Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Government Your Rights Online Politics

Vint Cerf, US Congresswoman Oppose Net Regulation 156

schliz writes "Vint Cerf, Google, ICANN and California Congresswoman Mary Bono Mack have opposed a recently revealed UN initiative to regulate the internet. Congresswoman Mack put forward a US resolution that the United Nations and other international governmental organisations maintain a 'hands-off approach' to the internet, arguing that 'the internet has progressed and thrived precisely because it has not been subjected to the suffocating effect of a governmental organization's heavy hand.' Meanwhile, the so-called 'father of the internet,' Vint Cerf, called on stakeholders to sign a petition to mobilize opposition of the UN's plan. 'Today, I have signed that petition on Google's behalf because we don't believe governments should be allowed to grant themselves a monopoly on Internet governance,' said Cerf, who is also Google's chief internet lobbyist."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Vint Cerf, US Congresswoman Oppose Net Regulation

Comments Filter:
  • Comment removed (Score:4, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Monday December 20, 2010 @09:45AM (#34614800)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by julesh ( 229690 ) on Monday December 20, 2010 @10:18AM (#34615032)

    Mohammed was a pedophile even by the standards of his day (marrying and deflowering a 9 year old was considered deviant even back then, as 9 was not a common marriage age for girls).

    Somewhat offtopic, but: you should be aware that the truth of this statement is disputed; some scholars suggest that she was 9 when she was betrothed to him, and approximately 14 when the marriage was consummated, which was considered perfectly acceptable at the time. That said, the majority of older sources do agree with the way you put it, so we could just be looking at a movement to whitewash his history.

  • Re:Nope. (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Haedrian ( 1676506 ) on Monday December 20, 2010 @10:23AM (#34615080)

    I'm not saying what Amazon did was illegal. I'm saying that someone has the ability to pull the plug out already. So saying "lets stay out and leave the internet free for everyone" is ineffective and counter-intuitive.

    If we don't want governments messing in our internet because they can:

    1. Remove sites
    2. Throttle certain speeds
    3. Add silly 'balancing' methods

    Then tough luck because its already perfectally legal for a company to do that. And I THINK I trust a government more than a company.

To program is to be.

Working...