Big Brother Friends Facebook 82
storagedude writes "Clara Shih, who created the first business app on Facebook in 2007, is back with a new venture: Hearsay Social, which makes Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn more palatable to corporations by adding features like SEC and FINRA monitoring and compliance and analytics. Conversations are monitored around the clock, regardless of where employees access pages from — work, home or mobile — and workflow tools let companies approve or suggest content before it appears. Those features appear to be making financial companies a little more comfortable Facebooking, as State Farm and Farmers Insurance are two early customers. Shih is backed in the new venture by veterans of Facebook, Twitter and YouTube."
Oh Yeah... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Oh Yeah... (Score:4, Interesting)
Employees are expected, while on the clock, to present a positive image of the man paying them cash.
Conversations are monitored around the clock, regardless of where employees access pages from — work, home or mobile —
And now while off the clock, apparently.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Oh Yeah... (Score:4, Informative)
They monitor your posts to the *company* Facebook page 24/7. If you post to the company page on your off-time, they still want to make sure that you're not posting stuff they don't want to see on the company page. At a guess it works like this: No human has write access to the company Facebook page, the password is kept secret. Instead you login to the service's page, and compose your post. When you hit "submit" rather than going to Facebook, it goes into a queue to be reviewed. Probably their are a number of people who can review and approve posts. When one of them (or some percentage of them, or if you're really paranoid, all of them) approve the post the software then posts it to Facebook.
Chats could have a similar setup, but with less of an "approve/disapprove" option and more "I can interrupt or take over your session if needed through the proxy". I'm betting Kenneth Cole wishes they'd had something like this about now...
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks for clarifying. That makes a lot of sense and seems a whole lot less big-brother than the summary or my (admittedly brief) skimming of the article seem to suggest.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Indentured servitude. The bedrock upon which America was built.
Re: (Score:1)
I don't see how a company can monitor my home or phone internet & postings, if they have not installed software on those machines? Hmmm.
I guess I just need to use anonymous IDs from now on (or at least until the government makes that illegal).
Re:Oh Yeah... (Score:5, Insightful)
Aha, you're talking about the mathematically undemocratic "vote with your wallet" thing, where the more money you have, the more votes you get?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Ahhh. There's no way you can prevent government power from being abused by those with money. It's impossible. The solution is to stop expanding government power, not to expand it even further in some attempt to stop such abuses.
But even with smaller/more limited government power, what's to stop those with money from abusing the power the government does have?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Like in the good old 19th century.
Re: (Score:1)
... Employees are expected, while on the clock, to present a positive image of the man paying them cash.
Which of course is institutionalized lying, sometimes.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
No. The "free" in free market actually refers to the right of the customer to exercise his/her Pro-choice decision of which company they want to deal with (or not).
For example I chose to exercise my freedom to boycott Comcast TV when they raised their prices from $30 to $70/month and give my money to hulu.com instead.
Wrong summary? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Check out Hearsay's Facebook page, where they discuss exactly those three things: http://www.facebook.com/hearsaysocial [facebook.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Damn, the link is blocked at work!
Re: (Score:1)
easy:
There you see:
Eliminate compliance concerns with foolproof FINRA and SEC regulation monitoring. Conversations are 100% monitored and archived with no downtime, whether reps access local pages from work, home, or on the go.
Re:Wrong summary? (Score:4, Interesting)
Shih said the service is particularly well-suited to companies that have franchises and branch offices that want to provide a local flavor to their Facebook content, but also must comply with corporate rules and leverage content from corporate and other users in the system.
In other words, they get to approve all comments made on not only their facebook page, but any of their local franchises, or the local users of those franchises. So if I go to my local McDonalds and get crappy service and decided to later post that on the local McDonalds facebook page, the corporate office AND the local franchise would have to approve my message before it was displayed for others to see.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
My corporate blacklist keeps growing:
ADD:
State Farm
Farmers Insurance
REMOVE:
Google (under new management)
Re: (Score:2)
I don't see where they talk about monitoring customer comments and the like. They're monitoring *employee* comments to the *corporate* website. WTF is the problem here? I own a company. I setup a company Facebook page. I'd like to make sure that my employees do not post illegal or damaging information on my company Facebook page. I can't stop you form making negative comments on your personal page (I could conceivably fire you if I found them, but that could happen anyway). I can't monitor customer c
Let me guess... (Score:3)
State Farm and Farmers Insurance are two early customers
The biggest incentive was the presence of FarmVille as new market niche, but until know not enough support for the employees to create a coherent sale pitch for this segment. Now, this is possible... loud an clear... mooo!
Re: (Score:2)
Excellent... I can't wait to buy insurance on my virtual tractor and fake crops in FarmVille.
Can I get drive-by insurance in Mafia Wars as well? :)
Multiple facebook profiles (Score:2)
Employees will just create multiple profiles. Idiot companies can monitor the public one, while the alter egos come out and play at night.
Stop trying to monetise, captilalise and otherwise sodomise both social networks and your employees and return to a culture where performance is rewarded instead of babysitting braindead employees.
Re:Multiple facebook profiles (Score:4, Insightful)
That's the whole idea. You don't want you sales rep using their personal facebook page for your marketing and mixing it in with their drunken adventures in Bangkok. You want them to use a facebook profile just for their work - but now you run into compliance issues since what they say is clearly said as part of your company.
And the sales rep likely doesn't want to have all their annoying as shit clients as friends on their personal facebook page either. So win-win.
Personal e-mail too? (Score:5, Insightful)
I would also like to thank my boss, Mr. Smith, for allowing me to post this message to
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
"If we all could balance pursuit of immediate monetary/emotional gain with other concerns, there wouldn't /be/ corporate overlords."
