Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Patents Graphics The Courts

Appeals Court Affirms Old Polaroid Patent Invalid 45

mpicpp (3454017) writes with news of a notoriously abused (basically "method of displaying images on a machine") software patent being declared invalid. From the article: The ruling from last week is one of the first to apply new Supreme Court guidance about when ideas are too "abstract" to be patented. ... The patents in this case describe a type of "device profile" that allows digital images to be accurately displayed on different devices. US Patent No. 6,128,415 was originally filed by Polaroid in 1996. After a series of transfers, in 2012 the patent was sold to Digitech Image Technologies, a branch of Acacia Research Corporation, the largest publicly traded patent assertion company. ... In the opinion, a three-judge panel found that the device profile described in the patent is a "collection of intangible color and spatial information," not a machine or manufactured object. "Data in its ethereal, non-physical form is simply information that does not fall under any of the categories of eligible subject matter under section 101," wrote Circuit Judge Jimmie Reyna on behalf of the panel.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Appeals Court Affirms Old Polaroid Patent Invalid

Comments Filter:
  • Hardly a shocker (Score:5, Informative)

    by SlaveToTheGrind ( 546262 ) on Friday July 18, 2014 @08:51PM (#47486979)

    The district court held the patent invalid under the old standard that was, in practice, more generous toward software algorithm patents. Then the Supreme Court decided CLS Bank, making software algorithm patents more difficult to obtain/keep. Under those circumstances, it would have been newsworthy if the Federal Circuit hadn't affirmed in this case.

Adding manpower to a late software project makes it later. -- F. Brooks, "The Mythical Man-Month"