Mobile Devices Banned From UK Cabinet Meetings Over Surveillance Fears 116
MightyMartian writes "British securities services fear foreign intelligence agencies have developed the ability to turn mobile devices such as phones and tablets into bugs without the owner's knowledge, allowing them to eavesdrop on confidential meetings. According to the article, UK security services fear China, Russia and Pakistan have figured out a way to turn mobiles into microphones, and have them transmit even when they're off. Ministers in sensitive government departments have been issued with soundproof lead-lined boxes, which they must place their mobiles in when having sensitive conversations."
Cone of SIlence (Score:3)
Do we really have to Max?
Summary Huh? (Score:2, Funny)
And what the fuck is Pakistway? Is that near Stalinstan, or Armeniad?
-- Ethanol-fueled
Re: (Score:3)
And what the fuck is Pakistway?
If you google it, you'll find that most of the hits are for exactly the text you just read in the summary. It doesn't seem to originate with /., though; that sentence is taken verbatim from a news-service report. /., like other news sites, has just posted the original article unchanged.
There is a pakistanway.com/net site, a portal website in Pakistan. The reporter that wrote the quoted article might be a regular user of that site, and garbled the country name as a result.
Re: (Score:3)
And what the fuck is Pakistway?
Sounds like a newfangled name for the Silk Road (the original one).
Re: Summary Huh? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Before the meeting, just be sure and tell Hymie to "kill everyone's phone" - problem solved.
Funny thing about backdoors (Score:5, Insightful)
Funny thing about chips designed in Cambridge (Score:4, Interesting)
Funniest thing about backdoors is that almost every mobile device in the world has an ARM chip, designed in Cambridge, UK. That's Cambridge as in MI5 open recruiting ground and MI6 clandestine recruiting ground [varsity.co.uk].
Devices manufactured in China, using a British-designed chip, routed through British Telecom using Huawei [theregister.co.uk] equipment... as you said, what could possibly go wrong?
If I were the conspiratorial sort, I might have reason to suspect Cambridge-recruited personnel of working for the other side [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nope.
If you're
Re: (Score:2)
Funniest thing about backdoors is that almost every mobile device in the world has an ARM chip, designed in Cambridge, UK. That's Cambridge as in MI5 open recruiting ground and MI6 clandestine recruiting ground [varsity.co.uk].
Devices manufactured in China, using a British-designed chip, routed through British Telecom using Huawei [theregister.co.uk] equipment... as you said, what could possibly go wrong?
If I were the conspiratorial sort, I might have reason to suspect Cambridge-recruited personnel of working for the other side [wikipedia.org].
All current or modern CPU designs have a microcode update capability. Perfectly good chips can be delivered, and then the microcode patch is applied. during the boot process. My android and my Linux system both do microcode updates at this boot time. For my desktop, Intel or AMD supply the "patches".
Re: (Score:2)
Do we really have to Max?
It gets better. This also means the shoe phones too. Soon the rancorous debates will seem more like rancid debates.... unless the upgrade the ventilation.
Snowden's Fridge (Score:2)
I think the boxes could more approriatally called Snowden's Fridge
Re: (Score:3)
I think the boxes could more approriatally called Snowden's Fridge
But why is it lined with lead? As a Faraday Cage, wouldn't copper or aluminum make more sense? Also, it seems easy to defeat the metal box: you could just record the conversation (metal doesn't block sound), and then transmit it later when connectivity is restored.
Re: (Score:2)
According to TFS the box is sound-proof. So you can't record sound. And this may be why they use lead; it's heavy which may stop the sound vibrations better than light metals like aluminium.
Re: (Score:2)
You're correct on the lead; a layer of which has long been a staple of building sound-attenuating walls. Found that out in mid-'70s when doing the materials and methods research for building a recording studio. (Interesting that the band for whom the studio was originally built laid down many tracks in one of the member's three-car garage - they liked the 'bounce' off the slab. We'd sometimes be up in the rafters with sheets of plywood or sheetrock for sweetener or mute. Fun times.)
Re: (Score:3)
Those evil Pakistwanians. (Score:5, Funny)
The Scowge of Dewocracies.