That might have true seventy years ago when the public was more spread out and independent and law wasn't written to support corporations outright but it's not so much now. People have moved to the cities that just can't function without corporate support(privatisation). We're largely dependent on corporations now, need examples: fcc net neutrality decision, all the various cor
Re: (Score:3)
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
I was always under the impression that Big Brother was a repressive Government.. and didn't have anything to do with corporations anyway.. and I believe the US Government [youtube.com] has already [time.com] embraced [ohmygov.com] social [facebook.com] media [twitter.com].
I don't understand companies on Facebook (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I'm someone who's only been to Facebook a few times, due to Google searches taking me there. I understand that it's a social site for people to post information about themselves and communicate with friends who use the service. I don't understand it when I see a product saying "Come visit us on Facebook!". Is this just a glorified web page? Why not just put up a website for your company, and let people link to it? Maybe it's like software APIs or something, where the company's Facebook page is a sort of wrapper that makes their interface match that of other Facebook users?
Its all about communicating with customers, and getting new ones. If you can get a customers to friend you what you post shows up on their wall and when
they friend you it shows up to all their friends. So the idea is very simple, get a bunch of people to friend you, send content out them and then get them to bring in
their friends.
Honestly with the size facebook is I would be worried about any company that was *NOT* on facebook.
Re:I don't understand companies on Facebook (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
This is true. I work for a marketing agency and leveraging facebook user data is of utmost importance to our clients. You can take some comfort in knowing that our clients don't know what to do with that data once they get it. They have a database somewhere that says you like Miller High Life, and carrots. Some execs pat themselves on the back for gathering this data, then they forget about it.
Honestly, what we have observed time and time again is if a company uses their facebook page to actually engage the
Re: (Score:2)
"Honestly with the size facebook is I would be worried about any company that was *NOT* on facebook."
Did they close their Second Life and Myspace account first?
Re: (Score:3)
Companies like it, because it is a platform for exposure to a _lot_ of people, with a minority of companies using it as a web presence.
Users like it, because it's a central hub for various services: status updates, friend connections, image hosting, music liking, video sharing, relationship statuses... just what lusers gravitate towards.
Its problematic, for example, to the point where I can't find out whats happening around my city anymore, without resorting to FB (I don't most of the time). We need FB to s
Re: (Score:2)
I have a hard time understanding why large companies do it, in spite of what the other posters' answers to you.
What I do get is that for SMALL companies, FB is a very affordable way to host a site and be guaranteed a lively guestbook. Compare that to how IT costs go up when you have entire GUIs to design, maintenance, downtime SLAs, databases to user-populate/de-spamify and so on... no wonder even some large companies that have done all that on their own end up burdenening their potential watchers with ads
And it's full of FAIL (Score:2)
You can, like I do, create TWO profiles. one that is my professional profile, and one that is my private profile. my private profile does not have my name or any of my real info linked to it, and it is kept separate completely, I'm not even a friend of myself!
And if I wanted to out my company for doing bad things, I'd create a third unconnected account to oust them on. So this system they are making is only good for getting the stupid people, and give corporations a "nice fuzzy feeling"(tm) they get when
Re: (Score:2)
I expect thats what most companies want, one profile that has your family and college buddies and one that has you friended to work people. You do work stuff from
the work profile. I think that what we do for those people at my office who are on facebook for customer relations.
Re: (Score:2)
I did this myself, and somehow facebook connected the dots because it keeps recommended that I friend myself.
The Real Big Brother(tm) (Score:2)
The Real Big Brother(tm) checked into Facebook a long long time ago. They signed in as "Accel Partners investment group".. *walks away casually*
Not Big Brother - just another provocative summary (Score:3)
Before you all jump on the bandwagon, this is about monitoring and being involved in the workflow of company accounts, not controlling what employees say on their personal accounts. I cannot see anything bad about this and in fact when I first saw it yesterday I thought it was a nice business idea.
Effectively it is for companies with local branches (like a franchise) where head office wants some control over the official social media accounts of their sub-branches or franchisees. It means branches can run their own social media marketing, but head office can be involved in the workflow to ensure it fits in with corporate policy and marketing.
I'm sure its open to abuse, but what isn't?
Split Personality (Score:2)
I love the split personality of Slashdot.
Company accused of insider trading – claims it will take months to recover the e-mail. The tragedy!
Company wants to monitor employee’s conversations to monitor of insider trading [and because the SEC, FINRA says those records must be kept for 7 years.].and is lambasted.
Talk about a double standard.
I know a couple of brokers who would like to use social media to keep in contract with their employers but can’t. Now, I am troubled that because everythi
Ok, so now... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Are you big or small?
Throw a seminar every 6 weeks or so. A little coffee, some cookies, a little FUD – which is easy with the current tax code. Hey – in 2 years you are going to need to report every transaction over $200 to the IRS. Changing rules on your car. Etc. By the way, if you keep receipts we will do the heavy lifting.
Draw in new customers, retain old customers. Network with stock brokers, estate lawyers, print shops, etc. Accounting firms is a weird combination of 1. application of kno
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You could pitch a marketing scheme based on facebook questions.
God, save me... (Score:1)
...from ever having to work at places like those.
Alabama for everyone else? (Score:2)
Yes, I know my state sucks in a lot of ways, but I have a bad feeling I didn't get the memo about how it's sucked lately.
Re: (Score:1)
Recent Slashdot article: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/11/02/03/2116249/Anniston-Alabama-To-Censor-Employees-Facebook-Pages [slashdot.org]
Success. (Score:2)
Makes Facebook... more palatable to corporations. (Score:2)
Now if only someone could make it more palatable to me.
And in a related note, given all the current buzz about The Social Network cleaning up at the Oscars, am I the only one around who thinks that movie completely sucks ass?