US Military Commissions Sock Puppet Program 217
chrb writes "The Guardian and The Telegraph are reporting that US based Ntrepid Corporation has been awarded a $2.76 million contract to develop software aimed at manipulating social media. The project aims to enable military personnel to control multiple 'sock puppets' located at a range of geographically diverse IP addresses, with the aim of spreading pro-US propaganda. The project will not target English speaking web sites (yet) but will be limited to foreign languages, including Arabic, Farsi, Urdu and Pashto. The project will be funded as part of the $200 million Operation Earnest Voice program run by US Central Command."
I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlords (Score:2)
Oh, wait... that didn't come out right.
Re: (Score:3)
Cappp...translate this into Farsi when you get a chance please.
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:4, Insightful)
Pro-USA propaganda is already planted in Iraqi news papers, this is a logical step. It's also despicable. Especially when the same government denounces these tactics when used by "the enemy".
Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The Bible does record the genocide of the Canaanites at the hand of the diety-led ancient Hebrews. I believe the people of Ai also got wiped out.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
No. He either was God, or he rode a bicycle.
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:4, Interesting)
As distasteful as it is, this is hardly a new thing. Pretty much everyone in history has done this to some degree. The only real "news" is that a new mechanism is going into place, but the machinery has been there all along.
I agree. And yet, when I say that the US population is massively propagandized by its government, I get called a conspiracy theorist. I know the program in question is aimed at only foreigners, but we know how that can go don't we? I once heard that the difference between Soviet and American propaganda was that the Soviet people recognized it for what it was; the Americans, not so much.
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:5, Funny)
Now..wouldn't any pro-USA comments on any ME message board or whatever now be suspected of being a sockpuppet?
I guess we now have a new meme: On the internet...
All the men are men
All the women are men
All the kids are FBI agents
And...all the pro-USA guys in foreign forums are CIA agents.
Re: (Score:3)
Knowing it exists, will not tell you what is and isn't tainted with propaganda. For this reason, I don't think they are going to lose all that much sleep over the big secret getting out.
Embarrassing? Well maybe a little, but remember this is the same nation that had a pretty damning video of a helicopter attack on civilian targets go public, and there was disturbingly little backlash from the public all things considered.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, all the anti-USA guys on foreign forums are CIA agents. Otherwise, how do you attract potential anti-USA suitors?
Re: (Score:2)
Having said this, propaganda is easy to believe when life is working out for you. When you are dirt poor and only have left shoes because the factory that makes right shoes is broken down, you stop believing the bullshit. In the modern US, people are realizing that the lack of healthcare,
everything's all Jamais vu all over again (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because people with power commonly do something bad, doesn't make it not bad.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Yet you're perfectly happy to pay for a newspaper laden with dishonest advertisements and astroturf articles. What gives?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You can opt out of the newspaper market, I certainly have. Can't easily opt out of tax paying.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, but if they decide you're renouncing your citizenship to avoid paying taxes, then you can't.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, people are always saying they want the government "run like a business". Well, friend, "business" has been doing this sockpuppet thing for years. Go look at the web site for "New Media Strategies", the company that provides sock puppets for the Koch Brothers, among others. That's their entire business model - providing sock puppets for businesses.
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:5, Informative)
The technical term for the whole process run by the rich to sway decision-makers is "astroturfing," because they're creating an artificial grass-roots effort. Sock puppetry is only one tool in their toolbox.
Nicky Hager's book Secrets and Lies [amazon.com], has terrific detail on how such a campaign is run, documenting the New Zealand timber industry's bought-and-paid-for efforts to run roughshod over the environmentalists in order to log the islands.
Of course it's a business (Score:2, Interesting)
Judge by their actions, not their words. Looking at history, the primary goal of government is growth -- expanding their business slowly but surely for the elite few who can exploit it. And it shows. The US government of today absolutely dwarfs the US government of only 50, let alone 100 years ago, both in revenue and power over the people. Every year government spends more, borrows more, and seizes more power over the people -- which will be leveraged as precedent for the next expansion of revenue and/or p
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
A recession means GDP is shrinking, which means revenue shrinks (especially when you're giving tax benefits to the richest group. That would make the percentage of GDP used by government increase temporarily. "Spending as a percentage of GDP" is a very misleading measurement.
