Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Crime United Kingdom United States

How an FBI Informant Led the Hack of British Tabloid "The Sun" 38

Daniel_Stuckey writes Hector Xavier Monsegur, also known online as "Sabu," was caught by the FBI in June of 2011 for a litany of hacking-related offenses and, within hours, began cooperating with authorities in hopes of receiving a lenient sentence. Now, never-before-published FBI records and exclusive interviews detail how the informant rallied other hackers to attack various News Corp. interests, including The Sun, at a time that the FBI has said it was tracking all of Monsegur's online activity. And for a week shortly after his arrest, he was privy to the anti-Murdoch campaign waged by Anonymous, according to the documents obtained by Motherboard.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How an FBI Informant Led the Hack of British Tabloid "The Sun"

Comments Filter:
  • by Karmashock ( 2415832 ) on Thursday October 16, 2014 @03:30AM (#48157273)

    When in US history was the FBI turned against a native political faction to the political gain of the sitting establishment?

    Exactly. We've seen this movie before.

    And we know how it ends. Whatever you think of the targets of these things... it won't destroy those movements... it is just pissing them off.

  • by Bruce66423 ( 1678196 ) on Thursday October 16, 2014 @06:03AM (#48157605)
    Given that the US has sought the extradition of UK based offenders who hacked US sites, there seems no reason for him not to be surrendered to Her Majesty's hospitality, even if he was given 'immunity' by the US.

    Or will the UK once again prove to be a lapdog of the US government.
    • I really think it's disparaging to call the UK government the lapdogs of the U.S.

      I mean, it's really not fair to lapdogs. They at least have SOME dignity.

    • Or will the UK once again prove to be a lapdog of the US government.

      I'm not familiar with this meme, would charging him or letting him off make the UK a lapdog?

      • Because his crimes occurred whilst he was perhaps covered by an FBI immunity, but not a UK one. For the FBI to expect us not to charge under these circumstances is to impose their choices, on the lapdog, who usually merely licks the master's face in response.
    • The US/UK extradition agreement is not symmetrical. The US need only ask nicely and we are supposed to turn over the accused, while the UK would need to provide evidence sufficient for conviction to even ask for someone to be extradited from the US.

  • by NotDrWho ( 3543773 ) on Thursday October 16, 2014 @07:42AM (#48157929)

    And THIS is why you should always be suspicious of the guy in your cause who always seems to be screaming the loudest for the most radical (and illegal) stuff, yet whose own operations always seem to end up sabotaged.

    Daniel Domscheit-Berg [wikipedia.org], I'm looking in your direction.

Technology is dominated by those who manage what they do not understand.

Working...