Indonesia Moves To Ban Same-Sex Emojis On Messaging Apps (thestack.com) 368
An anonymous reader writes: The Indonesian government has this week demanded that instant messaging apps available in the country remove all same-sex emoticons from their platforms, or face heavy sanctions. While homosexuality is not illegal in the country, it remains a controversial issue in the Muslim-dominated country. Now in the latest effort to crackdown on gay rights, Indonesian authorities want to ban emojis, stickers and emoticons which depict same-sex couples, the rainbow flag, and any symbol that symbolises the lesbian, bay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community. Apps that have been targeted by the demands include the popular Asian messaging app LINE, Whatsapp, Facebook and Twitter. The Indonesian Communication and Information Ministry added that a particular concern was that children would find the bright coloured stickers appealing.
But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:2, Insightful)
It's OK for non-whites to be homophobic.
SJWs have lower standards for non-whites, especially if the homophobes are Islamic - because the SJWs are awfully quiet when Islamic "culture" says EXECUTING gays is OK.
Hell, if you're Islamic you can be misogynistic, too.
Re:But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:5, Insightful)
And Americans are awfully quiet when christian politicians harass transsexuals with bathroom bills, and christians try to introduce bills that would authorize the killing of LGBTti people [bluenationreview.com] (fortunately, after the paperwork was filed, a judge ruled the attempt unconstitutional).
Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin. Fortunately, the majority in both camps don't go along with this crap. As for the SJWs, they're so full of it that the only people listening to them are other SJW wannabes.
Re:But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And Americans are awfully quiet when christian politicians harass transsexuals with bathroom bills, and christians try to introduce bills that would authorize the killing of LGBTti people [bluenationreview.com] (fortunately, after the paperwork was filed, a judge ruled the attempt unconstitutional).
Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin. Fortunately, the majority in both camps don't go along with this crap. As for the SJWs, they're so full of it that the only people listening to them are other SJW wannabes.
BULLSHIT.
Again:
Muslim extremists, Christian extremists - they're just two sides of the same coin.
BULLSHIT
Who was killed over Piss Christ?
NO ONE.
Got the balls to say how many people were killed at Charlie Hebdo?
Got the stones to say how many people were killed of Mohammad cartoons [wikipedia.org]?
Thank you so very much for demonstrating my point about SJWs having lower standards for non-white Islamic mores.
You fucking USELESS idiot.
Re:But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:4, Insightful)
BULLSHIT
Who was killed over Piss Christ?
NO ONE.
Got the balls to say how many people were killed at Charlie Hebdo?
Got the stones to say how many people were killed of Mohammad cartoons [wikipedia.org]?
Insults removed, but the salient point really should left intact for emphasis, as it is quite valid.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
BULLSHIT
Who was killed over Piss Christ?
NO ONE.
Got the balls to say how many people were killed at Charlie Hebdo?
Got the stones to say how many people were killed of Mohammad cartoons [wikipedia.org]?
Insults removed, but the salient point really should left intact for emphasis, as it is quite valid.
Who would try to create a moral equivalence between Christian fundamentalists who merely say you're going to hell but still pray for you, and Muslim extremists who actually try to send you there?
There's just no equivalence. One thinks you're wrong, the other actually tries to and often does kill. Literally, there's no equivalence. And anyone who tries to create a moral equivalence between Christian fundamentalists and Islamic extremists is at best intellectually suspect - at best.
And that's just a nice w
Re: (Score:3)
What about Christian fundamentalists who do kill? Terrorists or just misguided? There's an equivalence when the mainstream of both religions is against terrorism, except that with Christians there is acknowledgement that the violent acts are just some fringe wackso, but with Muslims there's so much propaganda out there that eveyr Muslim is a potential terrorist.
Re: (Score:2)
Nobody evr said the kkk was a christian organization - just that their members are white christian racists. See the difference? Of course not.
Religious extremism, whether by muslims, christians, or anyone else, is the problem. It may manifest itself in different ways, but nonetheless, it's the same problem.
Also, the current assault on women's right to have an abortion, which is vocally backed by fundie christians, if successful, is going to kill a lot of women. If men could get pregnant, you'd be able to
Re: (Score:2)
You're a complete idiot.
