'Nuclear Free' Maryland City Grants Waiver For HP 277
dcblogs writes "The City of Takoma Park, Md. this week granted a waiver to its public library to allow it to use some new HP hardware, whose products are otherwise banned under its 'nuclear free zone' ordinance. That law, adopted in 1983 one month after the Cold War-era movie 'The Day After' was aired, prohibits the city from buying equipment from any company connected to U.S. nuclear weapons production. The library bought new Linux-based, x86 systems from a Canadian vendor and didn't realize the vendor was using HP hardware. The hardware arrived in April and was unused until the Takoma Park city council granted it a waiver this week. The city's list of banned contractors was developed in 2004 by a now inactive group, Nuclear Free America, and hasn't been updated since."
Movies (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Welcome to "democracy".
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
So the voice of the people isn't real democracy?
Don't act like media influences are anything new. Go read Ben Franklin.
Democracy doesn't mean sound, thought out logical ideologies. Which would often take literally forever for everyone to agree to. It's the current voice of the people.
Re:Movies (Score:4, Interesting)
Not to mention -and has been since at least 1983.
If I was in that town I'd be pushing for it's repeal. Just like I pushed for getting rid of the ban on selling alcohol to indians in my old town. Yes, the law called them Indians.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Movies (Score:4, Funny)
So given that Indians are no longer called Indians, does that mean that people descended from the indigenous population can be served but not the guys from India?
Re: (Score:3)
I was basically told that they were no longer enforcing it. It was just in the book I got when I moved in along with some $10 fee for running a dance hall, rules on dog registration, etc...
I'm not sure anybody fron India has actually been within 10 miles of the town, or that the guy running the single bar cares.
Re: (Score:2)
I can't speak for the US, but such a law would be blatantly unconstitutional in Canada due to violating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (which is enshrined in our constitution). Does the US not have any part of the US constitution that forbids laws from discriminating like that? Does the bill of rights cover that, and is it part of the constitution? Not trolling, I'm not very familiar with the US constitution, only copyright law, ironically.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Movies (Score:5, Insightful)
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The 14th Amendment was not part of the original Bill of Rights, which was only concerned with limiting the power of the federal government to infringe on people's rights. The states could do almost anything they wanted within the limits of their own state constitutions. The 13th (ending slavery), 14th (civil rights), and 15th (right to vote regardless of race) amendments were passed after the civil war, and the southern states were forced to ratify them as a condition of being re-admitted to the Union. Under the 14th Amendment, most of the Bill of Rights now applies to the individual states.
This law is almost certianly unconstitutional under the current 14th Amendment jurisprudence, but somebody would have to challenge it first. Since it's apparently not being enforced, it's not likely that anybody is going to bother with challenging it.
Sure, it's unconstitutional (Score:2)
Yes, it's blatently illegal even in the USA. Still, it's for a very small town with a population of like 50, which is all about as white as you can get in the midwest. It's also old. It's not on anybody's priority list, not even mine. I knew it was a non-enforceable law, but wanted to get rid of it to prevent it from being abused by some joker. Such abuse being unlikely unless things massively change there.
Re: (Score:3)
No more unconstitutional than all the other procurement regulations that steer business to black, women owned businesses (often at significantly higher prices too).
As much as I'd rather see regulations that forced the govt to buy american made products, I know all too well how much paperwork and micromanagement such BS rules create. I'm tired of filling out the paperwork to prove that the monitor I'm buying is handicap accessible.
Re:Movies (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Since they come from Asia, the aren't "Native Americans" either.
"Indians" is actually less inaccurate.
Re:Movies (Score:5, Insightful)
And before that from Africa, along with every other human on the planet. The term "native" has to have some cuttoff date or it's completely useless, usually a few (or few dozen) generations suffices. Or are we now classifying every single US citizen an "African American"?
Re: (Score:2)
Every singe world citizen should be "African". In quotes.
Re: (Score:2)
Just simplify it: Terran. We both originated there, and are still there.
Re:Movies (Score:4, Funny)
Our lawyers will be contacting you shortly. Prepare to be both legally and bodily violated. We will make you sorry you were ever born.
