Woman Tells State Judiciary Committee, "DoD Implanted A Microchip Inside Me" 222
The Georgia House Judiciary Committee took up a bill that would "prohibit requiring a person to be implanted with a microchip," and would make violating the ban a misdemeanor. Things started to get weird at the hearing when a woman who described herself as a resident of DeKalb County told the committee, "I'm also one of the people in Georgia who has a microchip." Not sure of what she was trying to say, she was allowed to continue and added, "Microchips are like little beepers. Just imagine, if you will, having a beeper in your rectum or genital area, the most sensitive area of your body. And your beeper numbers displayed on billboards throughout the city. All done without your permission." Further prodding revealed that the woman's co-workers would torture her by activating the chips with their cell phones and that the chips were implanted by "researchers with the federal government." The committee thanked the woman for her input, and later approved the bill.
Well doy (Score:4, Funny)
Of course they did...look at that little "microchip"! Can you say mini-dildo? Because I can.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Of course they did...look at that little "microchip"! Can you say mini-dildo?
The other ladies in the study said "Is it in yet?"
Imagine office parties (Score:2, Funny)
Vote for best sentence in summary (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
The committee thanked the woman for her input,
Just imagine, if you will, having a beeper in your rectum or genital area, the most sensitive area of your body.
I think that I'll opt out from everything you said after "imagine" . . . Let's just skip that part.
Further prodding revealed that the woman's co-workers would torture her by activating the chips with their cell phones . . .
M'kay . . .
. . . and that the chips were implanted by "researchers with the federal government."
Finally! My tax dollars going toward something useful! To think that we could get some honest work out of government researchers!"
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
As a researcher for the Federal Government, I can assure you that we have no greater priority than to get microchips into the private parts of every crazy, nutjob, and tin-foil hat wearing psycho. Cell phone activated implanted beepers are invaluable in helping us sift through your garbage and public library records.
(p.s. The tinfoil hats make it easier for us to know that you know who we are. Thanks for your cooperation, we'll be sure to pay you a vist.)
Hmmmm (Score:4, Insightful)
A Misdemeanor is a pretty light punishment for something such as this.
er.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Read the bill (Score:3)
http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/versions/sb235_As_passed_Senate_5.htm [state.ga.us]
it is very self explanatory.
No one, one any condition, meaning employers too, can force you into an implant.
Frankly I am all for restrictions being codified in law
Re: (Score:2)
I think the GP's incredulity is from the woman's testimony, not the contents of the bill.
Re: (Score:2)
No one, one any condition, meaning employers too, can force you into an implant.
That's a relief; I heard it was common practice in Soviet Russia.
Re: (Score:2)
No, no, in Soviet Russia, the chip implants YOU into the GOVERNMENT.
The problem... (Score:5, Insightful)
Welcome to the future.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
My wife use to work at a university insect ID lab and got a LOT of "samples" (ie. fuzz, lint, or just an empty bottle) from people with delusional parasitosis. This woman has the same thing, only a little more high-tech.
Re:The problem... (Score:5, Funny)
Hell, my coworkers torture me even without an implant.
Re: (Score:2)
I know that's why my users call me.
Re:The problem... (Score:4, Insightful)
Being paranoid doesn't mean they aren't after you.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
She's investigated Morgellon's [wikipedia.org]? How cool - I've always thought Morgellon's was an interesting experiment in people's beliefs vs the medical establishment.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
As a resident of Dekalb county... (Score:5, Funny)
...it was probably CDC, not the DoD, that did it. CDC is based in a neighboring county (Fulton) and has offices in Dekalb. Definitely not county officials, though. The county police just shoot people.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A Misdemeanor? Seriously? (Score:5, Insightful)
Driving home after two beers or smoking the wrong plant is a more serious crime than planning on sticking a microchip under someone's skin for the explicit purpose of tracking them.
Weird priorities.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
What's weird about it? Driving drunk has the potential of the drunk person maiming and/or killing other drivers. Implanting a microchip in someone is a non-violent crime with no potential for the maiming or killing of others. It seems pretty clear to me that the former should be punished harsher than the latter.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Focibly violating someones body to install a microchip is a nonviolent crime? I think you should re-examine your how you have defined violence.