ISIS holds territory, and defends it militarily. They collect taxes, and they provide services to the populations under their control. They have a government, they pass laws, and they enforce those laws with police. They are a state in every sense of the term. You don't have to be recognized by other nations to be a valid state, you just have to be able to hold and defend your territory and have a government, which they do.
Re:But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:5, Informative)
I would also add on to that:
Mohammed would be proud of Muslim extremists
Jesus would condemn Christian extremists
Jesus taught that you should love those who are different
Mohammed was a warlord who practiced slavery
It is hard to believe that Islam stems from Christianity, they are opposites in so many ways.
Re:But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:4, Informative)
The common thread is that they both perverted Judaism by turning it into a proselytizing religion.
Re: (Score:3)
You might want to read the final chapter in the bible - the apocalypse. Doesn't sound all that full of loving-kindness. Also, Paul told early christian slaves that if their master would not grant them freedom, they should be content to be slaves. And this practice continued for almost 2 millennia. Or have you forgotten how runaway slaves were treated? And how they were "recruited" in the first place?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not a Christian, but Paul was not Jesus, and didn't even live at the same time. Just because some other people took Paul's writings, shoved them into a book together with 4 other guy's books who wrote down orally-passed-down stories about some guy named Jesus, and called it "the Holy Bible" does not mean that Jesus endorsed this Paul guy who lived decades later.
Now, I'll agree that everything in the Bible is part and parcel of "Christianity", because modern Christians believe it so, but the OP never sa
Re: (Score:3)
There are more references to violence in the Old Testamant than in the Koran. I think Mohammed would not be proud of the extremists when they act contrary to what he actually said. The most common theme in the Koran is mercy. The caliphates allowed Christians and Jews to live in their lands, albeit with extra taxes. Remember that Christians during ante-bellum South defended the most brutal form of slavery using the Bible, probably the biggest religious schism in America came from protestant churches di
Re: (Score:3)
The original poster could have been more polite.
I will still try to answer the point.
It might not happen in your neighbourhood today, but Christianity and various other religions have been used to justify bloodshed and other atrocities. Sometimes quite recent and sometimes not that far away.
Witch hunts might no longer happen where you live, but there are large parts of the world where they still do.
Prosecution of gays happens in a lot of places in the world based on supposed Christian values and was the nor
Re: (Score:2)
Now watch as the ACs that have Mod Points Punish-Mod me from my currently Punish-Modded "Good" (down from "Excellent" in one day about a week ago) to "Poor". I'll keep you posted.
ACs don't get mod points. You have to be logged in and be a moderately active user to get mod points. Now a logged in user can post as an AC (although I'm suspect how anonymous it is because I've noticed that I can't comment as an AC and then mod my own post up) but someone who isn't logged in can't earn mod points.
Re: (Score:2)
But why should that matter to anyone?
I post AC every once in a while specifically because of karma. Sometimes I have things to say that i know will be down moderated because the truth hurts people's feelings. Sometimes the comments are attempts at humor but might be slightly offensive. Sometimes I am on another computer (untrusted) just reading and do not want to drag my log in onto it but want to comment on something.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with that reasoning is assuming ACs are a bloc of people who think the same and are willing to mod you down for dissing ACs in general. There is no such bloc of people because most ACs have different reasons for being an AC.
ACs aren't going anywhere. The mod system was set up with them in mind. If they're really trolls, they do get modded down. If they merely irritate you with their speech, that's not trolling, that's free speech. The signal to noise ratio is less favorable, but there is so
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
There's a *huge* difference between...
* some overheated and breathless clickbait that stretches the ideological-but-otherwise-mundane true story well beyond credibility (e.g. the example you posted), and...
* actual, no-shit instances of overt and government-sanctioned discrimination (e.g. TFA).
So, please, knock off the false equivalency; it serves no beneficial purpose, and actually masks the fact that there are some no-shit barbarians out in the world, some of whom run whole governments.
Let me put it thi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
So the bill literally said "kill gays" or some variation thereof, right?
