Collar-Bomber Tracked By Gmail Accesses 119
RockDoctor writes "Reports indicate that a suspect has been arrested in the Australian 'collar bomb' hostage/extortion case. The allegation is that the suspect had set up a Gmail account, through which he (allegedly) planned to communicate with the extortion victims and arrange delivery of the payment. Unfortunately for him, records were kept showing the location and time the account was set up, and also for a number of accesses. This information, combined with 'CCTV footage and motor vehicle records,' allowed the police to put an identity to the suspect, and arrange for his arrest. So, if you're planning an extortion scheme, don't drive your car to the internet cafe, don't set up the account from an airport, wear anonymous clothes (like Jason Bourne does?) and do all your accesses through hacked shell accounts somewhere in Outer Mongolia. But, this being Slashdot, everyone knew that already."
Best advice not to get caught (Score:5, Insightful)
Don't do anything illegal.
Re: (Score:1)
If he really wanted to get away with it he should have been behind 7 proxies.
Re:Best advice not to get caught (Score:5, Informative)
Always work through people's unsecured access points.
A proxy node that has wireless access through an unsecured AP in one part of the world allows you to access it from another part of the world, and having a proxy set up inside a major company network can be a benefit too. And use TOR too just to make things even trickier.
Then access the entry AP from a long distance away using a Cantenna.
Of course - all data traffic needs to be encrypted except for the last hop. Add random time delays in the proxies to mess with data correlation too. Mail enters proxy, waits for a few minutes up to an hour and then bounce to the next proxy to finally arrive at destination. Patience is a virtue.
Re: (Score:1)
Of course!! He's learning how to get rich!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Can we get a new RFC that officially declares all internet users MUST stop referencing RFC 1149 since it stopped being funny 15 years ago?
Re: (Score:2)
No, I'd say that you should use RFC 6214 [ietf.org] instead.
Re: (Score:2)
HOW would someone ever be able to collect the money and not get caught? I mean...at some point, you pretty much HAVE to touch the money to get it.
Electronic is pretty much out of it...they'd get you on one end, and there's no numbered swiss accounts anymore that are 100% private and anonymous.
That leaves cash...and you have to pick it up somehow, someday somewhere in order to enjoy it. Any worthwhile ransom is gonna be a bulky amount of $$$...not to mention, traceable....
Re: (Score:2)
Have them put the unmarked bills into a waterproof duffel bag. Have them put the said duffel bag into a small airplane with a route flying over very inhospitable country. As they fly the route, you are on the ground and radio them to toss it out of the plane with a parachute. Collect bag and make your escape, or hide the bag and come back for it later.
Re: (Score:2)
You've missed out the necessary step of them finding a suitably qualified pilot who is willing to do the job. Note that you've specified a very inhospitable country (I suspect you mean more in a political sense than a physical access sense, which I look at later), so you're not going to get 3-way intergovernmental cooperation (extorter's government, extortee's and "inhospitable"). That rules out polic
Re: (Score:1)
He could have used one proxy service and been fine. More proof that crime doesn't pay, unless you are a _real_ criminal. LOOK AT WALL STREET!
Re: (Score:2)
Or better yet, seven boxxies.
Re:Best advice not to get caught (Score:4, Insightful)
Tell that to the people who get wrongly jailed.
Re: (Score:2)
Tell that to the people who get wrongly jailed.
Well, those people didn't get CAUGHT, now did they?
If you want to avoid being wrongly accused/jailed I think your only real option is prayer, as there are no real preventative measures for something you aren't related to.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Don't do anything illegal.
I'm sorry. That response is only appropriate in cases in which someone is falsely accused. Blaming the victim when it's actually his fault is a radical new twist on that argument.
Re: (Score:2)
Look, if criminals were smart enough to be good criminals, they wouldn't be criminals to begin with, they would do something else. Right?
Here's to hoping.
Re: (Score:1)
Don't do anything illegal.
Of course, you mistakenly posted as anon.
Re: (Score:1)
sometimes completely reasonable things to do are considered illegal by one's government.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Psshhh, be reasonable here!
gmail? (Score:2)
He probably would have gotten away with it if he didn't use gmail.
