Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed


Forgot your password?
Government Privacy Security News Your Rights Online

Obama Releases National Strategy For Information Sharing 83

wiredmikey writes "President Obama on Wednesday released a national strategy designed to balance the sharing of information with those who need it to keep the country safe, while protecting the same data from those who would use it to cause harm. 'The National Strategy for Information Sharing and Safeguarding' outlines how the government will attempt to responsibly share and protect data that enhances national security and protects the American people. The national strategy will define how the federal government and its assorted departments and agencies share their data. Agencies can also share services and work towards data and network interoperability to be more efficient, the President said. The President aimed to address concerns over Privacy by noting, 'This strategy makes it clear that the individual privacy, civil rights and civil liberties of United States persons must be — and will be — protected.' The full document is available here in PDF format from the White House website."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Obama Releases National Strategy For Information Sharing

Comments Filter:
  • by DarkOx ( 621550 ) on Thursday December 20, 2012 @08:20AM (#42346325) Journal

    Yes it is that same Obama. He is a slippery double talking sack of shit, and nobody should forget that.

  • by smpoole7 ( 1467717 ) on Thursday December 20, 2012 @08:51AM (#42346469) Homepage

    If information can be gathered, it will be. If laws are passed to restrict access to it, people will find ways around the laws and/or just plain break the law when they want to. This is true in both the public and private sectors.

    Whether it's websites that find new ways to track everywhere you browse, or government boffins who want to know what you eat for breakfast and how often you have sex, they ARE going to get that information. The technology exists now to do it, so they WILL do it.

    What should TERRIFY all of us -- without exception -- is the way this is being handled, both in the private and public sectors: "we will gather the info, but we promise not to abuse it and we will restrict access to it."

    Folks, that ain't gonna happen. People are people. Crooks are crooks and curiosity kills every time.

    Perfect example and please don't take this the wrong way. I'm NOT trying to restart the old debate about healthcare in the US. But I have to admit that it has puzzled me that some of the same people who scream about businesses tracking everything we do, don't say a word about the FACT that the Affordable Health Care Act creates one of the largest, most invasive and complete databases of health information that has ever existed.

    And our protection? The same thing you see here. "We promise not to abuse this goldmine of information in any way. We're the government and we're here to help. Trust us."

    Do you REALLY believe that, in a tight election, juicy tidbits aren't going to magically "slip" out about some challenger's medical history?

    I don't know what the answer is. But if you begin to understand that there is no real expectation of privacy anymore, you're at least headed in the right direction.

  • by BlueStrat ( 756137 ) on Thursday December 20, 2012 @08:52AM (#42346473)

    'This strategy makes it clear that the individual privacy, civil rights and civil liberties of United States persons must be â" and will be â" protected.'

    I mean, really...can this statement possibly be any more Orwellian?

    They've got to realize how totally full of shit that statement sounds, even to someone with no dog in the fight. I refuse to believe they are so clueless as to believe that statement does anything but incite and fan the flames of distrust and hostility.

    It's like they're trying to get people to start a rebellion, so they'll have an excuse to declare martial law and roll the Hellfire-equipped drones, checkpoints, and armor out on the general population.

    It would certainly be ironic if US citizens end up being saved from tyranny not by elections, rebellion, or the judicial system, but by Iran or N. Korea nuking Washington, D.C. either by ICBM or by a smuggled-in device.

    Personally, if I were a D.C. resident and accidentally learned of such a plot, either to nuke D.C. and/or to assassinate top government leaders, I'd quietly leave town and keep my mouth shut. And that really hurts me to have to say about my own nation's government and it's leaders. But sadly, it and they have become everything that the US has fought politically and waged wars against for over 100 years.


  • by Mitreya ( 579078 ) <mitreya&gmail,com> on Thursday December 20, 2012 @08:53AM (#42346479)


    Awesome. So anyone criticizing Obama is racist, simply because Obama is black?
    Troll he may be, but the OP has made no reference to race or any stereotypes. Where are you coming from with this?

Doubt isn't the opposite of faith; it is an element of faith. - Paul Tillich, German theologian and historian