Oh, wait - it most likely didn't.
Re:But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:4, Informative)
So the bill literally said "kill gays" or some variation thereof, right?
Oh, wait - it most likely didn't.
Ohh yes it does. It also called for anyone to do the same if the state refuses to enforce the law for 1 year. The actual text:
a) The abominable crime against nature known as buggery, called also sodomy, is a monstrous evil that Almighty God, giver of freedom and liberty, commands us to suppress on pain of our utter destruction even as he overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah.
b) Seeing that it is better that offenders should die rather than that all of us should be killed by God’s just wrath against us for the folly of tolerating wickedness in our midst, the People of California wisely command, in the fear of God, that any person who willingly touches another person of the same gender for purposes of sexual gratification be put to death by bullets to the head or by any other convenient method.
c) No person shall distribute, perform, or transmit sodomistic propaganda directly or indirectly by any means to any person under the age of majority. Sodomistic propaganda is defined as anything aimed at creating an interest in or an acceptance of human sexual relations other than between a man and a woman. Every offender shall be fined $1 million per occurrence, and/or imprisoned up to 10 years, and/or expelled from the boundaries of the state of California for up to life.
d) No person shall serve in any public office, nor serve in public employment, nor enjoy any public benefit, who is a sodomite or who espouses sodomistic propaganda or who belongs to any group that does.
e) This law is effective immediately and shall not be rendered ineffective nor invalidated by any court, state or federal, until heard by a quorum of the Supreme Court of California consisting only of judges who are neither sodomites nor subject to disqualification hereunder.
f) The state has an affirmative duty to defend and enforce this law as written, and every member of the public has standing to seek its enforcement and obtain reimbursement for all costs and attorney’s fees in so doing, and further, should the state persist in inaction over 1 year after due notice, the general public is empowered and deputized to execute all the provisions hereunder extra-judicially, immune from any charge and indemnified by the state against any and all liability.
g) This law shall be known as “The Sodomite Suppression Act” and be numbered as section 39 in Title 3 of the Penal Code, pertaining to offences [sic] against the sovereignty of the state. The text shall be prominently posted in every public school classroom. All laws in conflict with this law are to that extent invalid.
Re:But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:5, Informative)
Hate to break this to you, but that's a ballot initiative, and not a bill.
Anybody with $200 and a paltry number of signatures can introduce a ballot initiative.
It's not a legislative action (that is, a bill), as you falsely stated in the beginning.
Re: (Score:2)
Um, wasn't it the Jewish temple that Jesus kicked the money lenders out of? The Jewish religion has no qualms about banks. The Christian religion is ok with them, just not practicing in the temple/church.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And Americans are awfully quiet when christian politicians harass transsexuals with bathroom bills, and christians try to introduce bills that would authorize the killing of LGBTti people [bluenationreview.com] (fortunately, after the paperwork was filed, a judge ruled the attempt unconstitutional).
Did you even read that article? "After the paperwork was filed"? What does that even mean? He filed it with the "justice department" (all lowercase) according to the article.
So, in order to make something into law all I have to do is write it up and submit it to "the justice department", right?
Do you understand how utterly fucking stupid that whole thing sounds? Do you know how a state legislature even works?
Re: (Score:2)
"Under [California] law, any citizen who properly submits an initiative (and pays the $200 fee) is entitled to gather signatures for their pet proposal.” [slate.com] This is how ballot initiatives work.
Re: (Score:2)
You said "bill", now you're saying "ballot proposal". Two different things.
The frothing loon who wrote the linked article doesn't understand any more than you do, apparently.
There's a reason you're part of the "looney left"....
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
And Americans are awfully quiet when christian politicians harass transsexuals with...
Oh bullshit. Anyone who isn't a Christian decries this crap all the time. And then, in response, the Christian conservatives all bitch and complain about how Christians are being "persecuted" for wanting to "exercise their freedom of religion". It's even an issue on the GOP side with the Presidential election.
Did you somehow sleep through the media flap when that fat, ugly woman in Kentucky on her 4th marriage refused t
Re: But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:4, Insightful)
One could argue that the extremists are those who insist on dragging paedoterrorists, er... I mean SJW into every sodding thread regardless of it's relevance.