You'll notice that currently we are not at the highest level of "government spendi
Are you paying US taxes? (Score:2, Funny)
An American would not spell "dishonorable" the way you did.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Pro-USA propaganda is already planted in Iraqi news papers, this is a logical step. It's also despicable. Especially when the same government denounces these tactics when used by "the enemy".
Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.
Ever heard of Voice of America [wikipedia.org] ? Same thing, different media. These aren't subliminal messages [wikipedia.org], it's propaganda created to directly counter propaganda of those who would seek to continue doing harm in any form, not necessarily just against the United States but also against the interest of humanity - think Gadhaffi for a current example. Having a problem with this is just Naiveté on your part.
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
VoA? The CIA-controlled pieces of shit that flooded the airwaves with official support messages for the Prague Spring and the Basra Uprising, only to then decry the resulting slaughters of innocents?
The same VoA that was infiltrated by the KGB and the GRU, resulting in the death and imprisonment for dissidents who wrote letters to be published there? The VoA that is now illegally broadcast in the US and territories and on the Internet, in direct violation of laws stating that no military propaganda operatio
Re: (Score:2)
You sound like a sock puppet.
Re: (Score:2)
Why, yes, I was impersonating a lapping-dog lackey of the morally corrupt Jihadist mullahs! I congratulate you for your sagacity, citizen! No need to report for voluntary relocation, for now.
Re: (Score:2)
So you're saying that 9/11 was just tit for tat response to the CIA's meddling in Afghanistan?
Come on man. Your argument sucks.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:4, Interesting)
Are you sure you have an idea what the term "propaganda" means? For a start, it doesn't imply any commitment to truth...
There is nothing to object to propaganda that is clearly marked as such (see above comments about "Voice of America"), but if it comes in disguise then it is, of course, dishonorable.
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:5, Insightful)
Why is it dishonorable if the stories are true? People do not understand that propaganda does not have to be lies and frankly the best propaganda is the truth.
Re: (Score:2)
People do not understand that propaganda does not have to be lies and frankly the best propaganda is the truth.
It's hard to see how undermining social media with thousands of fake personalities can result in a very honest and truthful endeavor...
Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord (Score:4, Insightful)
Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.
Considering you spell dishonorable with a 'u', I assume it actually isn't with your taxes.
Re: (Score:2)
Did someone hack your account? You're making sense!
Re: (Score:2)
I, for one, am one of your new sock puppet overlords.
Unbellythinkful (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Unbellythinkful (Score:4, Funny)
What would you want it to be called? "Operation Naked Truth"?
Re:Unbellythinkful (Score:4, Funny)
Operation 15/f/Kabul ;-)
Re: (Score:2)
I think you are mistaken. It's operation Kunduz Kandy [cbsnews.com] you're probably thinking of.
Re: (Score:2)
What would you want it to be called? "Operation Naked Truth"?
Operation "Rough Penetration" might describe its intended relationship with the truth (bend over and spread 'em, citizen).
Plusgoodwise bellythinkful, verging bumthinkful. Approved fullwise.
Re: (Score:2)
I vote for "Operation Inconvenient Truth". That would clearly mark it as a propaganda machine.
Re: (Score:2)
What would you want it to be called? "Operation Naked Truth"?
Operation Kafka.
Re:Unbellythinkful (Score:5, Insightful)
Really, calling propaganda "Operation Earnest Voice"? I think a few braincells just exploded.
Actually, the name is perfect, since the name is also propaganda.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Truthful is orthogonal to propaganda.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/propaganda [merriam-webster.com]
2 : the spreading of ideas, information, or rumor for the purpose of helping or injuring an institution, a cause, or a person
3 : ideas, facts, or allegations spread deliberately to further one's cause or to damage an opposing cause; also : a public action having such an effect
Note that it doesn't say that the propaganda is necessarily lies. Ideas, allegations, and rumors may be either true or false; information and facts specifically imply that they're true (though they may still not show the whole picture, or both sides of the coin).
Many propagandists in fact believe that what they are saying is the truth. And even if something *is* the truth, it doesn't mean it isn't also propaganda.
Secret op? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
The operational secrecy seems un-compromised. It's not like someone provided Jihadi forum admins with a banhammer target list. I AM glad this has been exposed, mind you.
I happen to live outside the US, you see, so I really do not appreciate the thought that the US military might be taking an active, covert role in my country's political and social dialogue.
