financial advisor". Who would again claim victim of fraud.
They should find ALL the money transfers by that accountant, and see if any of it can be tied to funding illegal activity.
Re: (Score:2)
I had no trouble closing a retirement account to cover the down payment for a house over the telephone. Zero authentication, no date of birth, no last 4 of SSN, no verification of account number, nothing...it might help that I went to school with the receptionist, and I'm sure they had caller ID to verify my phone number...but still...
Re: (Score:2)
This is one of the things I like about my bank and my insurance agent they know me when I walk in the door and call me by my name. This is a good thing as even if you had my social it wouldn't help they know me to well and they wouldn't do a major transaction over email. It would be to out of character and they would call me.They have called me because I used my bank card out of town on the opposite side of the state but still in my home state and when I left the state to visit family.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Scam? (Score:2)
The word is stupidity.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You're mostly right. But then again there was an article posted here, maybe a year back,about "Business at the speed of trust". It was all about cutting bureaucracy and red tape and just gettin' 'er done and other gung-ho number-one stuff like that.
People, especially those that fly a lot, read stuff like that and it makes their point hair stand up with excitement.
IIRC it was posted a week after a story about how some major corp got scammed because someone didn't do all that bureaucracy shit.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I have seen something similar, but much closer to home.
A friend of mine started dating a single mom, who lived and worked in the same city as him. She used his affection for her to motivate him to spend very recklessly on her needs, including straight-up giving her cash to help with bill payments and such. Her demand for money kept rising, and when he finally said that he needed to roll his spending back, she dumped him flat.
My point is that dating is dangerous, especially for adults with money. Your emo
This sort of thing is rampant (Score:2)
Working on anti-spam products, I see some of the most amazing things.
There are dozens of "spoof person A in email to person B to get something valuable" variations. Money, W2 forms, anything.
A recent favorite is to compromise someone's email. Keep monitoring their email, and when some financial transaction is about to happen, forge an email as if it were from the party receiving the money, to the sender of the money, saying "Oh, because reasons, our bank account had to change, send the money to ...."
The