EFF Suggests Halloween Costume To Protest Facial Recognition Databases (eff.org) 65
An anonymous reader writes:
EFF's list of costume ideas for digital rights activists include a Stingray costume, dressing up like a Privacy Badger (or a patent troll), and using facepaint to simulate the eerie digitization algorithms that are currently capturing images of your face for government databases. "Just this week we learned that facial recognition is far more prevalent among local and federal law enforcement than we thought, with at least 26 states using this biometric technology... To draw attention to this emerging threat to privacy, you can use your face painting skills to recreate the digitization algorithms on your own mug based on public records we and others have obtained from law enforcement agencies."
Sixteen states already grant the FBI access to their DMV databases, reports EFF, noting that it's "almost completely unregulated," with one study reporting that 50% of American faces are already in a government database.
Sixteen states already grant the FBI access to their DMV databases, reports EFF, noting that it's "almost completely unregulated," with one study reporting that 50% of American faces are already in a government database.
Be the life of the party! (Score:4)
Because the real spirit of Halloween is protesting things.
Re: Be the life of the party! (Score:4, Informative)
Actually, it is. It's a remnant of the poor drunkenly demanding stuff from the rich during the end of the year harvest festival.
Re: (Score:2)
It was never favored by the early American Puritans, and only gained popularity with the mass Irish and Scottish immigration in the 1800s. Churches today still frown upon it, and religious-sponsored alternatives to Trick or Treat are offered nearly every place I've lived.
Evidently, the one belief in the supernatural is enough for any congregation.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
The Puritans didn't favor anything remotely connected to fun. They even banned Christmas because fuck celebrating and having a meal with friends and family you should be at work.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget dressing in a skimpy outfit.
what part of Cthulhu fhtagn don't you understand? (Score:2)
2. run it through google deep dream
3. inkjet print the result in makeup directly on your face
4. spend Halloween as a slutty beholder.
Re: (Score:3)
That's why Jesus died for a second time on the cross on Halloween. To give girls the right to wear skimpy "sexy ______" costumes.
Re: (Score:3)
That's why Jesus died for a second time on the cross on Halloween. To give girls the right to wear skimpy "sexy ______" costumes.
"Wow, I didn't think the costume designers could actually do it, but I have to admit, that is indeed a really sexy blank."
Re: (Score:2)
That's why Jesus died for a second time on the cross on Halloween. To give girls the right to wear skimpy "sexy ______" costumes.
And frog.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I dunno, reminding people of how far our privacy has been invaded should prove fairly scary.
Re: (Score:2)
Halloween has always been a way of protesting the Church, at least as long as it's been called "Halloween".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new... [dailymail.co.uk]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are various guides to creating stingray costumes out of towels or bedsheets, and all you'd need to do is add a little antenna or a cell phone on a makeshift fishing pole. If you're in a pinch, though, just grab a cardboard box, roll it around on the ground, and you've a "dirtbox," another form of cell-site simulator manufactured by the Boeing subsidiary Digital Receiver Technology.
"Hey, Bob, thanks for showing up. You're holding a box, what did you bring?"
"I didn't bring anything, this is my costume. This is not just "a box", as you can clearly see it has dirt on the outside from rolling it around on the ground. It is not "a box", it is "a dirtbox". As we all know, "dirtboxes" are devices that emit a strong, and nefarious, cell tower signal, which will cause some nearby cell phones to attempt to connect if the signal is stronger than the one they are receiving from the nearest le
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I can't vouch for the accuracy of this site, but it looks like most of us are okay although I have seen signs in convenience stores before telling people that masks were not allowed inside.
State Codes Related To Wearing Masks [anapsid.org]
Some states that do have laws have exemptions, like Minnesota:
unless based on religious beliefs, or incidental to amusement, entertainment, protection from weather, or medical treatment
Re: (Score:3)
Jersey Mike's here in the midwest is the only store I've seen with a sign that says no masks allowed.
I'd be ashamed to walk into a Jersey Mike's without wearing a mask.
Re: (Score:2)
Jersey Mike's here in the midwest is the only store I've seen with a sign that says no masks allowed.
I'd be ashamed to walk into a Jersey Mike's without wearing a mask.
Yeah, but that gets too confusing, because the staff there is generally trying to conceal their shame already. If the let us wear masks, too, nobody would know who the customers were.
Mmm, inexplicably wet sandwich.
Re: (Score:2)
Mmm, inexplicably wet sandwich.
As opposed to Subway, where it's explicably wet: http://tosh.cc.com/blog/files/... [cc.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Uh, yes there are. I mean, I don't think there are any "no masks whatsoever, under no conditions at all, we mean it" laws, but there are laws that prohibit masks.
http://law.lis.virginia.gov/va... [virginia.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
The violation of any provisions of this section is a Class 6 felony.
They even made it a felony!
Here's a thought... (Score:2)
Perhaps if we were to draw dick pics on our faces, it might confuse these systems into identifying us as an altogether different species...
Re: (Score:2)
The computer would think we're all lawyers.
Re: (Score:1)
... it might confuse these systems into identifying us as an altogether different species...
The computer would think we're all lawyers.
(Score:-1, Redundant)
That Makes the US Government ... (Score:2)
... the many-faced god. Come to think of it, both organizations operate in eerily similar ways...
These will be great (Score:3)
If you're going to the Halloween meeting of your local Linux user group...otherwise, not so much.
Murica!!! (Score:1)
But 'murica is "land of the free, home of the brave." Until one attack happens and then it becomes "home of the sissy cucks afraid of their shadows."
Re: (Score:2)
Changed what exactly? I could never actually figure out what they were arguing for or against.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, there was this one time that a group of individuals set about protesting the fact that the government had confiscated all of their personal weapons which that government actually deemed (at that time) to be personal property and allowable to be kept by its citizens and the point of the protest was to have them returned. Around that same time some other citizens were also protesting something about tax stamp requirements.
A not-so-careful reading of history suggests that a whole lot changed as a result
If you want to scare people (Score:1)
Run face recognition on them and project their Facebook profile, or their browser history if you feel ambitious.
Only 50%?? (Score:2)
"...with one study reporting that 50% of American faces are already in a government database"
I'd be surprised if it was only 50%. Just between the DMV and Facebook (which the NSA admits they mine for data) I think it'd be higher than that.
There are about 214 million licensed drivers in the U.S. according to Statista (https://www.statista.com/statistics/191653/number-of-licensed-drivers-in-the-us-since-1988/ [statista.com]). That's about 67% of the 319 million people in the US as of 2014.
If the NSA admits to mining Faceboo