Re: (Score:2)
"I really do not appreciate the thought that the US military might be taking an active, covert role in my country's political and social dialogue."
Glad you could join us; Welcome to the world as it has been for the last 50 years..
Re: (Score:2)
Direct US influence was not all that extensive in my country for at least 30 of the past 50 years, what with the Iron Curtain and everything.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean 25 of the last 50 years, right? We are at 2011. Also, I still doubt the US didn't have a big influence behind the Iron Curtain.
Re: (Score:2)
I mean what I say. We were deep within Moscow's sphere of influence for a while after 1990. Some neighboring countries and territories still are.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are lots of secret programs too. One reason they're not all secret is a lot of the people who work on these kinds of projects aren't qualified for high clearances, on account of being recent immigrants.
Earnest... (Score:3)
"The project will be funded as part of the $200 million Operation Earnest Voice program run by US Central Command."
This word you are using... I do not think it means what you think it means.
OK for furriners (Score:2, Insightful)
Another case of the US feeling that it is perfectly acceptable to treat foreigners in a way that would bring outrage if it tried it on its own citizens. Such things started, and were found acceptable: in cases of outright declared war (World Wars, Korea, Vietnam), it is OK to deceive and manipulate enemy civilians. But that has been translated to being OK to do the same to all except strong allies - and it would be a small step to apply it to them. The philosophy has become that war justifies lethal force,
Re: (Score:2)
Another case of the US feeling that it is perfectly acceptable to treat foreigners in a way that would bring outrage if it tried it on its own citizens.
Waddaya mean, "if it tried it"? There's tons of propaganda from the US government aimed at US citizens, from the most obvious (e.g. White House news briefings) to the not-so-obvious (e.g. describing generals on Pentagon payroll as "independent analysts" who just happen to have a pro-war viewpoint), to the downright illegal (e.g. agents provocateur to start violence in otherwise peaceful protests).
Re: (Score:2)
You mean the US government thinks it is unaccetable to apply that to their citizens?! That is news to me.
Also, read a bit of wikileaks if you can. Those you think are chinese's sock-puppets are in fact Saudi Arabia's sock-puppets. (They probably have some other overlords too, but it is not clear yet.)
Re: (Score:2)
The US has been subjected to this for a very long time. Having a "open" society certainly allows propaganda of all sorts to florish.
The KGB had long running programs to "introduce the brighter side of the USSR to Americans". Before that, the NKVD has that program.
I would certainly call anything published by NAMBLA and the Church of Scientology to be "propaganda". Anything at all. Both of these organizations are US-based. And the people that are suckered into believing their message are probably harmed
They probably don't have to pay for it (Score:2)
I think they don't have to bother all that much.
For a start, you can always play the "patriotism", "supporting the troops", "if you have nothing to hide", etc, cards and have idiots chest thump for your side of the story just to not, God forbid, come across as unpatriotic. Groupthink at its finest, really.
Or to quote Hermann Goering, "Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that
PROTIP: If you can understand the program name.. (Score:3, Insightful)
MKUltra: WTF
Operation Overlord / Neptune: WTF
Operation Iraqi Freedom: propaganda
Re: (Score:2)
Here come the "slippery slope" arguments. (Score:2, Insightful)
This is a good idea! (Score:2)
And bully for the good old US of A, the bastion of democracy and goodness, for coming up with it!
I, and all of my attractive, intelligent and clever friends agree with this! You should agree as well!
Re: (Score:3)
And bully for the good old US of A, the bastion of democracy and goodness, for coming up with it!
I, and all of my attractive, intelligent and clever friends agree with this! You should agree as well!
Absolutely. Let us all lay down our arms, convert to Christianity and promise to uphold copyright law.
Re: (Score:2)
And software patents. Don't forget the software patents.
On a side note, Obama will is visiting my country today. It's creepy.
Re: (Score:2)
If you're anti-american... (Score:2)
So when should we expect sock puppets here? (Score:2)
Re:So when should we expect sock puppets here? (Score:4, Funny)
Nah, the military is way too busy defending our freedoms and improving the world we live in to spend time posting on Slashdot!
(This message brought to you by the US military)
The project will not target (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The project will not target English language web sites.
Well that's me avoiding Lolcatz from now on.
I haz invadid ur cuntree and set u up da bom!
Budget problems? What budget problems? (Score:5, Insightful)
There's $200 million that should come directly out of the defense budget.
