Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?
Censorship Facebook Government Social Networks Transportation United Kingdom Your Rights Online Politics

Facebook Helps Israel Blacklist Air Travellers 478

Jeremiah Cornelius writes "According to a report by the Associated Press, protesters have been stopped in their tracks after Facebook aided Israel in cracking down on the group of activists from the UK, France, and Belgium who planned their event using the popular social networking site. Facebook allowed government agents to track the activists activities and then create a black-list of people who participated in the planning of the protests. The black-listed group was then forwarded to airlines with instructions to prevent the activists from boarding air flights to Israel. Over 200 activists were prevented from flying after being added to the airlines terrorism watch list, according the the AP report. Was Julian Assange correct, when he warned that Facebook was a giant, 'appalling spy machine'?"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Facebook Helps Israel Blacklist Air Travellers

Comments Filter:
  • Not surprising (Score:5, Interesting)

    by NSN A392-99-964-5927 ( 1559367 ) on Sunday July 10, 2011 @05:35AM (#36709892) Homepage

    Anything to do with Facebook, Israel and super hidden government agents is going to be bad. For those who have not watched Pilger's film The War you Don't see []

    I know Julian and he is also quite right about facebook being an appalling spying machine. I loathe facebook with a passion, but there again I am a non-conformist, facebook is the sheep following sheep society and if that is not enough, people get emotionally blackmailed into using it. You do not need facebook, you need a life!

  • by DNS-and-BIND ( 461968 ) on Sunday July 10, 2011 @06:07AM (#36710006) Homepage

    Is a bunch of young Israeli lawyers working round the clock sustained only by Diet Coke, falafel and cigarettes about to pull off the legal equivalent of the Six-Day War? [] A really good link which you should read. Here is another. []

    The Israelis have learned from the last flotilla, and hacked international law to serve their ends. The law firm Shurat HaDin [] (motto: "Bankrupting Terrorism - One Lawsuit at a Time") has done a bang-up job worthy of admiration, even if you're one of those people who thinks (like Hamas, the recipient of the aid flotilla) that Israel has no right to exist. I really recommend reading the link above, it does a great job of laying out what exactly has been done. They wrote letters to the insurers of the boat, warning them that under international law they would be legally liable for the consequences of helping Hamas. They informed INMARSAT that continuing their service exposed the company to liability. And, most hilariously, the legendary Greek bureaucracy has helped tremendously. Once a complaint is filed and an investigation started, the Greeks aren't exactly known for efficiency. American government is a model of speed compared to this.

    Some more interesting facts: there is no pressing need for the aid flotilla. The last convoy actually succeeded in making the Israelis open up land borders and things are super in Gaza now. If the goal was to actually deliver aid, then the flotilla could dock in Egypt and have the goods delivered overland [], permission has already been granted. Of course, this offer was refused because that's not the goal of the flotilla. It exists only to remove Israel's legitimacy as an entity (in other words, the same goal as Hamas). Yeah, yeah, right, you don't believe me. OK, how about what Adam Shapiro, co-founder of the International Solidarity Movement and a board member of the Free Gaza Movement said at a speech at Rutgers (to enormous applause, by the way)

    Free Gaza is but one tactic of a larger strategy, to transform this conflict from one between Israel and the Palestinians, or Israel and the Arab one between the rest of the world and Israel.

    Nobody in the Free Gaza movement gives a shit about being a delivery boy for rice and cooking oil. Journalists should really listen when organizations state their goals in public, but who gives a shit when the facts don't fit the narrative. []

  • Re:Oh, big wow. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by sosume ( 680416 ) on Sunday July 10, 2011 @06:10AM (#36710016) Journal

    Seems to me like the Israelis have every right to decide who enters their country.

  • Umm, duh? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Tridus ( 79566 ) on Sunday July 10, 2011 @06:53AM (#36710162) Homepage

    You mean if you plan things in a publically accessable area on the Internet, other people might read it and plan accordingly?

    Are these people really stupid enough to think this would somehow work? I guess for their next act they'll discuss plans to eat & dash at a restraurant by yelling the plans to each other right outside the restraurant front door?

  • by Opportunist ( 166417 ) on Sunday July 10, 2011 @06:56AM (#36710182)

    Because assholes come in many colors and shapes, tying greed and general antisocial behaviour to a group of people (where its members didn't choose to be part of it) is kinda nonsensical.

    If I'm an asshole to people, I chose to be that way. I didn't choose the color of my skin or the origin, religion or culture of my parents.

  • Re:Oh, big wow. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 10, 2011 @07:04AM (#36710212)

    Most countries are made up of parts stolen in wars of conquest. Your point is?

  • by number11 ( 129686 ) on Sunday July 10, 2011 @11:09AM (#36711486)

    Except the people being targeted by Israel using Facebook are not terrorists. They are political activists seeking to engage in non-violent protest.

    A "terrorist" is anyone that any government says is a terrorist. It's arbitrary. There cannot be any objective definition, because such a definition would include groups supported by the same governments (this applies to the US, Israel, France, and probably most other governments). "Terrorist", like "regime", is a word with great emotional content but little objective content. It applies to those a government disapproves of, but not those who it counts as friends or minions.

Nondeterminism means never having to say you are wrong.