Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime Privacy

Stingray-Like Device Enables Blackmail In S. Africa 50

New submitter PalmAndy writes to note that: South African Police nabbed some criminals using an IMSI catcher device, similar to a Stingray, in Johannesburg. The article says that it was made in Israel and is worth $2 million. A follow-on story says that it was used for tender manipulation and blackmail of Government officials. A corrupt government official helped procure this device, which in theory is only sold to goverments."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Stingray-Like Device Enables Blackmail In S. Africa

Comments Filter:
  • by wonkey_monkey ( 2592601 ) on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:05AM (#50283249) Homepage

    A follow-on story says that it was used for tender manipulation

    Ooh. That sounds kinda nice.

  • define "tender" (Score:5, Informative)

    by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:45AM (#50283335)

    Tender [wikipedia.org]

    A call for tenders, or invitation to tender (ITT) (often called tender for short) is a special procedure for generating competing offers from different bidders looking to obtain an award of business activity in works, supply, or service contracts. They are usually preceded by a pre-qualification questionnaire (PQQ).

    sounds like they used it to win government contracts and blackmail government officials that didn't play nice.

  • Dunno (Score:4, Interesting)

    by nospam007 ( 722110 ) * on Monday August 10, 2015 @05:46AM (#50283337)

    OK I know long cons need some investments, à la little fish to get a big fish, but a 2 million McGuffin just to maybe get something to blackmail is a bit far fetched IMHO.

    • The article says that it's worth $2 million, not that that is what it cost. Something like this needs to have a very large profit margin because of (1) a limited target audience and (2) the risk involved in needing to win a tender, which might not happen. So the actual cost is likely to be far less than $2 million. Besides, it's not unusual at all for large investments to be made in an attempt to win a tender, particularly when the investors are confident of winning, and the fact that the device itself can

      • The article says that it's worth $2 million, not that that is what it cost.

        I doubt that it is worth $2M. I suspect that $2M is the list price for this device, but since it is a first-generation device it is probably sold with a very large discount. This particular unit might be a used device, returned to the manufacturer.

        • That's true. I had skimmed the article and jumped to the false conclusion that they were blackmailing officials into accepting the use of the very device that was being used to blackmail them.

          What it actually claims is that a "top gold industry businessman" and a "bank employee" imported this illegally from Israel, with the help of a "senior government official", in order to secure (through blackmail) lucrative government contracts that might otherwise not have been awarded to them ("multibillion-rand" acco

    • Unless the tender is for multi-billion defense contracts (I don't have any information, didn't RTFA, but 2m to get a 2B contract is sound investment!)

      • Or, realistically, many smaller contracts.

        There aren't a lot of 2B contracts out there, but there are plenty of small ones worth a paltry few million that would easily fly under the radar because those aren't the big, shiny ones. Barely worth investigation if there are some shenanigans at play.

  • by Anonymous Coward

    "Stingray" is a trademark name for a device that is generically called IMSI-catcher. You wouldn't call a smartphone an "iPhone-like device".

    • You fail to understand how language works.

      The term "Stingray" has gotten lots of press while the phrase "IMSI-catcher" is unknown to most people. Relating a device to the most commonly known term for it is normal.

      It's no different than Scotch tape being used to refer to any brand of cellophane tape and Kleenex being used to refer to any brand of facial tissue.

    • Re:"Stingray-like" (Score:4, Informative)

      by geekmux ( 1040042 ) on Monday August 10, 2015 @08:01AM (#50283713)

      "Stingray" is a trademark name for a device that is generically called IMSI-catcher. You wouldn't call a smartphone an "iPhone-like device".

      "Ignorance" is a term often used to describe those asking for a pair of Vise Grips to get a better hold on the power of brand marketing without being able to grasp the irony that they don't know the tool by any other name...

    • by rossdee ( 243626 )

      Remember Steve Irwin - those things are deadly

  • by Anonymous Coward

    This doesn't matter. Everything is wonderful now that the country is democratic with free and fair elections.

  • by jbmartin6 ( 1232050 ) on Monday August 10, 2015 @07:31AM (#50283595)
    Since this device was supposedly only available to governments (as if that somehow makes it OK), this is an interesting illustration of the objections in the US to teh plan to backdoor everyone's phone encryption. If the government has the ability, criminals will soon have it also.
  • New jobs (Score:4, Informative)

    by johanw ( 1001493 ) on Monday August 10, 2015 @08:59AM (#50283949)

    For security people scanning for these devices. I'm sure an "official" IMSI catcher detector will cost millions as well, however, there are free detection programs for rooted Android phones, like https://github.com/SecUpwN/And... [github.com] and https://opensource.srlabs.de/p... [srlabs.de]

  • by Anonymous Coward

    And that will not remain the first instance. Any anti-security device used by governments will sooner r later make it into the hands of criminals. There will also be homemade ones around, as building them is not that hard and a lot cheaper than 2 Million. The problem is that the encryption of the mobile phone networks sucks, because governments (like the US one) want it that way. Now they are endangering everybody with their stupidity.

Avoid strange women and temporary variables.

Working...