XOXOXOX,
The Church of Scientology
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, that's not necessarily completely accurate. I'm pretty sure I saw an article (probably here on Slashdot) a couple weeks ago that there's now a new theory that modern humans all came from Asia first, then all migrated to Africa for some odd reason, then some of those migrated from there out to everywhere else (including back to Asia).
Re: (Score:2)
That article was not that modern humans originated in Asia, but that an ancestor to all the African humans and proto-humans was in Asia, so it's just setting the cutoff point out further still.
You can keep going back and now you're in the oceans, and the oceans have a different shape than today.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Movies (Score:5, Funny)
Negative: I am a Meat Popsicle.
If you lived in that town... (Score:3)
Re:Movies (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, the law called them Indians.
Our largest local Indian confederation refers to itself as "Indians". The Indians I've known all call themselves Indians.
The people I've known that get worked up about using "Native American" tend to be white and middle-to-upper class.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
The people I've known that get worked up about it tend to be Indians, as in people from India. It's also confusing to pretty much anyone outside of the Americas, as people from India are pretty common while indigenous Americans don't go abroad as much. It can even get confusing in some parts of the US west coast where there are a lot of Indian immigrants. I don't think it's offensive; it just gets confusing if you spend a lot of time in California and Europe.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm part Indian (the American variety) and I used to roll my eyes when people would say "Native American". However, as you pointed out, there is a sizable number of Asian Indian immigrants in the U.S. now, and it can get confusing. I don't know what the solution is. I still don't like "Native American", it just has too many damn syllables to be practical.
Re: (Score:2)
I've known some folks from Mumbai who strive to make that distinction too :)
Re: (Score:2)
As the AC mentioned, it's a specificality thing. When all you have to go on is 'Indians aren't allowed to buy alcohol', is it refering to Natives(further explanation in the rules would make that obvious) or those from India, the country?
When I was a kid, Indian = Native American. Now that I've traveled the world a bit, I use Indian to specify people from India enough that I have to use NA.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, the law called them Indians.
Our largest local Indian confederation refers to itself as "Indians". The Indians I've known all call themselves Indians.
The people I've known that get worked up about using "Native American" tend to be white and middle-to-upper class.
Not always the case, either. I remember when I was in college about 10 years ago and was chatting with a classmate I didn't really know that well. He said that he and his family were going to a powwow that weekend. I said, "Oh, you're American Indian?" He gently corrected me, "Yes, Native American."
(amusing sidenote: I checked dictionary.com to see if "powwow" was one word or two. The definition includes the phrase "North American Indian".)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.sni.org/ [sni.org]
Re: (Score:2)
You might object to the phrasing of that rule/law though. Too bad I no longer have the books.
Paraphrasing a bit: 'No alcohol will be sold to those under 16, habitual drunks, or indians.'
Re: (Score:2)
The only problem comes from the ambiguity of the word "Indians" when referring to Native Americans. Seneca Indians is fine, because I know that Seneca Indians came from America. Using the word "Indian" can be ambiguous or wrong depending on the context, since Indian refers to a group of people from Asia. Using the word Indian to refer to Native Americans just leads to confusion and is a poor choice of words.
Seneca Indians - A native tribe from America
Native Americans - Collection of native tribes from A
Re: (Score:2)
Well if they were Pakistanis they probably wouldn't want to buy it anyway, it's haram.
Re: (Score:2)
That ban could be helping everyone. Our natives here in Canada could certainly benefit from it.
Re: (Score:3)
Yes, the law called them Indians.
Why not?
According to a 1995 US Census Bureau set of home interviews, most of the respondents with an expressed preference refer to themselves as American Indians or Indians
Re:Movies (Score:5, Interesting)
Huh? Is this a troll?
The reason it isn't surprising that such a law was passed in Takoma Park is because since the early-60s, Takoma Park has been famous for being a very-left-leaning home for granola-munching ex-hippies who have become financially stable boomers. For decades it was referred to as the Berkeley of the East; people in DC still often call it "the People's Republic of Takoma Park." I can't think of a time when Takoma Park was a town of "dumb rednecks"; and even now, when it's less leftist than it used to be, it's still far more that way than any place else anywhere near DC.