Re: But they're not white, so it's OK (Score:5, Insightful)
SJW is mainly a straw man.
Yes, there are people who are completely bonkers, but they are so few that I am more inclined at thinking it is the people that misuses SJW for everyone they don't like that are the bigger problem.
Re: (Score:2)
SJW is mainly a straw man.
I would think it's an ad hominem as you are attacking the person rather than the person's argument.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Which religion has the longer history of slavery? Christianity, since it was founded 600 years before the muslim religion. And who came up with the crusades? And there are plenty of christians out there today who believe they are doing god's will by shooting those they oppose - "no more baby parts" [www.cbc.ca].
The guy's a terrorist just as much as any other terrorist. They all say they are doing the will of god.
Re: (Score:3)
Christianity had slavery for longer than the muslim religion has existed, so it would take a few more centuries for muslims to catch up, even though the majority of muslims don't believe in slavery. And lest you forget, the US resisted attempts by other countries, such as England, to abolish slavery.
Paul condoned slavery - all it would have taken was for Jesus to say "Hey people, thou can't own other people." But no, that wasn't even on the radar, even though the practice was so wide-spread that it would
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Because people like you sure as shit aren't going to do it. You're too busy whining about your lack of taxpayer-funded free-fuck pills.
Really? Why in the world would women like myself ever need "fuck pills", free or otherwise? Just the thought is ludicrous. And I've sat through too many baptist sermons preaching about how god hates gays, lesbians, and transsexuals. Fundamentalist Christian churches are the problem, not the solution. Good people don't need religion to force them to do right.
Re: (Score:2)
Jerry Falwell would have loved to send you to hell; perhaps not personally, but definitely by proxy. The difference is that we have a two-hundred year tradition in this country of not putting up with that sort of crap. Before that? Some of our earliest colonists were christian loons who are famous for murdering a bunch of people whom they thought might be wiccans.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget homo extremists, forcing and aggressing (sic) against others to associate with their deviant behavior.
Really? Someone force you to a pride parade against your will? Or do you not like that gay wedding cake the couple in line in front of you ordered and are afraid that the mere sight of it will give you "gay cooties"?
Re: (Score:2)
The fuck?
Re: (Score:2)
No one is perfect. I find Single Jewish Women incredibly appealing, and can forgive many of their other faults. Unless you're speaking of Stupid Jingoistic Whites?
Re: (Score:2)
I think bringing in race here was misplaced on part of the GP, but everything else he said was correct. SJW groups that would love to force a Christian bakery to provide a cake to a gay wedding, and which also support Islamic activists worldwide, suddenly find themselves on the receiving end even in 'moderate Muslim' countries like Indonesia. Can one spell 'schadenfreude'?
The deep insecurity of Islam (Score:3)
I am not talking about Muslims in general, because generalizations are impossible, but Islam itself is founded on some deep insecurities of men.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh as if any other delusion is any more secure. Remember, the Christian god is a jealous one. And jealousy is usually a pretty good sign of insecurity.
Re:The deep insecurity of Islam (Score:4, Insightful)
Bah ... if there's a god of the universe he made it with cool shit like gravity waves and other things we can understand using things like relativity, filled it with vast and complex things to amaze and delight us, and gave us the capacity to investigate and understand it, and ponder our own place in it.
That god is sitting around going "what the fuck are the little squishy ones on that little fucking rock doing ?"
It's the fucking humans which are the whiny little petulant assholes who can't get over our own bullshit and fantasies about shit like this.
Narrow minded people need to imagine a narrow minded god.
Re:The deep insecurity of Islam (Score:4, Informative)
The problem I have with the christian god is that he is inconsistent. Not only in his actions, that's normal with megalomaniac lunatics. No, in his psychological makeup.
He's insecure and jealous. Not my idea, his own manual says so. Ok. He's got the personality of an opera diva and wants constant worship from everyone. And anyone not worshiping him needs to be converted or sent on a one-way trip to hell. Because he wants a bigger audience. So far, so sensible. Typical egotist with a megalomaniac streak, which is not uncommon with people who not only get lifted on pedestals by their peers but also have a lot of power.