Re: (Score:2)
So, you're be-Fudd-led about the identity of the poster? [youtube.com]
I always thought that Elmer Fudd was a cartoon caricature of Barney Frank. Am I wrong?
box (Score:1)
" lead-lined boxes"
well they DO have to keep Supper Man from seeing in
Supper Man can see through lead (Score:1)
But he can't penetrate tupperwear.
Re: box (Score:1)
Yeah. But it doesn't protect against evil DinnerMan and his minion BreakfastBoy.
*wham*
I'm batman.
Pakistway (Score:4, Funny)
Is that anywhere near Norstan?
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's a town in New Jersey.
Good Lord! (Score:5, Informative)
This is positively ancient. Just so happens the elected officials are finally beginning to use the precautions that have been used in the military and other corners of government for quite some time.
Re: (Score:1)
All the recently discussed NSA abilities and programs were positively ancient as well. The real scandal is why all those countries currently up in arms over the US surveillance programs are lying their asses off when they proclaim they had no idea these surveillance programs existed. The same countries who have actually given data they have collected to the NSA and have in return requested data collected by the NSA.
Re: (Score:2)
British securities services fear foreign intelligence agencies have developed the ability to turn mobile devices such as phones and tablets into bugs without the owner's knowledge, allowing them to eavesdrop on confidential meetings.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if GCHQ were doing it as well... (but are afraid that the others will find out about it)
Re: (Score:2)
British securities services fear foreign intelligence agencies have developed the ability to turn mobile devices such as phones and tablets into bugs without the owner's knowledge, allowing them to eavesdrop on confidential meetings.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if GCHQ were doing it as well... (but are afraid that the others will find out about it)
It is so old and well known that I would guess most organized crime and terrorist organizations have been practicing this for years too.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget biker gangs --scenes from Sons of Anarchy clearly show them putting all their cellphones in a basket (in a separate room) before they conduct their meetings. I think that most technically-savvy people are aware cellphones are modern-day tracking/listening/viewing devices. The byline should've read: ...securities services know foreign intelligence agencies...
That is a good example from fiction drawn from reality. In another comment I mentioned organized crime too.
Good old Pakistway! (Score:2, Funny)
The land where editors are actually competent!
Ever been in a SCIF ? (Score:4, Informative)
They won't let you take phones in there, either, for the same reason. And they haven't for decades now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You had different NATO groups, NSA and factions in the cell networks of different NATO countries over the years via junk software.
If the contractors, police and mil can get in, so can anyone with the cash, press contacts or any other gov backing.
Once telco codes and methods a
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
A mate who worked for the MOD and he said that when he buys a new phone he had to buy one without a phone
So what brand did he buy? Fisher-Price?
Re: (Score:2)
I believe that, if specifically asked, suppliers will provide stripped out versions of their devices for exactly these purposes
(I'll admit that I have only anecdotal evidence of this happening, but it sounds reasonable enough to me)
Re: (Score:2)
A summary of all Old/New Tory Cabinet meetings (Score:3)
Prima: Right, who's paying us?
Secunda: Fotherington-Smythe Plc.
Prima: And what do they want?
Secunda: For HMRC to look the other way on their offshore banking; more unpaid labour via the Work Programme; an overseas meeting to drum up some business; hm, and they want to get into private healthcare work, so perhaps you could force the NHS to put some work out to tender?
Prima: OK, gentlemen, let's do it. Don't forget to ask GCHQ to send them any intercepts which might be of use to them. Tertia, prepare the speech.
Tertia: "Enterprise.. bla bla... hard working people.. bla bla.. austerity... bla bla... " hmm, growth.. nah, don't worry, should be easy to fudge these figures.
Prima: Excellent.
Re: (Score:2)
Quite: same old Tories, same old lies.
Re: (Score:2)
FOSS propaganda opportunity knocks (Score:2)
Wait. Maybe we could make an exception for a fully open source, well code reviewed phone?
Oh, it doesn't exist does it.
OK, troll over. Just another opportunity to show that open source does have a unique selling point and it's not being capitalised on.
Re: (Score:2)
IIRC, a fully open source phone would be illegal.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes I've heard that too, certainly for the UK and USA. To protect the airwaves. Not sure about the EU or other countries. The radio firmware would have to be supplied closed... any source code shouldn't be leaked...