Re:gmail? (Score:5, Funny)
if it weren't for that meddling Google!
fixed
Re: (Score:2)
Someone set up a madeleinepulver.com site plastered with advertising, including Google ads of course.
Yet curiously it was a competing ad network which placed the advertisement "Live in the USA!" on top of photos of Madeleine Pulver, not Google. With all the data in gmail about this guy moving to the USA, surely Google should have been placing that ad?
PS. Site is now down, screenshot at http://i54.tinypic.com/2ducdvn.png [tinypic.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
viral marketing run amok (Score:2)
PITA (Score:2)
Finding a shell account in outer Mongolia is more work than it is worth. What are you going to get from an extortion gig? A couple mil? You couldn't drag me to outer Mongolia for less than 10. Well. Unless the alternative was inner Australia. :P
Re: (Score:2)
With the Jason Bourne thing... was I the only one sitting there the whole time thinking "c'mon man, put on some gloves, or a hat, or maybe a different color jacket"?
Re: (Score:3)
Bourne WAS wiping fingerprints down etc up until the midpoint of the first film. After the Clive Owen incident he stopped running and started taking the fight to them, after which he WANTS them to know exactly where he is and what he's doing most of the time, to fuck with them, basically.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Would that be a Bourne Shell or a Bourne Again Shell
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
A friend of mine, who lives in China, just visited Mongolia. The photographs on Facebook look interesting, but I haven't seen him since he went so I'm not sure what he thought of the trip.
You couldn't drag me to outer Mongolia for less than 10 [mil]
I'd visit if I lived closer. Maybe if a return flight was £500, rather than £1500.
Re: (Score:2)
It IS expensive isn't it?!? I hear it is well worth the money. I'm sure some the pics you've received are of the country side. in all seriousness it has a lot of beautiful country side views. There is a reason the Huns took their sweet time crossing it.
Re: (Score:2)
I'll take your word for it for the moment, but if or when I find out for certain myself, I'll let you know.
I'd do it - perfectly happily - for my usual fee of around a thousand (USD, post tax) per day. From what I've heard, Outer Mongolia is a pretty wild place, with some interestingly wild people there. Should be a fun job. At least as much fun as this months j
Not New (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So you're saying that Dexter wasn't accurate in that respect?
Oops.
How to get rid of a body. (Score:4, Informative)
Duct tape at Home Depot, Shovel at Sears, pay cash.
But what do you need a shovel for?
I can think of several alternatives:
- Drop of body in a location where there are bears and wolves.
- Open a manhole cover, drop down the body into the sewer system.
- Drop body from a bridge or into the sea. (a naked body showing up at the beach is not always conclusive to be a murder victim - especially during the summer.)
- Leave body in the desert.
- Locate a cement factory, throw body into the kiln. (this will definitely take care of all traces of a body)
- Build a special trailer which you mount the body under, drive on remote highway during dark hours lowering the trailer to slowly grind off the body against the highway. Traces of the body over several tens of miles. Do this right before a rain and the traces will get washed away. Burn the trailer afterward.
- Place body in derelict building, burn building.
- Use a considerable amount of explosives, blow the body into pieces.
- Butcher the body into unrecognizable pieces, leave pieces at local butcher. (don't eat sausage from that butcher for a while)
And always make sure that the body is completely naked - no clothes will make identification harder. DNA will still require something to match the body to, and to match a specific body to the large number of missing persons can be tough.
Re: (Score:2)
We need a new mod category: "Far Too Informative".
Re: (Score:2)
Better yet... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Anonymous clothes? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Where can I find a good, higher-quality Guy Fawkes mask? The ones I see online are just plastic shell molds that suck nuts.
Um (Score:5, Insightful)
But, this being Slashdot, everyone knew that already
Anyone with a gmail account should know it. You go to a few Google places while signed in it tells you your location. You don't need to be a geek or what passes for one on Slashdot. You only need to be awake.
Re: (Score:2)
So...the secure proxy in Hong Kong that changes all my default Google sites to google.com.hk? Considering I'm in the middle of the US I'd say I feel safe.
