Microsoft Says Free Windows 10 Upgrades For Pirates Will Be Unsupported 193
An anonymous reader writes with this story about some of the fine print to Microsoft's offer of Windows 10 upgrades to pirates. "When Microsoft confirmed it will offer free Windows 10 upgrades to pirates worldwide, many were shocked. VentureBeat has been trying to get more details from the company, which disclosed today that after PCs with pirated copies of Windows 7 and Windows 8.1 are upgraded to Windows 10, they will remain in a 'non-genuine' status and Microsoft will not support them. 'With Windows 10, although non-genuine PCs may be able to upgrade to Windows 10, the upgrade will not change the genuine state of the license,' a Microsoft spokesperson told VentureBeat. 'Non-genuine Windows is not published by Microsoft. It is not properly licensed or supported by Microsoft or a trusted partner. If a device was considered non-genuine or mislicensed prior to the upgrade, that device will continue to be considered non-genuine or mislicensed after the upgrade. According to industry experts, use of pirated software, including Non-genuine Windows, results in a higher risk of malware, fraud — identity theft, credit card theft, etc. — public exposure of your personal information, and a higher risk for poor performance or feature malfunctions.' Yet this doesn't provide enough answers. After a pirate upgrades to Windows 10 for free, does this 'non-genuine' version expire and become unusable after a certain period of time? Does no support mean no security updates for pirates?"
This is pretty common. (Score:5, Informative)
They have a similar policy with Home Usage Policies. It's a "Ghost" License, not really a true license with warranty rights, support, transfers etc.. You can use the product legally, but you don't own any license. don't expect to be able to transfer the policy or seek technical support.
This copy won't expire, but you can't really re-sell it, transfer it or seek any other benefits. The product will technically "work" fine and will receive updates and so on without issue. One area which isn't guaranteed is if Microsoft continue this trend of free upgrades from earlier OS, they might not permit free upgrade for this pirate/amnesty copy.
Jason.
Re:This is pretty common. (Score:5, Insightful)
I disagree with lots of their policies, but this one is rather gratuitous and undeserved on our part.
Re:This is pretty common. (Score:5, Informative)
No - They've given you an amnesty license. Just don't automatically expect to upgrade from Windows 10 to Windows 11 or to use any phone / e-mail support. Don't expect other rights you'd get with full copies, such as any downgrade rights or the ability to transfer it to another computer or person.
Security patches/updates will work fine. These are legal restrictions not usage restrictions. It'll look like any other copy of Windows and work like any other copy of Windows. You just can't put it in a box and put it on e-bay, it's at that point it no longer exists.
Jason.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It depends on the copy. Non-OEM licenses are usually transferable to another computer. You can of course sell that digital copy installed on a computer. - assuming it's not an upgrade SA right.
It wouldn't be strictly legal to sell a computer with one of these amnesty copies.
I've never used phone support, but yes they do offer it for Office and Windows, I'm pretty sure it's free, but time / case limited.
Jason.
Jason.
Re: (Score:2)
I've never used phone support, but yes they do offer it for Office and Windows, I'm pretty sure it's free, but time / case limited.
Not sure about Free; though they could have changed policy since last I checked (late 1990's) when it was:
There's a reason why no one calls MS for support outside of Partner agreements, MSDN, etc. ;-)
Hopefully they've changed the policy since then.
Re: (Score:2)
>> No - They've given you an amnesty license.
No they haven't. They said you'd be able to upgrade, but windows will still bug you will "you might be a victim of software counterfiting", "your windows is not genuine" after a 30 day drial period. In another word Microsoft has just said that they won't specifically check for a license during upgrade. They will check after the upgrade, though.
Re: (Score:2)
Security patches/updates will work fine.
Hahaha, that's a good one...
Re: This is pretty common. (Score:5, Funny)
Reboot. * Install all updates. Reboot three times. * Uninstall all third party software and start over. * Reinstall the OS and drivers, all service packs, all patches. * Uninstall all third party hardware and start over. * Still a problem? Contact the PC manufacturer.
* Check for proper function.
There. Paste that to a file. You have Microsoft OS support forever.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: This is pretty common. (Score:5, Funny)
If that's windows support, linux support is as follows:
Check /var/log messages for errors. Find cryptic bizarro language pointing to some subsystem you've never heard of. Craft messages as follows and post to Slashdot:
"Linux is terrible! I'm going back to Windows! I can't even get function XYZ to work! Every time I try, error message $ERR shows up in my /var/log/messages!"