Re: (Score:2)
Fairphone might qualify as fully open source... they seem to be proud of their open source status. http://www.fairphone.com/ [fairphone.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Really? I didn't find any mention of open source on their site, except for an 'also open!' regarding Android 4.2. Do they ship a GPU with no proprietary drivers? What about the baseband processor?
Re: (Score:2)
"Open source" is still a techie term, but is referenced repeatedly on the site (just not in the most obvious places):
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Afairphone.com+%22open+source%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a [google.com]
I also noticed some of their job postings stressed "open hardware".
In any case, your question is a good one and I would hope help prompt clarification from Fairphone. I'd expect that Fairphone has hardware that is more open than most,
Re: (Score:3)
Either no windows in secure meeting rooms. Or they stick little piezoelectric transducers to them and drive them with white noise.
copper is not good for magnetic fields (Score:1)
In the "near field", the magnetic fields are dominant over the electric fields. Copper foil is fine for radiated e-field at a distance, not so hot close up. Something with very low coercivity and high permeability is what you want: iron or "mu-metal".
Copper mesh sucks in general, because it's woven, and you have wires that go from one side of the mesh to the other. Sure, copper windowscreen is nice for shielding line frequency, but for RF.. uh-uh.. you want perforated metal with no weaving. Look at yo
Worried about the wrong country? (Score:5, Informative)
I'd be more worried about the likelihood the NSA is listening in after recent revelations
Re: (Score:1)
There is ample reason for concern about Russia, China, and even Pakistan.
Number of Russian spies in the UK back to Cold War levels, say security services [telegraph.co.uk]
Chinese Espionage: Britain's MI5 reports epidemic in spying [examiner.com]
China's spies come out from the cold [bbc.co.uk]
Pakistani spies 'operating in Britain' [telegraph.co.uk]
I very much doubt that the US has ever aimed nuclear weapons at the United Kingdom. The Soviets / Russians certainly have. They still come for visits.
RAF catches Russian bombers in UK airspace [scotsman.com]
Yes, yes, I know, but still.
Pakistani spies 'operating in Britain'? (Score:2)
I read the entire "The Telegraph" story. There was no mention of Pakistani spies in Britain, other than in the headline. And the two "spies" in the US, were more like lobbyists. They had donated money to politicians to get favorable opinion of Pakistani side of the Kashmir issue. This is hardly what you would call "spying".
Re: (Score:2)
My mistake. This is the one I should have linked to:
'Pakistani spies' in the Houses of Parliament [telegraph.co.uk]
US prosecutors claim that three “Kashmir Centers” in Washington, London and Brussels, are run on behalf of “elements of the Pakistani government, including Pakistan’s military intelligence service, the Inter-Services Intelligence Agency (ISI).”
The Pakistani intelligence services seem to not come to the attention of the press too often in the UK. There is an allegation that they were involved with Sri Lanka's intelligence service in the UK to recruit and train operatives against the Tamils.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> The British nuclear weapons have been bought from America, and contain secret self destruct codes that Uncle Sam can turn on anytime it wants to blow the UK up.
So true. I had the exact same dream. And people claim that we are making this stuff up!
Re: (Score:2)
Well then, who can argue with that?
REPLACING TRIDENT [york.ac.uk]
The warheads carried by the Trident missiles are manufactured and designed in the UK by the Atomic Weapons Establishment.
Re: (Score:2)
No, not really.
REPLACING TRIDENT [york.ac.uk]
The warheads carried by the Trident missiles are manufactured and designed in the UK by the Atomic Weapons Establishment.
Re: (Score:2)
That you have to worry about Russia doesn't mean you don't have to worry about the USA.
And indeed the likelihood of the NSA listening in is possibly as high as all the others combined.
It's Okay When We Do It (Score:5, Insightful)
Per this [slashdot.org], I feel comfortable saying cry me a river.
The outrage over foreign spying--in particular Chinese backdoors--on the part of the American intelligence community is really a form of the same thing: it's okay when we do it, but as soon as anyone else does the same thing to us, it's a gross affront to our privacy and the relationship we have with the spying party and possibly an act of war. I realize intelligence agencies are trained to think this way, but is it really so terribly difficult to grasp that if you don't want it done to yourself, it's probably a sign you shouldn't be doing it to others?
