VPN Providers Report Huge Increase In Downloads, Usage Since Privacy Rules Were Repealed (ibtimes.com) 67
An anonymous reader writes: A number of major VPN providers reported a significant increase in subscriptions, downloads, and traffic from Americans since the U.S. Congress voted to repeal the Broadband Consumer Privacy Rules that would have mandated internet service providers get user permission before collecting information. The International Business Times reports that "several popular VPN providers reported a more than 50 percent increase in downloads." VPN provider ExpressVPN said they "experienced a 105 percent increase in traffic from the U.S. and a 97 percent spike in sales" since the repeal. Additionally, "KeepSolid, the New York-based company behind VPNUnlimited, noted a 32 percent increase in purchases and growth of 49 percent in total downloads," reports IBT. "The company also reports having a considerable amount of increased engagement via social media regarding user privacy." Have you taken any privacy measures since Congress voted to repeal ISP privacy rules? If you use a VPN, which provider do you recommend and why?
That is retarded. (Score:1, Informative)
The privacy rules WERE NEVER IN EFFECT so this is fucking retarded. Literally nothing has changed about your internet privacy today from a month ago. Or six months ago. Or a year ago. THE RULES THAT WERE REPEALED WERE NEVER ACTIVE. Further, what was really repealed was the FCC having any control over the internet. Yes, you should have privacy. NO THE FCC SHOULD HAVE NO INVOLVEMENT. Not for good or bad. They should have no ability to regulate anything on the internet. Fuck them and fuck them trying to reach
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The privacy rules WERE NEVER IN EFFECT
But repealing them shows an intent, and there is some rationale to react to just that.
Re:That is retarded. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Having no VPN is irresponsible for a long time, i had one years ago. Everyone who follows the news a bit knows why.
Re: (Score:2)
Please don't give me that limpwristed, incompetent bullshit that Google is 'avoidable'
I use DuckDuckGo, OpenStreetMap...
Re: Opera (Score:3, Interesting)
Epic browser? (Score:2)
It looks to me that the simplest one-stop shopping privacy aware vpn tunneled browser is Epic. However I never heard of them so I'm not sure I trust them. Anyone know about this browser. looks like the best one to me if it's all legit.
Re: (Score:2)
Network-wide solution? (Score:2)
With all this talk about using VPN for privacy, I've been wondering if there are any solutions that are designed to provide that kind of privacy across an entire LAN. If, for example, you wanted to make sure your company's web traffic was private, is anyone offering some kind of service that allows you to configure a common SMB firewall to route all outgoing traffic through a secure VPN/proxy?
I've had some clients request this, but I can't find anything that looks remotely reputable. Most of the services
Re: (Score:2)
Any SMB grade equipment or better will be able to setup a site-site VPN with one of the cloud VPN providers.
Are there any reputable privacy-guarding cloud VPN providers support site-to-site VPN?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
If both sites are owned by you, it would be smarter to just deploy OpenVPN yourself at one site and connect the other site to it directly. No reason to pay a 3rd party service for that.
Pay special attention to the difference between openvpn.net [openvpn.net] and openvpn.com [openvpn.com]. The first one is the free, open source software project. The second is their commercial service for said software. You do not need to subscribe to the second to use the first.
Re: (Score:2)
A lot of people seem to misunderstanding the nature of my question. I understand what a site-to-site VPN tunnel is, and I can set one up. The question is, is there a reputable service out there that provides some kind of proxy or site-to-site VPN that obscures the source of outgoing Internet traffic? The point here isn't to secure traffic between two endpoints that I control, but to make it so websites see all of my company's traffic as coming from an IP address other than my own, and where the service p
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Network-wide solution? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
A cheap device with two ethernet ports with pfsense installed can handle this, and as a benefit should handle much greater VPN speeds than a consumer router.
I used a Shuttle DS57U for my own setup as it was passively cooled and had dual intel NICs, but there are thousands of solutions that will work.
Make sure the device has AES-NI to accelerate encryption if you have a fast connection, without it you are unlikely to break 100Mbps VPN throughput.
Pfsense themselves sell a pre-made, supported device that would
Re: (Score:2)
So I just subscribed to a VPN service which supports OpenVPN (actually they just give me sole access to
Re: (Score:2)
No packet in or out can then escape the VPN as that is the only network.
Just make sure the router has the support, CPU, RAM needed for the network size and speeds.
I would not fully trust any OS or browser solution given the role of other networks to request isp ip like data from a browser or OS. VPN the entire network and hope anything that is requested or induced only gets the VPN ip.
Re: (Score:2)
pfSense works just fine. Depending on their internet connection get a newer CPU with AES-NI and you should have no problem routing all the traffic.
