FBI Posts Fake Hyperlinks To Trap Downloaders of Illegal Porn 767
mytrip brings us a story from news.com about an FBI operation in which agents posted hyperlinks which advertised child pornography, recorded the IP addresses of people who clicked the links, and then tracked them down and raided their homes. The article contains a fairly detailed description of how the operation progressed, and it raises questions about the legality and reliability of getting people to click "unlawful" hyperlinks. Quoting:
"With the logs revealing those allegedly incriminating IP addresses in hand, the FBI sent administrative subpoenas to the relevant Internet service provider to learn the identity of the person whose name was on the account--and then obtained search warrants for dawn raids. The search warrants authorized FBI agents to seize and remove any "computer-related" equipment, utility bills, telephone bills, any "addressed correspondence" sent through the U.S. mail, video gear, camera equipment, checkbooks, bank statements, and credit card statements. While it might seem that merely clicking on a link wouldn't be enough to justify a search warrant, courts have ruled otherwise. On March 6, U.S. District Judge Roger Hunt in Nevada agreed with a magistrate judge that the hyperlink-sting operation constituted sufficient probable cause to justify giving the FBI its search warrant."
I would have read the article before replying (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I would have read the article before replying (Score:3, Funny)
Rest Assured (Score:5, Funny)
Google's I'm feeling lucky (Score:4, Funny)
Re:How long until... (Score:5, Funny)
Is this Russia? (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Free Beer!! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:How long until... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I could conduct stings for the fbi (Score:5, Funny)
Re:How long until... (Score:4, Funny)
its me Where can i mk trilogy doiwnload???
http://www.firstgov.gov/fgsearch/index.jsp?dom0=www.fbi.gov&mw0=warez+sodomy+porn+microsoft+illegal+MORTAL+KOMBAT+TRILOGY+DOWNLOAD+FREE&rn=218&in0=domain&parsed=true&Submit=Go&domain=fbi.gov [firstgov.gov]
Just go here.
garret its true or false
It's true.
I'm getting it at 400KB/s!
garret its not true
You clicked the link?
yes garret and.....
You do realize you just searched fbi.gov for warez, porn, sodomy, illegal, microsoft, and mortal kombat right?
fuck ya all
* Quits: Guest17888 (MKIRCN-003@212.182.122.Kg9=) (QUIT: User exited)
also, from the classic bloodninja
eminemBNJA: Oh I like that Baby. I put on my robe and wizard hat.
BritneySpears14: What the f*ck, I told you not to message me again.
eminemBNJA: Oh ****
BritneySpears14: I swear if you do it one more time I'm gonna report your ISP and say you were sending me kiddie porn you f*ck up.
eminemBNJA: Oh ****
eminemBNJA: damn I gotta write down your names or something
Re:Stating the REALLY obvious problem (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I would have read the article before replying (Score:4, Funny)
I used to have a web page with a link that read "click on this to see the picture of a hot naked 10 year old female", which of course led to a digital photo of the female family dog.
Sigh. Gone are the days.
Re:"pedos deserve it"? (Score:5, Funny)
How to end this thing (Score:1, Funny)
2. Craft an e-mail to legislators that think this sort of surveillance is a good idea. Create the e-mail as a genuine message you would send to such a person, such as discussing their position on a particular bill.
3. Include links in your e-mail. Some to valid sites discussing the effects of the bill. Others are malicious XSS attacks that will direct $legislator to these fake links.
4. Use coffee shop/library wifi (since they don't keep logs usually), a spoofed MAC address, and a mail relay across the pond to send the message.
5. Lather, rinse, repeat until enough high ranking officials have been busted and see this as a bad idea.
I know, I'm dreaming, but imaging the possibilities.....
Re:Held off cops for 27 minutes (Score:3, Funny)
I'd heard Norton could destroy computers... but Literally? Wow.
Re:I would have read the article before replying (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I would have read the article before replying (Score:5, Funny)
So almost certainly.