Oracle-Google Trial Won't Start Until Next Year

angry tapir writes "The intellectual property lawsuit between Oracle and Google over the Android mobile OS won't go to trial until next year, according to a ruling made in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by the judge overseeing the case. The trial was initially set to begin Oct. 31 but was postponed last week by Judge William Alsup due to scheduling conflicts with a major criminal trial. The trial will be split into three stages heard by the same jury. In step one, 'liability on the copyright claims, including all defenses thereto, will be tried and determined by special verdict before going to Phase Two,' he wrote. The second phase will cover liability on the case's patent claims, he added. 'The jury will decide these issues before going to Phase Three.' In the final stage, 'all remaining issues will be tried, including damages and willfulness.'"

SCO

[bmo]

It took the SCO case 7 years to resolve and they had nothing on their side.

Google isn't going down without a fight. We'll still be reading about this in 2025.

--
BMO

Re:SCO

[Compaqt]

I doubt that. The judge prevented Google from redacting the "smoking gun" email where the founder of Android (which Google bought) is quoted saying, that, yes, in fact, Android does infringe on Java, and no amount of obfuscation via tech named after frosty European fishing villages (Dalvik) will get around that.

Don't have the link handy, but you could check my posting history.

Not that the judge is an Oracle fanboi, either. He wants neither $0 damages nor $1 billion. About $100 mil.