Ya, it's called IPSec (Score:2)
With IPSec you can set up all kinds of policies as to what can communicate with what and you can, if you wish, encrypt all traffic, even over the local LAN. Be warned: It can get complex and you are going to need PKI set up if you want to have any realistic hope of managing it in an enterprise. However you can set things up so that all traffic is encrypted on the wires for all communications, and so that devices can only communicate with other devices of your choosing.
So for a simple setup you could have a
Re: (Score:2)
My question wasn't whether it's technically possible to set up a VPN. It was more, is anyone providing that as a service? Specifically, one focussed on privacy (obscuring the source of the traffic and not logging), and also that is reputable security service (marketing to businesses rather than pirates).
Re: (Score:2)
Oh ok, gotcha. In that case, I'd go for Private Internet Access. Their privacy rules are very good (in all cases we have to take the company's own statement on it), price is good, performance seems to be good, and it uses open standards for VPN connections. It also isn't like some where they are located in some minor island nation you've never heard of, they are in the US.
It's what I use and what my instructor at SANS recommended to someone else this week who asked the same question.
If you wanted to filter
Out of the skillet and into the fire (Score:3)
How many of those fools will start using free VPN providers that make their privacy and security even worse: Proxy Services Are Not Safe. Try These Alternatives [wired.com]
Re:Out of the skillet and into the fire (Score:5, Informative)
A VPN service is different than a proxy service.
Here we go again... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Yes it can they will still be able to tell you are using a VPN and how much data your using but not the content.
Then you just have to trust your VPNs ISP more than your own ISP.
Re: (Score:2)
> Deep packet inspection doesn't break encryption
No, and they can't really get your search information as a result. HOWEVER, they do get to see every IP address you contact, when you contact, how long you contact for, how much data is passed, and in what direction. VPN reduces this fine tuned envelope information to "when your LAN is passing data, and how much", leaving out the very relevant "...and to whom" part.
Also note that DNS queries are almost always in plaintext as well, though that seems to be
Re: (Score:2)
> VPN reduces this fine tuned envelope information to "when your LAN is passing data, and how much", leaving out the very relevant "...and to whom" part.
This is wrong. They see only traffic to the vpn gateway and a properly configured vpn doesn't leak dns queries, either.
Re: (Score:2)
This is a half truth. You can get the spoken words from an compressed VoIP stream, just by the traffic pattern how good the compression works on different words. There are a lot of pitfalls, some of them are for example why SSLv3 is now fully deprecated, others only affect certain ciphers.
Its very complicated to keep up with which encryption really works. On the other hand most isp probably do not try to crack your vpn connection, yet.
Re: (Score:3)
Given the lack of VPN payment bans/comments on the use of VPN products in the US, UK and Australia, law enforcement at a national level does not care about VPN use.
If a user is found on an interesting site using a VPN, police will get a court order in that VPN's nation and log the next log in of that site by the same VPN.
Most people set their VPN, expect to enjoy a working VPN daily and connect the
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Given the lack of VPN payment bans/comments on the use of VPN products in the US, UK and Australia, law enforcement at a national level does not care about VPN use.
They do not care *yet*. They will if VPN use becomes ubiquitous.
The NSA spent considerable effort to make sure IPSEC did not become ubiquitous.
If a user is found on an interesting site using a VPN, police will get a court order in that VPN's nation and log the next log in of that site by the same VPN.
The VPN product would just connect the next day and have the origin ip, isp logged by the local police in the VPN servers nation.
There are ways for the VPN provider to make this more difficult starting with not including the capability to log this data. With some effort, I think it could be made impossible.
A user would have to totally change their VPN use every session to stay away from simple court ordered police logging efforts waiting days and hours later.
Oddly enough, if a user routinely uses a VPN, then this is possible to do by accessing the VPN anonymously like through a public hot spot.
Did the interesting person pay for the VPN every year out of a main bank account and CC? No funds for a good lawyer with all accounts frozen given the wider international connections.
This will create a demand for anonymous payment me
Independent VPN evaluation site (Score:4, Informative)
ThatOnePrivacyGuy on /r/privacy [reddit.com] manages That One Privacy Site, including a handy VPN section:
https://thatoneprivacysite.net... [thatoneprivacysite.net]
Unlike most other VPN reviews, this one encourages community discussion [reddit.com] and appears to be impartial [reddit.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, and AFAIK the guy is using iVPN.net but cannot recommend it, it is the one that best fit his need.
The answer is Tor... (Score:2)
The answer is Tor... (Score:2)
No... that would be stupid (Score:1)