Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Government Politics

Could Crowd-Sourced Direct Democracy Work? 594

maccallr writes "The Occupy movement is getting everyone talking about how to fix the world's economic (and social, environmental, ...) problems. It is even trialling new forms of 'open' democracy. Trouble is, it's easy to criticize the physical occupiers for being unrepresentative of the general population — and much of their debating time is spent on practical rather than policy issues. Well-meaning but naive occupiers could be susceptible to exploitation by the political establishment and vested interests. In the UK, virtual occupiers are using Google Moderator to propose and debate policy in the comfort of their homes (where, presumably, it is easier to find out stuff you didn't know). Could something like this be done on a massive scale (national or global) to reach consensus on what needs to be done? How do you maximize participation by 'normal folk' on complex issues? What level of participation could be considered quorate? How do you deal with block votes? What can we learn from electronic petitions and Iceland's crowd-sourced constitution? Is the 'Occupy' branding appropriate? What other pitfalls are there? Or are existing models of democracy and dictatorship fit for purpose?" One issue I see with a global version of something like this is all of the people in the world who haven't even heard of the Internet.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Could Crowd-Sourced Direct Democracy Work?

Comments Filter:
  • by Quiet_Desperation ( 858215 ) on Monday November 07, 2011 @08:30PM (#37980054)

    Pollster: Hey, you!
    Guy: Huh?
    P: What do you do?
    G: I have a Master's degree in puppetry.
    P: Wow! That's... a thing!
    G: Thanks!
    P: So how do you think the Global Economic Steering Committee should plan for the next 5 years? Should they continue to implement the existing computable general equilibrium models or switch over to the new Klein-Mobius models that have arisen from the joint econometric project at MIT and Oxford?
    G: Um. Wait, what was that about a joint?
    P: Do you feel the current IS/LM techniques are effectively pushing both the local and global economic realities toward the general equilibrium point, or is the locus of points generated by the algorithms simply not reflecting actual market trends?
    G: Did you say lotus? I can do the lotus position.
    P: Is there someone else here we can talk to?

"Ninety percent of baseball is half mental." -- Yogi Berra

Working...