Re: (Score:2)
The Bureau of Indian Affairs calls them that too. Shocking.
In Arizona Native Americans call their gambling properties "Indian Casinos".
Re: (Score:2)
Without sticking 'American' in there, how do I tell the difference from an Indian from India?
Re: (Score:2)
Many of them probably did, they just didn't spell it that way (at least not the literate ones writing laws). Written speech is frequently quite different from colloquial spoken speech done by the same person.
Re:Movies (Score:5, Funny)
Movies, not reason, dictates their city policy.
You should see the stockpile of shotguns and Patrick Swayze clones they have on hand just in case Red Dawn comes true...
Re:Movies (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
>>>Movies, not reason, dictates their city policy.
It all depends upon your viewpoint. The Greeks believed that plays (which is what a movie is: a film play) can not just entertain but also educate the audience. If I recall my AP english terms correctly, they called it "catharasis".
I guess the Maryland Democrats who run this city experienced catharsis after viewing the destruction of a nuclear holocaust, and decided to no longer be part of any weapon manufacturing business.
Re:Movies (Score:5, Informative)
That word (catharsis) doesn't mean what you think it means.
Catharsis is a purging of built up emotion/tension. It has absolutely nothing to do with education of any sort.....
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If you were living during the Cold War, and seen this movie, that's pretty much what it did. I've always thought an emotional purging was educational. That movie certainly made me "wake up" and realize how dangerous it is to toy with war (especially if our victims have nuclear-equipped allies like Russia).
>>>"Just rammed it through" def'n: any legislation that passes that you don't like.
Actually the Maryland Democrats do pass some good laws. Like the recent decision to allow a student to attend
Re: (Score:2)
I've always thought an emotional purging was educational.
That's where you are wrong. You don't have to learn anything from an emotional outpour. You just get a sense of relief after it is done.
In fact, it would probably be safe to say you are less likely to learn something when experiencing an emotional outpur, but are more likely to do something about it. From my understanding, the only time that people are more likely to accept differing points of view are when they are personaly vulnerable; however, feeling vulnerable doesn't assure that the new point of vi
Re: (Score:2)
Socrates was given the opportunity to leave but chose to remain on principle. As was common at the time the sentence was in practice "GTFO or die", a fine example of Athenian democracy (the classic "elections" was for banishment rather than office, gave everyone incentive not to be the least-popular guy in town).
As for the problems with majority rule, I'll grant you those freely, but the alternatives are minority rule (which rarely goes well for the majority) or consensus, which rarely gets anything done a
Re: (Score:3)
...That's why Maryland and all the other States are REPUBLICS (rule of law & protection of basic human rights), not democracies.
REPUBLIC doesn't mean what you think, either. From Webster: Republic - a state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.
Our protection of basic human rights comes from the constitution, not from being a republic.
Re: (Score:2)
It was more about scaring the SHIT out of people (and kids like me.) I was in junior high at that time and the threat of nuclear war with the USSR felt very real to me. Maybe not to all kids, but definitely to me. The Day After was really scary IMO. It didn't make me think "war is a bad thing" it made me think "we're all going to die!!"
Agreed. It was scary has hell at the time. Although the one thing I look back on and laugh about is how one of the main characters survives by ducking down in the front seat of his Volvo and surviving the shock wave. Everyone else on the freeway was vaporized. I remember thinking we really needed to get a Volvo after that.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Who says product placement doesn't work???
Re: (Score:3)
Personally, I didn't find The Day After all that scary, having seen Damnation Alley and other movies with similar themes already (Logan's Run, for instance, which I saw on broadcast television, so it was even sanitized), but I also didn't take the threat of nuclear war with the USSR all that seriously. I didn't buy that either side would actually go through with it, no matter how much posturing was done. What person really wants to be responsible for the termination of life on earth? Neither side had anythi
Re: (Score:2)
You keep using that word (cartharsis). I do not think it means what you think it means.
