MPEG LA Says 12 Parties Have Essential WebM Patents 136
suraj.sun tips this report from the H Online:
"The hopes that the VP8 codec at the heart of Google's open source WebM video standard would remain unchallenged in the patent arena are diminishing after the MPEG LA says 12 parties hold patents that its evaluators consider essential to the codec. ... No VP8 patent pool has been formed yet; the MPEG LA says it met with the patent holders in late June and is 'continuing to facilitate that discussion' but the decision to form a pool is up to the patent holders. ... Google responded to the MPEG LA's interview saying it is 'firmly committed to the project and establishing an open codec for HTML5 video' and noting the April launch of the WebM CCL, a community cross-licencing agreement for essential WebM related patents."
No mention of Apple? (Score:2, Informative)
Why no mention of Apple? Or Microsoft? They are both members of MPEG-LA [wikipedia.org], not to mention other sleazy organizations [wikipedia.org].
Re:New rule (Score:5, Informative)
You shouldn't be able to sit on it and wait for it to be more "lucrative" to sue.
I am not a lawyer, but I believe this is what you wished for; it's already part of the law.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laches_(equity) [wikipedia.org]
steveha