Wait one hour before you get a response as follows:
"You moron, All you have to do to get that to go away is edit $CONFIG_FILE and restart $DAEMON! Windows sucks!"
Problem solved.
Re: (Score:2)
>> Effectively this is a way of saying 'Free For Personal Use', without impacting on retail sales to much.
Where have they said anything of the sorts? It's like seeing a free Windows 7 iso download and running around screaming "OMG, MICROSOFT JUST MADE WINDOWS FREE". They will most likely push a 30 day trial as they always have, so you can upgrade a pirated windows, you can use it for 30 days and then BAM, you have to buy a license.
Re: (Score:2)
they'll patch it.
if for nothing else to patch new checks for if it's genuine.
they've been patching non genuine windows's forever.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But the rumor is it will be filled with nags [computerworld.com] complete with the background turning black and daily pop ups bitching and demanding cash.
They started doing that with Vista. Win7 and WIn8 do that as well. so that's not new.
Re:This is pretty common. (Score:4, Informative)
Many of us who are "stupid and clueless enough to voluntarily run Windows" simply don't have a choice, the software we want/need to use is locked to Windows.
In my case, Desktop = Windows because 3 of the 3 games I spend most of my PC time playing are Windows-exclusive, laptop (which is more general-computing) is running Linux.
Re: (Score:2)
You might have to qualify that statement with "DX9 or lower" games, since Wine can't run any game that requires DX10+ yet.
Re:This is pretty common. (Score:4, Interesting)
So you are bragging you are running Linux which has more vulnerabilities than Windows
Wow, that was truly a massive douche move, and today, you are a massive douche telling lies and spreading fud. How does it feel to be a liar? That study shows publicly acknowledged vulnerabilities. It doesn't show the total vulnerabilities, because we don't know how many there are.
Nobody knows which OS has the most vulnerabilities. Repeating a lie in ignorance is even worse than telling the lie to begin with.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
So you are bragging you are running Linux which has more vulnerabilities than Windows [betanews.com] while being "forced" to run Windows for games?
Actually, your link shows that the number of high severity vulnerabilities is about the same for Linux and Windows, and it is higher for Apple operating systems. Also, it looks odd that none of the Windows versions have any reported low severity vulnerabilities at all (compared to the more natural looking bell shaped distribution of severity for Linux), which suggests that either Microsoft programmers have a strange tendency to only have serious bugs in their code, or that the vulnerabilities are under-repo
Re: (Score:2)
I think that you're always going to find this to be the case. For the simple fact that open source programmers are better programmers. Open source programmers either do it by choice in their free time, or are paid to do it by companies who feel that it's worth it to invest back into the community.
The Venn diagram for companies that employ bad programmers and companies that want to contribute back to the community
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's a lot easier than troweling through binaries with ida pro. Otherwise we have only microsoft's word on the number reported.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:This is pretty common. (Score:5, Interesting)
I gave Microsoft about £100 8 years ago for this PC I'm writing on's operating system. Now, you can claim I'm stupid and clueless enough to have paid that money if you like, but you'll have to show me how I would have played all the games that I have done since without having bought the operating system.
Re: (Score:2)
I learned of a new problem with some Hewlett Packard desktops : an incompatibility with newer graphics card on not so old models (with Intel Sandy Bridge) and no BIOS upgrade to fix the bug.
That, and no way to lower the RAM speed on those OEM PCs to keep the PC stable when the RAM, motherboard or memory controller aged not too well.
On the other hand I've had some trouble with assembled hardware, software related, for doing dual boot or multiboot.. I have the bug of Windows-7-on-multiboot-fails-to-install-SP
Laptops (Score:2)
There are other reasons though, better hardware if I assemble the box myself
Has it become common to assemble a laptop yourself since I last checked?
Re: (Score:2)
Do you play the games on Linux or on a video game console? If you play on a console, you paid in the price of each game, and you paid by not being able to install community-made mods.
Re: (Score:2)
They'd be shooting themselves in the foot (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly. They can't afford not to do security updates for the pirates because there are so damn many it'll cause problems for all the legit users. I hope they follow through because illegitimate windows installations are holding back expansion of alternative operating systems but I know MS simply can not afford not to do security updates.
