Wil Wheaton: BitTorrent Isn't Only For Piracy 354
itwbennett writes "Geek advocate Wil Wheaton has written a blog post on the (legal) usefulness of BitTorrent, saying that the speed of his recent download of Ubuntu 12.04 should serve as a reminder that BitTorrent fills an important niche. Wheaton compares blocking BitTorrent to closing freeways because bank robbers could get away."
Some game companies do this too... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Downloading Ubuntu (Score:4, Informative)
Surely there's something? Right?
Re:Downloading Ubuntu (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I agree that BitTorrent is a tool, but.... (Score:2, Informative)
It seems like network owners have the right to shape their traffic, and Will has a right to take his business to ISPs that don't do it.
This is such a bullshit argument with the reality of the current state of broadband across the US. There is almost no competition to go to in most areas, there is no way to start a competition in a lot of areas where the right to lay the cable was granted along with a local monopoly for whoever laid the fiber and these internet service providers also own or are owned by the big media companies that have an interest in stomping out anything that competes with their content divisions...
BitTorrent was NEVER the Performance Problem (Score:5, Informative)
Over and above the claim that torrents helped pirates, there was the claim that it was a bandwidth-hog.
Well, it aint so! Jim Gettys researched it, and found what the network vendors were seeing was ... bufferbloat! See https://gettys.wordpress.com/2012/05/14/the-next-nightmare-is-coming/ [wordpress.com]
Re:Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
Here's the problem... a lot of things that are technically illegal, people don't believe OUGHT to be illegal.
If I can watch, oh I don't know, Seinfeld reruns on TV over the air for free, why is it illegal for me to download the episode I missed last night? I use Usenet for time-shifting, the way that I used to use a DVR. I have no moral qualms whatsoever about doing so, and I don't think that there OUGHT to be any legal impediment to doing so.
Re:Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
Citation needed.
Here. [arstechnica.com]. 89% definitively illegal, 11% probably illegal, 0.3% confirmed legal. And since you want to play the wikipedia game, anything you say to make this article invalid is [citation needed], no arguments of your own only reliable third party sources.
Re:bittorent is not for speed (Score:2, Informative)
Re:bittorent is not for speed (Score:5, Informative)
On the other hand, a direct transfer is never faster than the most congested link between you and the server. If you have a reasonably fast connection, the bottleneck is often not your connection. Downloading from multiple peers that are likely taking different paths to reach you lets you reach an high overall speed even if all the peers are congested.
Re:Not quite (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
And since you want to play the wikipedia game, anything you say to make this article invalid is [citation needed], no arguments of your own only reliable third party sources.
I guess you missed the link [torrentfreak.com] in your own article that debunks the study? Cliffs notes version: They only looked at the files with the most seeds, which already skews the results, and pirated stuff has a huge list of fake seeds to screw up lazy anti-piracy enforcers, which means that choosing the torrents with the most seeds invalidates the entire study because the ones with the most (fake) seeds are the pirated ones.
I would also add that relying on 'this one public BitTorrent tracker we found somewhere' is not statistically valid, because it's just one tracker. You have to get a statistically valid sample of all the trackers or you can't conclude anything. For example, if they included these these [btlist.info] trackers instead, I would expect different results -- and by failing to consider them, they naturally get totally invalid numbers.
Re:Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
A single user here, Using bittorrent since the beginning to download dead shows. But the majority of my usage is piracy. Whether or not you want to believe me, thats all you, but my use is almost all illegal.
That's you. There are plenty of WoW players out there. Every last one of them uses bittorrent for updates, whether they know it or not (most don't even know what bittorrent is). Other update programs are using bitorrent too according to the scuttlebutt.
Re:Not quite (Score:5, Informative)
"This content is not available in your region."
Re:Not quite (Score:5, Informative)