FTFY.
Re:Movies (Score:4, Insightful)
Hmm, so the cure to war is to make sure that your side won't win if one happens?
I've always preferred the "If thou would have peace, prepare then for war" POV....
Re:Movies (Score:4, Interesting)
Hmm, so the cure to war is to make sure that your side won't win if one happens?
I've always preferred the "If thou would have peace, prepare then for war" POV....
You don't need nukes for that; just look at Switzerland. [wikipedia.org]
Apparently arming the shit out of your populace (with automatic rifles) is a far greater deterrent to being attacked than stockpiling nuclear weapons.
Re:Movies (Score:5, Funny)
Apparently arming the shit out of your populace (with automatic rifles) is a far greater deterrent to being attacked than stockpiling nuclear weapons.
Cool. Then we (US Americans) are covered on both counts.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Apparently arming the shit out of your populace (with automatic rifles) is a far greater deterrent
The guns don't really matter much, except that an invader would be forced to treat the populace as combatants and inflict a high civilian death toll. Switzerland avoids attack because it is vanishingly small, protected by mountain ranges and devoid of natural resources. Politically and militarily irrelevant, in other words.
Switzerland and its guns are like an 5lb dog barking at a 200lb mailman from behind a fence. The dog is brilliantly proud of itself when the mailman leaves the property.
This situation
Re: (Score:3)
Apparently arming the shit out of your populace (with automatic rifles) is a far greater deterrent to being attacked than stockpiling nuclear weapons.
That's an interesting correlation, but the real reason is that they are smack in the middle of a continent that is connected to the main likely source of nukes (Russia), and I believe that the prevailing weather systems go that way, too. If Russia nuked Switzerland, it would be about a week (or less) before the cloud reached Moskva, and even less before the rest of the neighbors were overrunning Russia in retaliation.
And, of course, if someone else nuked the clock makers, Russia would have a vested intere
Re: (Score:2)
So no, potential nuclear fallout has nothing (or at best, very little) to do with Switzerland's record of not being fucked with. I suppose it could be posited that Switzerland remains untouched because that's were the world's elite keep their wealth, but I would wager such a statement is putting the cart before the horse.
I mean, just look at Achmed. He's scary (but not as scary as Walter).
Tell me about it - I've got a Walter
Re: (Score:2)
Russia is not the only antagonist ever realized by Europe: Hitler abandoned plans to invade Switzerland years before nuclear weapons were even invented.
How did arming Swiss people stop Hitler from staring a nuclear conflagration if Hitler had no nukes?
The statement was that arming the Swiss people was how they defended themselves, and cpu6502 started by talking in a nuclear holocaust context. I was pretty clear in saying that arming them could be a reason that conventional forces from their neighbors (e.g., Hitler and Germany) hadn't overrun them. Read all the way to the end of what you reply to, please.
Re: (Score:2)
Bollocks. Not worth invading. Not on the easiest route between anywhere that's worth invading and anywhere likely to be capable of invading anywhere that's worth invading.
There's a reason the Schlieffen plan was designed as a right hook, and it wasn't a bunch of bankers, chocolate-makers and horologists armed with pop-guns.
Re: (Score:2)
Bollocks. Not worth invading. Not on the easiest route between anywhere that's worth invading and anywhere likely to be capable of invading anywhere that's worth invading.
There's a reason the Schlieffen plan was designed as a right hook, and it wasn't a bunch of bankers, chocolate-makers and horologists armed with pop-guns.
Non sequitur.
My point was, and still is, a nation does not need nuclear weapons to be secure. Switzerland is merely the example I used.
Your post only serves to further prove my words.
Re: (Score:2)
Nope, you don't recall your AP English terms at all, because that's not what catharsis (not "catharasis") is. Cartharsis is an emotional purging, not an educational experience.
Re:Movies (Score:5, Interesting)
What's really shitty is that HP (not to defend them given my hatred of them) is mostly involved in a nuclear capacity with regards to medicine, not weaponry.