Re:They'd be shooting themselves in the foot (Score:4, Insightful)
Hey stupid. The legit uses have legal copies and will get updates.
Hey genius! Those machines running broken illegal copies will get infected and become zombies. Who will get DDOSed by them? Those with legal copies, or services used by those legit users
Re:They'd be shooting themselves in the foot (Score:5, Informative)
Disallowing security updates to run on non-genuine copies of Windows is not exactly in Microsoft's best interest.
After push back YEARS ago, Microsoft allowed security updates for non-genuine users. No "feature feature improvement" type downloads though.
Interestingly, with Windows 7 at least, OEM-SLP loader method of "piracy" has remained bullet-proof. In the past 5 years it's been in use, it has always reported genuine, no altering MS binaries, and MS can't tell the difference between you and someone that bought their HP PC at Best buy.
So far with Win 8.x phony KMS servers has made it indistinguishable from a computer activating on a company's LAN.
XP you could just harvest VL keys from university and workplaces attended.
There are clean ways to "pirate" any MS OS, starting with a clean genuine install ISO, yet people end up with junky malware filled garbage.
In any case even if you get a free upgrade on this "genuine" pirated copy, I would expect to remain genuine, but not be able to call in for tech support, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
> In any case even if you get a free upgrade on this "genuine" pirated copy, I would expect to remain genuine, but not be able to call in for tech support, etc.
Hm. My Windows experience started with 3.1 (before that it was a VT100 terminal, Telebit modem and BSD) and in all those years, I only remember calling Microsoft Tech Support once, years ago, and it was a licensing issue. (A recently purchased laptop who's installed instance of XP persisted to show "not genuine".) It's only one data point, but
Re: (Score:3)
Might be overrated for you. I happen to know people who work in MS tech Support center and it's a hellhole. The shit people call about would increase my suicidal tendencies to 100%, and I worked in tech support center and seen/heard quite the shit myself.
Re: (Score:2)
I get it, but have to point out that any call center can be made a hellhole merely by being understaffed, which many are, because they're usually not a profit center.
I do tech support myself, and often it depends on how you approach it. It's important to remember, for instance, that the people calling you are users, not geeks. Their job often isn't to understand the inner workings of the product. Their job is usually something that involves *using* the product, and they can't do their job if the product
Re: (Score:2)
You're amused at first. Then bored. Then mad. Then legally insane.
It's all about repetition. You encounter a ridiculous question once, it's worth a hearty laugh. But when you encounter the same question 1000 times, asked by 1000 total morons, it's way, way beyond funny.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, and you know, I do encounter that. Even worse, since over 80% of IT at this company is "least expensive shore" now, I get it from two different directions -- from the users, and from the tragically incompetent offshore admins I have to work through to get the problem fixed, because they have root and I don't anymore. If anything irritates me, it's the latter.
Because, users shouldn't have to know this technical stuff in order to do a job that's not related to knowing this stuff. Any more than a bus
Re: (Score:2)
That's a nice way of saying, "anytime they wait on hold for 15-45 minutes to ask a question that's answered on page 1 of the documentation, the help file, the FAQ, and a ten-second Google search, they should be rounded up, forcibly surgically sterilized, publically flogged, and informed that we are merciful people who gave stupidity a lighter punishment than it actually deserves".
Have you considered that perhaps you're just not a people person? Maybe a job dealing with the public just isn't for you.
I'd rather go on welfare than work another tech support job.
I'd rather you work for a living than sucking off the government teat, which happens to be paid for by your fellow citizens, most of whom are also working at shitty jobs.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It will be interesting to see if upgrading a OEM-SLP Windows Loadered Windows 7 maintains full "genuine" status on an upgrade to Windows 10.
If so, it's going to be a pirate free-for-all on Windows 10, just like Windows 7
When Windows 8 was released there was a free upgrade for Windows Pro users to Windows 8 Pro Pack. You could install Windows 8 Pro, activate against KMS, then upgrade to Pro Pack. It would then be permanently activated. Microsoft caught on and stopped letting new KMS clients upgrade to Propack.
Re:They'd be shooting themselves in the foot (Score:4)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not "reasons unknown". You don't buy lifetime licenses from MS. Windows licenses are tied to the computer itself - or most specifically, the motherboard. New computer, new license required.