Re:It's Okay When We Do It (Score:4, Insightful)
... it's okay when we do it, but as soon as anyone else does the same thing to us, it's a gross affront to our privacy and the relationship we have with the spying party and possibly an act of war.
Well, yeah; that's because we're God's chosen people, so everything we do to those foreigners is good and moral, but if they do it to us, they're evil and wrong.
[Plug in your favorite country, and translate to that country's official language(s), if necessary, to reach full understanding of how human governments work.]
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe you Americans are like that, but the rest of the world isn't. Before the US existed, the world was a peaceful place with puppies and rainbows and... I'm sorry, I can't keep this up with a straight face.
I just wanted to head off those who will inevitably chime in to say that something like this would never happen in their little utopia [sordid history of their country conveniently forgotten].
Following Recent News (Score:2)
After what has been revealed recently, anyone who thinks they are an ally of the USA needs to worry more about the NSA and other criminal organisations than Pakistan. At least they do not tell everyone that they have the divinely given duty to rule over the world. They may think it but, if so, are smart enough not to tell everyone about Pakistani Exceptionalism.
Re: (Score:3)
Why is everyone still believing that they are saying what they mean. I rather expect that the left out the US because that's primarily who this is ruling is directed at.
Heh (Score:1)
Fixed that for you (Score:5, Insightful)
China, Russia and Pakistway (Score:2)
Pakistway?
Its Rupert and co they (Score:4, Insightful)
Lead? (Score:2)
British gov't afraid of surveillance? (Score:3, Insightful)
We aren't even talking about citizens being the recorders (which would be super-ironic).
When the people in your government don't trust their closest co-workers, there's reason to be concerned about the health of the entire leadership system.
Its too late to turn off the phones... (Score:2)
...They already know what you think.
Infinity Bug (Score:2)
Thanks Snowden, now what for the UK? (Score:3)
Only now does the UK gov understand what 'their' junk Enigma like cell network encryption can really be used for. The UK security staff willing, knowingly and over generations offered their countries political leadership junk encryption and told them its 'safe' to use it.
Now the reality of having some of your skilled UK tech more in touch with the NSA, NATO and other groups in the USA sets in. Who are your trusted security staff really working for and who are they promoting internally over the years? Two spy bosses? One in the US? One for contractors in the US? One in the UK? Would they do a modern MI5 and work for Russia too? China? Cash from the press? Cash from just about anyone or group? Some other faith?
All that UK policy about political issues, commercial deals, crime, oil, gas, weapons sales is not ending up in a safe in the Soviet Union - its been used in near real time thanks to sloppy UK staff.
No pudding for you! (Score:2)
The fact that the Slashbot editors couldn't even catch something like "Pakistway" instead of "Pakistan" is bad enough.
But the fact that they haven't corrected the typo after this long is an absolutely sickening example of lazy assed, shoddy, don't-give-a-shit attitudes. Shame on Dyce.
Re: (Score:2)
Or is it "Dyse"? "Dyks?"
How does it feel, bone heads?
There's an easier way. (Score:1)
"Ministers in sensitive government departments have been issued with soundproof lead-lined boxes, which they must place their mobiles in when having sensitive conversations."
Have they considered taking the battery out of their phone?
Re: (Score:2)
Like this is new? (Score:3)
Because this news is about as fresh as that, a wireless phone should not ever be in the vicinity of any meeting, ever.
Re: (Score:1)
Doesn't go far enough (Score:1)
Why don't they put themselves in lead-lined boxes? (Score:2)
Aww, no more Angry Birds... (Score:2)
Well, I suppose they finally found a way to get rid of people playing Angry Birds while in the government.
Coffins (Score:1)
Operation Bubble and Squeak (Score:1)
Re:Off? (Score:5, Informative)
A lot of modern "off" switches should really be named "sleep". They don't turn the power off. If they did you couldn't use, e.g., wake on the network. Nothing that allows remote activation really turns itself off...and that includes a huge number of things with off switches.
Re: (Score:2)
*pedant mode on*
It's a good thing Elton John sang and performed on stage as well as he took dicks in his ass! Otherwise, we wouldn't have such hits as "Benny and the Jets," "Daniel," and "Tiny Dancer."
*pedant mode off*