Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×
Electronic Frontier Foundation Patents The Courts The Media

Adam Carolla Joins Fight Against Podcast Patent Troll 126

First time accepted submitter tor528 (896250) writes "Patent troll Personal Audio has sued top podcasters including Adam Carolla and HowStuffWorks, claiming that they own the patent for delivery of episodic content over the Internet. Adam Carolla is fighting back and has started a Fund Anything campaign to cover legal fees. From the Fund Anything campaign page: 'If Adam Carolla loses this battle, then every other Podcast will be quickly shut down. Why? Because Patent Trolls like Personal Audio would use a victory over Carolla as leverage to extort money from every other Podcast.. As you probably know, Podcasts are inherently small, owner-operated businesses that do not have the financial resources to fight off this type of an assault. Therefore, Podcasts as we know them today would cease to exist.' James Logan of Personal Audio answered Slashdotters' questions in June 2013. Links to the patent in question can be found on Personal Audio's website. The EFF filed a challenge against Personal Audio's podcasting patent in October 2013."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Adam Carolla Joins Fight Against Podcast Patent Troll

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 25, 2014 @09:05AM (#46572997)

    "If Adam Carolla loses this battle, then every other Podcast will be quickly shut down."

    lol no

    'If Adam Carolla loses this battle, then every other Podcast in America will be quickly shut down."

    lol yes

  • by CastrTroy ( 595695 ) on Tuesday March 25, 2014 @09:09AM (#46573031) Homepage
    I'm tired of hearing about patent holders coming out years (maybe a decade in this case?) after something has already been in common use, and declare that they invented it. Patents should be like trademarks in this regard in that if you don't protect it from the beginning, you lose it. You shouldn't be able to make claims about something that's already being used for year by hundreds of millions of people around the world. It's not just this case, but many others, and it doesn't just affect small time guys but big time guys too. I remember some company coming around years after a game console was released (can't remember which one) saying they had a patent on the controller. You shouldn't be allowed to let somebody infringe on your patent for years and then demand all the backpay. There are too many patents for the people making the products to know if they are infringing. If you have so many patents that you can't keep track of whether or not people are infringing, maybe it's time to let a few of them go.
  • by nospam007 ( 722110 ) * on Tuesday March 25, 2014 @09:10AM (#46573037)

    "ie. radio?"

    Newsletters (the twitter of the nineties)
    I got emailed 'periodic content' daily, weekly, monthly, over the 'internet', you could subscribe an unsubscribe via email too.
    Some of them run to this very day.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 25, 2014 @09:12AM (#46573053)

    You need to fight this problem at the source: the patent office. Generalized patents like this shouldn't be awarded, and generalized patents already granted should be revoked. Take away the trolls ammo and tell the troll he's not getting any future ammo.

Everybody needs a little love sometime; stop hacking and fall in love!