Meet the Muslim-American Leaders the FBI and NSA Have Been Spying On 223
Advocatus Diaboli (1627651) writes The National Security Agency and FBI have covertly monitored the emails of prominent Muslim-Americans — including a political candidate and several civil rights activists, academics, and lawyers — under secretive procedures intended to target terrorists and foreign spies.
From the article: "The individuals appear on an NSA spreadsheet in the Snowden archives called 'FISA recap.' Under that law, the Justice Department must convince a judge with the top-secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court that there is probable cause to believe that American targets are not only agents of an international terrorist organization or other foreign power, but also 'are or may be' engaged in or abetting espionage, sabotage, or terrorism. The authorizations must be renewed by the court, usually every 90 days for U.S. citizens. ... The five Americans whose email accounts were monitored by the NSA and FBI have all led highly public, outwardly exemplary lives. All five vehemently deny any involvement in terrorism or espionage, and none advocates violent jihad or is known to have been implicated in any crime, despite years of intense scrutiny by the government and the press. Some have even climbed the ranks of the U.S. national security and foreign policy establishments."
Probable cause (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Probable cause (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Islam has a problem (Score:2, Informative)
Quaran 9.3 (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
To be honest, under duress, any fanatic could easily be expected to lead an exemplary public life provided that he considered it important for the cause.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
You might want to study a little of the history of India they don't teach in high school.
After Ghandi got control of India he ordered _many_ killings in the future 'Pakistan' and 'Bangladesh'. Non violence is for when you don't have the power.
Re:Probable cause (Score:5, Informative)
After Ghandi got control of India he ordered _many_ killings in the future 'Pakistan' and 'Bangladesh'. Non violence is for when you don't have the power.
You mean when he personally visited the riot-prone areas to stop the massacres [wikipedia.org]:
Gandhi suggested an agreement which required the Congress and Muslim League to cooperate and attain independence under a provisional government, thereafter, the question of partition could be resolved by a plebiscite in the districts with a Muslim majority. When Jinnah called for Direct Action, on 16 August 1946, Gandhi was infuriated and personally visited the most riot-prone areas to stop the massacres. He made strong efforts to unite the Indian Hindus, Muslims, and Christians and struggled for the emancipation of the "untouchables" in Hindu society.
Read the reasons given for his assassination: [wikipedia.org]
Godse felt that it was Gandhi's fast (announced in the second week of January) which had forced the cabinet to reverse it's earlier recent decision not to give the cash balance of Rs. 55 crores to Pakistan on 13 January 1948.
[...] He also felt that Gandhi had not protested against these atrocities being suffered in Pakistan and instead resorted to fasts.
[...] In Godse's own words during his final deposition in the court during the trial, "...it was not so much the Gandhian Ahimsa teachings that were opposed to by me and my group, but Gandhiji, while advocating his views, always showed or evinced a bias for Muslims, prejudicial and detrimental to the Hindu Community and its interests.
If Gandhi had been ordering murders in addition to his fasts and prayers and actions to stop them, I would imagine this would have been added to the list of reasons given for his assassination.
Re: (Score:2)
Eh? Mahatma Gandhi never "got control of India".
You might be thinking of Indira Gandhi or Rajiv Gandhi, neither of whom were related to the Mahatma.
Re: (Score:2)
So Ghandi was a terrorist who just lived exemplary in front of everyone while ordering people to kill others?
If this is supposed to be a counter-argument, it's quite poor due to the obvious logical fallacy.
Re: (Score:3)
And there were "Commernists hiding under every beadstead" in the 50's.
Your neo-Macarthyism is based in pure irrational hate/bias. As such, you will always find an unassailable, self-justification for insisting on your views.
Re: (Score:2)
And there were "Commernists hiding under every beadstead" in the 50's.
Except that he was at least partly right. That doesn't justify his actions, of course, but he was by no means a pure paranoic.
Your neo-Macarthyism is based in pure irrational hate/bias.
Wouldn't I have to be a right-winger to be able to be a "neo-Macarthyist"? I know I get labeled as a "godless commie" by Americans. Also, my opposition to ludicrous fairy tales with no foundation in reality hardly seems irrational. It's a waste of time at best times, and oftentimes it gives some people stupid ideas.
Re: (Score:3)
OK. To de-escalate, and in the interest of trying an educational dialogue, I will attempt to clarify what appears to be an assumption in the posting to which I responded.