No one ever reads TFA... (Score:1)
And if you did, you'd get a nice treat! The victim has some DAMN first-class sweater meat!!!
What a sick freak! (Score:5, Insightful)
So he wasn't very technically savvy, and let's make fun of him for that. But Jesus F'innng Christ!!! He stuck a fake bomb collar around the neck of an eighteen year old girl to extort her parents. It took cops TEN HOURS to get that device off of her. Can you freaking imagine that ordeal? I would have shit my pants a few times already in that time span.
And not to be disrespectful or anything, but that girl is really pretty!
Re: (Score:2)
It wasn't a bomb, he had a crush on her and wanted to give her some high-tech jewelry!
Re: (Score:2)
10 hours to figure out it's a fake.
Well I guess trial/error was a bit risky.
Had this happen in Erie PA (Score:2)
Re:Had this happen in Erie PA (Score:5, Interesting)
The "poor guy" is believed to have been part of the gang that came up with the plan in the first place. He wasn't, however, expecting it to be a real bomb.
Brian Douglas Wells [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The guy was actually a conspirator in the plan, not an innocent bystander.
Wiki Brian Douglas Wells [wikipedia.org]
Cleveland Article [cleveland.com]
yup, saw that on america's most wanted (Score:2)
they had tv footage and everything
for awhile he was like "i'm going to blow up, i'm going to blow up". then towards then end he basically just gave up and accepted what was coming. pretty sad. the bomb squad was still being assembled: boom, right on the side of the road, surrounded by cops. i guess many thought it was a fake until then
thank god for hollywood, which had to turn it into a comedy >/sarcasm<
http://www.wired.com/underwire/2011/08/30-minutes-or-less-collar-bom/ [wired.com]
as a matter of timing, you won
Re: (Score:2)
He was an idiot for not having the foresight to be a pretty girl like Maddy Pulver.
Retribution (Score:3)
I guess one could say that he got collared!:)
Re: (Score:1)
*puts on sunglasses* Yeeeaaahhhhh!!!!!
Police report is pretty darn damning (Score:3)
Reading through the police report pdf the guy appears to be a complete moron. Using his own credit card, car, public internet spots surrounded by CCTV, wearing/keeping the same clothes. Not real smart if you ask me. "A lawyer for Mr Peters said his client would fight the charges against him." - Why bother even trying given the evidence? Save your money or whats left of it for buying your way out of inevitable ass-rapage in jail.
Re: (Score:2)
Why bother even trying given the evidence? Save your money or whats left of it for buying your way out of inevitable ass-rapage in jail.
Umm... paying a lawyer to argue against the evidence is exactly how you buy your way out of that.
Idiot (Score:1)
What an idiot. Where do these guys learn their techniques.
or, even better (Score:3)
if you are smart enough to run a successful extortion plot, you are also smart enough to make money honestly and jeopardy-free, and realize that's the better choice
i know, i know: there is always the common refrain that you don't hear about the smart criminals. that their invisibility is proof of their success. their invisibility could also be taken as proof of their nonexistence
not that smart criminals don't exist. i am certain there's some dude in french polynesia sunning himself right now with his ill-gotten gains from a perfect caper. but i believe this is the rarity. most people have hollywood-addled imaginations, and overestimate the number of the mysterious perfect criminal in this world
Re:or, even better (Score:5, Insightful)
Smart criminals exist. We call them politicians and executives.
Re: (Score:2)
Smart criminals exist. We call them politicians and executives.
But they're not criminals: they are acting according to the logic of the system in which they exist. They are rewarded for their behavior by social prominence and an abundance of wealth, not punished for it like a burglar both by social stigma and the prison. If we didn't live in a place that both culturally and economically encourages the behavior, people like that would appear to no longer exist; they would be the pariahs on the fringe, unknown to all but the few who are forced to interact with them (perh
Re:or, even better (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
And being a politician or an executive does not make one a criminal. Nelson Mandela: politician. Warren Buffet: executive.