This is an undeserved reputation.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Movies, not reason, dictates their city policy.
Sometimes we call these "campaign shots", but yeah, that's pretty much how the system works.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't give a damn. Anything that keeps money out of the military-industrial complex, no matter how insignificant, gets a wholehearted approval from me.
Do you also approve of income tax evasion? Because, compared to what the military-industrical complex is likely to get from the money that HP is likely to get from you in a year, that's peanuts to what you probably already pay in income taxes.
Re:Movies (Score:4, Funny)
He's a school district?
Restraint of trade (Score:3)
Re:Restraint of trade (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
It's not banning sale of goods from those companies within the city, it's just the city government itself that can't buy them. A lot of government entities have whitelists of vendors... this city just happens to use an (outdated) blacklist instead.
Of all the stupid laws.... (Score:2, Troll)
Really? Can not buy anything from a company that is related to US nuclear weapons production? Really? What a stupid do nothing make everybody feel good while accomplishing nothing lets all hold hands and sing Kumbaya crap law!
I guess they don't use any gasoline since the oil companies sell fuel used to move nuclear weapons. Or any Aluminum since they use Aluminum to build the missiles...
Yeah this made such a difference....
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Really? Can not buy anything from a company that is related to US nuclear weapons production? Really? What a stupid do nothing make everybody feel good while accomplishing nothing lets all hold hands and sing Kumbaya crap law!
No, wrong problem. The REAL problem is that HP is involved in US nuclear weapons production. And now Microsoft is making their computer manufacturing partners very very angry, and one of those manufacturers is HP...
Stay away from the Redmond, WA area for the time being, is all I'm saying.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Just need a couple amendments (Score:4, Insightful)
Maybe they should extend the ban to companies involved with biowarfare (agar, petri dishes, thermal control chambers), or to cyberwarfare (Microsoft, RedHat, and your son's best friend who became a script kiddy last night).
Try to keep up, people. (Score:5, Funny)
"Nuclear free" is sooo 1980s. It's all about "greenness" now. You need to update your pc checklists monthly.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Seventh-day Adventist Church (Score:5, Informative)
Takoma Park [wikipedia.org] has long been a center for the Seventh Day Adventist Church [wikipedia.org], and 7DAs tend to be pacifists.
Takoma Park Kid (Score:5, Interesting)
Takoma Park [wikipedia.org] has long been a center for the Seventh Day Adventist Church [wikipedia.org], and 7DAs tend to be pacifists.
Just FYI, Takoma Park's liberalness (which includes a bead store, vegan restaurants and the rest) has little to do with the Adventists, who aren't really a force in town. Instead, Takoma Park has a long hippy tradition and is filled with aging boomers who moved to the community because of its reputation as a liberal enclave. It's often referred to as the "Berkely of the East" and other such monickers.
My favorite nuclear free story growing up was that the police department looked for a while like it was going to have to buy Volvo squad cars, because every other major manufacturer had some toe hold in nuclear weapons. Not sure how they managed to avoid that, but they did. Similarly, when the transit authority wanted to build a major highway right through the middle of Takoma Park (which at that point was a sleepy middle class suburb full of WWII bungallos), the local community rallied together and killed the massive highway plan on the Maryland side of Washington, DC. Those techies in Northern Virginia who enjoy the Mixed Bowl during their morning commute see what could have happened to Maryland. Of course, nothing's that simple -- but it's refreshing that there's still a place that combates global warming by banning gasoline-powered lawn mowers.....
Takoma Park was a great place to grow up. Crazy as they are, it's refreshing to have such a community of idealists. Even though it seems like the whole community has gentrified over the last few years, I still love it, even as I've transitioned to the Dark Side (business! Eeek!)
Re: (Score:2)
So it's not really a matter of pushing beliefs. It's a matter of people voting their conscience at the ballot box.
Those are synonymous. The ballot box is a means for forcing one's conscience onto other people.
If it was just a matter of beliefs/conscience, no ballot box would be needed.
like Steve Jobs security clearances to sell Pixars (Score:3)
Power Grid (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
For the USA on average, it's about 20%. If you live in a city serviced by a nuclear power plant, then it would be ~80-95%. Otherwise 0%.