I know that this kind of shit can be done. I know that it could be useful to "win".
But jesus fraggin' christ... do we have to go there first? Do we have to piss on our own credibility at every turn?
Re: (Score:2)
$200 million is dirt cheap. If this can prevent, even a very small amount of US military action, it's way more than worth it.
Re: (Score:2)
Congress will put a stop to this. (Score:2)
Congress will do its best to put a stop to this...
as soon as the cheques from Facebook and News Corp clear.
Let's be fair (Score:3)
Considering the source, I think it's fair to assume that this news has an anti-military slant.
Also, could this be considered "counter propaganda?" A lot of people get a lot of misinformation about the USA, often from official sources. There is no way for the US to defend itself in the government controlled media of those countries.
I like this sort of action a lot better than dropping bombs, or rolling tanks.
Is this like "Radio Free Europe?" (Score:2)
RFE/RL's mission is to promote democratic values and institutions by reporting the news in countries where a free press is banned by the government or not fully established. Our journalists provide what many people cannot get locally: uncensored news, responsible discussion, and open debate.
Based on the conviction that the first requirement of democracy is a well informed citizenry, and building on over a half-century of surrogate broadcasting:
1. RFE/RL provides objective news, analysis, and discussion of d
Re: (Score:2)
All good but propaganda non the less. The stories are all designed to make the US look good. Although it does provide a more balance reporting of stories into those territories that are not getting the stories because of controlled media. But then this is controlled media too. We should have something like that coming from other countries into our back yard to hold a mirror up to some of what the rest of the world sees that our country is doing at home and abroad.
Decade (Score:2)
This has been going on for at least a decade. I had a floormate in college that used to get drunk and brag about monitoring chatrooms for a private contractor.
Arm the people,requires allowing anonymous posting (Score:2)
The US constituition is founded on the belief that the populace is allowed to bear arms. The government/army has now declared that anonymous accounts are a valuable military asset.
This would seem to indicate that US second amendment rights should apply to anonymous posting.
I await the following legal battle especially given the legislative branches move to prohibit anonymous on line presence.
The end justifies the means? (Score:2)
This is what we railed against with the godless Communists. Now with the neo-conservatives, they are bringing their business practices into the government and law enforcement realms. Look at Abu Grab, the recent Psy-Op's scandel from Afganistan. etc.
Actually they could pick up some tips from the law enforment departments that have been trying to trap people online by posing as underaged children that want to go have sex with them. I think we are veering away from some basic core principals that used to ma
Funny (Score:2)
This is right below a story about Microsoft investing a huge amount of resources to stop spam...
What could possibly go wrong? (Score:2)
This will come back and bite... (Score:2)
Um. I think I found a program to cut (Score:2)
Lordy, this program is all about social (media) programs. Cut it, cut it, cut it.
Bachmann, you are a self-described cutter. Cut it. Come on, cut, cut, cut.
Maybe once we see Glen Beck crying about this on Fox the patriot citizenry will kill this outrageous social program.
.
Re: (Score:2)
What are you talking about? Facebook is the Internet.
Re: (Score:3)
Even though I was joking, I can't believe I just said that. You can ostracize me now.
Re: (Score:3)
When I say I'm watching T.V. my friends call me a bullshitter... I never watch TV.
When I say I'm watching T.V., I'm sitting in the living room staring at the giant black monolith, staring carefully. You can never be too safe, those things are dangerous. It hasn't been plugged in since I go it, the last thing you want to do is give those damn things POWER. The sad thing is no one believes me either... my girl friend left me, I can hear my cats chitter with contempt and amusement... But I will continue my vigil, for the good of the humane and just society.
I'm a hero. A hero damnit.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is just some natural cultural antagonism, particually with the more strictly Islamic countries.
Not really.
For instance, watch Jason Jones's reporting on Iran in his Behind the Veil series (yes, I realize this was done for the Daily Show, but it was some pretty good serious reporting, just done in a semi-silly way). You find out pretty quickly that average Iranian likes Americans, and like and use many American products. What they're not so keen on is American military forces building up on both sides of their country with American political leaders regularly threatening to bomb their country into obl
Re: (Score:2)
Hey Vern, how ya doin? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Which probably explains... (Score:2)
... why your mom never was put on the candidates list by any party, much less elected, huh?