Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Facebook Privacy Security Social Networks IT

Michigan Makes It Illegal To Ask For Employees' Facebook Logins 132

An anonymous reader writes "Michigan joins Maryland as a state where employers may not ask employees or job applicants to divulge login information for Facebook and other social media sites. From the article: 'Under the law, employers cannot discipline employees or decline to hire job applicants because they do not give them access information, including user names, passwords, login information, or "other security information that protects access to a personal internet account," according to the bill. Universities and schools cannot discipline or fail to admit students if they do not give similar information.' There is one exception, however: 'However, accounts owned by a company or educational institution, such as e-mail, can be requested.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Michigan Makes It Illegal To Ask For Employees' Facebook Logins

Comments Filter:
  • Re:However.... (Score:4, Informative)

    by anagama ( 611277 ) <obamaisaneocon@nothingchanged.org> on Friday December 28, 2012 @07:45PM (#42415201) Homepage

    I thought it was a sign of being a terrorist or something like that. For most positions, that is a reason to not hire. I'm so glad I'm self-employed.

    http://tech.slashdot.org/story/12/07/29/1627203/facebook-abstainers-could-be-labeled-suspicious [slashdot.org]

  • Re:However.... (Score:5, Informative)

    by blackraven14250 ( 902843 ) on Friday December 28, 2012 @07:46PM (#42415211)
    Except now they aren't allowed to ask at all to begin with. If they ask, it's grounds for what seems like a complaint and a fine, just as if the employer asked what religion you are a member of or how old you are.
  • by icebike ( 68054 ) on Friday December 28, 2012 @08:08PM (#42415433)

    The law [mi.gov] states:

    Sec. 5. (1) This act does not prohibit an employer from doing any of the following:

    (a) Requesting or requiring an employee to disclose access information to the employer to gain access to or operate any of the following:

    (i) An electronic communications device paid for in whole or in part by the employer.

    (ii) An account or service provided by the employer, obtained by virtue of the employee’s employment relationship with the employer, or used for the employer’s business purposes.

    (b) Disciplining or discharging an employee for transferring the employer’s proprietary or confidential information or financial data to an employee’s personal internet account without the employer’s authorization.

    (c) Conducting an investigation or requiring an employee to cooperate in an investigation in any of the following circumstances:

    (i) If there is specific information about activity on the employee’s personal internet account, for the purpose of ensuring compliance with applicable laws, regulatory requirements, or prohibitions against work-related employee misconduct.

    (ii) If the employer has specific information about an unauthorized transfer of the employer’s proprietary information, confidential information, or financial data to an employee’s personal internet account.

    (d) Restricting or prohibiting an employee’s access to certain websites while using an electronic communications device paid for in whole or in part by the employer or while using an employer’s network or resources, in accordance with state and federal law.

    (e) Monitoring, reviewing, or accessing electronic data stored on an electronic communications device paid for in whole or in part by the employer, or traveling through or stored on an employer’s network, in accordance with state and federal law.

    (2) This act does not prohibit or restrict an employer from complying with a duty to screen employees or applicants prior to hiring or to monitor or retain employee communications that is established under federal law or by a self-regulatory organization, as defined in section 3(a)(26) of the securities and exchange act of 1934, 15 USC 78c(a)(26).

    (3) This act does not prohibit or restrict an employer from viewing, accessing, or utilizing information about an employee or applicant that can be obtained without any required access information or that is available in the public domain.

    Sec. 6. (1) This act does not prohibit an educational institution from requesting or requiring a student to disclose access information to the educational institution to gain access to or operate any of the following:

    (a) An electronic communications device paid for in whole or in part by the educational institution.

    (b) An account or service provided by the educational institution that is either obtained by virtue of the student’s admission to the educational institution or used by the student for educational purposes.

  • Re:However.... (Score:5, Informative)

    by Jane Q. Public ( 1010737 ) on Friday December 28, 2012 @10:34PM (#42416555)

    "They can ask if you are over an age."

    No, they can't, unless being a certain age is a demonstrable job requirement. And there aren't many fields in which it's a legitimate job requirement. They can ask if you are of legal age to sign a contract. Not much more than that.

  • Re:However.... (Score:4, Informative)

    by Sique ( 173459 ) on Saturday December 29, 2012 @10:05AM (#42419237) Homepage
    You don't need a Federal law to have this being illegal. In most legislations it is illegal to demand someone to break a contract with a third party. And the Terms and Conditions of Facebook are a contract, and they explicitely forbid it to hand over your credentials to someone else.

An Ada exception is when a routine gets in trouble and says 'Beam me up, Scotty'.

Working...