Novell to SCO - Pay Up 151
gosherm writes with word that, now that the dust is beginning to settle on the long-running SCO case, Novell wants to get paid. Now. They're requesting that the customary stay on SCO's finances (as a result of their bankruptcy) be lifted so that Novell can begin recouping some of its losses from the protracted legal battle. "'We need to adjudicate if this is money owed to Novell or if it is Novell's property,' said Bruce Lowry, spokesman for Novell. That could determine how quickly Novell can recover those funds. And time is of the essence since there's a possibility SCO 'may run low or even completely out of cash during the process of trying to reorganize,' Novell said in court documents filed Thursday. Novell is also trying to protect royalties SCO collects from Unix and Unixware software licensees and remits annually to the software developer. SCO is required to continue to remit between $500,000 and $800,000 annually to Novell -- the next payment is due Nov. 14. SCO remitted $696,413 to Novell between the third quarter of 2006 and the second quarter of this year."
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:4, Insightful)
Negative value reorganization? (Score:4, Insightful)
Anyway, the good part of this fiasco seems to be that it shows that IP blackmail is a lot riskier SCO thought it would be. I'm expecting IBM to pile on soon, just to make sure that SCO goes away and stops bothering them. Either that, or the guy with the wooden stake.
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:4, Insightful)
So basically, he's saying he did what he believes is right in the face of opposition, and you call him a self-righteous asshole.
Tell me, when RMS does what he believes is right in the face of opposition, what is he?
Re:Negative value reorganization? (Score:4, Insightful)
The people who expended SCO will remain wealthy.
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:4, Insightful)
The question is did he believe it? What was his so called belief based on? The evidence is that he knew that his belief was not backed up by facts and proceeded anyhow.
He had reports from his own company specialists saying there was nothing yet he gave interviews stating he had a team of MIT deep divers that has found millions of lines of evidence but he couldn't produce either the evidence or the deep divers in court. Why was that?
I and many others don't think he had a belief in the justice of his cause. I think as do others that he was trying to get IBM and others to pay them off without having to prove anything. It obviously didn't work.
Ain't no SysV code in Linux (Score:4, Insightful)
SCO repeatedly claimed that there were millions of infringing lines in Linux. But unfortunately for SCO in addition to the delusion that they owned the SysV copyrights, they also suffered from the delusion that they somehow had control over IBM's own home-grown code.
Linux is clean regardless of who owns the SysV copyrights.
Re:Novell to become the new SCO? (Score:5, Insightful)
just for a second, lets assume that novell isn't a linux distro company, and that they don't want to make it up to the linux community out there for the microsoft deal, and lets forget that sco is the personification of evil.
they have a company that they've sued and won.
whatever the reasons:
1) sco owes novell money.
2) sco is going broke.
3) novel wants their money before sco goes down.
id imagine the phb's in novell are looking at the situation exactly this way.
its cool that they come out to be the linux advocates, and taking down the bad guy - free good publicity and so on.
but that's just a side-effect, they would go after sco regardless of the circumstances.
aside from that - i wouldnt consider novell to be the new 'stewards' of linux.
i don't have all the data - so this is just my impression, but....
we have all seen IBM fight the good fight with sco for more than just a few months... i mean - its been years, and lets face it - it would have been cheaper for them to just buy sco, instead of fighting them.
novell noticed whats going on with this linux thing, and they manage to make a profit while creating contributing back to the linux community.
but IBM is investing a lot more then their getting back (i may be wrong here, as we(i) don't know whats in their agenda for the years to come - this could be one of those investments where you loose money for 10 years, and start making money in 20 - IBM is a company that can afford a business plan like this), and novell is just doing business like everyone else (it may sound cold, but there is no shame here - we all benefit from what they do, so cudos to them).
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:4, Insightful)
Basically, he kept lying and his lies got more and more grandiose. Timed in fact quite well to his very sizeable scheduled sales of SCO stock. And it's not just the "nerd rage" afflicted making the implicit claim here -- Redhat's complaint (which hasn't even been heard yet; they're literally lining up to take a chunk out of SCO) actually used the words "pump and dump scheme".
Re:out of money (Score:2, Insightful)
Microsoft should give them another 66 million [zdnet.com].
Re:out of money (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:out of money (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually, that's the last thing we want. If SCO goes Chaper 7 (gets dismantled) before Novell gets a ruling against it, then they've won a partial victory.
Right now, SCO hasn't yet been defeated completely in the courts. They're mortally wounded but still standing. SCO needs to be an instance where they're made brutal example of. The result can't be "SCO ran out of cash arguing its claims", but rather "SCO's claims were baseless and found so by the courts". Given the power of the spinmeisters, the issue isn't resolved until the Novell case and ideally the IBM case are decided against SCO.
Then there's the SCO execs themselves. Personally, I think that they need to be brought to justice for their perversion and mockery of the US judicial system, and also for their stock antics. People like Darl McBride have gotten rich off of this whole thing. I want their butts behind bars, or at least under suit for malpractice or whatever. If they can walk out profiting from riding SCO into the ground and attacking Linux, it'll just encourage other trolls.
SCO is using this bankruptcy time to spend their money in a way that either enriches them or enriches their partners. They're trying to steer their allies onto the bankruptcy committee, and giving huge bonuses to their execs, and hiring temps at exorbitant fees.
Finally, if they run out of money, they can't pay Novell and IBM anything. They owe Novell millions of dollars, with only the amount now in dispute. Essentially, this is Novell's money they're burning through, according to the Novell v. SCO judge. They probably owe IBM some money too on the counterclaims (if they ever get to them).
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:4, Insightful)
And on September 18, McBride claimed [yahoo.com] that "[a]s a result of both the Court's August 10, 2007 ruling and our entry into Chapter 11, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. " He has a lithe relationship with reality.
Corporate veil about to get shredded (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:5, Insightful)
Usually he's right.
See the difference?
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:1, Insightful)
It's even harder to believe that Darl believed that precious copyrighted (not by SCOX) code was in Linux, seeing as they never came up with a shred of evidence.
RMS may be self-righteous, but at least what he's fighting (proprietary software that can't be modified) is something that exists in reality, whereas Darl is 'defending' something everyone knows is an illusion.
Occam's razor says he got money from Microsoft to spread FUD about Linux. Doing that is assholish.
Hey may even believe his FUD, and believe that there's a big crusade against him. That doesn't mean he isn't a prick.
Re:Where is Darl's big mouth now? (Score:2, Insightful)
Gerry