Re: (Score:2)
and in the specific case of this article a woman's rectum and genitals were violated by The Smoking Man and his henchman so the alien's disguised as co-workers could torment her all day. This must be stopped!
Re: (Score:2)
They have to break the skin to implant something, that is harm. Whether or not this story is true the act of having something implanted into you without your permission (excepting life-saving medical treatment) I would consider harm of the most grievous nature.
As to non-violent they would obviously have to sedate you or do this while you were sleeping, I don't know about you but that seems pretty violent to me, using violent to mean sudden or unexpected obviously.
Re: (Score:2)
You must be kidding. Are you seriously arguing, that death is the worst thing that could happen to you?
Oh boy. My mother used to have contact to an insane person. That person would make your life such a living hell, that you would wish to die, but couldn’t.
Believe me. Death hasn’t got shit on someone dedicated enough to implant a microchip into you and drive you crazy.
This video right there is the best example of how that would turn out for you:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VDvgL58h_Y [youtube.com]
But inste
Re: (Score:2)
Maim [merriam-webster.com]:
1 : to commit the felony of mayhem upon
2 : to mutilate, disfigure, or wound seriously.
Explain how "implanting a microchip" constitutes "maiming"? Does it cause pain? probably. Could it have negative effects? Certainly. Does it result in long term loss of a limb or limbs or other severe disfigurement? Not so much.
Having a limb blown off by a roadside bomb = maiming. Being run down by a drunk driver and losing a limb, or being permanently d
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Driving home after two beers or smoking the wrong plant is a more serious crime than planning on sticking a microchip under someone's skin for the explicit purpose of tracking them.
Weird priorities.
If you begin comparing crimes, their offense to society or individuals, and then the manner in which those convicted are prosecuted and punished, you're headed down a very long, confusing road. Who should be punished more severely, a rapist or a murderer? OK, what if instead of a murder, it was white collar crime, embezzling $5 million USD. Okay, what about 500 million. OK, what about retirement accounts of millions across the nation? OK, but what if the rapist actually [unimaginable details]...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't manslaughter imply that the killing was accidental, but still your fault?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, if you drive drunk you're likely to kill someone. As for the wrong plant, I totally agree.
If you implant microchips in someone's rectum and genitals I think that might be some form of rape or sexual harassment. Especially if you are smoking the wrong plant and drinking two beers while doing so.
Re: (Score:2)
USDOT Study. [druglibrary.org] Their conclusion is that it doesn't make you "as bad" a driver as alcohol or other drugs, but that it does impair driving performance, and as such, does pose some safety concern, though should be considered secondary to the risks of alcohol impairment. From the linked article:
What did she do to get to that point, we can learn (Score:3, Insightful)
This proves that the squeaky wheel gets the grease.
This woman must be doing something right for them to write up a bill specifically for HER to get her to "stfu and gtfo already" about the government planting chips in her body.
I can just see it now "thank you, ok aye votes? motion passed" *she leaves the floor* *some legislators laugh into their sleeves* "NOW, on to real issues".
Georgia will be a safe haven after the Rapture (Score:5, Interesting)
Christian eschatology declares that the End Times will see a split of the human race into faithful and the non-believers. The faithful will not take the "Mark of the Beast" and will suffer economically because of it. By rejecting the MotB, they will be excluded from all transactions and be essentially outcasts from the new society.
However, because of their steadfastness, they will not be condemned to hell upon the second coming of Jesus. Those who take the Mark will be torn asunder and cast into the pits of hell.
Many believe that the MotB is or will be something similar to this type of microchip implant. By grafting the mark to a person, any transaction can be monitored and tracked. This is one of the methods of governmental control via the MotB.
This lady was clearly insane. But there are MANY people out there who believe in exactly what I wrote above. These are your neighbors, Americans.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
And before the invention of the microchip, it was barcodes. Before barcodes, it was tatoos...
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
You forgot barcode tattoos.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Georgia will be a safe haven after the Rapture (Score:5, Insightful)
Just adapt the preterist [wikipedia.org] interpretation of the Book of Revelation and you'll be fine.
