Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Businesses Cloud Government Transportation

Uber Gives Cities Free Travel-Time Data (usatoday.com) 26

Uber is now "leveraging anonymous GPS information from hundreds of thousands of online Uber vehicles" using a new tool called Uber Movement. An anonymous reader quotes USA Today: Uber is going to make urban traffic and mobility data gleaned from its millions of drivers and riders using the Uber app freely available to all. The data, which shows anonymized travel times between points in cities, will be available on a public website called Uber Movement. Uber says it will first invite planning agencies and researchers to access the information and then make the website free to the public... The San Francisco-based company decided to release the data when it realized it had "this very valuable but untapped resource for understanding a city's transportation infrastructure," said Andrew Salzberg, Uber's head of transportation policy...

Pegged to a transportation conference in DC on Sunday, the release is also likely is a bid to gain some goodwill with cities, with which Uber has often had bare-knuckled fights over regulation... Uber Movement doesn't map individuals rides, but rather segments of rides, focusing on travel time between specific points... The Uber data will give cities a low-cost way to do high-resolution travel time analysis

Boston's chief information officer says the new tool "gives people tools to ask us questions. That's really powerful."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Uber Gives Cities Free Travel-Time Data

Comments Filter:
  • by burtosis ( 1124179 ) on Sunday January 08, 2017 @05:43PM (#53630167)
    Awesome, tell my girlfriend she really needs to take that pill last month.
  • NYC to Collect GPS Data on Car Service Passengers—Good Intentions Gone Awry or Something Else? https://freedom-to-tinker.com/... [freedom-to-tinker.com]
  • Some thoughts (Score:5, Insightful)

    by buss_error ( 142273 ) on Sunday January 08, 2017 @06:22PM (#53630317) Homepage Journal

    1. Like any good drug dealer, the first taste is free. EG: Uber gave it away this time, but wait until the hook is set and then they will charge for it. I wouldn't mind if Uber either gave me a discount or let me opt out. Yeah, that's not gonna happen.
    2. Anonymous today, meta-data tomorrow if not yesterday. Big data is just another way to say Big Brother.

    • I don't really see a strong reason to let passengers opt out. By stepping foot in the car, you know, by definition, that Uber is receiving GPS data from the route. It's how they bill you. What they do with that data is up to their EUTOS which I imagine is pretty broad.

      You're the passenger in their contractor's (their definition...open for argument) car...might as well tell the FAA that they need your permission to track the route of the plane while you're on it.

      • By similar logic, your doctor should be allowed to sell all your health information. After all, he needs to know your health details in order to treat you and you agree to his terms of service by walking in the door.

        • by Anonymous Coward

          Don't fool yourself, your health data is already being sold. (I was a database server administrator at a large hospital)

        • Your Anonymized Health Care Data is already available and HIPAA Compliant.
          https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/laws-regulations/index.html [hhs.gov]
          There are no restrictions on the use or disclosure of de-identified health information. De-identified health information neither identifies nor provides a reasonable basis to identify an individual.
          I don't see this as being any different.
          Actually it is different: they are not tracking YOU, they are tracking the UBER driver's car.

    • Yep. Now that Uber has provided it to Boston Police, etc., "anonymized", it will be difficult to put the genie back in the bottle. Expect 3. Court Subpoenas for non-anonymized data. Uber should develop a plan to dump false or trivial data in if subpoenaed. Deleting data could be a legal violation of the subpoena. Intentionally mixing in random false data points before a subpoena is issued should be legal.
  • They're still bandits.

    And the king should still hang them when he catches them.

Avoid strange women and temporary variables.

Working...