IBM Seeking 'Patent-Protection-Racket' Patent 169
theodp writes "Wikipedia defines a protection racket as an extortion scheme whereby a powerful non-governmental organization coerces businesses to pay protection money which allegedly serves to purchase the organization's 'protection' services against various external threats. Compare this to IBM's just-published patent application for 'Extracting Value from a Portfolio of Assets', which describes a process by which 'very large corporations' impress upon smaller businesses that paying for 'the protection of a large defensive patent portfolio' would be 'a prudent business decision' for them to make, 'just like purchasing a fire insurance policy.' Sounds like Fat Tony's been to Law School, eh? Time for IBM to put-their-money-where-their-patent-reform-mouth-is and deep-six this business method patent claim!"
Perhaps this is a means to stop the practice (Score:5, Interesting)
I'd tend to think this is more their purpose, than to become the master bully.
1-click again? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Perhaps this is a means to stop the practice (Score:3, Interesting)
Or their lawyers have a sense of humor (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Good for small businesses? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Shining example (Score:3, Interesting)
There was a time when saying that would have been the equivalent of saying it about Microsoft now, or Eolas.
They changed; but can you be sure they won't change back?
A bad patent is a bad patent no matter who has it.
Re:Good for small businesses? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I think its a good idea for now (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm a small company developing some new kind of networked mass storage system with what I think are novel ways to manage the backup and restoration of applications and data. Given that many others have done similar things I run the risk of infringing some obscure patent out there. Rather than devote resources I don't have to lawyers and research, I subscribe to IBM's new "super-patent" service.
I get sued by a patent holder over a method of deciding where and when to backup a file. I enter said patent into the search function of my uber-patent GUI. I get a hit on something IBM has patented that could allow me to counter sue the troll. I hit the "license now" button and now I have a patent that I can use to discourage the troll's suit.
I like it.
Re:I don't suppose anyone has considered (Score:3, Interesting)
Check! And checkmate in three... (Score:5, Interesting)
This is a wonderful, delightful piece of work!
If this patent is to be successfully contested on the basis of prior art, some corporation is going to have to go public with the details of its patent protection racket. That company would be exposing itself to a lot of nasty business risks (possibly RICO, possibly anti-trust measures, more probably loss of sales and market cap, very definitely some image problems). I doubt that there are very many CEOs who would like the risk/benefit ratio of such a plan, especially as this kind of thing could break their personal career even if it is successful in blocking the patent.
If IBM is awarded the patent, it can use it to publicly expose the backroom details of the MS - SCO deal, the MS - Novell deal, and similar deals where there is good cause to suspect that some form of patent protection was involved. Through lawsuit and discovery, the secret clauses in those contracts would become public. This would stifle a lot of those kinds of activities, which would be a Good Thing for anyone favoring competition of products based on their technical merit.
IBM could also put the patent in the Linux patent protection pool. I cannot see anything negative for FOSS coming out of that.
But basically I see this patent as a way of demonstrating just how absurd the entire business model patent structure is.
Go IBM!
Re:I don't suppose anyone has considered (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm reading it as it is also a renta-patent system, if your a small=fry and some patent-trollish company is trying to bully you out of existance, you can acess IBM's patent pool and counter-sue. It works because some much trivial shit is patented so vaguely that you can't do anything without infringing on someones patent. if the troll argue the patent is invalid, then IBM has to step in and protect their stockholder's assets, and going against IBM's lawyers isn't for the faint of heart.
Re:you can patent something like that? (Score:2, Interesting)
[sarcasm]
With IBM literally patenting organized crime, one puts his ear on the grave of J. Edgar Hoover:
whirr, whirr, whirr,
click, click, click, click,
Tick, tick
clack, clack, clack, clack,
gock, gock, gock! GOCK! CRUNCH!
He was spinning so fast, he spun a bearing and puked a rod!
[/sarcasm]