Shouldn't a religious interpretation be based on what you believe the applicable holy book actually says, not what you want it to mean? The 'just interpret it like this' method is what brings us Muslim terrorism and the Westboro Baptist Church's "God Hates Fags" go-out-and-protest-a-funeral tactics.
Personally, I find the preterist view fails to explain many bits, not least of which was the mark of the beast. When were Jews forced to receive a phyiscal marking in order to perform commerce?
Re: (Score:2)
Wot? Westboro baptist and co. would be the first to claim that they "just believe what it says" without interpreting it. You see the same in legal interpretation: the most nutty claim that they're not interpreting the law at all, just reading what it says.
Re: (Score:2)
Right, but despite what they say that's exactly what's happening.
Regardless, my intent was to point out that no good can come from interpreting a religious text differently because it made something more convenient or to further one's own purposes. Why promote an interpretation for a reason other than its truth?
Re: (Score:2)
I'd say both the islamic terrorists and the Westboro baptists use a more literal interpretation of their respective scripture than the mainstream, and are less prone to let common sense or decency alter that interpretation without a factual basis.
If you think the Bible/Quran is the literal truth rather than a spiritual guideline, then yes, god hates fags, and wants you to kill non-believers.
Re: (Score:2)
If you think the Bible/Quran is the literal truth rather than a spiritual guideline, then yes, god hates fags, and wants you to kill non-believers.
While The Bible indeed does call homosexuality a sin, it calls many other things sins as well. It also gives everyone forgiveness for their sins, should they ask (New Testament, of course). Note that Jesus ate dinner with prostitutes, rather than condemning them for their sins. The WBC ignores this point for the sake of pushing their agenda.
Similarly, my understanding is that the Quran has similar prohibitions against killing of innocents, women, children, or any soldier who is not holding a weapon. Th
Re: (Score:2)
You seem to think that religion is about truth.
It's like any other bureaucracy. Once established, it only seeks to perpetuate itself.
Re: (Score:2)
You seem to think it's about bureaucracy. Just because many (or most) treat it as such doesn't make it the primary purpose.
Re: (Score:2)
Because "the book" is thousands of pages and has massive internal contradictions, all of "what it says" is an interpretation.
Not to mention that we're actually talking about a middle-ages translation of an ancient text, combined with a collection of a number of after-the-fact letters written about events, which, in many cases, were third hand accounts of events where the original author likely was not even present, which were hand-selected hundreds of years later by a pseudo-political organization, likely m
Re: (Score:2)
First of all, there are no "contradictions" in the Bible that have not been addressed by theologians
ROFL.
I think we were just talking about "interpretation", weren't we?
I find it highly ironic that there are at least a dozen different sects (or uhm, denominations) where there are pretty vast differences in interpretation, all with "scripture" reference.
The fact that the bible specifically condones slavery and stoning might fly for Muslims, but not so much for Christians. I'm sure your particular sect's opinion is that some newer text says that these things don't apply anymore. I'm not quite sure how thi
Re:Georgia will be a safe haven after the Rapture (Score:4, Informative)
"When were Jews forced to receive a phyiscal marking in order to perform commerce?"
Around 1938. A big yellow star with 'Juden' on it, identifying you as a Jew. Suddenly with that star you couldn't do business in some places and were forced to go to Juden-catering places (which were often shut down as Germany went forward with the ethnic cleansing.)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
While plausible, it fails to fit within the preterist viewpoint, which says that the events of Revelation took place before it was written, which was significantly prior to the 1930's.
RE: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:4, Funny)
Thank goodness our lawmakers are tackling these important non-existent problems
Surely this is as important an issue as the fact that the island of Guam might tip over [youtube.com]...
Re: (Score:2)
It wasn't the DoD... It was Aliens! (Score:5, Funny)
Just proves that they are educated evil and too stupid smart to understand implanted tracking devices and timecubes.
Re:It wasn't the DoD... It was Aliens! (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
fnord
Re:It wasn't the DoD... It was Aliens! (Score:4, Funny)
light reading (Score:2)
Increasingly often, I can't remember if I'm reading a legitimate news source or the Onion.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, while Slashdot has always been entertaining, and occasionally even factual, I'm not sure it was ever a 'legitimate news source' -- that's part of its charm.