Re:They'd be shooting themselves in the foot (Score:4, Informative)
OEM, sure. But it's not my understanding that if you buy a PC and buy the full, expensive version of windows and the PC dies and you buy a new pc then you need to buy another copy of windows. Otherwise....why would anyone pay for the full version; you'd get the oem, right?
Re: (Score:3)
After searching a bit, I think you're right. Apparently, if you use a retail/upgrade version, you can install on new machines, but you're still restricted to using the license only on one machine at a time. If you got an OEM version, it's tied to your motherboard, so you can't transfer the license to a new computer.
I've read a few places saying that this wasn't true for Windows 8/8.1, but the information out there seems a bit confused, so I'm not certain of that.
I was under the impression that this was tr
Re: (Score:2)
I needed to reinstall XP on an old laptop because it was the only thing in the house with a firewire port.
It said the key from the original sticker on the base was invalid.
Re: (Score:3)
Were you using OEM media? With XP a Retail disk won't except an OEM key.
Re: (Score:2)
And lifetime licenses expire. I have an XP license I "stole" from an old computer being thrown away. It wasn't OEM, but was a full license. I tried activating it with MS for a new install, and the activation failed. I called MS and they said that the license was not valid. And when they expire them, there's no discussion. It's just dead. Forever. And no, it wasn't from a licensing contract or such that expires. It was a full-retail purchase, expired by MS, for reasons unknown.
One reason why I'll buy licenses (to support the product, like $40 upgrades to Win 7 Pro), but then install the pirated copy. Never have to worry about shit like that. Kind of like how Pirated movies don't have previews and unskippable content like DVDs you buy.
Re: (Score:2)
More important to me (Score:2, Insightful)
What about all the PCs that were shipped with valid licenses, but for whatever reason, techs (such as myself) have had to install a fresh copy of Windows on the box. Could be a failed drive, or other failed hardware, or whatever, reason doesn't matter too much. The point is that it shipped with a legit copy of Windows, and often times doesn't have a recovery disk or an OEM copy of Windows. What are we supposed to do then as techs? Tell the customer "SUCKS TO BE YOU" or "GOTTA PAY FOR THE THING YOU ALREADY P
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:More important to me (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If you bought a PC with a legitimate version of Windows and you don't have a product key with it, you more or less got screwed.
Even then, assuming again that its legitimate, you can recover the product key and reinstall with it from a vanilla disk. The OEM product keys have been legit for installing with any other ISO/disk for a long time now.
Re: (Score:3)
If the computer came with a legitimate copy of Windows, the license should be stuck on the back of the box, as required by Microsoft of OEMs. You can install Windows fresh from your own disc and just re-enter the license code from that sticker. Microsoft recently started allowing ISO downloads of supported versions of Windows, so a tech should always have their own copy of Windows to use if needed.
New hardware won't generally cause problems with license activation unless you change the motherboard, and th
Yes, it will have security updates (Score:2)
Microsoft doesn't want Windows machines to cause the amount of malware and exploits on the web to explode far beyond current levels. They'll continue to get security updates for sure. But it does mean that if they call in to MS support, the agent won't help them without a valid key, and there may be some non-security Windows updates which will be restricted.
What Microsoft is warning people about is that hackers may have trojans, keyloggers, etc. built-in to the OS from the start. I don't know why this wo
Not a genuine advantage (Score:4, Insightful)
"the agent won't help them without a valid key"
Not a genuine advantage with 99% of users (pirates included) outside the US (figure pulled off my behind). When was the last time you called tech support for support and not visit some online forum or your local tech guru.
The real issue: will the software police break down your door if you get reported using a legally upgraded "pirate" version? Can you just say, but the kind folks at Redmond say I get a pass, my sins have been forgiven?
Yeah, well... (Score:2)
I'm still waiting on my free upgrade from Vista.
However, I'm one of the few who liked Vista, and still run it (on the system I bought it with, a core 2 duo E6850, XFX 650i motherboard, and a brand new (old) gtx 470 graphics card I got off ebay for £29).
Re: (Score:2)
No Support? (Score:5, Interesting)
Who actually calls Microsoft for support? They should scrap Retail, OEM, System builder, etc. and just have With Support $X, Without Support $Y.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So then they buy a retail copy to get support. I'm not saying it is completely useless, just useless to someone who has been using Windows long enough or is comfortable with computers in general.
