EULAs Don't Have To Suck 233
jfruhlinger writes "The ubiquitous EULA — reams of baffling text imposing draconian terms on software users — infuriate most Slashdot users and are routinely ignored by everyone else (until they suddenly cause trouble, of course). But it doesn't have to be that way. Several European countries are considering laws mandating user-friendly EULAs, and some companies provide them voluntarily."
Oligopoly (Score:5, Interesting)
Then don't sign contracts that have terms you disagree with.
So what should one do when all providers of an essential service have disagreeable terms? Join the Amish?
The best EULA I ever agreed to (Score:5, Interesting)
When I bought IDA Professional, in the EULA it explicitly spelled out several things:
1.) I an install it on any machine I own
2.) I can make backups
3.) I can reverse engineer the software
If only the rest of the world worked that way. They trust their users - and it inpires a level of respect, at least with me, where there is absolutely no chance I would share a copy.
Re:Step 2 (Score:5, Interesting)
Meh, you live in a messed up country, I don't. Swedish contract law contains a number of stipulations that EULA fails to uphold, so they're not valid contracts here. Instead most of what EULA covers is covered by the copyright laws.
Televisions with EULAs (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Corporate Owned Government (Score:2, Interesting)
You might want to reconsider that; you as an individual only have two hands with which to hold pistol(s). The company offering the software has a small army of workers that it can draw on, as well as enough funds to buy your opposition full ballistic body armour if they so choose.
Either way, the choice is against you. At least with the current system, you're likely to come away with your lungs intact.