Of course, increasingly, mainstream news sounds like the Onion from time to time. :-P
Cheers
I live in Dekalb County GA. (Score:2)
I had a chip put in my pet cat.
But I have one too, only its not by any humans.
How else is alien god gonna find me and others when the shit starts hitting the fan in 2012?
Some of us have a ticket to leave and miss the shit.
Guess such tracking devices can be used for good things too.
Re: (Score:2)
Only a misdemeanor? (Score:2)
Its only a misdemeanour? Wow I bet that has the CIA/police/government quaking in their boots. Laughing that is.
How is violating someones body with a microchip much different from rape? It should get the same penalty.
Nutbars and Oddballs Come Out of the Woodwork (Score:2, Insightful)
While I emphasize to this woman's predicament, possible mental illness and/or delusional state I find it difficult to correlate her story to the eventual decision by the legislature to pass the bill.
It would be like someone petitioning against Reynolds Aluminum because they profit from aluminum foil sales. "It is all a vast conspiracy, I have to wear this aluminum hat to keep the mind control rays from Planet #10 under control."
There are wack-jobs on any side of any issue you can imagine. It was unfortunate
Re: (Score:2)
That someone would use a delusional/mentally ill person to further a legislative effort creeps me out almost as much as the idea that people in such a state aren't getting help for their problems.
Re: (Score:2)
How did this further a legislative effort? If anything it would have weakened it.
Re: (Score:2)
I would like to emphasize something as well. I believe proper emphasis should be placed on understanding the empathy involved in this case. I should emphasize that I am not an expert in empathy.
Good talk, Russ.
Re: (Score:2)
Frito-Lay implanted a chip in me... (Score:2, Funny)
...this morning. Actually a whole bag full of chips. Could not stop after only one.
Pet Chips (Score:2)
absolutely true story: (Score:5, Funny)
there was a little old lady who used to stand on 42nd street and eighth avenue handing out little pamphlets about how the devil was always trying to corrupt you via external means (i love picking up religious literature from the kooks in times square to analyze their words for entertainment value: reference timecube.com). according to her screed, one way was by putting a microchip in a grain of rice you would eat, another way from a stranger shaking your hand in such a way that 666 would be formed in the curl of their fingers, evil eyes, etc.
anyway, one day on the way to the port authority bus terminal i went into a store right near the little old lady to get a yogurt and a can of diet soda. the total came to $3.34, and i gave him a $10. the guy was insistent on me taking my receipt. i went outside and thought i would take another pamphlet from the old lady to see if she had updated her shpiel. randomly and without intent, i gave her my receipt as i took her pamphlet
my receipt that said $10 minus $3.34 change: $6.66
i never saw that little old lady again
coincidence? or was i AN UNWITTING TOOL OF THE DEVIL
absolutely true story
LOL (Score:2)
with your numerical analysis skills, you might consider a lucrative career in numerology. the challenging part is keeping a straight face ;-)
Not necessarily a wack-job... (Score:5, Interesting)
This woman sounds pretty nuts.
That said, I've got a colleague, ex-military, NOT a crank, who says the US Army implanted a glass-tube into his hand much like the one pictured - without his knowledge or consent. It was implanted while he was out during an unrelated surgery.
The implanted tube irritated him enough that he was regularly scratching it, and he eventually dug it out of his skin - and was surprised to see the foreign object.
The same guy has never spouted any nutty theories to me, never was paranoid about being tracked - just mentioned this experience.
For my part, I figured it was the Army experimenting with ways to inventory their humans, and maybe to posthumously ID them.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
US Army implanted a glass-tube into his hand
Sure it wasn't a METAL tube like a piece of broken off IV needle? You even mentioned he was in for surgery.
Also, bone particles? Every couple years for a decade or two, a tiny little shard of bone from a broken molar extraction works its way to the surface of the skin of my mouth, makes a little pimple, hurts for about a day, pops out, and its gone. We're talking tiny little pieces of bone here, like the ball on the end of a ball point pen.