Re: (Score:2)
I have, about a year ago. My Surface Pro 2, on wake from sleep, wouldn't allow me to enter credentials, it would just sit at the login screen. The attached keyboard wouldn't allow input, and the on-screen touch keyboard wouldn't show up. Only work around was a hard reboot. Turns out the Surface didn't really like being put to sleep while using a full-screen game, such as Civ 5. Never did get an official resolution to the issue, but I haven't had the problem as of late (maybe quietly fixed somewhere along th
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I know for a while win7 had the same issue. That one turned out to be power management was "selectively" disabling usb devices... it neglected to leave the keyboard on... so when it went to sleep... space would never wake it up. Quite often a soft ACPI reset would do the trick. One tap on the power button and the keyboard would wake.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't worry, that issue is still out there - have it myself at least once a month.
Do you get the issue where the screen registers a continuous finger press on it? The only way to clear that one is to reboot the device too :/
So let me get this straight... (Score:2)
new favorite phrase (Score:5, Interesting)
"Upgrades for Pirates" is this week's winner for new favorite phrase.
Ummm... (Score:2)
This isn't exclusive to Microsoft; but it certainly includes them: Except in the occasional case of some indie hero/martyr; or heroically expensive software priced like it includes hours of a technical expert's time because it in fact does, software isn't really 'supported'. If you are reasonab
Re: (Score:2)
The enterprise market is unaffected. They mostly are on subscription contracts with free upgrades anyway.
What's the difference? (Score:2)
Does that mean I can't get on MSDN to get an answer to my question that doesn't answer the question?
But seriously, what does "unsupported" mean for MS? No updates? In other words, even more unpatched, insecure spamchuggers? I doubt that's going to affect any of those that are already, we just might get a few more of these.
Thank you Microsoft. No, I mean it! As long as you exist, I'll have perfect job security.
It's a good time to be in IT security.
Re: (Score:2)
Quantum physics at its best (Score:2)
microsoft-offers-pirates-amnesty-and-free-windows-10-upgrades [slashdot.org]
microsoft-says-free-windows-10-upgrades-for-pirates-will-be-unsupported [slashdot.org]
Why would they do anything else? (Score:2)
And why are we surprised enough somehow this is new. People STEAL the software... They get no love from MS.
If you can't afford windows there's actually useful open source alternatives. Just use that. Why someone would steal software when you can go open source and be legit make snow sense to me....
Is the asinine "Home" flavoring preserved? (Score:2)
I'm not a pirate (Score:3)
But I will stick with Win 7 anyway.
I don't want a phone/tablet OS on my desktop
Non-genuine? (Score:2)
According to industry experts, use of pirated software, including Windows, results in a higher risk of malware, fraud — identity theft, credit card theft, etc. — public exposure of your personal information, and a higher risk for poor performance or feature malfunctions.
Corrected. The term "non-genuine" is not needed--it is superfluous. The sentence is correct with *any* version of Windows. All the damn thing is is a bunch of bits, doesn't matter if they come on a piece of plastic that Microsoft sold to some retailer or through a copyright-infringing file downloaded over the Internet. Either way it will eventually become infected by countless bits of invasive garbage for the vast majority of users. It's just that with Microsoft's version, at least it doesn't come pre-bundl
Still never paying for Windows again (Score:2)
Since Windows support is pure bullshit, it's not worth paying for.
Since there are no other Microsoft products worth paying for, I don't see where their revenues are going to come from.
Not published? (Score:2)
"'Non-genuine Windows is not published by Microsoft."
What the heck does that even mean? A bit identical copy of Windows that is not accompanied by a legitimate license is suddenly not published by Microsoft? Who is it published by? No one?
Google-fu? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> If it's free, I'll upgrade my laptop from Win 7 to Win 10. But if it's a subscription model as rumoured, I'll stick with 7
Same here. Same reason I'm sticking with older versions of Adobe products. (They've migrated to a subscription model.)
Of course, over the long term, I'm assuming that there will be a different product I can migrate to in the future.
Re: (Score:2)
What's wrong with Windows 7 that makes you want to upgrade?
I'm still running Vista, with (mostly) the same hardware I bought this system with literally 10 years ago. Directx11, stability measured by power cuts, simple to run.
