Trial Set To Determine What SCO Owes Novell 126
BobB-nw writes with word that this April will be the trial date for SCO's financial reckoning. Novell will discover via the courts how much (if anything) SCO is going to be compelled to pay in compensation for the lengthy trial over Unix code rights. The NetworkWorld piece also offers an overview of the case. "In September, The Wall Street Journal described the ruling against SCO as 'a boon to the open source software movement.' But experts say Unix is filled with technology that carries copyrights tied to many different companies and that it would be a nightmare to open source the Unix code collectively. Instead, Novell would have to pick and choose pieces to open-source, a process that could begin once the trial has ended."
Just shut down (Score:1, Interesting)
Quick question (Score:3, Interesting)
I guess my question is bit more far-reaching - what is the relationship between the IP holder v. the trademark holder in these circumstances, and are there any other examples where someone owns the IP of something, but doesn't necessarily own the trademark?
Re:I thought we figured this out (Score:3, Interesting)
Perhaps we will see the SCO obelisk auctioned off in Ebay or donated to the Computer History Museum.
Just how much does SCO have? (Score:4, Interesting)
Another way to look at how much SCO is worth is to look at their market cap. Back in July, SCOX closed at $1.48 per share. Over 21.25 million shares, that's $31.45 million. Today, they're at $0.09 per share for a market cap of $1,912,500. Novell could easily buy up the remaining pieces of SCOX if they wanted to. Any way you slice it, SCO is toast and won't be able to pay Novell back even a fraction of what they owe them.
Re:I hated SCO first (Score:2, Interesting)
SOX? Go after execs personally? (Score:4, Interesting)
Besides, scox paying novell is not the point. The point is to legally prove that Linux does not use proprietary UNIX technology, and to thereby stop the msft FUD.
The trial is significant because this trial has to be completed before the real trial can be held.
not SCO's money in the first place (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:SOX? Go after execs personally? (Score:3, Interesting)
I agree with Lewis Black on this one. You don't want another Enron, here's your law: If you can't explain, in one sentence, what it is that your company... DOES... it's illegal!
Not trolling, just having flashbacks! SOX makes me rock back and forth in a corner in the fetal position...
Re:Make the law firm pay Novell. (Score:3, Interesting)