Finally, your hand is semi-translucent. Hold it up in front of a
Re: (Score:2)
He said glass. He works in healthcare IT and would probably be able to tell the diff between a needle, a bone shard and an RFID implant of some kind.
Re:Not necessarily a wack-job... (Score:4, Interesting)
You mean like this little puppy [ti.com]?
Re: (Score:2)
For my part, I figured it was the Army experimenting with ways to inventory their humans, and maybe to posthumously ID them.
FWIW (which may not be much), I have a barcode tattooed on my arm, and someone who saw it once told me that her son was in the US Army's Special Forces, and they'd been considering using barcode tattoos instead of dog tags, but decided implanted chips were better (which isn't hard, given how long it takes to give someone a barcode tattoo, especially in a way that will remain machine-re
Re: (Score:2)
do you think a skin tattoo or glass chip under the skin will still be visible/readable after the body is burned or mutilated? this is as opposed to the current dog tags which are cheaper and more resilient.
that said, a passive chip which would be charged by and respond to a certain radio frequency would be a godsend in the event I was shot down and/or captured behind enemy lines.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Puhleeze. I like Jonathan Demme probably more than the next guy, but at least go back to the wellspring of military weirdness...
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0056218/ [imdb.com]
Applied to the skin? (Score:3, Interesting)
Unlike most slashdotters I actually read the bill as passed.
What does this mean?
'Implant' includes any means intended to introduce a microchip .... or applied to the skin of a person.
http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2009_10/versions/sb235_As_passed_Senate_5.htm [state.ga.us]
Do they mean something really weird like superglueing a passkey/ibutton to your skin? That's a new one I've never even heard of, and I've been interested in this general area of research for a long time (not for paranoid reasons, but more for medical and UI reasons)
'Microchip' means any ... electronically readable marking,
Ah, so no barcodes, no "mark of the beast" in GA etc. Technically a tattoo parlor inking a bar code would be "implanting a microchip" according to this bizarre law.
Such term shall not include pacemakers.
And there's the out. You'll get all the implants they want, just with a pacemaker feature that is not enabled.
Re: (Score:2)
ok... (Score:2)
Hey lady, no one cares or even wants to THINK about you having sex.
Maybe those numbers on the billboards are simply the number of slaps on the back of your head you need.
I hope the guy who scouted her to talk to the committee got fired.
Window of opportunity (Score:2)
What poor taste. (Score:2)
This poor woman is evidently paranoid schizophrenic, and Samzenpus has taken it upon himself to make fun of HER (for being chemically delusional) instead of the legislature.
My "firesamzenpus" tag is half in jest, usually, but this post is just beyond the pale.
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt that ridiculing the woman was the point.
The point was most likely that the committee has such a low hurdle for witnesses when they support the pre-determined decision.
It ridicules the ethics of the committee, and justifiably so.
And if the committee had any morals, they would follow up and see that the woman has the opportunity for treatment.
Re: (Score:2)
Another 25% seem to be about how this is "such a waste of time," which absolutely floors me to read here on Slashdot. That a group which seems in many other threads
Georgia (Score:2)
The Peaches-and-Nuts state.
Ineffective law (Score:2)
Lets say the feds want to chip you. They will just say "We can put this chip in you, or we can [nsert absurdly horrible alternative here]. It is your choice."
It is like how the federal government can't interfere with state schools, so they just tax the state then say "if you want funding for your schools, install mandatory filtering software and teach things this certain way." Another example is when states offer to bring you to trial faster if you plead guilty. (I forget if that is Maryland or just Balt
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like in this case, that's not the body part that needs to be wrapped in tinfoil.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that and the microchip.
Re: (Score:2)
So, the only two things you got were a chip, a lousy t-shirt, and a story to tell.
No, wait...
Re: (Score:2)
You know, it is crap like this that puts us in the same league as Democrats that ban salt in restaurant food preparation.
Like to see you make a NY hot dog with out salt...
Re: (Score:2)
DemocratS? Who have banned salt in restaurant food preparation? So you're saying multiple Democrats have successfully banned salt in restaurant food preparation? Where was this?