And then he does everything to make himself obsolete. Take this universe. Time and again I get to hear how this is a proof for god because it's so "perfectly tuned". Aside of being impossible to observe were it any other way (because we didn't exist then), wouldn't a god that wants groveling and worship ensure that we KNOW it's his doing and ONLY his doing, that keeps us alive? He's all powerful, and if only half the stories in his ad brochure are true he also has no problem observing any physical limitations or pesky little things like conservation of energy. It would be trivial for him to ensure we KNOW he's there.
But instead he hides and gives us every reason to not believe in his existence because it is possible to explain this universe, from its creation to its current state, without there ever being some kind of supernatural entity required.
How does this get together with that diva personality?
Sorry, christians, your god makes no sense. Get a more sensible one that doesn't look like something Michael Bay would want to make a movie of (seriously, he's big with the special effects in his ad publication but poor with dialogue and sensible content... much like a Bay movie) and we can talk.
Re:The deep insecurity of Islam (Score:4, Insightful)
> He's insecure and jealous. Not my idea, his own manual says so.
His/Her manual also says in Jer 8:8 [biblehub.com]:
Blaming God because (some) Men distort the truth is tossing the baby out with the bathwater. i.e. Sacrifices were never commanded [biblehub.com] (Jer 7:22)
Jesus clarified the spiritual immaturity & stupidity of Judaism when he quotes Hosea 6:6 [biblehub.com]
> But instead he hides
If everyone knew God existed it wouldn't change a single thing. Why? Because you're forgetting about a little experiment called Earth:
Free Will
> because it is possible to explain this universe ... without there ever being some kind of supernatural entity required.
And the Laws of Physics just "magically" appeared one day?? Or are you saying they have always existed ??
The first law of Thermodynamics tells us:
Ergo, the universe has always existed, which implies the Laws of Physics have always existed.
Either way it takes faith to believe in an Eternal Universe or Eternal God. Infinity is curiouser and curiouser that way.
What you are missing is that, at the end of the day, who cares where your faith is placed?? What DOES matter is your _actions_ towards others. There is a reason ALL the major religions teach The Golden Rule. Look, ALL Religions bibles, holy works, and theology can be summarized in 2 words:
Love Unconditionally
THAT'S the point of pure Spirituality, not the corrupted versions of Judaism, Christianity, Islam selling Heaven Insurance.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, and not only does this dog disappear into obscurity, he actively works to *hide* his presence:
- Fake dinosaur skeletons, complete with the carbon isotopes tampered with so they appear to be 65 million years old instead of 6000.
- The whole geologic record for that matter, also with falsified carbon isotopes.
- Lots of fake light inserted into space, supposedly originating from sources hundreds, thousands, and millions of light-years away. Said light is tampered with further: red-shifted to support that w
Re: (Score:2)
I am not talking about Muslims in general, because generalizations are impossible, but Islam itself is founded on some deep insecurities of Mohammed.
FTFY
As for Muslims, is there a good way of sorting out Muslims who don't believe in Islam from those who do?
This just in (Score:3)
Religious nutjobs create law without any connection to reality. Film at 11.
Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck you . . . you're not helping.
Helping what? The notion that there's a sane religion out there that exists for the welfare of the people? Hint: Imaginary friends stopped being cool when you turned 10.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Insightful)
It's not like "yarg, teh batshit crazy Muslims" is any different from "yarg, teh batshit crazy Christians".
I know right? Refusing to bake a gay wedding cake is literally and exactly like dragging them into the street and stoning them to death. It is, as you say, "the exact same fucking thing."
Re: (Score:2)
I'll tell you what ... when these same Christians endorse the right of someone else to say "we don't serve your kind", great, you can claim to have a logically coherent position.
But you can't claim to be exempt from being discriminated against on religious grounds, while using your religion to claim the right to be able to discriminate against someone else. Fuck that.
