Online, You're Being Watched At All Times; Act Accordingly. 299
An anonymous reader writes "Kaspersky Lab's Internet security expert Costin Raiu discusses internet surveillance claims that you should assume that you're being watched at all times. The article reports that Raiu conducts his online activities under the assumption that his movements are being monitored by government hackers. Raiu: 'I operate under the principle that my computer is owned by at least three governments' ... 'this is not meant as a scare tactic, but a rather as a statement of fact that should now be the default setting for everyone.'"
Dear NSA (Score:2, Interesting)
Nothing happened today to me personally, just for your records.
Signed someone not important at all.
Fuck Beta (Score:2, Interesting)
The Slashdot content/comment quality is dropping fast.
Also, Fuck Beta.
Don't miss the point of this please. (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Ohhh, Slashdot beta makes sense now (Score:5, Interesting)
"They set out to build something even the government wouldn't want to watch! Mission accomplished."
I think this is accomplished already. They could not possibly want to "watch" everybody. You'd have more watchers than watched.
I think OP erred in saying everyone is "watched". That's simply not so. Their data may be collected, and it may be looked at later, but that's not QUITE the same thing as "being watched".
Having said that: I still despise the current situation and it does need to change.
Re: MOD PARENT *BETA* (Score:2, Interesting)
How are they supposed to let the folk who run the site know how upset they are? At least it was under the first post, which is pretty much always a throw-away.
P.S.: I may not be as upset as he is, but I'm not fan of Beta, either. I *am* currently testing it, and it's not really terrible, but that's all I can say in its favor.
P.P.S.: This is just to test how it reacts to unicode:
OK, it looks good before I post it, but it didn't show up in the preview...so now I'll post. (It was largely Greek letters.)
Re: MOD PARENT *BETA* (Score:2, Interesting)
And fuck beta.
Re:Ohhh, Slashdot beta makes sense now (Score:4, Interesting)
How do you know WHY they have the data, WHAT their intentions are, or WHAT their capabilities are?
Grabbing everything is absolutely useless to going after an enemy. Real bad guys aren't going to be linking to FaceBook when they search for bomb materials, and they aren't going to use their own credit cards.
But it's great if you want to create profiles on people and control movements. If you want to build consensus and monitor people who are not convinced by propaganda -- absolutely awesome.
Re:Dear NSA (Score:5, Interesting)
If you're unashamed of your past (harmless) behaviour it's harder for people to "use it against you".
This is not how it works. Not even close.
Political operatives dig something up - often something entirely harmless, something that neither you nor any of normal people would even consider to be shameful - and they blow it up until it crushes you. Take, for example, "Dean Scream," or Swiftboating of Kerry, among many other. The defining characteristic of such attacks is that they are, generally, dishonest, and influence the uneducated audience, forcing the candidate to take defensive posture - which never helps. The attack itself may be an outright lie, or a lie constructed upon some foundation of a real event, or a real event that is completely misrepresented.
Besides, a person who has nothing to be ashamed of in his past is either a saint or a narcissist. I am not aware of *anyone* who'd manage to live from cradle to grave without making an unfortunate mistake somewhere.
Re:Early Posts Win With Beta (Score:0, Interesting)
So yet another basic feature... that should have been put in BEFORE you start redirecting people and talking about killing the old site...
You know. So it could like.... be um... beta tested?
How stupid are you guys exactly?
In the rush to monetize you've just thrown out decades of common sense and best practices?
And just hope that *IT'S NEW!* will cover up completely *IT'S CRAP WITH NO NEW FEATURES YOU WANTED AND ALL THE STUFF YOU LIKED IS GONE!*
-/facepalm
Really looks like you're just going to bull ahead with this 'upgrade' and to hell with all the people who actually made this site what it is.
Kill the cow and complain when the milk doesn't flow anymore.
Best pray really hard you find some new "users".
You won't... But that's about your only option left. Hope.
Damm gonna miss slashdot. Been reading it daily for 16 years. Had a good run.
But yet again blind greed ruins something good. Damm shame.
Re:Ohhh, Slashdot beta makes sense now (Score:3, Interesting)
I'd like to quote from Michel Foucault's essay "Panopticon" from his book _Discipline and Punish_. Here's a link to the a pdf of the text:
http://dm.ncl.ac.uk/courseblog... [ncl.ac.uk]
But first an explanation of the term is in order. In the late 18th century Bentham designed a prison where all the cells pointed to a central guard station. Thus, inmates were always being watched. The guard house design incorporated venetian blinds and obtuse corners so that inmates would know that at any time they could be under the watchful eye of guards, but never know exactly _when_. The intent of this was to impose self-restraint upon the inmate community by fear of potential surveillance. That is, self-censorship imposed by an architectural design. Here's what wikipedia has to say on the matter:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P... [wikipedia.org]
Foucault took this idea and extended it to surveillance by authorities as a kind of 'social panopticon'.
Foucault extended the idea of the social panopticon throughout all institutions of society, drawing parallels between hierarchical structures in church, state, and corporate spheres where a authority used the possibility of surveillance and the tr
Re:Ohhh, Slashdot beta makes sense now (Score:4, Interesting)
It's not so much "WHY" they have the information or even "WHAT" their intentions are. It's tremendously unlikely that the government has raw computer capabilities even as high as an order of magnitude more than what's currently available on the market. They simply don't have the expertise and such huge amounts of private money are going into the same kind of R&D they'd be doing. I suppose it's possible that all the cost overruns in every government IT project and every recent military project have been going into some sort of super secret project to build high capacity storage and really fast processors, but I think it far more likely that that money has gone to making immensely powerful planes that are useless in modern warfare and paying for 50 levels of contracting.
The most recent [wikipedia.org] data I can find indicates that in 2012 just under 28 exabytes of data per month was flowing through the internet and it was increasing at about 7 exabytes year on year, so a relatively safe assumption is that internet traffice for 2013 was probably about 35 exabytes a month. Based on an old whatif" [xkcd.com] from xkcd, the highest density storage we have microsd cards is about 160 terabytes per kilogram. Let's assume for the sake of insanity that the government can store 10 times that in a manner which is actually practical to process, so we'll give them a data density of 1.6 petabytes per kilogram. This is obviously insane, but let's do it anyway. By that math storing all internet traffic everywhere will mean 35 tons of storage every single month. Note this is ridiculously low and the actual figure is likely substantially higher not counting the mechanisms to actually process and archive all that information.
None of that even comes close to all the data that isn't on the intranet that they're supposedly trying to siphon down, which probably easily doubles or trebles this figure. This is how we know they aren't storing everyone's information indefinitely, or even temporarily, they can't.
Re:Don't miss the point of this please. (Score:4, Interesting)
Yet nothing.
The truly infuriating thing about the NSA is how inconsequential they have been. Don't get me wrong, the spying is horrifying and anger making...
But we aren't even getting security theater out of it. They're doing things just to do them. Cases aren't being solved by PRISM or any of the other creepy programs.
It's not just that they're violating our rights, they're also doing their jobs really badly.