West Point Researchers Demonstrate Passive Netflix Traffic Analysis Attack (threatpost.com) 64
hypercard writes: Researchers from West Point recently presented research on a real-time passive analysis of Netflix traffic. The paper, entitled "Identifying HTTPS-Protected Netflix Videos in Real-Time" is based on research conducted by Andrew Reed, Michael Kranch and Benjamin Klimkowski. The team's technique demonstrates frighteningly accurate results based solely on information captured from TCP/IP headers. Even with the recent upgrade to HTTPS, their technique was effective at identifying the correct video with greater than 99.99 percent accuracy against their database of over 42,000 videos. "When tested against 200 random 20-minute video streams, our system identified 99.5 percent of the videos with the majority of the identifications occurring less than two and a half minutes into the video stream," the paper reads. However, there are important points to note. First, the attack described only applies to streams still using Silverlight. Additionally, an attacker would likely need significant resources and access to intercept, fingerprint and process the traffic in real time. Netflix has reacted positively to the team's research and acknowledged the issue as a known drawback to processing video streams with HTTPS.
So... (Score:3, Insightful)
"only applies to streams still using Silverlight"
Stop using Silverlight, or better yet, stop using anything Microsoft releases to try and accomplish what ActiveX and Silverlight try to?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
That's just what they used in their work. The technique seems to be applicable to any other kind of transports as well, they just didn't bother doing that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:So... (Score:4, Interesting)
"only applies to streams still using Silverlight"
Stop using Silverlight, or better yet, stop using anything Microsoft releases to try and accomplish what ActiveX and Silverlight try to?
At the moment, options are limited. Adobe Flash player with RTMP, HTML5 with RTP, or HLS? The problem is largely that web based video streaming doesn't have a whole lot of options unless you commit to writing your own cross-browser plugin. That is precisely what Flash Player did. We need better standards for video streaming. HTML5 (or perhaps browser adoption of it) didn't really step up to the plate very well.
It's funny to me that a lot of developers seem to think that because you're in the context of a web browser that one needs to use HTTP for everything. That's just simply not true.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
HTML5 didn't step up to the plate because Google chose to push their own CODEC instead of simply using the industry standard H.264.
Re: (Score:2)
Fwiw I've been happily watching Netflix in the browser via their excellent HTML 5 player without flash or Silverlight for a long time now. Works flawlessly in Chrome and I think it's ok in Firefox. Requires the (built in) Widevine plugin for DRM.
Amazon Prime video works too. I uninstaller Flash 2 years ago and have never installed Silverlight.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is not the video streaming. It is the DRM.
The DRM that Google and the W3C want to standardize on, and that Netflix must use by law, yet FOSS peeps keep railing against. These FOSS peeps can't see the forest for the trees; they would rather be stuck using Silverlight.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not watching TV at work! I'm doing research (Score:1)
Some academics are trying to rationalize their work-time bingewatching as "security research" ;)
Seriously, this is pretty interesting nevertheless. It shows how much information can be garnered from side channels. And to think we're leaking them all the time...
And this gem from the PDF paper:
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, I don't get it either. Where is the 'attack' part of this? It's more like traffic analysis. Given the access to the traffic you need it might be easier to stand outside their front door and listen for a minute.
Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 (Score:3)
The "attack" is described in the rationale for the Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 [wikipedia.org], which was a response to the release of D.C. Circuit Judge Robert Bork's video rental history and its publication in Washington City Paper before his unsuccessful nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States [wikipedia.org].
Re: So an attacker would know what you are watchin (Score:1)
Knowing your taste for entertainment makes social engineering a lot more viable.
Re: (Score:2)
Particular when the "security questions" used as a faux second factor for authentication on many services include "What is your favorite movie?", as I discovered yesterday when creating an account on a web-based income tax return preparation service.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
You're analogy is quite flawed.
As is your grammar.
Re: (Score:2)
It's Silverlight for chrissake. Is anybody surprised that the envelope is transparent and doesn't protect anonymity and content?
Timing is everything (Score:1)
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
streams still using Silverlight? (Score:3)
I thought Silverlight was supposed to be dead. Besides, if you are using Windows, your first concern obviously isn't privacy.
The truth is out there... now (Score:2)
Average Slashdotters: I'm watching porn! Lots of porn!
Researchers: Actually, we've determined you're watching the Veggie Tales' "Barbara Manatee" song clip, over and over.
Re: (Score:2)
Or Rule 34, it's porn of Veggie Tales' Barbra Manatee.
so what (Score:2, Insightful)
Why should I care? Netflix already knows what I watch and I have no doubt that they would sell that information.
Compression+HTTPS=Badness (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I often have the subtitles on and I watch at 1.3x to 1.5x.
Plus Netflix sells all this data anyway. It's easier to just buy it from them to find out I watched Kubo and the Two Strings yesterday.
Netflix doesn't even have porn. If they like money, they should, though. Far more people would pay an extra $10 a month for Netflix + Porn over what they currently pay for Netflix. Not many people are willing to pay $10 a month standalone for porn. But as an add-on from a reputable company that won't infect your
Waste of time (Score:2)
Rarely has so much research been done to reveal so little of any actual worth. This is West Point funded -- I assume the government is behind this somewhere? Don't.... don't they already have access to Netflix data on the backend?