But if someone said "get out of my store, I won't serve you" to a Christian, the yowling and cries of oppression would be epic ... which mean
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
The problem is that religious nutjobs will take your inch and try to steal a mile. They will do their damndest to shove their nose in your business, and will use any means to do so, at every possible opportunity, even if it's illegal. I mean, look at what's happening in the US right this moment.
Michigan just banned sodomy despite the fact that have a whackton of real and devastating problems that are costing people their lives.
Republicans are actively waging a war against women, cause vaginas are skeery.
Re: (Score:3)
Michigan just banned sodomy despite the fact that have a whackton of real and devastating problems that are costing people their lives.
This is false. [snopes.com]
They went so far as to produce fraudulent footage of planned parenthood just so they could open an investigation.
This is false. People said inconvenient things for PP.
It has been demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt, repeatedly, that they they lied and cheated in order to accomplish what they wanted
This is true! Also, unclear on the concept of an undercover expose (with the accent mark; thanks for being there when I need you, Unicode).
Women are now dying because of various medical issues that would have been trivially prevented by Planned Parenthood, because they either didn't have, or didn't know they had, options.
You could mean two things with this, and both things are false. First, if you're referring to the much ballyhoo'd mammograms, it would be helpful here to mention that PP doesn't perform them anyway, and never has. Second, if you're referring to women somehow not being aware of the fact that abortions e
Re: (Score:2)
I know right? Refusing to bake a gay wedding cake is literally and exactly like dragging them into the street and stoning them to death. It is, as you say, "the exact same fucking thing."
Not to the same degree, no. But certainly the same side of the scale, just a question of being more emboldened after that.
Re: (Score:2)
Child marriage is legal in Indonesia. If you were a baker there, would you want to be forced to bake cakes for underage ceremonies?
Re: (Score:2)
If the children are both consenting adults marrying of their own free will, and if I were a baker in Indonesia then I'd happily bake them a cake. On the other hand if I were a baker in the USA and I was asked to bake a cake to celebrate two gay minors being forced into marriage then I would refuse.
Complex, isn't it.
Not much trumps the rights of children to be protected until they are adult and certainly not some false comparison between gay marriage and child abuse
Re: (Score:2)
You know, I really wish that a bakery had not become the test case for the issue of businesses and public accommodations refusing to sell to gay people. Because to sue over something as trivial as a bakery does make the plaintiffs look a bit silly and petty. And I say that as a someone who's 100% on the side of the plaintiffs. The problem is, of course, not so much bakeries, but grocery stores, gas stations, doctors, banks, insurance companies, real estate agencies, and so on. If it had been JP Morgan C
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Christians would be doing exactly that [wikipedia.org] if we let them get away with it. And note that is from California, which is generally one of the more progressive states in the "not murdering gay people" department.
wow (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They're worried children will turn gay because they like rainbows? I'm in awe.
My little pony has been twisting the minds of small boys for generations now.
There are Same Sex Emoticons? (Score:2)
Seriously?
I'm guessing that somebody went out of their way to look for something like this and then was "shocked! shocked!" to find them.
Whatever happened to live and let live?
Re: (Score:3)
Whatever happened to live and let live?
That is not a thing in fundamentalist religious nations.
Emoticons have a gender? (Score:2)
When did that happen?
Oh, they mean rainbows? Right!
Re: (Score:2)
What a bunch of regressive douchebags! (Score:3)
Fuck these asshats and their shitty religious ideas.
How long would it take to discover 3 unichar seque (Score:2)
How long would it take to discover 3 unichar sequences like ðY'©ðY'ðY'© and ðY'ðY'ðY'?
Re: How long would it take to discover 3 unichar s (Score:2)
And finding out which forum websites don't mangle them...
Only time this is *ever* going to be on topic (Score:2)
Screw you, Indonesia, and have fun banning every emoticon...
8===>--- (_._)
p.s. screw you too, slashdot, for still totally failing at supporting basic non-US characters. That is a *remarkably* flat butt.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you meant to type LBBT. Was just going to comment on that.
Has proofreading also been banned (ganned?) in Indonesia?
Re: (Score:2)
I think you meant to type LBBT. Was just going to comment on that.
Has proofreading also been banned (ganned?) in Indonesia?
I think you mean poofreading.