You mention "taqiyya" as a point of doctrine, or an approved mode for action, by those who profess a "witnessing" of Islam ("tashud").
This is in most was incorrect. Certainly, it is misleading, as a generalization. Al-Taqiyya is usually translated as "dissimulation". There are numerous arguments about the permissibility of this specific
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is still an instrument for guiding one's evaluation of claims and conundrums: Cui Bono?
In matters of human affairs, it is generally less erring than application of Occam's razor.
"Someone" is interested in getting you to think that the biggest potential for catastrophe, in your daily life and for your way of living, is impending Muslim ideological violence. They wish you to believe an absurdity.
What group or party benefits from this? Why have they chosen this from other possible alternatives? What ot
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And of course you could be such a fanatic jihadist pretending to not even be muslim. So you want mind if the FBI goes through all your communications and belongings anytime they feel like it. And of course you won't mind the occasional week long questioning session..
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Probable cause (Score:5, Insightful)
I have nothing to hide, except the pron from my wife (she found it already) so why would I care what the FBI does? They aren't going to act on any of this unless these people actually plan to do something criminal and in that case, they should.
If you think you have nothing to hide, you should probably spend a bit of time studying the history of the FBI. Leading an exemplary life has never been a protection from them, if they suspect you may be part of whatever conspiracy is popular at the time. A few decades ago, it was Communists, and having no connection to any Communist organization was never protection from them or their colleagues in organizations like HUAC. It's quite clear that the "anti-terrorist" push nowadays is no more concerned with whether you have anything to hide; if they need a scapegoat and you're handy (perhaps because your name is vaguely like some name on one of their lists), they'll go after you and make your life a hell on Earth.
Having "nothing to hide" is one of the most naive misconceptions going around, and has been for at least a century. Dig into the history of the FBI and assorted other similar organizations. Google can find a lot of it for you. Then come back and tell us again whether you have anything to hide.
(And they probably already have a copy of your pron collection, added to their own. ;-)
Re:Probable cause (Score:5, Insightful)
What a Muslim American Said to Defend His Patriotism
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/07/what-a-muslim-american-said-to-defend-his-patriotism/374137/ [theatlantic.com]
-"You should be active in your community. And I have done that. The fact that I was surveilled in spite of doing all thatâ"it just goes to show you the hysteria that everybody feels." ..."
-"I've never given a speech where I've said any ill feelings toward the United States."
-"I was a very conservative, Reagan-loving Republican."
-"I watch sports. I watch football. My kids are all raised here. My kids at that time went to Catholic school. It isn't as if I was raising them in a different way
Gill correctly perceives that we'll all know what he means when he invokes the characteristics he possesses that would seem to make him less suspicious. The fact that most people internalize these judgments to some degree illustrates how chilling effects work: Americans, especially those who belong to minority groups, formulate a sense of what speech and actions will cast suspicion on or away from them.
Chilling Effects.
Re: (Score:3)
Or he may have been lying (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently being Muslim is good enough for probable cause. So much for freedom of religion.
I'm pretty sure that the agencies in question did not tell these people they aren't free to be Muslims.
Re: (Score:2)
To be fair, at least one of the targets (Nihad Awad of CAIR) appears to have been targeted only during the period that his organization was labelled an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terrorism trial. When the label was removed (by court order), the surveillance stopped. (This assumes that the data released by Greenwald is complete and the lack of surveillance after January 2008 is real.)
Awad has some questionable associations in his background but that alone shouldn't be cause to put
Re:Probable cause (Score:5, Insightful)
Unless, of course, you work for a multinational, are a serving member of the armed forces, you have traveled there and made friends, your forefathers came from the region, you still have family there, or lovers, you like to watch the news and have an inkling of an interest in international politics, history or economy it is indeed incredibly unlikely as an American citizen to be involved with anything happening in the Middle East.
Re: (Score:2)
You left out all the WASP perpetrators of crimes in that region.
Not on purpose, I think -- but even though, glad to assist.
Re: (Score:2)
Most of the WASPS in the region have been replaced by DRONES; get with the program : ).
Re: (Score:2)
So you don't think the Crusades are relevant to mention?
Re: (Score:2)
As relevant as the Muslim wars of conquest.