It is more like abusive police. Not all police are abusive. But it is true that the idea of police work attracts certain people with the psychological need to assert dominance and violent physical power. Like the priesthood or the teaching profession appeals to pedophiles because of positions of trust and access to children.
Likewise, the profession of politician and executive does indeed
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:or, even better (Score:4, Insightful)
Given the copyright laws in most of the developed world, I'd say most Slashdotters are smart criminals...
Well, (Score:2)
It's worse than you think (Score:3, Insightful)
All these Hollywood films give the impression that a clever individual can, with anonymity, challenge the state, rob a bank, uncover corruption at the highest levels and so on. In practice it is already impossible to do any of those things. Yes, you can get your hands on explosives, guns, private data, information etc. and sure, you can send emails, make phone calls from a stolen mobile phone and so on, but there are so many logs these days that if the authorities want to track down who did it they can.
You cannot walk through London without being recorded on hundreds of CCTV systems. All mobile phone calls are logged by number and location. No vehicle on the UK motorway system goes unrecorded. Twitter, Google and Facebook all cooperate with the authorities and hold your data long after you believe that you have deleted it.
One person in the UK has just been given a 4 year jail sentence for encouraging rioting via his twitter account. Come the revolution the revolutionaries will be outsmarted and in jail.
Technology has tipped the balance heavily in favour of authority and you cannot do much about it, except wave banners around and chant, and to be honest that is just entertainment for the masses, column inches for the tabloids and will change nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
That will get the stupid ones who fail to use being tracked to their advantage instead of simply trying to avoid tracking.
The idea that people will only use cell phones and computers to communicate is nice for....conditioning most of them to do that....and conditioning the surveillance state to expect that and not look elsewhere.
Re: (Score:1)
First, this guy deserves the punishment he's about to get..
Second, tech used by the state isn't the big problem with "revolutionaries". The problem these "revolutionaries" have is that there is very little to revolt against. Minor injustices aren't worth overturning an entire system. Cutting state benefits, reducing university subsidies, etc.. BFD. You're complaining about a reduction in benefits, and your solution is to overturn the system so the benefits don't exist at all?
Fact is, the "revolutionaries" a
Re: (Score:2)
In 2008, a man set fire to the Texas Governor's Mansion with a molotov cocktail. The structure essentially burned to the ground. He had to jump a fence and walk across the mansion grounds to lob the bottle. It's all on video. Three years later, no one has been charged with the crime.
Video camera footage is pretty hit-and-miss, while hard data like IP addresses, license plate phot
Kudos to the Aussie Police (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I completely agree with this. A very clear cut case of murder by cop. They didn't even try to help the poor guy. They treated him as a terrorist to the bitter end.
And don't use GMail (Score:4, Interesting)
And don't use Google, who fed the IP information to the police.* That seems to be the key here; without an ability to link the GMail account to an IP address in the first place, they never would have found a physical location at which to look for a specific person or a car.
* GMail headers, last I checked, do not contain this information. Some webmail providers add an X-Originating-IP header, e.g. Hotmail, but Google doesn't.
Re: (Score:2)
Did Google just "feed" the information to the police? Or did they obtain a warrant from a judge to get them to reveal it?
Re: (Score:2)
Sure. My point wasn't to necessarily say that Google gave them the information proactively, but just to point out one glaring omission in the chain of events that led to the police finding this guy: That Google and their records made the connection between GMail and IP address.
Being a Slashdot reader, you and most of the other people here would probably say this is obvious. But for the thousands (millions?) of ordinary people who read the BBC article, if it had been explicitly mentioned that Google provided
Fallout 3 (Score:1)
A collar bomb? I think the perp played a little too much Fallout 3.
Outer Mongolia? (Score:1)
(like Jason Bourne does?) (Score:2)
RockDoctor,
Question marks mark questions. This is not a question. It's a statement. /. should have a requirement that you must have a better grasp of the English language than a fifth grader to post headlines. Or maybe hire an editor.
Re: (Score:2)
Explains why it took 10 hours to 'defuse' the thing.
"Barnes - the collar is around her neck. Not her chest".
"Er, yessir!"