Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?

LA Police Officers Suspected of Tampering With Their Monitoring Systems 322

An anonymous reader writes "An internal audit conducted by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) in March revealed that 'dozens of the [voice] transmitters worn by officers in Southeast Division were missing or damaged.' In the summer of 2013, this same division was found to have mysteriously lost 45% of the antennae placed on their cars to pick up the signals sent by their voice transmitters. The Southeast Division of the LAPD covers an area that has 'historically been marred by mistrust and claims of officer abuse.' For decades, the LAPD had been closely monitored by the U.S. Department of Justice, but a federal judge in 2013 decided to end that practice after being assured by the LAPD and city officials that the LAPD sufficiently monitors itself via dash-cams and voice transmitters. A formal investigation is currently being conducted to determine whether or not police officers intentionally subverted mandatory efforts to monitor and record their patrols."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

LA Police Officers Suspected of Tampering With Their Monitoring Systems

Comments Filter:
  • Re:Easy fix (Score:2, Funny)

    by Yakasha ( 42321 ) on Wednesday April 09, 2014 @02:00PM (#46706453) Homepage

    I'd throw tampering and obstruction charges in on the second offense.

    Ah, I see you're new to the whole "filing charges" thing. The correct filing should include (but is absolutely not limited to):

    Evidence tampering, hindering an investigation, obstruction of justice, vandalizing government property, theft, fraud, abusing authority, circumventing electronic security, computer hacking, assault, providing material support to terrorists, and a "conspiracy to commit" of every one of those charges.

Help! I'm trapped in a PDP 11/70!