Re: (Score:2)
Amnesty International has taken over 100 first-hand testimonies of large-scale anti-balaka attacks on Muslim civilians in CAR's northwest towns of Bouali, Boyali, Bossembele, Bossemptele, and Baoro. International troops had failed to deploy to these towns leaving civilian communities without protection. The most lethal attack documented by Amnesty International took place on 18 January in Bossemptele, where at least 100 Muslims were killed. Among the dead were women and old men, including an imam in his mid-70s.
Source: http://www.amnesty.org/en/news... [amnesty.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Yes: 'I'm New Around Here' is trolling hard.
What else would you call only mentioning one side of a war?
Re: (Score:2)
No, that's not at all what I was getting at.
Mister Liberty mentioned in his post WASPs in the Middle East. I referred to the Crusades because those happened before there were WASPs. If you think someone is picking on Christians or white people, it started before I posted.
But in reality, claiming I'm trolling because I mention a historic episode is pretty thin. When I'm trolling this board, everyone knows it, and mods appropriately.
Re: (Score:2)
The crusades were a response to the muslim's wars of conquest. Mentioning one as relevant, while pretending the other never happened is a huge distortion of history.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Well, since most of us weren't alive when they happened, and were done by a church we don't all agree with ... this constant reference to the Crusades is idiotic.
Yes, a long time ago a Pope decided that killing anybody who didn't follow his teachings was a good idea.
And somehow you think that all white people should bear the blame for that? Fuck that.
Sorry, but I am not responsible for what some fucking idiot in a funny hat advocated for hundreds of y
Re: (Score:2)
So you don't think the Crusades are relevant to mention?
You might want to read a couple of history books concerning the period 600AD to 1000AD. Other than all those ABCs and silly dates it's a good way to educate yourself.
Re:Probable cause (Score:5, Insightful)
freedom of religion IS the seperation clause.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Nor does it include My Freedom From Your Freedom From Religion.
Re:Probable cause (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Yes, it does include a freedom "from" religion clause. If you take the time to learn anything about the framers of the Constitution, you'll know that they were dead-set against allowing anything invoking divine authority to creep into the system of law and government which they were creating. Not all of them, but most, and that wisdom, thankfully, carried the day.
What language exactly are you writing in? It appears to be english but you appear to not understand english. I quote the first amendment.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
Where in that set of phrases do you see a freedom "from" religion? It enshrines the principle that the "government" can neither establish a state church or prevent the free exercise of any religion. It does nothing to protect atheists from having to live around non-atheists. You have to make that choice yourself and move elsewhere if you don't like your neighbours. It bin
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I think people have different notions of what "freedom from religion" means. What you're talking about is not at all the same as what some others I've seen have talked about. The first time I encountered the "separation clause doesn't imply freedom from religion" was somebody arguing that it would not violate the US constitution to require politicians to swear that they believed in a god (without specifying further the attributes of this god), which seems like a crystal-clear violation to me.
True - but you're not going to be heard here (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No - the amendment prevents CONGRESS's action (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The great and powerful government of the USA will send its spokesmen to appear on television, bringing this message to the masses: "Who could have predicted this? Nobody!"
Followed by "Well, what difference does it make now?"
Re: (Score:2)
Campaign contributions and other favors funneled through third parties by the Saudis and other middle eastern individuals and entities have created a US government that is more or less foreign controlled.
I hate to break the news to you, but you are a moron.
That "US politicians are puppets" would be a decent statement to make, but only "decent" because it's not all inclusive. To claim it's Islam, or Jewish, or Satanic, or what ever else people claim is simply a propagated argument to maintain the puppet show and keep everyone bickering instead of fixing the problem.
Instead of playing the blame game, work to correct the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Civil Rights Activists (Score:5, Funny)
Yeah, it's a good thing they are monitoring civil rights activists because the last thing we want in America is civil liberties and rights. Civil rights and freedoms are unAmerican and have no business here.
Why yes, I do watch Fox News. why do you ask?
Re: (Score:3)
Why yes, I do watch Fox News. why do you ask?
Because citizens who do not watch Fox News are threats to national security, and are therefore placed under surveillance. No need for you to be concer...oh wait, you're posting on a known subversive site that is part of our selector set. I guess we'll be watching you after all.
Re: (Score:2)
They're not a corporation (Score:5, Insightful)
Until they incorporate they're not entitled to free speech or religious exemptions.
Re: (Score:2)
Not just that, they have to be heavy donors to a SuperPAC in order to have basic rights...