How about Taxes? (Score:5, Interesting)
Do they refuse to accept tax payments from any residents who are employed by any company with ties to the nuclear industry? Because that would be blood money, yanno?
Say what? (Score:4, Insightful)
Say what? ANY company "involved"?
I suspect to make nuclear weapons, you need, like, EVERYTHING. Bricks, mortar, screwdrivers, voltmeters, paper, pencils, pens, pipes (lots of pipes), cars, gasoline, welding rods, drill presses, lathes, etc, etc, etc, etc..............
I think you'd be blocking the buying of almost everything, except maybe nail salon services.
Nuclear free = intelligence free (Score:2)
nuclear power is NOT the bomb!
What about smoke detectors? (Score:4, Interesting)
How do they handle smoke detection, since the radioactive americium detectors in them are all manufactured by defense contractors that also work with other nuclear materials, including bombs?
Government (Score:2)
It really is impossible for government (local, state, or federal) to kill a program, isn't it?
Just for SOMEONE to say "you know, this may have been a good idea, but now it's just stupid, let's stop this"?
Please note that the Rural Electrification Administration - a 1935 New Deal office set up to bring electricity to US farms - still exists.
1935 11% of farms had electricity
1949 mandate was expanded, to allow the REA to offer federal loans to local telephone co-ops
1952 98% of farms had electricity...agency s
That's telling them (Score:2)
This is a bold, assertive policy that will have a major impact on world peace and stability. You go, Takoma Park, all 17,000 and 2.36 square miles of you.
This is why bicamerial houses are a good thing (Score:2)
This is what happens when you have ONE legislative body or even two that are elected the same way.
Ideally you want at LEAST two that are elected in a different enough way that there would be a culture difference between the two houses. The only legislation that gets passed is what can be agreed upon by BOTH bodies.
Checks and balances.
Re: (Score:3)
PCs in Maryland function in much the same way their automobiles are driven.
Hordes of monkeys fighting for control of an abacus.
Re: (Score:2)
I've been in Maryland.
Try Memphis. Despite the lower population density (across the metro area) we've got people that think it's NASCAR time when it rains, and most have no clue 'How to computer.'
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Because illegal aliens tend to be anti-nuke?
No, because they almost exclusively vote Democrat.
Regardless of any good reasons you might have to like the Democrats, it is they who stand to benefit from voter fraud and allowing illegal aliens to vote. That's why they raise such a huge stink whenever the requirement of photo ID to vote is mentioned. They use their old standby of how "racist" this would be, even though a photo ID is free in some states and very cheap in others. Not to mention it's racist of THEM to suggest that just because someone
The subject was Takoma Park's anti-nuke policy (Score:2)
Plenty of Democrats are pro-nuke. So you're lacking a middle term for your syllogism. Even if it is true that most illegal immigrants that vote do so for Democrats, that doesn't explain why it's no surprise that the city council (and the voters at large in the city) are both anti-nuke and supportive of suffrage for non-citizens in local elections.
Moreover, this is not about voter fraud. This is about a city that lawfully has broader criteria for who gets to vote in local elections. It's not about state or f
Re: (Score:3)
Many cities and other municipalities have ordinances like this. Why is this one instance news?
The real lesson has nothing to do with any particular city being "nuclear free" or "sanctuary" or anything else in particular. The lesson is that government passes laws and leaves them on the books ad infinitum without ever revisiting them to see if they need updating or outright repeal. In this case, the special interest group that pushed for the law's latest version of specifics no longer exists. I bet people in that community have bumper stickers saying "question authority" but won't ever think of bringi
Old laws (Score:5, Interesting)
This is why I like the idea of having ALL laws auto-sunset every 10 years(or so).
1. Keep legislatures busy re-approving old laws rather than passing new
2. Get a review of the old laws going.
Re: (Score:2)
That's where they store the statutes. Carved in stone on the city's statuary. That's why it's so hard to get them repealed.
Re: (Score:3)