Re:Religion (Score:5, Funny)
I'd say it's a good thing.
You did mean that they'll eventually ban all emojis, right?
Re:Curious (Score:5, Funny)
Hmm... 72 virgins... a 90s LAN party?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And all the people who died before Jesus go where?
Just because (some) Christian Theology is so full of logic & doctrinal holes doesn't mean you toss the baby out with the bathwater.
> That's all you need to know about Christianity.
Incorrect. All one needs to know about Christianity, in fact the ENTIRE bible can be summed up in 5 words per when the Lawyer asked "What shall I do to inherit eternal life? @ Luke 10:27 [biblehub.com]
Love God. Love Your Neighbor.
Or in the modern colloquialism: Be excellent to each other
A
Re: (Score:2)
No longer. The new Pope says that's hogwash.
But is his ruling retroactive? What happens to all the babies that went to hell over the last ~2000 years?
And does it apply to non-Catholics, or is it only Catholics that get a "Get out of Hell free" card.
Re:Curious (Score:5, Funny)
The claim is men that martyr themselves get 72 virgins when they die.
I've never understood the appeal for this. I mean, it's the afterlife. I would assume that STD's are no longer an issue. I would think that two ridiculously attractive whores would be preferable.
Or maybe we've really misunderstood the true meaning of this. Perhaps Islam is really opposed to martyrdom. It could be such a bad thing in Islam that if you do so, you will nagged for all eternity by 72 women with whom you can never have sex.
What do the women get when they martyr themselves?
They get to be one of the 72 women who nag some stupid man to insanity for all of time. Hell, there's 72 of them and not an AK47 in site. They can stone him to death over and over.
Re: (Score:2)
The claim is men that martyr themselves get 72 virgins when they die.
What do the women get when they martyr themselves?
That’s all you need to know about Islam.
I think the men get 72 Helen Thomases. The women get 72 lesbian virgins as well.
Re: (Score:3)
Actually, they should get along pretty well [youtube.com].
Dawkins help us if they ever find out how much they have in common and stop shooting each other.
Re: (Score:2)
Dawkins help us if they ever find out how much they have in common and stop shooting each other.
Doesn't matter if they find out how much they have in common, they all believe that their specific belief is the right one and everyone else are the spawn of satan, ie. the situation will get even more polarized if they compare notes.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Hmmm ... let's see ... wants to define what others can do based on their own religion ... are 100% convinced of their right to do so ... wish to impose own standards of decency/morality on the rest of the world whether the rest of the world likes it or not ... thinks the rest of the world needs to let them do as they please while refusing to respect other beliefs ... wants their religion taught in school and to supersede science and facts ... firmly think god is personally on their side and can do no wrong.
Re:And... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
Sanity is defined by the norm. Since a large proportion of the human population believes in some kind of god, it's considered normal and sane. Because few people believe in aliens or unicorns, people who do are considered to have some kind of problem or flaw.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Here's a fun question: Would you rather live in a society dominated by Judeo-Christian values, or Islamic ones?
But I guess false equivalency is more comforting, no?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
I want to live in no society which is controlled by either.
I know moderate Muslims, and moderate Christians ... and remarkably, they seem to share the same values, and have no interest in imposing them on anybody else.
Islam derives from the same lineage as gets you from Judaism to Christianity to Islam ... along all of the variations along the way.
It's not a false equivalency to say that "fundamentalist sect of a religion" is no different -- there are probably Christians who would agree with stoning someone
Re: (Score:2)
Would you rather live in a society dominated by Judeo-Christian values, or Islamic ones?
Well, with those two sets of values being so universally unambiguously defined and understood in exactly the same way by every individual on the planet, that shouldn't be a hard question to answer.
Oh, wait...
Re: (Score:2)
How is the christianist wing of the Republican Party (AOT,K) any different than any other fundamentalist sect of a religion?
Well for one thing, the people behind this are trying to pass a law banning gay emojis. Can you point to a Republican that's trying to ban gay emojis?
Re: (Score:2)
When they do it will be towards abortion clinics
They've already bombed abortion clinics.
--
BMO
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Use your words.