Re: (Score:2)
See? The perfect marriage of American Patriotic Capitalism and American Freedom! Bid for rights! You have every right you can afford!
Re: (Score:2)
Until they incorporate they're not entitled to free speech or religious exemptions.
Non sequitur.
One is a case involving employer responsibilities for health care, in light of the religious views of the employers. The other is an article about individuals being surveiled for their religious views.
Law Enforcement has been doing this forever. (Score:5, Interesting)
Back in the 50s and 60s, when the Civil Rights Movement was starting to pick up, the FBI had files on most of the major civil rights leaders, even those that advocated purely peaceful resistance. I recall reading an interview with a high-ranking FBI official at the time who said that J. Edgar Hoover was particularly proud of the file he had on Martin Luther King. They tracked relationships between civil rights groups, and tried to watch them all. I'm fairly certain that there were also secret wiretaps done on some of the people they were tracking, though I don't remember if that was the case with MLK or not.
If you look on the list, the agency responsible for maintaining the surveillance against the Muslim-Americans targeted in this case is the FBI. They haven't changed much since 1960, and it shows.
Re:Law Enforcement has been doing this forever. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm fairly certain that there were also secret wiretaps done on some of the people they were tracking, though I don't remember if that was the case with MLK or not.
Not only did they wiretap MLK, they bugged his hotel room and then used the recordings to try to blackmail him. [firedoglake.com]
No Warrant? (Score:5, Informative)
Under the heading “Nationality,” the list designates 202 email addresses as belonging to “U.S. persons,” 1,782 as belonging to “non-U.S. persons,” and 5,501 as “unknown” or simply blank. The Intercept identified the five Americans placed under surveillance from their email addresses.
It is unclear whether the government obtained any legal permission to monitor the Americans on the list. The FBI and the Justice Department declined to comment for this story. During the course of multiple conversations with The Intercept, the NSA and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence urged against publication of any surveillance targets. “Except in exceptional circumstances,” they argued, surveillance directly targeting Americans is conducted only with court-approved warrants. Last week, anonymous officials told another news outlet that the government did not have a FISA warrant against at least one of the individuals named here during the timeframe covered by the spreadsheet.
So, for all the idiots arguing that we have FISA to make sure mass surveillance isn't abused: it looks like they've decided to skip that step entirely.
Incorporate (Score:5, Insightful)
Every American should incorporate themselves. It's the only way to guarantee you have rights. If you are a closely held corporation, your religious rights cannot be infringed, your property cannot be confiscated, you can commit heinous crimes and only face a fine (no jail time for CEOs); and furthermore, NSA "spying" can be sued over as industrial espionage or as copyright violations under intellectual property rights laws.
Basically you have way more rights as a corporation. If you're an individual or "citizen", you're screwed.
Re: (Score:2)
^^^ THIS ^^^
Since I don't have any mod points, please accept a virtual +10 from me.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Generally speaking, if you're a major shareholder with inside knowledge of wrongdoing and the power to change it, you can be personally held accountable for the actions of ' the corporation'. Since you're a 1 man band, you'd be guaranteed to meet the two conditions and be thrown in jail regardless of the veil of a 'corporate shield' or not.
About that.... (Score:4, Informative)
Every American should incorporate themselves. It's the only way to guarantee you have rights. If you are a closely held corporation, your religious rights cannot be infringed, your property cannot be confiscated, you can commit heinous crimes and only face a fine (no jail time for CEOs); and furthermore, NSA "spying" can be sued over as industrial espionage or as copyright violations under intellectual property rights laws.
Basically you have way more rights as a corporation. If you're an individual or "citizen", you're screwed.
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess you're someone who hates the recent hobby lobby decision; nonetheless, the opinion delivered by Alito directly addresses this 'corporations are treated like people and it's wrong!!!' outrage perpetuated by the left.
Re:About that.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If somebody were suing my employer, why would they need to look at anything that belonged to me? I don't own this computer, or the papers on my desk. They're corporate property.
Home-Grown Terrorists (Score:2)
This kind of behavior by the US government has the unintended consequence of creating more terrorists than it catches. The result is a vicious circle of rebellion and crackdown. It has already happened in the middle east with the constant meddling of the USA, and it is going to happen more and more at home. The country is already starting to divide into Patriots and Tories.
