Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Transportation

Red Light Cameras Raise Crash Risk, Cost 499

concealment writes with news of dissatisfaction with a pilot program for stoplight-monitoring cameras. The program ran for several years in New Jersey, and according to a new report, the number of car crashes actually increased while the cameras were present. "[The program] appears to be changing drivers’ behavior, state officials said Monday, noting an overall decline in traffic citations and right-angle crashes. The Department of Transportation also said, however, that rear-end crashes have risen by 20 percent and total crashes are up by 0.9 percent at intersections where cameras have operated for at least a year. The agency recommended the program stay in place, calling for 'continued data collection and monitoring' of camera-monitored intersections. The department’s report drew immediate criticism from Assemblyman Declan O’Scanlon, R-Monmouth, who wants the cameras removed. He called the program 'a dismal failure,' saying DOT statistics show the net costs of accidents had climbed by more than $1 million at intersections with cameras." Other cities are considering dumping the monitoring tech as well, citing similar cost and efficacy issues.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Red Light Cameras Raise Crash Risk, Cost

Comments Filter:
  • by Taco Cowboy ( 5327 ) on Tuesday November 27, 2012 @08:45PM (#42111621) Journal

    ...regarding ...

    * 1. exploitation of homeless/unemployed people and putting them in harm's way ?

    * 2. drivers getting into accident due to the distraction by the appearance of homeless/unemployed/unkempt people at busy traffic intersections?

    * 3. little girls in cars got spooked by homeless/unemployed/unkempt people taking pictures of them?

     
    If your answer is "YES" to all of the above questions, then, sure, go ahead, start distributing digital cameras to homeless/unemployed people and putting them in the middle of busy traffic intersections.
     

  • by TheGratefulNet ( 143330 ) on Tuesday November 27, 2012 @10:09PM (#42112459)

    There are a lot of folks out there who think stopping at lights is optional.

    my friend had this strange habit; when we approached an intersection he would speed up and plow thru the red lights. I would ask him why and he would say 'relax, my brother does this all the time'. every time, the same thing: running past a red light and telling me not to worry. it all worked up until we came to a green light and, yes, he slams on his brakes. when I ask why he does *that*, his reply was 'look, my brother could be on that road!'

  • by NIK282000 ( 737852 ) on Tuesday November 27, 2012 @11:15PM (#42112945) Homepage Journal

    That sounds like logic! I wont have any logic when it comes to traffic control and regulation, its obscene!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday November 28, 2012 @01:33AM (#42113859)

    Wreckless drivers slam there break peddle. Or not.

The optimum committee has no members. -- Norman Augustine

Working...