Google Resolves Gmail Name Dispute In UK 48
united_notions writes "Slashdot has previously reported the legal challenges over the Gmail brand in Europe. Now, the BBC reports that UK users can finally register @gmail.com addresses — and existing @googlemail.com users can switch to @gmail.com too. Google has put up a page describing the change."
Oh great! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
I doubt it. I live in the UK and I set my sister up with a gmail account 6 months ago when she was changing ISPs, she asked me if she could use @gmail.com instead of @googlemail.com , so I tested it and the @gmail variant worked fine then. So although they would only let you register for @googlemail.com they sent any email addressed to @gmail.com to your inbox anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
\s\googlemail\gmail (Score:2)
I thought that googlemail would automatically change to gmail. At least that is how I remember it, unless I mmisunderstood the summary...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Other business... (Score:4, Informative)
almost all of that can be accomplished using advanced search
Re: (Score:2)
Apparently so. Try clicking on the "Show Search Options" link by the GMail search box as that lets you limit your search to everything on your list except for the last one about attachments, also look at the help topic for "Searching" as there is also an extensive set of search keywords to further control what matches the search criteria.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
1) looks fine to me
2) just add restrictions to your search
after:2010/03/01
before:2010/03/01
from:Alice
label:work
has:attachment
etc.
http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=7190 [google.com]
You got me wrong! (Score:2)
I knew those options were available but what I missed was to ask Google to automatically sort those found messages for me. This way, my memory can be triggered in case I have 900 results as I said.
Sometimes you know something exists but cannot remember until you see something else. This is what I was talking about. It happened to me recently. My search term was "details" and Gmail returned 311 messages. I also knew that the attachment this message had was in 'tiff' format.
With my suggested approach, a messa
Re: (Score:2)
I see what you're saying now. Could be a useful feature, I suppose.
Re: (Score:1)
"this name change will save approximately 60 mill" (Score:2, Interesting)
Gmail users aren't the sort to type out full e-mail addresses, or even know what they are.
While we're at MPAA-piracy-style stats to pretend they care about their users, think of how many billions of keystrokes and/or bytes of bandwidth could be saved if Google advertised the gogle.com misspelling it owns!
Re: (Score:2)
mods: it is an abuse of moderation to overrate an unmoderated post. If you disagree, debate it.
Re: (Score:1)
Dodgy maths... (Score:2)
FTA: "Since 'gmail' is 50% fewer characters than 'googlemail' we estimate this name change will save approximately 60 million keystrokes a day," wrote software engineer Greg Bullock on Google's Gmail blog.
OK, so that's 5 characters less. So he claims that 12 million gmail addresses are manually typed per day?
I find that hard to believe. Surely most addresses are cut & pasted, or automatically included as a reply, or from an address book lookup?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Think signing into facebook or myspace.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
1. Activate 'master password' option in firefox
2. Store 'trivial' passwords (facebook..) in ff
Re: (Score:2)
I don't use either, but surely you can copy and paste like everywhere else?
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Dodgy maths... (Score:5, Informative)
P.S. I like the idea of measuring energy use in bonbons.
Re: (Score:2)
I like the idea of measuring energy use in bonbons.
Indeed binge eating actually is power!!! (Measured in bonbons per second.)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I prefer using Horses per Submarine as my units.
Anything else is just pandering to the SI crowd!
Re: (Score:2)
Collateral Damage (Score:1)
Aww (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
@gmail.com has always worked anyway... (Score:1)
I've had an @googlemail.co.uk address for a long while, and if you sent mail to youraddress@gmail.com instead of youraddress@googlemail.co.uk you always ended up receiving the mail fine.
The only difference for UK people wishing to 'convert' their email address to @gmail.com is what's displayed on the gmail.com site when you log in.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
and what appears in the From: field when you send emails out to people using the web interface.
Causes problems with Android (Score:4, Interesting)
I made the change this morning, and I've just had to switch back due to issues I've had with my android phone. Switching to gmail.com causes numerous logins to fail because they attempt to do so using the googlemail.com login and are instead rejected. Changing the username on my phone involves resetting many of the default options and having to restore a load of data on it manually, so the best option was switching back to googlemail.com.
This isn't a problem for me, but just a heads up for those using android. Receiving mail using the gmail.com extension still works with the googlemail.com setting, I'm just unsure if you can send from a gmail.com login if you haven't made the switch.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
The other way round for me. I registered my Android in the UK to a new gmail address last summer. All fine until the last couple of weeks, when Google seemed to be aggressively editing my login to googlemail on my desktop -- not helpful for those apps which sync to the cloud. Fortunately I didn't run into obvious problems on the phone itself.
So today I have had to positively fix that account back to gmail, whereas the old, old account I use for Reader has stayed gmail throughout. But I made a new one abou
Europe != UK (Score:2)
I've had my Gmail account for ages now (I'm located in the Netherlands) so it's very probably just an issue within the UK. Even then you can probably get around it using a proxy when registering. I do believe that most people here will know where the UK is located. So why the "legal challenges in Europe" thing? It's certainly nowhere in the main article. Or is "united_notions" holding back?
good for them (Score:2)
1)settle out of court
2) profit
3) stocks rise
4) profit again