As an example, the feds raid Waco, yada yada, Oklahoma City gets bombed. This is not to say that all was well with the Branch Davidi
Re: (Score:2)
Other examples are Prohibition and the War on Drugs. We know how they turned out.
Your usage of the past tense implies that you think either of these two things are over...
Comments (Score:2)
Many of the comments on First Look and even here are disturbing, both in their rancor and in their bigotry. These kind of haters represent a tiny but vocal minority of the US population but they seem seem to swarm to the comments sections of any story that touches on one of their hot button issues. This is especially true at "mainstream" media sites like Yahoo News, CNN, etc. Clearly their intent is to disguise their minority status and make it appear as if their radical opinions are mainstream.
Do they h
Re: (Score:2)
Do they have RSS feeds or Twitter Bots or something that tell them "Muslim story on First Look - Troll Force GO!" or something? It's fkn amazing.
I always wonder the same thing...and the answer is "maybe:"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
This is true of many issues out there. There are techies that jump on everything they slightly disagree with. Christians, Muslims, Jews, etc
It's the price o
A republican political candidate! (Score:2)
Hot Damn! A republican political candidate! This could not be better. I don't like either party, but the democrats will never address the NSA. It's just not part of their psyche to get up in arms about the government getting into their business.
The republicans however? Their paranoid reactionary, "Government is bad" attitude could very well serve to light this fuse. This is probably the most helpful thing to come out of that archive. Everyone, get out there and start telling all your conservative friends ho
Re: (Score:3)
Naw, he's still an a-rab, and terreristy trumps republican.
This is, however, part of what I've been waiting for for a year. I've always wanted Snowden through Greenwald to name names. They say they pick up everything but it's only the targets who get their emails read and their phone calls listened to. Okay, who are the targets? Names.
So first they told us it wasn't Americans, it was only foreign terrorists. Now we find out they were targeting Americans. Now the Fox News crowd is going to say "yeah but it w
Re: (Score:2)
I thought FBI/NSA spied on everyone (Score:2)
Is this really news? Are we going to have an exposé entitled "Meet the model railroad enthusiasts the FBI and NSA have been spying on" ?
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, the moment model railroading is a Constitutionally-protected right.
Diversity doesn't work (Score:2)
It spreads distrust and destroys social standards in common.
Thus, paranoia is an inevitable reaction.
Witch hunt? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No they each imagine a different imaginary man in the sky, but their stories all have common origin so they pretend he actually exists and thus is a single being. Far more accurate that way.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You miss my point, I say no two Christians even have the same imaginary friend, since each of them has an independent imagination in which to instantiate their friend.
I mean yes, you can give two kids the same model of barbie doll, but if one cuts the hair on theirs, the other will not have short hair, they may be the same class of doll, but they are not the same doll.
Re: (Score:2)
The Koran is just like the Book of Mormon. It contains stories/passages derived from mistranslations of the christian bibles that were circulating at the time.
Basically they are both logically proven to _not_ be deviny inspired books. Of course if you believe in them, they are true and my not be questioned.
Re: (Score:2)
If there is a god, would she inspire you to write 'inerrant dogma' that correspond to local, very unlikely, miss-translations of previous 'holy books'?
Remember the premise of 'divinely inspired book': There is in fact, a god, who is sending the book. All you need to do is find one blatantly wrong thing and POP. (Bats are not birds).
Re:i remember when (Score:5, Insightful)
That's just pre-9/11 thinking.
Everything's different now - we got the National Security State we always dreamed of. Better, even!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, you don't remember very clearly then. People's 'rights' have always been trampled on when the state deemed it necessary. This is nothing new to the US. It's happened since the dawn of time. Human's requirements for security will always trump their desire for equality (well unless you're the top of the pyramid I suppose). Once things 'calm down' on a global scale, expect more politicians massaging away the bad bump in these laws. Then expect 'the next great calamity', which will again cause more knee j
Re: (Score:2)
They haven't suspended 'Habius Corpus' yet. Lincoln remains the most flagrant violator of the constitution.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
FDR sent 100,000 Americans to concentration camps, while allowing their property and belongings to be stolen or destroyed. I think that may outweigh Lincoln.
Re: (Score:2)
Habeus Corpus may be suspended when necessary in case of insurrection or invasion. I take it you are aware of no military actions on US soil during Lincoln's Presidency.
Re: (Score:2)
What did you do to get the negative karma?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)