Re: (Score:2)
Make that 8 years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
The main reason I currently run Win8.1 is for Hyper-V. Unlike its predecessor Virtual PC, it actually supports Linux guest VMs, and it also does it well. Probably the only missing feature is the ability to share folders between host & guest. It works so much more smoothly than VirtualBox. Little things like being able to use an active ftp connection from a VM, rather than forcing passive mode (yes, people still use FTP in 2015) or have the VM suspend/resume when the host is rebooted automatically is awe
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing is "wrong" with it -- I just don't want to end up being a die-hard "next generation XP user" who is stuck on an obsolete version of the OS. If I can get on the newest edition for free, why not? At least that way the updates will keep coming for more than another year or two -- and most of my hardware is kept running for a decade before it gets replaced.
Re: (Score:2)
Nothing, other then the problem that it will stop getting updates within the next few years. So if you want to continue to receive security updates, you have to move to Win10.
Which, fortunately for Microsoft, is getting good press and good reception unlike Win8.
Re: (Score:2)
You bought a Windows LAPTOP to run database software???? Please tell me this is for a portable development and test environment and not for actually doing something?
Also, why bother with the big named SQL database offerings on a laptop? It's got to be insanely expensive to have all three of those licensed for all your cores on a laptop. Why not just use a cheaper stand in like MySQL or something that's free? Unless of course you are just doing development work and your production environment requires a
Re: (Score:2)
It was the cheapest i7 option out there, and gave me portability for when I want it. It's not like I'm running servers -- I just need to be able to check script syntax by *creating* the database instances. Performance is a non-issue.
Besides, if a single user can swamp a database even on a laptop, then the database isn't worth developing for. Don't forget -- even laptop hardware is nearly 1000 times as powerful as "servers" were when these products first came out.
Re: (Score:2)
Ever hear of "developer editions"?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but this guy/gal claims to have *purchased* software and development stuff is usually free, or part of a development kit that you buy as part of your support agreements. Licensing costs are not an issue...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: If it's free, I'll bite the bullet (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or really good copy protection and a small customer base who doesn't mind paying you.
Re: (Score:2)
The best copy protection, in my experience, is a complex program and good customer support.
Re: (Score:3)
The best copy protection, in my experience, is a complex program and good customer support.
The obsessive control freaks who run major corporations will never be satisfied with this approach.
Re: Even Microsoft doesn't know what they mean... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They know what they are doing - for the first time in many years. Windows devices are currently 14% of global computing devices sales. Their 1.5 billion unit installed base is already less than Android's 2 billion plus and its advantage is eroding at a billion units a year. It is incredibly fragmented, with only 15% of their own users on version 8+ able to access the latest version of their browser. They must consolidate their base if they hope to leverage it into a credible entry into the mobile space. And they are out of time. If this fails, by the time a "next version" is ready they will be in Blackberry share land because between them Android and iOS will be moving 2 billion units a year, their installed base will be greater than 4 billion, and there are only 7 billion humans - many of whom are too young, one, poor to count at all.
They can still save themselves without giving it away for free. I'd buy Windows 10 if the price was around 20USD for the full non-crippled run-as-many-processes-and-users-as-you-want version, rather than 100USD for the crippled home-user-who-only-runs-one-program-at-a-time. As it stands, I've got Win7, won't move off it due to their stupid pricing but will gladly upgrade to Win10 for free if it is anything like Win7. If it wasn't free, I am willing to pay up to 20USD for Win10, but won't "upgrade" to Win10
Re: (Score:3)
Too many SKUs (combined with cost).
Trying to keep track of what features came with WinVista X vs Y vs Z (or Win7 SKUs or Win 8.1 with five different SKUs) was very consumer-hostile. Consumers got confused and annoyed. Plus there was a huge cost difference between the top-end SKU and the home edition.
There should only have been (1) version of Windows 7 -- with all of the bells and whistles included in Enterprise/Ultimate/DaddyGates editions -- for a maximum of a
Re: (Score:2)
I was going to call you out on your paranoid nonsense, but then I noticed you spelled MS with a dollar sign! I've never seen that before, and it struck me that because of that, you must really understand Microsoft's intentions, business model and their plans for the future. You are a sage. You are providing invaluable information for the greater computing community. You, sir, are the saviour of the world.
Back in the real world: If you are worried about MS getting a hold of your host GUIDs, MAC addresse